Re: [Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?
Il 24/06/2014 09:14, Michael Schnell ha scritto: On 06/23/2014 06:48 PM, Giuliano Colla wrote: one must add a Mediator, aware of the new widgetset units, etc. But currently duplicates aren't allowed. Meaning that a different widgetset cannot contain units or classes with the same name of an LCL counterpart. As you never mention this term I am not sure if you are aware of the Lazarus concept of Widget Types. I understand, at compile time the define variable WidgetType is used to (e.g.) select include files that define the behavior of all related objects. I understand that this is provided to allow for things similar to different widgetset contained in units or classes with the same name, by moving the relevant source code to include files.. Widget Types are LCL related. It's the part which actually implements virtual abstract methods in the Interfaces unit. Moreover widgets must be designer aware: you increase the width property, and the widget must become wider. LCL widgets already are, others must be adapted to take advantage of Lazarus Mediator, Designer etc. I understand that you can add new widgets to the Lazarus GUI designer by installing packets (and then recompiling the ide) Why not add the Widgets you are missing using a packet ? (If you want to re-use existing code, maybe you can activate macro-processing for compiling these units (I seem to remember that fpc somehow allows for this) and by that e.g. rename the duplicate classes, or write your own preprocessor doing this. ) I'm already using packages, but they're run time only packages. They can't be installed into the IDE, because of class names conflict, and therefore they can't take advantage of the IDE Designer facilities. Solving this problem is the subject of this thread. Giuliano -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] nonlcl basic issue: is codetools LCL dependent?
On 06/23/2014 06:48 PM, Giuliano Colla wrote: one must add a Mediator, aware of the new widgetset units, etc. But currently duplicates aren't allowed. Meaning that a different widgetset cannot contain units or classes with the same name of an LCL counterpart. As you never mention this term I am not sure if you are aware of the Lazarus concept of Widget Types. I understand, at compile time the define variable WidgetType is used to (e.g.) select include files that define the behavior of all related objects. I understand that this is provided to allow for things similar to different widgetset contained in units or classes with the same name, by moving the relevant source code to include files.. Moreover widgets must be designer aware: you increase the width property, and the widget must become wider. LCL widgets already are, others must be adapted to take advantage of Lazarus Mediator, Designer etc. I understand that you can add new widgets to the Lazarus GUI designer by installing packets (and then recompiling the ide) Why not add the Widgets you are missing using a packet ? (If you want to re-use existing code, maybe you can activate macro-processing for compiling these units (I seem to remember that fpc somehow allows for this) and by that e.g. rename the duplicate classes, or write your own preprocessor doing this. ) -Michael -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
Hi Lazarus team,
Lazarus IDE is IMO so superior to Delphi's that any comparison would be
unfair.
However there's a Delphi IDE small feature which I miss when using
Lazarus: a quick mouse access to the Jump Back/Jump Forward function, to
navigate history. I find keyboard shortcuts (CTRL-H and Shift-CTRL-H)
more cumbersome.
There's no easy way to add Icons to the NoteBook pages or tabs of the
Source Editor window, so it came to my mind to add a source editor
dedicated tool bar, to host those functions. It steals just 18 pixels in
height, and one could take advantage of it to insert more editor related
commands, which are now available in drop down menu's.
I attach a small patch to SourceEditor, just to show the idea. If
accepted, it can be fully implemented, making it perhaps the umptieth
option to the user configuration, extended, made fully configurable, etc.
If not, I'll just keep it for my personalized IDE.
(Double clicking on the added tool bar, it can be moved from top to
right or to bottom. Quick and dirty just for testing the best position.)
