Re: [Lazarus] Daily snapshots
2013/1/25 Mark Morgan Lloyd : > Vincent Snijders wrote: >> >> 2013/1/25 Mark Morgan Lloyd : >>> >>> Look at the version numbers: 1.1 is trunk, 1.0.5 is stable+fixes (the >>> main >>> download page is 1.0.4 so hasn't quite caught up). Choose and keep >>> separate. >> >> >> What do you mean by "hasn't quite caught up"? It is up to date, isn't it? > > > I was trying not to make a value judgment as to whether that was intentional > or not. Obviously going by the numbering convention- which the OP might not > be familiar with- 1.0.4 is a stable "stable+fixes", while 1.0.5 is just how > it's described: an automatically-generated snapshot slightly ahead of > reality. Yes, and 1.0.4 is a release and the download page contains released versions and no snapshots. So it will never catch up to 1.0.5, only to to 1.0.6 when that is released. But I would not call that catching up. I did not hear a value judgement, I guess, but an expectation or a possibility, which I don't see. Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Daily snapshots
Vincent Snijders wrote: 2013/1/25 Mark Morgan Lloyd : Look at the version numbers: 1.1 is trunk, 1.0.5 is stable+fixes (the main download page is 1.0.4 so hasn't quite caught up). Choose and keep separate. What do you mean by "hasn't quite caught up"? It is up to date, isn't it? I was trying not to make a value judgment as to whether that was intentional or not. Obviously going by the numbering convention- which the OP might not be familiar with- 1.0.4 is a stable "stable+fixes", while 1.0.5 is just how it's described: an automatically-generated snapshot slightly ahead of reality. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Daily snapshots
2013/1/25 Mark Morgan Lloyd : > Look at the version numbers: 1.1 is trunk, 1.0.5 is stable+fixes (the main > download page is 1.0.4 so hasn't quite caught up). Choose and keep separate. What do you mean by "hasn't quite caught up"? It is up to date, isn't it? Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Daily snapshots
Antonio Fortuny wrote: Hi again. On the download sites I always see for Linux downloads: In fairness, that's the "Daily Snapshot" page, not the "Download" page. Rather more serious is that the last update on the explanatory wiki page was in 2011. 1. Lazarus (needs fpc and fpc-src) followed by lazarus-1.1.39945-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 65Mo then 2. Lazarus fixes (needs fpc and fpc-src) followed by lazarus-1.0.5.39944-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 63Mo What is the subtle difference between them ? Look at the version numbers: 1.1 is trunk, 1.0.5 is stable+fixes (the main download page is 1.0.4 so hasn't quite caught up). Choose and keep separate. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Daily snapshots
Antonio Fortuny hat am 25. Januar 2013 um 09:32 geschrieben: > Hi again. > > On the download sites I always see for Linux downloads: > > 1. Lazarus (needs fpc and fpc-src) > followed by lazarus-1.1.39945-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 65Mo > then > 2. Lazarus fixes (needs fpc and fpc-src) > followed by lazarus-1.0.5.39944-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 63Mo > > What is the subtle difference between them ? 1.1 is the development version (experimental). 1.0.5 the fixes version (last release plus some bug fixes). http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Development_Process#Lazarus_branches_.2F_version_numbers_around_1.0 > When installing the # 1. should the # 2. be installed too ? Only one is needed. > Only # 1. is needed ? > > A little explanation would be appreciated. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Daily snapshots
Hi again. On the download sites I always see for Linux downloads: 1. Lazarus (needs fpc and fpc-src) followed by lazarus-1.1.39945-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 65Mo then 2. Lazarus fixes (needs fpc and fpc-src) followed by lazarus-1.0.5.39944-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 63Mo What is the subtle difference between them ? When installing the # 1. should the # 2. be installed too ? Only # 1. is needed ? A little explanation would be appreciated. Antonio. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Daily snapshots are not updated anymore ?
2012/1/10 Samuel Herzog : > Hi, > > looks like there is a problem on the build machine ? > The dalily snapshots for windows have stopped at end of 2011 (except win64 > version). Lack of time to complete the upgrade to fpc 2.6.0. Vincent -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Daily snapshots are not updated anymore ?
Hi, looks like there is a problem on the build machine ? The dalily snapshots for windows have stopped at end of 2011 (except win64 version). Regards, Sam-- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
