Re: [LEDE-DEV] Branching LEDE 17.01 / problems with ath9k

[Bastian Bittorf]

* Thomas Endt  [13.01.2017 09:19]:
> > the page https://lede-project.org changed again and 'reporting bugs'
> > is hidden under 'Developer Guide' which is just...wrong Please make
> > this more "friendly".
> 
> https://lede-project.org/contact contains a link to
> https://bugs.lede-project.org/ since 11/11/2016.
> IMHO the perfect place.

thank you - that makes sense. maybe move it more
ontop? it's nearly the last entry after, even after
"Server Status Changes Announcements on Twitter" 8-)

bye, bastian

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Branching LEDE 17.01 / problems with ath9k

[Thomas Endt]

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-boun...@lists.infradead.org] Im Auftrag
> von Bastian Bittorf
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. Januar 2017 10:39
> An: Jo-Philipp Wich
> Cc: l...@kitschensync.net; LEDE Development List
> Betreff: Re: [LEDE-DEV] Branching LEDE 17.01 / problems with ath9k
> 
> Thanks for these strong steps toward a release, the last weeks where
> full of commits and everybody seems to work very hard.
> 
> What i want to mention is, that older ath9k chips (ar91xx?) are not
> useable with LEDE anymore, e.g. TP-Link 1043nd v1
> 
> This needs more testing and reporting. Maybe someone has time to jump
> in. I have opened a ticket for that:
> https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=details_id=373
> 
> bye, bastian
> 
> BTW:
> the page https://lede-project.org changed again and 'reporting bugs'
> is hidden under 'Developer Guide' which is just...wrong Please make
> this more "friendly".

https://lede-project.org/contact contains a link to
https://bugs.lede-project.org/ since 11/11/2016.
IMHO the perfect place.

regards,

Thomas


___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Branching LEDE 17.01 / problems with ath9k

[Bastian Bittorf]

Thanks for these strong steps toward a release,
the last weeks where full of commits and everybody
seems to work very hard.

What i want to mention is, that older ath9k chips (ar91xx?)
are not useable with LEDE anymore, e.g. TP-Link 1043nd v1

This needs more testing and reporting. Maybe someone has
time to jump in. I have opened a ticket for that:
https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=details_id=373

bye, bastian

BTW:
the page https://lede-project.org changed again and 'reporting bugs'
is hidden under 'Developer Guide' which is just...wrong
Please make this more "friendly".

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Branching LEDE 17.01

[Jo-Philipp Wich]

Hi Ted,

so no one else objected and you want to hold of until after the weekend;
therefor I propose to branch on Monday, the 16th.

~ Jo



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Branching LEDE 17.01

[Ted Hess]

On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 16:19 +0100, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I'd like to branch off lede-17.01 on Friday, the 13th and would
> appreciate if you could merge your outstanding, release critical work
> until then.
> 
> If you think we should delay branching, then raise your objections now.
> 
> If no objections are brought up within the next 24 hours, I'll go
> forward asking the feed maintainers to create "lede-17.01" branches.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Jo
> 
> ___
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Hi Jo -

Could you possibly hold off on this until after the weekend. I'm still working
on a few PolarSSL issues (and some other more minor) in the Packages repo. I
should have them done by then.

After that, I'll just cherry-pick other fixes until we freeze a release.

/ted


___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

Re: [LEDE-DEV] Branching LEDE 17.01

[Daniel Golle]

Hi!

I'd really like to see a rather trivial issue addressed:
dnsmasq fails to get notifications on /tmp/resolv.conf.auto changes
when running inside ujail. This is because the bind mount obviously
won't survive this file being *replaced*, eg. if the DHCP client
supplies the DNS server to be used only after dnsmasq has already
been started.

The easiest solution would be to introduce a directory
/tmp/resolv.conf.d/, move all /tmp/resolv.conf* in there and bind mount
that into the jail instead. The current /tmp/resolv.conf.auto seems to
hardcoded in netifd and appears in dnsmasq's and mwan's default config.
Anywhere else? Given the overall code quality of dnsmasq, it would
really be nice to at least have it run in a jail by default for the
next release...

Mentioning the problem to John, he said that the current bind mounting
approach will be replaced by a future jailfs he is working on. However,
I'm afraid this won't be ready by Friday ;)

If there are no objections, I'll suggest a PR introducing
/tmp/resolv.conf.d/ and moving the location of /tmp/resolv.conf* into
that directory.

Cheers

Daniel


On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 04:19:05PM +0100, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> I'd like to branch off lede-17.01 on Friday, the 13th and would
> appreciate if you could merge your outstanding, release critical work
> until then.
> 
> If you think we should delay branching, then raise your objections now.
> 
> If no objections are brought up within the next 24 hours, I'll go
> forward asking the feed maintainers to create "lede-17.01" branches.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Jo
> 
> ___
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev

[LEDE-DEV] Branching LEDE 17.01

[Jo-Philipp Wich]

Hi guys,

I'd like to branch off lede-17.01 on Friday, the 13th and would
appreciate if you could merge your outstanding, release critical work
until then.

If you think we should delay branching, then raise your objections now.

If no objections are brought up within the next 24 hours, I'll go
forward asking the feed maintainers to create "lede-17.01" branches.


Regards,
Jo

___
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev