Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
El 14/02/14 00:21, Mattias Gaertner ha escrit: On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:17:31 +0100 Luca Olivetti l...@wetron.es wrote: [...] TBuildManager.DoCheckIfProjectNeedsCompilation icon has changed Project /home/luca/Datos/1354_vision_dot/programas_pc/test_plc/project1.ico don't know why (I didn't change it but the date changes every time I try to run the project). Fixed. Please test. It works, thank you! (Note that I just took ide/buildmanager.pas and ide/projecticon.pas from svn revision 44062). Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es Tel. +34 935883004 Fax +34 935883007 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
El 13/01/14 18:34, Mattias Gaertner ha escrit: The Lazarus team would like to announce the second Release Candidate for the upcoming Version 1.2. ... I don't know if it's a known problem or it has already been reported, but even with the option Always build (even if nothing changed) unchecked, every time I try to run it recompiles and relinks. These are the messages (hidden and shown) in the messages window: (under windows) Hint: Start of reading config file C:\FPC\2.6.2\bin\i386-Win32\fpc.cfg Hint: End of reading config file C:\FPC\2.6.2\bin\i386-Win32\fpc.cfg Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.2 [2013/02/12] for i386 Copyright (c) 1993-2012 by Florian Klaempfl and others Target OS: Win32 for i386 Compiling project1.lpr project1.lpr(10,10) Hint: Unit nodavelib not used in project1 project1.lpr(10,21) Hint: Unit synapse not used in project1 project1.lpr(10,48) Hint: Unit datos not used in project1 Compiling resource D:\1354_vision_dot\programas_pc\test_plc\lib\i386-win32\project1.or Linking project1.exe 20 lines compiled, 5.3 sec , 1420768 bytes code, 379340 bytes data 5 hint(s) issued Project project1 successfully built (under linux) Hint: Start of reading config file /etc/fpc.cfg Hint: End of reading config file /etc/fpc.cfg Free Pascal Compiler version 2.6.2 [2013/07/06] for x86_64 Copyright (c) 1993-2012 by Florian Klaempfl and others Target OS: Linux for x86-64 Compiling project1.lpr project1.lpr(10,10) Hint: Unit nodavelib not used in project1 project1.lpr(10,21) Hint: Unit synapse not used in project1 project1.lpr(10,48) Hint: Unit datos not used in project1 Compiling resource /home/luca/Datos/1354_vision_dot/programas_pc/test_plc/lib/x86_64-linux/project1.or Linking project1 /usr/bin/ld: aviso: link.res contiene secciones de salida. ¿Olvidó -T? 20 lines compiled, 1.4 sec 5 hint(s) issued Project project1 successfully built Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es Tel. +34 935883004 Fax +34 935883007 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:44:55 +0100 Luca Olivetti l...@wetron.es wrote: El 13/01/14 18:34, Mattias Gaertner ha escrit: The Lazarus team would like to announce the second Release Candidate for the upcoming Version 1.2. ... I don't know if it's a known problem or it has already been reported, but even with the option Always build (even if nothing changed) unchecked, every time I try to run it recompiles and relinks. These are the messages (hidden and shown) in the messages window: Please create a bug report. (under windows) Hint: Start of reading config file C:\FPC\2.6.2\bin\i386-Win32\fpc.cfg Hint: End of reading config file C:\FPC\2.6.2\bin\i386-Win32\fpc.cfg Please start the IDE with the command line parameter --debug-log=log.txt. This will log why it recompiles. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
El 13/02/14 19:22, Mattias Gaertner ha escrit: Please create a bug report. Fist I want to be sure is not a PEBKAC ;-) (under windows) Hint: Start of reading config file C:\FPC\2.6.2\bin\i386-Win32\fpc.cfg Hint: End of reading config file C:\FPC\2.6.2\bin\i386-Win32\fpc.cfg Please start the IDE with the command line parameter --debug-log=log.txt. This will log why it recompiles. TBuildManager.DoCheckIfProjectNeedsCompilation icon has changed Project /home/luca/Datos/1354_vision_dot/programas_pc/test_plc/project1.ico don't know why (I didn't change it but the date changes every time I try to run the project). Bye -- Luca Olivetti Wetron Automation Technology http://www.wetron.es Tel. +34 935883004 Fax +34 935883007 -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:17:31 +0100 Luca Olivetti l...@wetron.es wrote: [...] TBuildManager.DoCheckIfProjectNeedsCompilation icon has changed Project /home/luca/Datos/1354_vision_dot/programas_pc/test_plc/project1.ico don't know why (I didn't change it but the date changes every time I try to run the project). Fixed. Please test. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
I noticed that the behavior of separatators and dividers in TToolbar changed so that it now draws two lines for separators while previously it only left some space... i do not think this is a good thing - actually i initially i thought it was a bug and tried to dig in the code to see why it happens, which is how i saw the comment about it actually being intentional. IMO the two lines look bad visually (i noticed them in the SVN version and thought they were just a temporary bug that someone certainly will notice and fix so i didn't mentioned them here) since in many themes the divider's style is already made of two lines forming a relief. I think that if something has to be shown there, it should be a single centered line with bigger padding, which is at least visually distinct from the separator. But in addition to that, changing this behavior loses the previous ability for adding empty space between the buttons (it can be hacked by adding a disabled button without label or icon... but imo it is an ugly hack), so an extra style for empty space should be added. Alternatively restoring the previous behavior with an option in the TToolbar to show separators in flat styled toolbar could be added (although i'd suggest to avoid the double separators, they really look ugly in my opinion :-P). On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:15 PM, William Oliveira Ferreira bdexterholl...@gmail.com wrote: as I said, I'm just a user of the feature, I don't really know what implications can came with this change. Today, if you change debug profile to another that doesn't generate that file, the compiler doesn't ignore it? Here, I tested (Lazarus 1.0.14 r43446 FPC 2.6.2 i386-win32-win32/win64) with an old project that have 2 build modes and one of them doesn't generate any debug symbols. Lazarus has just ignored my break points. Lazarus doesn't removed my debug file. Could this be a hint that external debug symbols could be used without issues? 2014/1/18 Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com On 18/01/2014 14:18, William Oliveira Ferreira wrote: 2014/1/16 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de mailto:laza...@mfriebe.de What happens, if you have an external info file, and rebuild the exe (but without creating new debug info)? Will the wrong info be applied? Or will it be ignored? well, i think this issue affects expecially the IDE users and I wondering that lazarus always make their way to rebuild that file I don't quite understand your answer. AFAIU, Martin is describing this scenario: 1. You build a project with external gdb info file 2. You change the settings (or choose a different build mode) so it does not generate an external gdb info file, but do not remove the existing gdb info file 3. You change the code and recompile, generating a new executable (and now the gdb info file and executable are out of sync) Are you saying the gdb info file will be ignored? If so, that is good to know. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- William de Oliveira Ferreira -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On 18/01/2014 14:18, William Oliveira Ferreira wrote: 2014/1/16 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de mailto:laza...@mfriebe.de What happens, if you have an external info file, and rebuild the exe (but without creating new debug info)? Will the wrong info be applied? Or will it be ignored? well, i think this issue affects expecially the IDE users and I wondering that lazarus always make their way to rebuild that file I don't quite understand your answer. AFAIU, Martin is describing this scenario: 1. You build a project with external gdb info file 2. You change the settings (or choose a different build mode) so it does not generate an external gdb info file, but do not remove the existing gdb info file 3. You change the code and recompile, generating a new executable (and now the gdb info file and executable are out of sync) Are you saying the gdb info file will be ignored? If so, that is good to know. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
as I said, I'm just a user of the feature, I don't really know what implications can came with this change. Today, if you change debug profile to another that doesn't generate that file, the compiler doesn't ignore it?Here, I tested (Lazarus 1.0.14 r43446 FPC 2.6.2 i386-win32-win32/win64) with an old project that have 2 build modes and one of them doesn't generate any debug symbols. Lazarus has just ignored my break points. Lazarus doesn't removed my debug file. Could this be a hint that external debug symbols could be used without issues? 2014/1/18 Reinier Olislagers reinierolislag...@gmail.com On 18/01/2014 14:18, William Oliveira Ferreira wrote: 2014/1/16 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de mailto:laza...@mfriebe.de What happens, if you have an external info file, and rebuild the exe (but without creating new debug info)? Will the wrong info be applied? Or will it be ignored? well, i think this issue affects expecially the IDE users and I wondering that lazarus always make their way to rebuild that file I don't quite understand your answer. AFAIU, Martin is describing this scenario: 1. You build a project with external gdb info file 2. You change the settings (or choose a different build mode) so it does not generate an external gdb info file, but do not remove the existing gdb info file 3. You change the code and recompile, generating a new executable (and now the gdb info file and executable are out of sync) Are you saying the gdb info file will be ignored? If so, that is good to know. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- William de Oliveira Ferreira -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:16:56PM +, Martin wrote: On 15/01/2014 17:09, Henry Vermaak wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:45:46PM +, Henry Vermaak wrote: That has already been fixed in r43703 in trunk and merged to 1.2. I can't see it in fixes_1_2? Am I the only one missing this? I've fixed mine locally, for now. Actually you were are right. It was supposed to be merged, but somehow got lost... Done now, thanks for the persistence Thanks, it's working well now. Henry -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Thanks, Michael and Stefanos ! Оригинално писмо От: Stefanos Beligiannis Относно: Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2 До: Lazarus mailing list Изпратено на: Сряда, 2014, Януари 15 12:53:30 EET Of course, I am already using it under Windows 8.1! Stefanos On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:43 PM, Kostas Michalopoulos wrote: Is it really necessary to mention exe size in the Windows installer? It looks very weird that from everything about Lazarus this has to be mentioned in the installer. Maybe a tips or faq or something in a welcome screen that answers this and other first questions (how do i enabled opengl?, how do i use a single window?, etc) should be better? (of course such a welcome screen needs to be coded first :-P 2014/1/14 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org :On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Kamen Ketev wrote: Hi, Can I use Lazarus on Windows 8.1?Yes, I do so. Michael. