Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
On 27/10/2018 13:37, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:34:26 +0100 C Western via Lazarus wrote: [...] Did you try this starting the IDE with an empty .lazarus directory? Yes, exactly. I am not sure I made it clear in the original message, but this was on first run of the RC Lazarus, and I was loading my usual set of packages preparatory to recompiling Lazarus. Maybe one of these packages makes the difference? Mattias Attached is a minimal package that causes the problem for me. The trigger might be two missing packages? Colin -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 13:34:26 +0100 C Western via Lazarus wrote: >[...] > Did you try this starting the IDE with an empty .lazarus directory? Yes, exactly. > I am > not sure I made it clear in the original message, but this was on first > run of the RC Lazarus, and I was loading my usual set of packages > preparatory to recompiling Lazarus. Maybe one of these packages makes the difference? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
On 27/10/2018 09:56, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 13:22:16 +0100 C Western via Lazarus wrote: On 19/09/2018 12:50, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: The Lazarus team is glad to announce the first release candidate of Lazarus 2.0. I worked through installing and compiling with a fresh user on linux, and only noticed one issue. If I loaded a package (via "Package, Open Package File") with an unsatisfied dependency I saw a misleading error message "Unable to read file: /usr/lib64/lazarus/." This seems to be specific to a system wide install; I had installed the RPM version for testing, and I do not see this behaviour with my usual setup using an svn checkout for lazarus. Here on fedora core the IDE opens the package editor showing the dependency with the error icon (red exclamation mark). No message. Can you provide an example broken package? Did you try this starting the IDE with an empty .lazarus directory? I am not sure I made it clear in the original message, but this was on first run of the RC Lazarus, and I was loading my usual set of packages preparatory to recompiling Lazarus. Colin -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
On Sun, 21 Oct 2018 13:22:16 +0100 C Western via Lazarus wrote: > On 19/09/2018 12:50, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: > > The Lazarus team is glad to announce the first release candidate of > > Lazarus 2.0. > > I worked through installing and compiling with a fresh user on linux, > and only noticed one issue. If I loaded a package (via "Package, Open > Package File") with an unsatisfied dependency I saw a misleading error > message "Unable to read file: /usr/lib64/lazarus/." This seems to be > specific to a system wide install; I had installed the RPM version for > testing, and I do not see this behaviour with my usual setup using an > svn checkout for lazarus. Here on fedora core the IDE opens the package editor showing the dependency with the error icon (red exclamation mark). No message. Can you provide an example broken package? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
On 19/09/2018 12:50, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: The Lazarus team is glad to announce the first release candidate of Lazarus 2.0. I worked through installing and compiling with a fresh user on linux, and only noticed one issue. If I loaded a package (via "Package, Open Package File") with an unsatisfied dependency I saw a misleading error message "Unable to read file: /usr/lib64/lazarus/." This seems to be specific to a system wide install; I had installed the RPM version for testing, and I do not see this behaviour with my usual setup using an svn checkout for lazarus. Colin -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:43 PM Andrea Mauri via Lazarus wrote: > I didn't tested on Lazarus 2.0 RC1. Well, this theread is about Lazarus 2.0 RC1. Maybe you should write about it elsewhere. Cocoa is under construction. It will not be stable in Lazarus 2.0. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
I have issues with TListView and cocoa using lazarus trunk. I didn't tested on Lazarus 2.0 RC1. See forum post: http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,42671.0.html Il 19/09/2018 13:50, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus ha scritto: The Lazarus team is glad to announce the first release candidate of Lazarus 2.0. This release was built with FPC 3.0.4. The previous release Lazarus 1.8.4 was built with FPC 3.0.4 as well. Here is the list of fixes for Lazarus 2.0.x: http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_2.0_fixes_branch Here is the list of changes for Lazarus and Free Pascal: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_2.0.0_release_notes http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3.0.4 The release is available for download on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/ Choose your CPU, OS, distro and then the "Lazarus 2.0RC1" directory. Checksums for the SourceForge files: http://www.lazarus-ide.org/index.php?page=checksums#2_0_0RC1 Minimum requirements: Windows: 2k, XP, Vista, 7, 8, 8.1 and 10, 32 or 64bit. FreeBSD/Linux: gtk 2.8 for gtk2, qt4.5 for qt, qt5.6 for qt5, 32 or 64bit. Mac OS X: 10.5 to 10.12; Carbon (32bit), Cocoa (64bit, beta), qt and qt5 (32 or 64bit). The svn tag is http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/tags/lazarus_2_0_0_RC1 For people who are blocked by SF, the Lazarus releases from SourceForge are mirrored at: ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/releases/ and later at (after some time for synchronization) http://mirrors.iwi.me/lazarus/ == Why should everybody (including you) test the release candidate? == In the past weeks the Lazarus team has stabilized the 2.0 fixes branch. The resulting 2.0RC1 is now stable enough to be used by any one for test purposes. However many of the fixes and new features that where committed since the release of 1.8 required changes to the code of existing features too. While we have tested those ourself, there may still be problems that only occur with very specific configurations or one project in a million. Yes, it may be that you are the only person with a project, that will