Re: ornamental turning on a rose engine lathe video

2018-12-06 Thread 'Curt George' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
 Hello Everyone.When trying to make more OT looking cuts with the Legacy, we 
have a few problems, as a matter of fact the Legacy's strongest point is also 
its weakest ONE, "the lead screw". Most OT machines do not use one.(but having 
said that,)I have had some good results with the Legacy and making OT type of 
cuts,doing some things somewhat differently then the normal router bits, type 
of cuts (things like slot cutters, side cutting,roughing end mills, diamond 
hole saws .. ) but at this time, I feel the biggest problem that I've been 
running into is the lack of a worm gear for the Legacy lead screw.
The 5/8"-4 is a very hard pitch to make a worm gear for. (I've tried, with only 
poor results so far.)  
What I've been thinking of is something like a pendulum Z axis, where the 
cutter is on the center, and the Rosette is off of the side, hooked up to a 
worm gear &,the lead screw. (sorta like a backwards and upside down Rose lathe 
on top of the Legacy.) ;-)
The pumping up and down action idea came form another time.and project that I 
tried, I still think it just might works for short / small spindles and 
face-plate work, This idea was to put a rosette on the head-stock after the 
head-stock and before the spindle.the single rosette will make a up and down 
movement of the cutter. This idea did not pan out for me. I was not able to 
control the weight of the movement.  But I did have some good results with a 
spring loaded spindle, and a rosette pushing on the spring to make a pumping 
type of cut. This was a screwy idea but it did work (somewhat.) the spindle was 
supported by a spring at both ends, the rosette was hooked to the indexing 
gear, When the rosette hit the spindle it pushed everything down, and then it 
returned back up, making a weird up and down cut, that was not uniformed from 
end to end. (I've not done a lot with this attachment.as a matter of fact, I 
scraped the idea.)
My profile follower and the "Wave attachment," have worked out well for me in 
the past, (at least I've had some success with these to attachments, although 
somewhat limited.)The concept is to move/ control the work piece rotation 
instead of the cutter's movement,simple pattern's, can be used over and over to 
make, more complex types of cuts. The biggest problem here is... trying to not 
make the spindle look to busy!
Basically what I'm saying here is, I've been trying for a while, I can show a 
1000 ways how not to do it. and only a few ways that have worked for me. But 
I'm not going give up yet. I'm having to much fun trying.Have a good night.
C.A.G.


On Thursday, December 6, 2018, 6:15:56 PM EST, Tim Krause 
 wrote:  
 
 Curt and myself have been thinking about the options to create rose engines 
cuts for a very long time.  So long that I bought a mdf rose engines myself to 
get on with actually doing the work!  More on this later.On Dec 6, 2018, at 
2:49 PM, 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills 
 wrote:
hey Pat!... can I assume that in your variation, the router carriage is 
stationary without the ability to slide along the bed?... I would need the 
carriage to move along the X axis so various "pump" action cuts could be done 
along a spiral of some sort... so the pumping action needs to be in motion 
while the carriage is in motion... I am racking my brain on this one... I have 
done a lot of mods on my Legacy, and some that I have done the design work on 
but just don't have the time right now to execute and build... but this mod has 
me stumped to the point that I cannot get the design worked out, never mind 
what it might take to complete the actual mod to a full working stage!... I 
like the idea of coming off the end of the lead screw... the problem is how to 
transfer that motion to a X-axis moving carriage, along the full length of the 
bed... let the quest continue!... LOL!... thanks... Joe








-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/legacy-ornamental-mills.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/legacy-ornamental-mills.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ornamental turning on a rose engine lathe video

2018-12-06 Thread Tim Krause
Curt and myself have been thinking about the options to create rose engines 
cuts for a very long time.  So long that I bought a mdf rose engines myself to 
get on with actually doing the work!  More on this later.

On Dec 6, 2018, 2:49 PM, at 2:49 PM, 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills 
 wrote:
>hey Pat!... can I assume that in your variation, the router carriage is
>
>stationary without the ability to slide along the bed?... I would need
>the 
>carriage to move along the X axis so various "pump" action cuts could
>be 
>done along a spiral of some sort... so the pumping action needs to be
>in 
>motion while the carriage is in motion... I am racking my brain on this
>
>one... I have done a lot of mods on my Legacy, and some that I have
>done 
>the design work on but just don't have the time right now to execute
>and 
>build... but this mod has me stumped to the point that I cannot get the
>
>design worked out, never mind what it might take to complete the actual
>mod 
>to a full working stage!... I like the idea of coming off the end of
>the 
>lead screw... the problem is how to transfer that motion to a X-axis
>moving 
>carriage, along the full length of the bed... let the quest
>continue!... 
>LOL!... thanks... Joe
>
>-- 
>You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>Groups "Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
>To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>an email to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>To post to this group, send email to
>legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com.
>Visit this group at
>https://groups.google.com/group/legacy-ornamental-mills.
>For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/legacy-ornamental-mills.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ornamental turning on a rose engine lathe video

2018-12-06 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
hey Pat!... can I assume that in your variation, the router carriage is 
stationary without the ability to slide along the bed?... I would need the 
carriage to move along the X axis so various "pump" action cuts could be 
done along a spiral of some sort... so the pumping action needs to be in 
motion while the carriage is in motion... I am racking my brain on this 
one... I have done a lot of mods on my Legacy, and some that I have done 
the design work on but just don't have the time right now to execute and 
build... but this mod has me stumped to the point that I cannot get the 
design worked out, never mind what it might take to complete the actual mod 
to a full working stage!... I like the idea of coming off the end of the 
lead screw... the problem is how to transfer that motion to a X-axis moving 
carriage, along the full length of the bed... let the quest continue!... 
LOL!... thanks... Joe

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/legacy-ornamental-mills.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ornamental turning on a rose engine lathe video

2018-12-06 Thread patrick
Combining several ideas:
Use a variation of Tim's wave attachment 
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/legacy-ornamental-mills/gsFab9dTSr8/h15dZQFqwEMJ)
Run the lever up to a plate on a jack-shaft instead of the leadscrew.
Connect the jack-shaft to a chain-driven Z axis (no leadscrews on Z)
You'll need a sprocket on the jack-shaft on top and another below, with a 
closed-loop chain, so it pulls up and down to minimize slop on Z.
Mount the router parallel to the longitudinal axis 
(https://ornamentalmills.com/Bill_Bulkeley/revo_side_mount/index.html)

No, I haven't built this, just combining ideas from previous posts.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/legacy-ornamental-mills.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ornamental turning on a rose engine lathe video

2018-12-06 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
hey Curt!... not surprised you have thought of this mod in the past... from 
what I can tell, you seem to always have "Legacy" on your mind!... LOL!... 
anyway, I would think the "pumping" action of the z axis would be better if 
it was in-and-out, rather than up-and-down... an in-and-out motion would 
allow using side cutting bits, which also opens the door for using a lot of 
different router bits, as well as grinding your own, custom profiles... 
from what I have seen on videos, the rose engine lathes use this same 
technique... that is, cutting from the side... if you cut from the top(or 
12 o'clock position), you are severely limiting yourself to the type of 
router bit you could use... unless you had some other idea in mind with the 
z axis going up and down... I would like to think that with all the talent 
in this group, something could possibly be designed and made that was 
functional, affordable(to a degree!...LOL!) and easily understandable... 
maybe not exactly like what a rose engine lathe could do, but close enough 
that it would expand what a Legacy could do... thanks... joe


>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/legacy-ornamental-mills.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: ornamental turning on a rose engine lathe video

2018-12-06 Thread 'joe biunno' via Legacy Ornamental Mills
okay, driving home last night(1 3/4 hours!), came to the conclusion that a 
long length of a "wave" pattern for the z axis is not going to work... it 
would work when doing spindles, but not when the z axis was stationary and 
indexed cuts were desired... and to consider having one set of "rosettes" 
set up when doing spindle work and another when the z axis is in one, set 
position is not ideally desired either, at least in my opinion... too many 
setups, brackets, etc. … although it might be a considerable option, if an 
all around setup cannot be designed and made... so it's back to the drawing 
board, as the saying goes... I think Mike's idea of pumping the Z axis is 
spot on and the easiest way to achieve this mod... the problem now is how 
to get it to work in perfect unison with the lead screw, with no back 
lash... always impressed with Mike's solutions and jigs, i'll be interested 
to see what he might come up with for this... no pressure Mike!, LOL!... 
later... Joe


>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Legacy Ornamental Mills" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to legacy-ornamental-mills+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to legacy-ornamental-mills@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/legacy-ornamental-mills.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.