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus-- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On 16/01/2014 06:45, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: Am 2014-01-15 23:40, schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira: I think is much better change the default behavior to generate a external debug file but i don't know if it has any consequence... Definitely! I also wondered why this is *not* the default. What are the reasons? Don't know.. Probably Never touch a working system. The debugger has enough issues as it is. Changing this would need to be tested on many versions, of many OS (and for some many Distributions), with many versions of gdb, and linkers involved. (Not to mention at least 2 released fpc fixes and trunk.) That is a lot of work. Well ok, we could just put it out there, and wait for reports. Then IMHO, it is not just changing it. At the very least, the IDE must clean up the dbg file, if the exe is rebuild (without dbg info) Also it needs te be changed in many places (lazbuild, makefiles...). I tried to make dwarf default, a some ,time ago. I reverted, because it it turned out to need more and yet even more changes. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Hi Barth, I use a external debug file and never noticed any issue. Can you tell something about it? I'm just curious and I wanna know that to do when happens... 2014/1/16 Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com On 16.01.2014 07:45, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: Am 2014-01-15 23:40, schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira: I think is much better change the default behavior to generate a external debug file but i don't know if it has any consequence... Definitely! I also wondered why this is *not* the default. What are the reasons? Buggy GDB? (at least that's what I would think is the most plausible reason ^^) Regards, Sven -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- William de Oliveira Ferreira -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Am 16.01.2014 15:49 schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira bdexterholl...@gmail.com: Hi Barth, Note: here we prefer first names, which for me is Sven ;) I use a external debug file and never noticed any issue. Can you tell something about it? I'm just curious and I wanna know that to do when happens... I didn't say that it does not work. I said that this is the most likely I can imagine. Regards, Sven -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
16.01.2014 18:41, Martin пишет: On 16/01/2014 06:45, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: Am 2014-01-15 23:40, schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira: I think is much better change the default behavior to generate a external debug file but i don't know if it has any consequence... Definitely! I also wondered why this is *not* the default. What are the reasons? Don't know.. Probably Never touch a working system. The debugger has enough issues as it is. Changing this would need to be tested on many versions, of many OS (and for some many Distributions), with many versions of gdb, and linkers involved. (Not to mention at least 2 released fpc fixes and trunk.) That is a lot of work. Well ok, we could just put it out there, and wait for reports. Then IMHO, it is not just changing it. At the very least, the IDE must clean up the dbg file, if the exe is rebuild (without dbg info) Also it needs te be changed in many places (lazbuild, makefiles...). I tried to make dwarf default, a some ,time ago. I reverted, because it it turned out to need more and yet even more changes. Somehow I don't think that this change will be as complex as changing default debug format. Anyway, we can try to enable it in trunk and see what happens. -- Best regards, Maxim Ganetsky mailto:gan...@narod.ru -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On 16/01/2014 19:45, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: Somehow I don't think that this change will be as complex as changing default debug format. Anyway, we can try to enable it in trunk and see what happens. If you want to try, go ahead. What happens, if you have an external info file, and rebuild the exe (but without creating new debug info)? Will the wrong info be applied? Or will it be ignored? Another issue is, that some people even complain about the size of a none debug exe (empty form project compiled). They compare with Delphi, but they do not add the size of any run time dependency/ package that the delphi project needs. (IIRC / Afaik). While this is not addressed in the installer hint, there is still a chance that once a user was pointed to the FAQ has file size info, they will look (ok maybe I am to optimistic) -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Am 16.01.2014 20:55 schrieb Martin laza...@mfriebe.de: Another issue is, that some people even complain about the size of a none debug exe (empty form project compiled). They compare with Delphi, but they do not add the size of any run time dependency/ package that the delphi project needs. (IIRC / Afaik). No, at least in older versions (before Delphi 2009) also static ones are smaller than stripped Lazarus ones. But then they only have to support one platform... (in younger versions the extended RTTI blows up quite a bit). Regards, Sven -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
