RE: [Leaf-devel] Web-config devel

2002-07-02 Thread Richard Amerman

Lynn,

I completly agree with all of your points, no nead to be spacific.  I am too new to 
the group to make any major sugestions to procedure.  Most all of my changtes were 
just to the normal weblet as it is/was.  I do believe that the modulerization and code 
cleanup I did should help support the configuration project unless we decide to 
completly change things.  Much of what I did uses the existing methods so their may be 
better ways to do things.

I think it would be good to replace the texttohtml function with a better one.  See 
the source code printout at the Dev Demo site to see what I mean.

Richard Amerman

-Original Message-
From:   guitarlynn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Mon 7/1/2002 10:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 
Subject:[Leaf-devel] Web-config devel
As stated before, there appears to be several people
doing preliminary work on modifying Weblet to be used
as a web-based configuration tool in the LEAF community,
but not limited to the LEAF developers. It would be safe to
assume that at some point redundant work will be done to 
achive the same end result. It would seem to be logical to
form a consolidated group of developers to work together 
on this project, so that 1) development would be faster, 
2) each developer could focus on a particular piece of 
the code, 3) the finished product would likely be better
and more portable in respect to LEAF itself.

How (and if) a group to develop a web-config package should
be formed and run within the LEAF site is questionable and 
any idea's and advice is appreciated for a direction to take.

At the moment, the work that has been done has been considered
to be an extension of the weblet package and/or sh-httpd. 
Personally, I find a Web-configuration product to be something
that is it's own entity, and be treated as such even though 
extensions will be made to the present sh-httpd code and integration
with weblet will be a safe assumption. Shell/CLI environment 
configuration will need to be availible and the finished package
should be optional as a package to the LEAF release(s) used on.

I think a dedicated CVS branch, a means of communication, a 
schedule, and a roadmap would be general requirements to a clear
and efficient development cycle for such a project. Is there an existing
way to do and or all of this within the present LEAF infrastructure? 

Thoughts???
-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel







---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel



[Leaf-devel] Web-config devel

2002-07-01 Thread guitarlynn

As stated before, there appears to be several people
doing preliminary work on modifying Weblet to be used
as a web-based configuration tool in the LEAF community,
but not limited to the LEAF developers. It would be safe to
assume that at some point redundant work will be done to 
achive the same end result. It would seem to be logical to
form a consolidated group of developers to work together 
on this project, so that 1) development would be faster, 
2) each developer could focus on a particular piece of 
the code, 3) the finished product would likely be better
and more portable in respect to LEAF itself.

How (and if) a group to develop a web-config package should
be formed and run within the LEAF site is questionable and 
any idea's and advice is appreciated for a direction to take.

At the moment, the work that has been done has been considered
to be an extension of the weblet package and/or sh-httpd. 
Personally, I find a Web-configuration product to be something
that is it's own entity, and be treated as such even though 
extensions will be made to the present sh-httpd code and integration
with weblet will be a safe assumption. Shell/CLI environment 
configuration will need to be availible and the finished package
should be optional as a package to the LEAF release(s) used on.

I think a dedicated CVS branch, a means of communication, a 
schedule, and a roadmap would be general requirements to a clear
and efficient development cycle for such a project. Is there an existing
way to do and or all of this within the present LEAF infrastructure? 

Thoughts???
-- 

~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn

guitarlynn at users.sourceforge.net
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

If linux isn't the answer, you've probably got the wrong question!


---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel