Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On 11.10.2015 19:54, FreeMan wrote: On 11.10.2015 20:31, Ondrej Pokorny wrote: On 11.10.2015 19:19, FreeMan wrote: Ondrej, Visible always True, just resizing or not. I mean, if /"Environment" option checked, not resize but visible True. /if /"Environment" option NOT checked, visible True and resize. Thank you/ Sorry. I don't understand you. Was your first suggestion a) "do not show the splitter if it cannot move" Yes A patch is welcome! Ondrej -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On 12.10.2015 09:37, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: I actually like this "old view". The 'Alt-P' method is much slower for me. I even restore the 'old view' in Delphi XE 10. Freeman's suggestions would not change anything about your settings. It is irrelevant if the component palette is visible or not for the splitter visibility. Btw. it's not "Delphi XE 10" but "Delphi 10". The 10 is the new product-line name - it replaced the XE product-line :) Yes, their marketing office was over-creative and almost nobody understands it :) So nice we have Lazarus 1.x.x! Ondrej -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015, FreeMan wrote: I hide component palette, I don't need it every time, When I need any component "alt + P" show component search, its much easy and useful. of course for me. And Editor toolbar, add much used menu item on one line. This mean, Much more Source editor area and can see much source line without scroll. For me better then huge unuseful IDE main toolbar. This huge bulky view style similar from delphi 1 I actually like this "old view". The 'Alt-P' method is much slower for me. I even restore the 'old view' in Delphi XE 10. Preferences vary wildly... Michael. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Ondrej Pokorny wrote: On 12.10.2015 09:37, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: I actually like this "old view". The 'Alt-P' method is much slower for me. I even restore the 'old view' in Delphi XE 10. Freeman's suggestions would not change anything about your settings. It is irrelevant if the component palette is visible or not for the splitter visibility. I know. I just wanted to point out that preferences differ. Btw. it's not "Delphi XE 10" but "Delphi 10". The 10 is the new product-line name - it replaced the XE product-line :) Yes, their marketing office was over-creative and almost nobody understands it :) So nice we have Lazarus 1.x.x! It's in fact "Delphi 10 Seattle". But with the sale of Embarcadero to Idera, maybe the name will change again; I have no idea. Michael. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On 12.10.2015 11:28, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Ondrej Pokorny wrote: On 12.10.2015 09:37, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: I actually like this "old view". The 'Alt-P' method is much slower for me. I even restore the 'old view' in Delphi XE 10. Freeman's suggestions would not change anything about your settings. It is irrelevant if the component palette is visible or not for the splitter visibility. I know. I just wanted to point out that preferences differ. All person is unique, we have NOT fill, think etc. has to same. So I wrote "for me" :) My suggestion was if I can not resize why I show it, it can be hide, thats all, and this is not much importent . Other ones can be useful maybe Btw. it's not "Delphi XE 10" but "Delphi 10". The 10 is the new product-line name - it replaced the XE product-line :) Yes, their marketing office was over-creative and almost nobody understands it :) So nice we have Lazarus 1.x.x! It's in fact "Delphi 10 Seattle". But with the sale of Embarcadero to Idera, maybe the name will change again; I have no idea. Michael. I saw this in forum, and I shared it in my forum as well. one membership asked good question, did any body see this on embarcadero? -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
Hello, fpc r32000 & lazarus r50023 osx el capitan qtx64 1- Is it possible to add new form for opened windows list, like under Main menu --> Window. This is so useful if use docking style IDE. Because all tool window is not stay on top, so when click main (usually source form) all non docked form(s) go under this and looking for it. 2- This slider not using but always there, no resizing, not moving. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
It is movable in the fixes branch at r50025. The main toolbar and component palette (together the main form) is resizeable by moving it... 2015-10-11 14:21 keltezéssel, FreeMan írta: > Hello, > fpc r32000 & lazarus r50023 osx el capitan qtx64 > > 1- Is it possible to add new form for opened windows list, like under > Main menu --> Window. This is so useful if use docking style IDE. > Because all tool window is not stay on top, so when click main (usually > source form) all non docked form(s) go under this and looking for it. > > 2- > This slider not using but always there, no resizing, not moving. > > > > -- > ___ > Lazarus mailing list > Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > -- Péter Gábor p...@freemail.hu -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On 11.10.2015 18:17, Péter Gábor wrote: ...The slider is required (to be movable) when the main form is not wide enough to display all components in a single row on the active page of component palette. Otherwise the editor can go down too much. Is it possible that the main form is not resizeable manually or anchor docking does something wrong? Actually, it's not a bug. There is an option that does it: Options->Environment->Window->Automatically adjust IDE main windows height. Ondrej -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On 11.10.2015 20:31, Ondrej Pokorny wrote: On 11.10.2015 19:19, FreeMan wrote: Ondrej, Visible always True, just resizing or not. I mean, if /"Environment" option checked, not resize but visible True. /if /"Environment" option NOT checked, visible True and resize. Thank you/ Sorry. I don't understand you. Was your first suggestion a) "do not show the splitter if it cannot move" Yes or b) "make the splitter move, it does nothing" ? >> suggestion: Can add max resize value for heigth. I myself don't think something like this is needed. Ask Lazarus developers for their meaning and if they think it is a good enhancement, create a patch. Ondrej/ / I'm writing mail list 'cos All lazarus developers read here, for create patch, If I finish my project maybe I can, but I lost enthusiasm Thank you -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On 11.10.2015 18:52, FreeMan wrote: I hide component palette, I don't need it every time, When I need any component "alt + P" show component search, its much easy and useful. of course for me. And Editor toolbar, add much used menu item on one line. This mean, Much more Source editor area and can see much source line without scroll. For me better then huge unuseful IDE main toolbar. This huge bulky view style similar from delphi 1 Yes, I do the same. The splitter can be hidden if "/Options->Environment->Window->Automatically adjust IDE main window height/" is enabled. If the option is disabled, the splitter has to be visible. Ondrej -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
...The slider is required (to be movable) when the main form is not wide enough to display all components in a single row on the active page of component palette. Otherwise the editor can go down too much. Is it possible that the main form is not resizeable manually or anchor docking does something wrong? 2015-10-11 18:01 keltezéssel, Péter Gábor írta: > It is movable in the fixes branch at r50025. > The main toolbar and component palette (together the main form) is > resizeable by moving it... > > > 2015-10-11 14:21 keltezéssel, FreeMan írta: >> Hello, >> fpc r32000 & lazarus r50023 osx el capitan qtx64 >> >> 1- Is it possible to add new form for opened windows list, like under >> Main menu --> Window. This is so useful if use docking style IDE. >> Because all tool window is not stay on top, so when click main (usually >> source form) all non docked form(s) go under this and looking for it. >> >> 2- >> This slider not using but always there, no resizing, not moving. >> >> >> >> -- >> ___ >> Lazarus mailing list >> Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org >> http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus >> > -- Péter Gábor p...@freemail.hu -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
I hide component palette, I don't need it every time, When I need any component "alt + P" show component search, its much easy and useful. of course for me. And Editor toolbar, add much used menu item on one line. This mean, Much more Source editor area and can see much source line without scroll. For me better then huge unuseful IDE main toolbar. This huge bulky view style similar from delphi 1 On 11.10.2015 19:01, Péter Gábor wrote: It is movable in the fixes branch at r50025. The main toolbar and component palette (together the main form) is resizeable by moving it... 2015-10-11 14:21 keltezéssel, FreeMan írta: Hello, fpc r32000 & lazarus r50023 osx el capitan qtx64 1- Is it possible to add new form for opened windows list, like under Main menu --> Window. This is so useful if use docking style IDE. Because all tool window is not stay on top, so when click main (usually source form) all non docked form(s) go under this and looking for it. 2- This slider not using but always there, no resizing, not moving. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On 11.10.2015 19:19, FreeMan wrote: Ondrej, Visible always True, just resizing or not. I mean, if /"Environment" option checked, not resize but visible True. /if /"Environment" option NOT checked, visible True and resize. Thank you/ Sorry. I don't understand you. Was your first suggestion a) "do not show the splitter if it cannot move" or b) "make the splitter move, it does nothing" ? >> suggestion: Can add max resize value for heigth. I myself don't think something like this is needed. Ask Lazarus developers for their meaning and if they think it is a good enhancement, create a patch. Ondrej/ / -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On 11.10.2015 18:17, Péter Gábor wrote: ...The slider is required (to be movable) when the main form is not wide enough to display all components in a single row on the active page of component palette. Otherwise the editor can go down too much. Is it possible that the main form is not resizeable manually or anchor docking does something wrong? It should not be movable/resizable. If it is so, it's a bug. If you want to show all components in the component pallette, use Options->Environment->Window->Show complete component palette Ondrej -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
Ondrej, Visible always True, just resizing or not. I mean, if /"Environment" option checked, not resize but visible True. /if /"Environment" option NOT checked, visible True and resize. suggestion: Can add max resize value for heigth. Thank you / On 11.10.2015 20:08, Ondrej Pokorny wrote: On 11.10.2015 18:52, FreeMan wrote: I hide component palette, I don't need it every time, When I need any component "alt + P" show component search, its much easy and useful. of course for me. And Editor toolbar, add much used menu item on one line. This mean, Much more Source editor area and can see much source line without scroll. For me better then huge unuseful IDE main toolbar. This huge bulky view style similar from delphi 1 Yes, I do the same. The splitter can be hidden if "/Options->Environment->Window->Automatically adjust IDE main window height/" is enabled. If the option is disabled, the splitter has to be visible. Ondrej -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:07 PM, FreeMan freema...@delphiturkiye.com wrote: No, not YET, because I'm still learning and I'm not expert. I'm using rxset, I added #0025524. I have one more, I will add after more test. Ok, your patch is for Rx library in CCR. It is assigned (maybe automatically) to Lagunov Aleksey. The wiki page: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/RXfpc has a comment by Matthijs : If someone knows how the authors can be contacted, please tell us. My russian is not too good. Does it mean Lagunov Aleksey is not actively maintaining it and nobody knows how to contact him? Could you try contacting him somehow? In any case your patch cannot be applied because it has no source file information. It has only a dot (.). $ patch -p0 ~/patch/Freeman_rxpatch_2.diff patch: File . is not a regular file -- can't patch Additionally, a patch should be made from a top level directory so path information is included, too. Easier to apply. Like: svn diff trunk/rxsomething.pas myrx.diff You have included formatting changes together with actual code changes. They should be separated as much as possible. Respect the style of surrounding code is the basic rule, although it is broken often. You have commented out some lines instead of removing them. Just remove them, the changes will be visible in SVN history. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
1. Why have disabled AutoSort? 2. The formatting of the source code does not need to change anything - let the style is classical. В Пт, 14/03/2014 в 22:07 +0200, FreeMan пишет: Did you try helping by providing source code? No, not YET, because I'm still learning and I'm not expert. I'm using rxset, I added #0025524. I have one more, I will add after more test. I wrote TExlookup Component, my plan I share it too but need more work on it. IDE code more complicated for me (yet) And I send my install and update svn fpc lazarus script. Just don't forget everyone has not now all code and/or expert. We can do Pascal source code. Yes, absolutely right. regards 14-03-2014 21:27 tarihinde, Juha Manninen yazdı: Yes Juha, FreeSparta is good viewing on video, But he wrote Already done by me :D and no share or detail. so, for get it, what we can do our self? We can do Pascal source code. Regards, Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
Already done by me :D http://youtu.be/-aUf7hhgwwI 2014-03-12 13:04 GMT+01:00 FreeMan freema...@delphiturkiye.com: Hello, Is it possible add menu item on right click on form while designing, Hide none visual components. This is so useful while setting visual component position and sizes. Thank you -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- Pozdrawiam Maciej Izak (hnb.c...@gmail.com) -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Maciej Izak hnb.c...@gmail.com wrote: Already done by me :D http://youtu.be/-aUf7hhgwwI Aparently not for Lazarus. Sorry my ignorance but what is FreeSparta? Google found only your YouTube video but no information. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Juha Manninen wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Maciej Izak hnb.c...@gmail.com wrote: Already done by me :D http://youtu.be/-aUf7hhgwwI Aparently not for Lazarus. Sorry my ignorance but what is FreeSparta? Google found only your YouTube video but no information. Another rebranding of Lazarus, like CodeTyphon ? Michael. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:15 PM, FreeMan freema...@delphiturkiye.comwrote: Status acknowledged 2011-02-23 17:48 Created 2012-03-17 17:57 Zeljan Rikalo = 1.2 2014-01-14 15:16 Martin Friebe 1.2 = 1.4 svn version is 1.3 whats is the meaning of all this, kindly explain this please. Nobody implemented the feature for Lazarus 1.0 so Zeljan postponed it for Lazarus 1.2 two years ago. Nobody implemented it for Lazarus 1.2 either so Martin postponed it for Lazarus 1.4 which will be the next release. Lazarus 1.3 is the development version that will finally turn into 1.4 around a year from now. I am still curious about what is FreeSparta? Regards, Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
Juha Manninen, Michael Van Canneyt, FreeMan I am still curious about what is FreeSparta? FreeSparta is the new Lazarus distro. The aim of the project is to provide better quality and user experience (at the beginning only for windows, maybe with out of the box cross-compilation). I want to start FreePascal/Lazarus foundation named FreeSparta, which will be possible to sponsor new open source libraries (gestures, live bindings / data binding, more Delphi compatible RTL, remote debugger, ToolsAPI). FreeSparta license is the same as Lazarus but it will be possible to buy an optional extra quality tools. I want to enter the synergy (and accelerate the development of Lazarus and FPC) between the open source project and commercial additives. With first release will be included the Generics.* library (new and much better version of fpc-generics-collections), fixes for a few (IMO) critical Lazarus errors and new modern UX. Project is almost ready :). Regards Maciej Izak (hnb), -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
I mean, are Lazarus team want to say, not need suggestion, so don't tell us suggestion, you can use, if we, what we do. I wrote 3 suggestion, 2 good idea writed, but, for first suggestion do nothing. for second suggestion next year maybe. 3. suggestion, for fpc svn install script, I was share mine, but problem OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 not write again I was write all detail. I'm just do NOT want to thing like this, Why I'm STILL trying helping, testing, just loosing time. If I have problem, write it to forum or mail list, if some one write answer is good, if no answer, forget it, use different way Yes Juha, FreeSparta is good viewing on video, But he wrote Already done by me :D and no share or detail. so, for get it, what we can do our self? Regards 14-03-2014 17:38 tarihinde, Juha Manninen yazdı: On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:15 PM, FreeMan freema...@delphiturkiye.com mailto:freema...@delphiturkiye.com wrote: Status acknowledged 2011-02-23 17:48 Created 2012-03-17 17:57 Zeljan Rikalo = 1.2 2014-01-14 15:16 Martin Friebe 1.2 = 1.4 svn version is 1.3 whats is the meaning of all this, kindly explain this please. Nobody implemented the feature for Lazarus 1.0 so Zeljan postponed it for Lazarus 1.2 two years ago. Nobody implemented it for Lazarus 1.2 either so Martin postponed it for Lazarus 1.4 which will be the next release. Lazarus 1.3 is the development version that will finally turn into 1.4 around a year from now. I am still curious about what is FreeSparta? Regards, Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Maciej Izak wrote: Juha Manninen, Michael Van Canneyt, FreeMan I am still curious about what is FreeSparta? FreeSparta is the new Lazarus distro. The aim of the project is to provide better quality and user experience (at the beginning only for windows, maybe with out of the box cross-compilation). I want to start FreePascal/Lazarus foundation named FreeSparta, which will be possible to sponsor new open source libraries (gestures, live bindings / data binding, more Delphi compatible RTL, remote debugger, ToolsAPI). FreeSparta license is the same as Lazarus but it will be possible to buy an optional extra quality tools. I want to enter the synergy (and accelerate the development of Lazarus and FPC) between the open source project and commercial additives. With first release will be included the Generics.* library (new and much better version of fpc-generics-collections), fixes for a few (IMO) critical Lazarus errors and new modern UX. Project is almost ready :). Why not simply cooperate with the FPC and Lazarus teams ? I'm sure they will welcome additional manpower. FPC accepts patches, so does Lazarus. These fragmented projects really are not fun. Discrepancies will start growing. Soon the FPC team will have to go back to using a text editor to ensure code works in all IDEs :( Michael.-- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Maciej Izak wrote: I want to start FreePascal/Lazarus foundation named FreeSparta, which will be possible to sponsor new open source libraries (gestures, live bindings / data binding, more Delphi compatible RTL, remote debugger, ToolsAPI). FreeSparta license is the same as Lazarus but it will be possible to buy an optional extra quality tools. I want to enter the synergy (and accelerate the development of Lazarus and FPC) between the open source project and commercial additives. For Martin: That's my point of developing Pascal based debugger API as independent from either compiler (FPC and Delphi friendly) as well as IDE (no bindings for Lazarus / LCL) Another upspiral of IDEs development: FreeSparta, XeroCoder and, sure, CodeTyphon .. and I know some similar works in Russian pascal community ... they all would benefit from having a good debugging API :) thanks, Dmitry -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Maciej Izak hnb.c...@gmail.com wrote: FreeSparta is the new Lazarus distro. The aim of the project is to provide better quality and user experience (at the beginning only for windows, maybe with out of the box cross-compilation). Ok, it is a fork like CodeTyphoon with maybe a little different focus. I am also wondering why you cannot contribute the bug fixes directly for Lazarus and FPC. You could still make a business around them. Anyway, good luck with your project! Commercial support and products are needed around these open source projects. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
2014-03-14 15:38 GMT-03:00 Dmitry Boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com: On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote: On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Maciej Izak wrote: I want to start FreePascal/Lazarus foundation named FreeSparta, which will be possible to sponsor new open source libraries (gestures, live bindings / data binding, more Delphi compatible RTL, remote debugger, ToolsAPI). FreeSparta license is the same as Lazarus but it will be possible to buy an optional extra quality tools. I want to enter the synergy (and accelerate the development of Lazarus and FPC) between the open source project and commercial additives. For Martin: That's my point of developing Pascal based debugger API as independent from either compiler (FPC and Delphi friendly) as well as IDE (no bindings for Lazarus / LCL) Another upspiral of IDEs development: FreeSparta, XeroCoder and, sure, CodeTyphon .. and I know some similar works in Russian pascal community ... they all would benefit from having a good debugging API :) thanks, Dmitry Sorry for my ignorance, but, what is XeroCoder? -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:47 PM, FreeMan freema...@delphiturkiye.com wrote: I mean, are Lazarus team want to say, not need suggestion, so don't tell us suggestion, you can use, if we, what we do. I wrote 3 suggestion, 2 good idea writed, but, for first suggestion do nothing. for second suggestion next year maybe. 3. suggestion, for fpc svn install script, I was share mine, but problem OVERRIDEVERSIONCHECK=1 not write again I was write all detail. What do you think, who should implement your suggestion? Me? Somebody else? Who? The problem in this (like in many other) open source project is that there are more ideas than there are people willing to implement those ideas. The best way to get your ideas through is to implement them yourself. Just provide a patch and very likely it will be accepted. For example a patch for issue #18811 would certainly be accepted. Sometimes it happens that all developers are busy with other things and a patch is ignored for a long time. If that happened for you then I apologise and I promise to look at your patch. Just tell me the details where to find it. I'm just do NOT want to thing like this, Why I'm STILL trying helping, testing, just loosing time. If I have problem, write it to forum or mail list, if some one write answer is good, if no answer, forget it, use different way You forgot the most important thing: source code. Did you try helping by providing source code? It is ultimately the only thing that matters in a SW projects. Don't you agree? Yes Juha, FreeSparta is good viewing on video, But he wrote Already done by me :D and no share or detail. so, for get it, what we can do our self? We can do Pascal source code. Regards, Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
Did you try helping by providing source code? No, not YET, because I'm still learning and I'm not expert. I'm using rxset, I added #0025524. I have one more, I will add after more test. I wrote TExlookup Component, my plan I share it too but need more work on it. IDE code more complicated for me (yet) And I send my install and update svn fpc lazarus script. Just don't forget everyone has not now all code and/or expert. We can do Pascal source code. Yes, absolutely right. regards 14-03-2014 21:27 tarihinde, Juha Manninen yazdı: Yes Juha, FreeSparta is good viewing on video, But he wrote Already done by me :D and no share or detail. so, for get it, what we can do our self? We can do Pascal source code. Regards, Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
A multilingual IDE http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,22236.0.html FPC/Lazarus based, though it doesn't specifically target pascal development, though. thanks, Dmitry On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:10 PM, silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for my ignorance, but, what is XeroCoder? -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
2014-03-14 17:10 GMT-03:00 Dmitry Boyarintsev skalogryz.li...@gmail.com: A multilingual IDE http://forum.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,22236.0.html Thank you! (y) -- Silvio Clécio My public projects - github.com/silvioprog -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
Why not simply cooperate with the FPC and Lazarus teams ? I'm sure they will welcome additional manpower. FPC accepts patches, so does Lazarus. These fragmented projects really are not fun. Discrepancies will start growing. Soon the FPC team will have to go back to using a text editor to ensure code works in all IDEs :( Don't worry! Before each release I want to send all the patches and extensions. :) I care about compatibility. Regards, Maciej Izak (hnb) -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:04:47 +0200 FreeMan freema...@delphiturkiye.com wrote: Hello, Is it possible add menu item on right click on form while designing, Hide none visual components. This is so useful while setting visual component position and sizes. Thank you Good idea. Feel free to create a feature request. Mattias -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
This already exists: Summary0018811: Hide/Show components in form designer I apparently supported the idea back then. Now somebody just have to implement it. Juha -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
[Lazarus] Suggestion for IDE
Hello, Is it possible add menu item on right click on form while designing, Hide none visual components. This is so useful while setting visual component position and sizes. Thank you -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