16.01.2014 23:55, Martin пишет: On 16/01/2014 19:45, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: Somehow I don't think that this change will be as complex as changing default debug format. Anyway, we can try to enable it in trunk and see what happens. If you want to try, go ahead. I think that it should be your decision, because you will have to sort out possible bugs. Personally I am fine with current default. What happens, if you have an external info file, and rebuild the exe (but without creating new debug info)? Will the wrong info be applied? Or will it be ignored? Don't know, I think this should be handled by GDB? AFAIK if exe was built without debug info, old debug info file won't be applied. The case you describe can happen only if user manually moves/copies exes without correct debug file, but even then probably GDB has some protections. -- Best regards, Maxim Ganetsky mailto:gan...@narod.ru -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On 16/01/2014 22:26, Maxim Ganetsky wrote: 16.01.2014 23:55, Martin пишет: If you want to try, go ahead. I think that it should be your decision, because you will have to sort out possible bugs. Personally I am fine with current default. For me it is not a priority at the moment. Especially not, if I have to sort out the problems from it. What happens, if you have an external info file, and rebuild the exe (but without creating new debug info)? Will the wrong info be applied? Or will it be ignored? Don't know, I think this should be handled by GDB? AFAIK if exe was built without debug info, old debug info file won't be applied. I dont know, but it needs to be tested, and that takes time. (Again different GDB, different platform, potentially different linkers) -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Is it really necessary to mention exe size in the Windows installer? It looks very weird that from everything about Lazarus this has to be mentioned in the installer. Maybe a tips or faq or something in a welcome screen that answers this and other first questions (how do i enabled opengl?, how do i use a single window?, etc) should be better? (of course such a welcome screen needs to be coded first :-P 2014/1/14 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org: On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Kamen Ketev wrote: Hi, Can I use Lazarus on Windows 8.1? Yes, I do so. Michael. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Of course, I am already using it under Windows 8.1! Stefanos On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:43 PM, Kostas Michalopoulos badsectorac...@gmail.com wrote: Is it really necessary to mention exe size in the Windows installer? It looks very weird that from everything about Lazarus this has to be mentioned in the installer. Maybe a tips or faq or something in a welcome screen that answers this and other first questions (how do i enabled opengl?, how do i use a single window?, etc) should be better? (of course such a welcome screen needs to be coded first :-P 2014/1/14 Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org: On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Kamen Ketev wrote: Hi, Can I use Lazarus on Windows 8.1? Yes, I do so. Michael. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus-- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Mattias Gaertner schrieb: The Lazarus team would like to announce the second Release Candidate for the upcoming Version 1.2. We invite all users to test this Release Candidate. Please read here why everybody really should join the testing now. I've tried to test it, but couldn't make it work at all :-( It would be nice to have a complete distribution package, that also performs the installation as seen by the users later. Size is not a problem (to me), but I cannot continue to use or recommend the use of Lazarus, when it takes significantly more than one hour before it's ready for testing. DoDi -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:26:24PM +, Henry Vermaak wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:34:19PM +0100, Mattias Gaertner wrote: The Lazarus team would like to announce the second Release Candidate for the upcoming Version 1.2. Well done! I'd love to stick to this branch. lazbuild crashes for me, though: hcv@technical09:~/source/lazarus$ ./lazbuild --help [FORMS.PP] ExceptionOccurred Sender=Exception Exception=Unknown Run-Time error : 210 Stack trace: $080483E6 FILTERCONFIGFILECONTENT, line 190 of lazbuild.lpr $08051889 main, line 1679 of lazbuild.lpr $B7590E46 TApplication.HandleException Unknown Run-Time error : 210 Stack trace: $080483E6 $08051889 $B7590E46 exception at 080483E6: Unknown Run-Time error : 210. GetCfgFileContent() returns nil, since I don't have a lazarus.cfg anywhere on my computer. Code in FilterConfigFileContent() doesn't check the return result of GetCfgFileContent(), so it crashes. I see this has been fixed in trunk (revision 43703). Can someone merge