not work in the new IDE. So if you do not test, we can not fix it. Please do not wait for the final release, in order to test. It may be too late. Once the release is out we will have to be more selective about which fixes can be merged for further 2.0.x releases. So it may be, that we can not merge the fix you require. And then you will miss out on all the new features. == How to test == Download and install the 2.0 RC1. - On Windows you can install as a 2ndary install, that will not affect your current install: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Multiple_Lazarus#Installation_of_multiple_Lazarus - On other platforms, if you install to a new location you need to use --primary-config-path In either case you should make backups. (including your primary config) Open your project in the current Lazarus (1.8.x), and use "Publish Project" from the project menu. This creates a clean copy of your project. You can then open that copy in the RC1. Please test: - If you can edit forms in the designer - rename components / change properties in Object inspector / Add new events - Add components to form / Move components on form - Frames, if you use them - If you can navigate the source code (e.g. jump to implementation) - Auto completion in source code - Compile, debug and run - Anything else you use in your daily work Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
Please could somebody (Martin?) review the final patch at https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=33935 which limits a hack I put in to certain widget sets (Qt will print a $00 character, GTK2 won't). I'm off-list in a couple of days time, I'll probably be able to get to Mantis before I have a replacement email address. I'm not cancelling this account's subscription so that my colleagues have access. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
On 19/09/18 12:00, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: The Lazarus team is glad to announce the first release candidate ofLazarus 2.0. This release was built with FPC 3.0.4.The previous release Lazarus 1.8.4 was built with FPC 3.0.4 as well. Here is the list of fixes for Lazarus 2.0.x:http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_2.0_fixes_branch Here is the list of changes for Lazarus and Free Pascal:http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_2.0.0_release_noteshttp://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3.0.4 Please could somebody (Martin?) review the final patch at https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=33935 which limits a hack I put in to certain widget sets (Qt will print a $00 character, GTK2 won't). -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
OnMouseWheelHorz is already included, thanks. -- Regards, Alexey -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
Hi. as I see, no OnMouseWheelHorz /Left/Right is added. is it ok? Alex -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Lazarus Release Candidate 1 of 2.0
The Lazarus team is glad to announce the first release candidate of Lazarus 2.0. This release was built with FPC 3.0.4. The previous release Lazarus 1.8.4 was built with FPC 3.0.4 as well. Here is the list of fixes for Lazarus 2.0.x: http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_2.0_fixes_branch Here is the list of changes for Lazarus and Free Pascal: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_2.0.0_release_notes http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/User_Changes_3.0.4 The release is available for download on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/ Choose your CPU, OS, distro and then the "Lazarus 2.0RC1" directory. Checksums for the SourceForge files: http://www.lazarus-ide.org/index.php?page=checksums#2_0_0RC1 Minimum requirements: Windows: 2k, XP, Vista, 7, 8, 8.1 and 10, 32 or 64bit. FreeBSD/Linux: gtk 2.8 for gtk2, qt4.5 for qt, qt5.6 for qt5, 32 or 64bit. Mac OS X: 10.5 to 10.12; Carbon (32bit), Cocoa (64bit, beta), qt and qt5 (32 or 64bit). The svn tag is http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/tags/lazarus_2_0_0_RC1 For people who are blocked by SF, the Lazarus releases from SourceForge are mirrored at: ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/lazarus/releases/ and later at (after some time for synchronization) http://mirrors.iwi.me/lazarus/ == Why should everybody (including you) test the release candidate? == In the past weeks the Lazarus team has stabilized the 2.0 fixes branch. The resulting 2.0RC1 is now stable enough to be used by any one for test purposes. However many of the fixes and new features that where committed since the release of 1.8 required changes to the code of existing features too. While we have tested those ourself, there may still be problems that only occur with very specific configurations or one project in a million. Yes, it may be that you are the only person with a project, that will not work in the new IDE. So if you do not test, we can not fix it. Please do not wait for the final release, in order to test. It may be too late. Once the release is out we will have to be more selective about which fixes can be merged for further 2.0.x releases. So it may be, that we can not merge the fix you require. And then you will miss out on all the new features. == How to test == Download and install the 2.0 RC1. - On Windows you can install as a 2ndary install, that will not affect your current install: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Multiple_Lazarus#Installation_of_multiple_Lazarus - On other platforms, if you install to a new location you need to use --primary-config-path In either case you should make backups. (including your primary config) Open your project in the current Lazarus (1.8.x), and use "Publish Project" from the project menu. This creates a clean copy of your project. You can then open that copy in the RC1. Please test: - If you can edit forms in the designer - rename components / change properties in Object inspector / Add new events - Add components to form / Move components on form - Frames, if you use them - If you can navigate the source code (e.g. jump to implementation) - Auto completion in source code - Compile, debug and run - Anything else you use in your daily work Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