Best,
Giuliano
Index: sourceeditor.pp
===
--- sourceeditor.pp (revision 45619)
+++ sourceeditor.pp (working copy)
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@
SynEditMouseCmds, Classes, SysUtils, Math, Controls, ExtendedNotebook,
LCLProc, LCLType, LResources, LCLIntf, FileUtil, Forms, ComCtrls, Dialogs,
StdCtrls, Graphics, Translations, ClipBrd, types, Extctrls, Menus, HelpIntfs,
- LConvEncoding, Messages, LazLoggerBase, lazutf8classes, LazLogger, AvgLvlTree,
- LazFileCache,
+ Buttons, LConvEncoding, Messages, LazLoggerBase, lazutf8classes, LazLogger,
+ AvgLvlTree, LazFileCache,
// codetools
BasicCodeTools, CodeBeautifier, CodeToolManager, CodeCache, SourceLog,
LinkScanner,
@@ -609,6 +609,9 @@
{ TSourceNotebook }
TSourceNotebook = class(TSourceEditorWindowInterface)
+pTools: TPanel;
+sbJback: TSpeedButton;
+sbJforward: TSpeedButton;
StatusBar: TStatusBar;
procedure CompleteCodeMenuItemClick(Sender: TObject);
procedure DbgPopUpMenuPopup(Sender: TObject);
@@ -629,12 +632,15 @@
procedure OnPopupOpenPackageFile(Sender: TObject);
procedure OnPopupOpenProjectInsp(Sender: TObject);
procedure OpenAtCursorClicked(Sender: TObject);
+procedure pToolsMove(Sender: TObject);
procedure RenameIdentifierMenuItemClick(Sender: TObject);
procedure ShowAbstractMethodsMenuItemClick(Sender: TObject);
procedure ShowEmptyMethodsMenuItemClick(Sender: TObject);
procedure ShowUnusedUnitsMenuItemClick(Sender: TObject);
procedure SourceNotebookDropFiles(Sender: TObject;
const FileNames: array of String);
+procedure sbJbackClick(Sender: TObject);
+procedure sbJforwardClick(Sender: TObject);
procedure SrcEditMenuCopyToExistingWindowClicked(Sender: TObject);
procedure SrcEditMenuFindInWindowClicked(Sender: TObject);
procedure SrcEditMenuMoveToExistingWindowClicked(Sender: TObject);
@@ -676,6 +682,8 @@
FWindowID: Integer;
// PopupMenu
procedure BuildPopupMenu;
+// Toolbar
+procedure BuildToolBar;
//forwarders to FNoteBook
function GetNoteBookPage(Index: Integer): TTabSheet;
function GetNotebookPages: TStrings;
@@ -5819,7 +5827,8 @@
// popup menu
BuildPopupMenu;
-
+ // Toolbar
+ BuildToolBar;
// HintTimer
FMouseHintTimer := TIdleTimer.Create(Self);
with FMouseHintTimer do begin
@@ -6503,6 +6512,23 @@
{$ENDIF}
end;
+procedure TSourceNotebook.BuildToolBar;
+var
+ jbackIdx: Integer;
+ jforwIdx: Integer;
+begin
+
+ jbackIdx:= IDEImages.GetImageIndex(16,'menu_search_jumpback');
+ if jbackIdx =0 then
+IDEImages.Images_16.GetBitmap(jbackIdx,sbJback.Glyph);
+ sbJback.Hint:= lisMenuJumpBack;
+
+ jforwIdx:= IDEImages.GetImageIndex(16,'menu_search_jumpforward');
+ if jforwIdx =0 then
+IDEImages.Images_16.GetBitmap(jforwIdx,sbJforward.Glyph);
+ sbJforward.Hint:= lisMenuJumpForward;
+end;
+
function TSourceNotebook.GetNoteBookPage(Index: Integer): TTabSheet;
begin
if FNotebook.Visible then
@@ -7548,6 +7574,19 @@
Manager.OnOpenFileAtCursorClicked(Sender);
end;
+procedure TSourceNotebook.pToolsMove(Sender: TObject);
+begin
+ if pTools.Align = alTop then begin
+pTools.Width:= 50;
+pTools.Align:= alRight;
+ end
+ else if pTools.Align = alRight then begin
+pTools.Height:= 18;
+pTools.Align:= alBottom;
+ end
+ else pTools.Align:= alTop;
+end;
+
procedure TSourceNotebook.CutClicked(Sender: TObject);
var ActSE: TSourceEditor;
begin
@@ -7669,6 +7708,16 @@
LazarusIDE.DoDropFiles(Sender,Filenames,WindowID);
end;
+procedure TSourceNotebook.sbJbackClick(Sender: TObject);
+begin
+ if FManager.ActiveSourceWindow nil then FManager.HistoryJump(Sender,jhaBack);
+end;
+
+procedure TSourceNotebook.sbJforwardClick(Sender: TObject);
+begin
+ if FManager.ActiveSourceWindow nil then
Re: [Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Giuliano Colla wrote: Hi Lazarus team, Lazarus IDE is IMO so superior to Delphi's that any comparison would be unfair. However there's a Delphi IDE small feature which I miss when using Lazarus: a quick mouse access to the Jump Back/Jump Forward function, to navigate history. I find keyboard shortcuts (CTRL-H and Shift-CTRL-H) more cumbersome. There's no easy way to add Icons to the NoteBook pages or tabs of the Source Editor window, so it came to my mind to add a source editor dedicated tool bar, to host those functions. It steals just 18 pixels in height, and one could take advantage of it to insert more editor related commands, which are now available in drop down menu's. I attach a small patch to SourceEditor, just to show the idea. If accepted, it can be fully implemented, making it perhaps the umptieth option to the user configuration, extended, made fully configurable, etc. If not, I'll just keep it for my personalized IDE. (Double clicking on the added tool bar, it can be moved from top to right or to bottom. Quick and dirty just for testing the best position.) There is already such a component, implemented by Graeme Geldenhuys, see components/editortoolbar. Maybe you can improve that? Michael. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
