Re: [lazarus] RTTI and Object inspector question

2007-12-28 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:46:29 +0100
Giuliano Colla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Mattias Gaertner ha scritto:
> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:50:34 +0100
> > Giuliano Colla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> Assuming that I was so crazy as to attempt to compile Lazarus with
> >> a different Component Library, what's the relationship between
> >> RTTI, Object inspector and the rest of the devilishly wizardry
> >> which makes it tick?
> >> IOW if my components miss some properties found in LCL, and have
> >> some properties not found in LCL, should also RTTI be modified
> >> accordingly, or that's not necessary?
> >> 
> >
> > The RTTI is your smallest problem.
> > More important are the events and the special LCLIntf functions. You
> > will see what I mean when you try to compile the IDE.
> >
> >   
> Sounds like I should give up before starting.

Don't interpret mails too much. 
I just said, you don't need to worry about RTTI and that the events and
some LCLIntf functions need some work.


> However, if I make it *very* similar to LCL.

Yes.

> Thanks a lot, however,


Mattias

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] RTTI and Object inspector question

2007-12-28 Thread Giuliano Colla

Mattias Gaertner ha scritto:

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:50:34 +0100
Giuliano Colla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  
Assuming that I was so crazy as to attempt to compile Lazarus with a 
different Component Library, what's the relationship between RTTI, 
Object inspector and the rest of the devilishly wizardry which makes

it tick?
IOW if my components miss some properties found in LCL, and have some 
properties not found in LCL, should also RTTI be modified

accordingly, or that's not necessary?



The RTTI is your smallest problem.
More important are the events and the special LCLIntf functions. You
will see what I mean when you try to compile the IDE.

  

Sounds like I should give up before starting.
However, if I make it *very* similar to LCL.
Thanks a lot, however,

Giuliano

_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


Re: [lazarus] RTTI and Object inspector question

2007-12-28 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:50:34 +0100
Giuliano Colla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Assuming that I was so crazy as to attempt to compile Lazarus with a 
> different Component Library, what's the relationship between RTTI, 
> Object inspector and the rest of the devilishly wizardry which makes
> it tick?
> IOW if my components miss some properties found in LCL, and have some 
> properties not found in LCL, should also RTTI be modified
> accordingly, or that's not necessary?

The RTTI is your smallest problem.
More important are the events and the special LCLIntf functions. You
will see what I mean when you try to compile the IDE.


Mattias

_
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
   archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives


[lazarus] RTTI and Object inspector question

2007-12-28 Thread Giuliano Colla
Assuming that I was so crazy as to attempt to compile Lazarus with a 
different Component Library, what's the relationship between RTTI, 
Object inspector and the rest of the devilishly wizardry which makes it 
tick?
IOW if my components miss some properties found in LCL, and have some 
properties not found in LCL, should also RTTI be modified accordingly, 
or that's not necessary?


Thanks,

Giuliano


_
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject
  archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives