Re: Force balance report to always put sub accounts in own node
> "NS" == Nikita Skobelevs writes: NS> --empty seems relevant but not quite what I'm looking for. NS> It would help in the above example if I already had some account NS> Baz:* that was 0 and not displayed, but in this case Foo is the only NS> subaccount in Baz so --empty doesn't change how it's displayed NS> I'm assuming there's logic somewhere checking if there's more than 1 NS> subaccount and if so putting them over multiple lines - I'm looking NS> for a way to force that behaviour so every ":" forces a new node in NS> the indented tree. I’m reading the code, but it’s been a while since I last worked on it. I don’t think this feature exists, but I agree it’s a pretty obvious omission for it not to be there. There should be a way to ask it not to collapse accounts, even if they are empty or unused. John -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ledger-cli+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ledger-cli/m28r89jav7.fsf%40newartisans.com.
Re: Force balance report to always put sub accounts in own node
Hi John, --empty seems relevant but not quite what I'm looking for. It would help in the above example if I already had some account Baz:* that was 0 and not displayed, but in this case Foo is the only subaccount in Baz so --empty doesn't change how it's displayed I'm assuming there's logic somewhere checking if there's more than 1 subaccount and if so putting them over multiple lines - I'm looking for a way to force that behaviour so every ":" forces a new node in the indented tree. Regards, On Tuesday, 10 October 2023 at 00:04:50 UTC+1 John Wiegley wrote: > > "NS" == Nikita Skobelevs writes: > > NS> I was wondering if it's possible to force the balance report to > NS> always have sub accounts as new nodes in the indented tree even if > NS> there's only 1 sub account? Either with some flag or custom > NS> --balance-format? > > Does --empty does what you want? > > John > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ledger-cli+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ledger-cli/b16a8d3a-e912-49c5-bb6d-5a3e790627f7n%40googlegroups.com.
Re: Force balance report to always put sub accounts in own node
> "NS" == Nikita Skobelevs writes: NS> I was wondering if it's possible to force the balance report to NS> always have sub accounts as new nodes in the indented tree even if NS> there's only 1 sub account? Either with some flag or custom NS> --balance-format? Does --empty does what you want? John -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ledger-cli+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ledger-cli/m2a5srz9bq.fsf%40newartisans.com.
Force balance report to always put sub accounts in own node
Hi, I was wondering if it's possible to force the balance report to always have sub accounts as new nodes in the indented tree even if there's only 1 sub account? Either with some flag or custom --balance-format? Example: * Current Output:* xx.xx Expenses xx.xxBaz:Foo xx.xxBar:Qux --- 0 *Desired output:* xx.xx Expenses xx.xxBaz xx.xx Foo xx.xxBar xx.xx Qux --- 0 Thanks, Nikita -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ledger-cli+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ledger-cli/d651e1af-c248-458a-baaf-3bf39c0a5ec9n%40googlegroups.com.