this, please. Henry -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On 1/15/14, Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com wrote: lazbuild crashes for me, though: That has already been fixed in r43703 in trunk and merged to 1.2. Bart -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +0100, Bart wrote: On 1/15/14, Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com wrote: lazbuild crashes for me, though: That has already been fixed in r43703 in trunk and merged to 1.2. I can't see it in fixes_1_2? -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On 15/01/2014 10:43, Kostas Michalopoulos wrote: Is it really necessary to mention exe size in the Windows installer? It looks very weird that from everything about Lazarus this has to be mentioned in the installer. Maybe a tips or faq or something in a welcome screen that answers this and other first questions (how do i enabled opengl?, how do i use a single window?, etc) should be better? (of course such a welcome screen needs to be coded first :-P A tip of the day or even tip depending on action, that shows useful info within the IDE itself would be great. If someone would write the code... Right now, we do not have this code, and we do not have anybody who writes it. So displaying something in the installer was the easiest option. Exe size on windows is (for win users) the single most often asked question. And for some reason a lot of people do not read the FAQ. So this seemed the best solution. It was already put in 2nd place, to avoid starting with a problem. First is the what is Lazarus (not very useful, in the installer, since a person running the installer will already have an idea). -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:45:46PM +, Henry Vermaak wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:34:58PM +0100, Bart wrote: On 1/15/14, Henry Vermaak henry.verm...@gmail.com wrote: lazbuild crashes for me, though: That has already been fixed in r43703 in trunk and merged to 1.2. I can't see it in fixes_1_2? Am I the only one missing this? I've fixed mine locally, for now. Henry -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On 15/01/2014 17:09, Henry Vermaak wrote: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:45:46PM +, Henry Vermaak wrote: That has already been fixed in r43703 in trunk and merged to 1.2. I can't see it in fixes_1_2? Am I the only one missing this? I've fixed mine locally, for now. Actually you were are right. It was supposed to be merged, but somehow got lost... Done now, thanks for the persistence -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
I think is much better change the default behavior to generate a external debug file but i don't know if it has any consequence... 2014/1/15 Martin laza...@mfriebe.de On 15/01/2014 10:43, Kostas Michalopoulos wrote: Is it really necessary to mention exe size in the Windows installer? It looks very weird that from everything about Lazarus this has to be mentioned in the installer. Maybe a tips or faq or something in a welcome screen that answers this and other first questions (how do i enabled opengl?, how do i use a single window?, etc) should be better? (of course such a welcome screen needs to be coded first :-P A tip of the day or even tip depending on action, that shows useful info within the IDE itself would be great. If someone would write the code... Right now, we do not have this code, and we do not have anybody who writes it. So displaying something in the installer was the easiest option. Exe size on windows is (for win users) the single most often asked question. And for some reason a lot of people do not read the FAQ. So this seemed the best solution. It was already put in 2nd place, to avoid starting with a problem. First is the what is Lazarus (not very useful, in the installer, since a person running the installer will already have an idea). -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- William de Oliveira Ferreira -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Am 2014-01-15 23:40, schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira: I think is much better change the default behavior to generate a external debug file but i don't know if it has any consequence... Definitely! I also wondered why this is *not* the default. What are the reasons? Unexperienced users wonder why their exe file is so big and experienced users know how to change it anyway. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
On 16.01.2014 07:45, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: Am 2014-01-15 23:40, schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira: I think is much better change the default behavior to generate a external debug file but i don't know if it has any consequence... Definitely! I also wondered why this is *not* the default. What are the reasons? Buggy GDB? (at least that's what I would think is the most plausible reason ^^) Regards, Sven -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
Hi, Can I use Lazarus on Windows 8.1? Оригинално писмо От: Mattias Gaertner Относно: [Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2 До: lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2014, Януари 13 19:34:19 EET The Lazarus team would like to announce the second Release Candidate for the upcoming Version 1.2. We invite all users to test this Release Candidate. Please read here why everybody really should join the testing now. News in this Version http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.2.0_release_notes On Windows the installer now allows 2 independent installations. http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Multiple_Lazarus#Installation_of_multiple_Lazarus About the release process: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.2_fixes_branch#Roadmap_to_1.2 The 1.2.0RC2 is built with fpc 2.6.2. The release is available for download on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/ Choose your CPU, OS, distro and then the Lazarus 1.2RC2 directory. Minimum requirements: Windows: 98, 2k, XP, Vista, 7, 32 or 64bit FreeBSD/Linux: gtk 2.8 or qt4.5, 32 or 64bit Mac OS X: 10.5 to 10.8, LCL on carbon only 32bit, non LCL apps can be 64bit == Why should everybody (including you) test the release candidate? == It the past months the Lazarus team has stabilized the 1.2 fixes branch. The resulting 1.2RC2 is now stable enough to be used by any one for test purposes. However many of the fixes and new features that were committed since the release of 1.0 required changes to the code of existing features too. While we have tested those ourself, there may still be problems that only occur with very specific configurations or one project in a million. Yes, it may be that you are the only person with a project, that will not work in the new IDE. So if you do not test, we can not fix it. Please do not wait for the final release, in order to test. It may be too late. Once the release is out we will have to be more selective about which fixes can be merged for further 1.2.x releases. So it may be, that we can not merge the fix you require. And then you will miss out on all the new features. == How to test == Download and install the 1.2RC2. - On Windows you can install as a 2ndary install, that will not affect your current install: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Multiple_Lazarus#Installation_of_multiple_Lazarus - On other platforms, if you install to a new location you need to use --primary-configpath In either case you should make backups. (including your primary config) Open your project in the current Lazarus (1.0.14), and use Publish Project from the project menu. This creates a clean copy of your project. You can then open that copy in the RC2. Please test: - Can you edit forms in the designer - rename components / change properties in Object inspector / Add new events - Add components to form / Move components on form - Frames, if you use them - Can you navigate the source code (e.g. jump to implementation) - Auto completion in source code - Compile, debug and run - Anything else you use in your daily work Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Lazarus Second Release Candidate, 1.2RC2
The Lazarus team would like to announce the second Release Candidate for the upcoming Version 1.2. We invite all users to test this Release Candidate. Please read here why everybody really should join the testing now. News in this Version http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.2.0_release_notes On Windows the installer now allows 2 independent installations. http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Multiple_Lazarus#Installation_of_multiple_Lazarus About the release process: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.2_fixes_branch#Roadmap_to_1.2 The 1.2.0RC2 is built with fpc 2.6.2. The release is available for download on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lazarus/files/ Choose your CPU, OS, distro and then the Lazarus 1.2RC2 directory. Minimum requirements: Windows: 98, 2k, XP, Vista, 7, 32 or 64bit FreeBSD/Linux: gtk 2.8 or qt4.5, 32 or 64bit Mac OS X: 10.5 to 10.8, LCL on carbon only 32bit, non LCL apps can be 64bit == Why should everybody (including you) test the release candidate? == It the past months the Lazarus team has stabilized the 1.2 fixes branch. The resulting 1.2RC2 is now stable enough to be used by any one for test purposes. However many of the fixes and new features that were committed since the release of 1.0 required changes to the code of existing features too. While we have tested those ourself, there may still be problems that only occur with very specific configurations or one project in a million. Yes, it may be that you are the only person with a project, that will not work in the new IDE. So if you do not test, we can not fix it. Please do not wait for the final release, in order to test. It may be too late. Once the release is out we will have to be more selective about which fixes can be merged for further 1.2.x releases. So it may be, that we can not merge the fix you require. And then you will miss out on all the new features. == How to test == Download and install the 1.2RC2. - On Windows you can install as a 2ndary install, that will not affect your current install: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Multiple_Lazarus#Installation_of_multiple_Lazarus - On other platforms, if you install to a new location you need to use --primary-configpath In either case you should make backups. (including your primary config) Open your project in the current Lazarus (1.0.14), and use Publish Project from the project menu. This creates a clean copy of your project. You can then open that copy in the RC2. Please test: - Can you edit forms in the designer - rename components / change properties in Object inspector / Add new events - Add components to form / Move components on form - Frames, if you use them - Can you navigate the source code (e.g. jump to implementation) - Auto completion in source code - Compile, debug and run - Anything else you use in your daily work Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