Il 24/06/2014 09:58, Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto: [...] There is already such a component, implemented by Graeme Geldenhuys, see components/editortoolbar. Maybe you can improve that? There are so many things in Lazarus that a special edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica would be barely sufficient to cover all of them :-) I'll give a look. No point in reinventing the wheel. Chances are good that it's implementation is similar to what I had in mind, because I've seen in the past that Graeme and I share similar points of view on IDE usage. Thank you. Giuliano -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Lazreport of master-detail
Hi, I got a strange problem when I show a Lazreport of a master-detail relationship. If the master-table contains an odd number of items, the report is OK. If it contains an even number of items it crashes with this error : Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x004df6d4 in SYSTEM_MOVE$formal$formal$INT64 () (gdb) bt #0 0x004df6d4 in SYSTEM_MOVE$formal$formal$INT64 () #1 0x008c2893 in BUFDATASET_TCUSTOMBUFDATASET_$__CURRENTRECORDTOBUFFER$PCHAR () #2 0x77fb6701 in ?? () #3 0x in ?? () That's with Lazarus 1.2.2, on Linux 64bit. But I think I do have the same problem on 32bit Windows. I switched to linux to be able to backtrace. Can I have a backtrace in Windows ? Koenraad. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
It's a more general component than specifically jump back/forward. You can assign any IDE menu functionality to the toolbar button. Personally, I prefer the shortcut since it's faster. -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Source-Editor-enhancement-mini-patch-tp4037602p4037606.html Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] on new project inspector
umachid.pas why not in project option? where is open project source or I was forget view project source menu item? added dblclick open lpr file in source editor. are lazarus developer, make changes for theme self? or all what who want to use. If is the answer is all what who want to use PLEASE write help and/or description for added or changed about class or property, so if we looking for help can find and more then ONE word or more description then (example)this is integer property etc. If some one want to say, you can write help and we are share! I'm not wizard, If I know all class and everything, I was be in team or I can make a new lazarus, and who can know who is, why write that code, to team persons, please do NOT geton to same plain, bus, car or any device -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
Il 24/06/2014 11:15, leledumbo ha scritto: It's a more general component than specifically jump back/forward. You can assign any IDE menu functionality to the toolbar button. Personally, I prefer the shortcut since it's faster. Actually it does exactly what I had in mind (start from jump bak/forward, then add other functions from IDE menu). I was trying to reinvent the wheel. I too usually prefer the faster keyboard shortcuts, but for some reasons for jumps I'm more at ease with the icon click. Giuliano -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] on new project inspector
On 24/06/2014 11:23, FreeMan wrote: are lazarus developer, make changes for theme self? or all what who want to use. snip to team persons, please do NOT geton to same plain, bus, car or any device I know you're not a native English speaker but please try to refrain from threats and suggestive remarks. Additionally, phrasing your questions in a more positive way may help you get more cooperation, respect and quicker answers. Thank you. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazreport of master-detail
On 24/06/2014 10:29, Koenraad Lelong wrote: backtrace. Can I have a backtrace in Windows ? Yes. Use e.g. -gw2 -gl -O-1 (Lazarus: dwarf 2 format, line number, no optimization, add -O-1 in extra options or whatever it's called) when compiling. Run gdb as usual and you should get the backtrace or run it in the debugger under Lazarus to do things the GUI way ;) -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
24-06-2014 13:13 tarihinde, Giuliano Colla yazdı: I too usually prefer the faster keyboard shortcuts, but for some reasons for jumps I'm more at ease with the icon click. I was used to icon on editor toolbar too. keyboard shortcuts is better then nothing. I hope no body say (do) this is been old removed it.!!! -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
Hi Lazarus developers, in the last few days, (I can't tell exactly since which revision it happens) I get an Invalid argument index in some translated IDE dialogs, such as the dialog which prompts for an IDE rebuild when installing a package. Sort of: Invalid argument index in format Il pacchetto %s%s%s è marcato per l'installazione.%sAttualmente lazarus supporta solo pacchetti con link statico. L'installazione dovà ricostruire Lazarus e riavviarlo.%s%sVuoi ricostruire Lazarus ora?. The same occurs with IDE language set to Italian and to French, so I don't think it to be just a translation string issue. Setting IDE language to English makes the problem disappear. Environment is Linux, Lazarus svn trunk, fpc 2.6.2, OS both CentOs 5 and Fedora 14. Giuliano -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
Il 24/06/2014 12:26, FreeMan ha scritto: [...] I was used to icon on editor toolbar too. Then you can install the package editortoolbar.lpk. You'll find it in lazarus/components/editortoolbar. Once installed you may use configure toolbar to put in your toolbar whatever you like from IDE menu, and other dropdown menus. Giuliano -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Giuliano Colla giuliano.co...@fastwebnet.it wrote: in the last few days, (I can't tell exactly since which revision it happens) I get an Invalid argument index in some translated IDE dialogs, such as the dialog which prompts for an IDE rebuild when installing a package. I recently tweaked some IDE resource strings so that quotation mark () is now hard-coded in the string instead of passed as a %s parameter. It reduced the number of %s parameters and eliminated long sequences like %s%s%s%s which were difficult to translate and required reading the source code. I did not anticipate error messages. Less params are passed now and they should well fit in the old parameter lists although in wrong places. Anyway, the solution is to fix the fuzzy translations. The changes are only in the parameter lists and our PoChecker will find any remaining mismatches. Patches that fix it will be accepted. (eg. In case the official translation maintainer is busy). Sorry for the inconvenience. This change creates more work in short term but makes things easier in long term. See also a thread on this list titled: Resource strings and newline Hard-coding line endings is still an open issue. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Giuliano Colla giuliano.co...@fastwebnet.it wrote: Then you can install the package editortoolbar.lpk. You'll find it in lazarus/components/editortoolbar. ... and also in the Install/Uninstall packages dialog under Available for installation. Easier. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
Il 24/06/2014 13:25, Juha Manninen ha scritto: On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Giuliano Colla giuliano.co...@fastwebnet.it wrote: in the last few days, (I can't tell exactly since which revision it happens) I get an Invalid argument index in some translated IDE dialogs, such as the dialog which prompts for an IDE rebuild when installing a package. I recently tweaked some IDE resource strings so that quotation mark () is now hard-coded in the string instead of passed as a %s parameter. It reduced the number of %s parameters and eliminated long sequences like %s%s%s%s which were difficult to translate and required reading the source code. I did not anticipate error messages. Less params are passed now and they should well fit in the old parameter lists although in wrong places. Anyway, the solution is to fix the fuzzy translations. The changes are only in the parameter lists and our PoChecker will find any remaining mismatches. Patches that fix it will be accepted. (eg. In case the official translation maintainer is busy). Once the problem is understood, it would appear that a quick scan to .po files, adjusting the number of %s to the same number found in LazarusIDEStrConsts, even without a good knowledge of the language would fix the issue. If such is the case I could do it. Only lazaruside.xx.po are affected, or other packages/translations need the same housekeeping? Giuliano -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Source Editor enhancement mini-patch
On 24/06/2014 08:50, Giuliano Colla wrote: Hi Lazarus team, Lazarus IDE is IMO so superior to Delphi's that any comparison would be unfair. However there's a Delphi IDE small feature which I miss when using Lazarus: a quick mouse access to the Jump Back/Jump Forward function, to navigate history. I find keyboard shortcuts (CTRL-H and Shift-CTRL-H) more cumbersome. I see Editortoolbar is already covered. Since this is about navigating by mouse: By default the IDE reacts to the 2 extra buttons of a 5 button mouse (forward/backward in history). Similar like some web browser do. If you do not have a 5 button mouse you can map this to other buttons. (also with shift/ctrl/alt / on some OS not all modifiers work with the right mouse button.) -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Giuliano Colla giuliano.co...