Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus 1.4.4 fpc 3.0
Santiago A. wrote: El 24/12/2015 a las 12:00, Juha Manninen escribió:> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Santiago A. wrote:>> Is it posible to use Lazarus 1.4.4 with fpc 3.0?> Yes but why would you do that? Lazarus 1.6 is almost here.> You may get problems with codepage aware strings when using Lazarus> 1.4.4. Depends on use case of course.>> Juha I am afraid of using Lazarus 1.6. New versions introduce new bugs andproblems. I want to work with stable versions. Well, in fact, with versions thathave been stable since some time. New versions come with new bugs andproblems and I have already enough political problems pushing Lazarus tofight with technical issues. I have come across some bugs in 2.6.4 that I need to solve, so I havedecided to move to 3.0. It is stable since some time ago (They arealready working on 3.1).if they had applied backports to solve them, I would have sticked on2.6.4. Nevertheless, If I run into problems with Lazarus 1.4.4 / FPC 3.0, codepages etc, I will move lazarus 1.6. As I've said before, I keep a combination of Lazarus+FPC versions here and my preferred one isn't necessarily the most recent. *BUT* if you're asking the core developers for help, the first thing that they'll expect is that you're on the current version of IDE and compiler. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus 1.4.4 fpc 3.0
El 24/12/2015 a las 12:00, Juha Manninen escribió: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Santiago A. wrote: >> Is it posible to use Lazarus 1.4.4 with fpc 3.0? > Yes but why would you do that? Lazarus 1.6 is almost here. > You may get problems with codepage aware strings when using Lazarus > 1.4.4. Depends on use case of course. > > Juha I am afraid of using Lazarus 1.6. New versions introduce new bugs and problems. I want to work with stable versions. Well, in fact, with versions that have been stable since some time. New versions come with new bugs and problems and I have already enough political problems pushing Lazarus to fight with technical issues. I have come across some bugs in 2.6.4 that I need to solve, so I have decided to move to 3.0. It is stable since some time ago (They are already working on 3.1). if they had applied backports to solve them, I would have sticked on 2.6.4. Nevertheless, If I run into problems with Lazarus 1.4.4 / FPC 3.0, code pages etc, I will move lazarus 1.6. -- Saludos Santiago A. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus 1.4.4 fpc 3.0
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Santiago A. wrote: > Is it posible to use Lazarus 1.4.4 with fpc 3.0? Yes but why would you do that? Lazarus 1.6 is almost here. You may get problems with codepage aware strings when using Lazarus 1.4.4. Depends on use case of course. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus 1.4.4 fpc 3.0
Santiago A. wrote: Is it posible to use Lazarus 1.4.4 with fpc 3.0? Will I run into a lot of problems (compiling IDE for new packages etc)? Seems to be OK here. I've used that combination intermittently since about September, but it's not one I run regularly. -- Mark Morgan Lloyd markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk [Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues] -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Lazarus 1.4.4 fpc 3.0
Is it posible to use Lazarus 1.4.4 with fpc 3.0? Will I run into a lot of problems (compiling IDE for new packages etc)? -- Saludos Santiago A. s...@ciberpiula.net -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