@fastwebnet.it wrote: Only lazaruside.xx.po are affected, or other packages/translations need the same housekeeping? Also: components/ideintf/objinspstrconsts components/codetools/codetoolsstrconsts components/anchordocking/anchordockstr lcl/lclstrconsts Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:02:45 +0300 Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Giuliano Colla giuliano.co...@fastwebnet.it wrote: Only lazaruside.xx.po are affected, or other packages/translations need the same housekeeping? Also: components/ideintf/objinspstrconsts components/codetools/codetoolsstrconsts components/anchordocking/anchordockstr lcl/lclstrconsts Have you tried pochecker? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: Have you tried pochecker? Well, yes. lazaruside.xx.po files are not updated in SVN. Usually they are auto-generated and then somebody commits them. What happened now? Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:08:40 +0300 Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: Have you tried pochecker? Well, yes. And does it show the wrong strings? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: And does it show the wrong strings? No because the old strings are still there. Why the .po files are not auto-generated? Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:47:00 +0300 Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday, June 24, 2014, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: And does it show the wrong strings? No because the old strings are still there. Why the .po files are not auto-generated? The IDE is compiled by make and that must not alter sources. You can do it: ./localize.sh Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: The IDE is compiled by make and that must not alter sources. You can do it: ./localize.sh Right. I committed the .po files. Translators are now welcome to fix the fuzzy strings. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 19:49:13 +0300 Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: The IDE is compiled by make and that must not alter sources. You can do it: ./localize.sh Right. I committed the .po files. Can you now use pochecker? Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] IDE bug handling translations?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote: Can you now use pochecker? Yes. It shows 173 errors in eg. lazaruside.fi.po which looks correct. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] map file check
Hi guys, I was browsing my project’s map file and came across something that I found odd. There are several files that the linker is not removing although they have 0 references on them. This is a part of my map file “ Keeping lr_intrp.o(.text.n_lr_intrp_tfrinterpretator_$_preparescript$crc56918e91_last$$longint) 0 references Keeping lr_intrp.o(.data.n__$LR_INTRP$_Ld10) 0 references Keeping lr_intrp.o(.text.n_lr_intrp_tfrinterpretator_$__copyarr$longint$longint$$ansistring) 3 references References fpc_ansistr_setlength in system.o(.text.n_fpc_ansistr_setlength) References fpc_ansistr_unique in system.o(.text.n_fpc_ansistr_unique) References SYSTEM_MOVE$formal$formal$LONGINT in system.o(.text.n_system_move$formal$formal$longint) “ I do NOT have good knowledge of this, so this is just a question to the experts to figure out if this is correct behavior or not Regards, Chris -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Lazarus MX-14
Hi to all, I am currently testing Lazarus 1.2.2 on MX-14, a light version of Linux developed from Antix. We have 1.2.2 in the MX testing repository and will probably update to 1.2.4 when moving it to the main repo. So far, the tests look good. I see a few references to Laz 1.3 . Does this exist or is it something for the future? I do not wish to upset the packager by asking for changes too frequently. Thanks, Gordon -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus MX-14
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:18 AM, Gordon Cooper hughgord...@gmail.com wrote: I see a few references to Laz 1.3 . Does this exist or is it something for the future? I do not wish to upset the packager by asking for changes too frequently. 1.2.4 is the latest release. I believe 1.3 is the current development branch, and exists only in the SVN repository. Check out the wiki here: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Getting_Lazarus#Getting_Lazarus_SVN_development_version or for windows here: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/TortoiseSvn At some point 1.3 will be considered stable and released as 1.4. There is no fixed date for this. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus MX-14
Thanks Michael, Will go ahead with 1.2.4 On 25/06/14 12:16, Michael Van Ham wrote: At some point 1.3 will be considered stable and released as 1.4. There is no fixed date for this. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
