Re: [LegacyUG] Calendar Report Errors

2009-08-03 Thread Cathy Vallevieni

Marilyn:

Do you have birth dates or anniversary dates (whichever you are 
searching for the Calendar) for everyone?  The Calendar report only 
finds individuals that have a date for the field you are searching to 
include in the Calendar.


Cathy Vallevieni
Orange County, CA


At 04:43 PM 8/2/2009, you wrote:
I thought I'd try the Calendar Report out and I am getting strange 
results. I'm only using a db with 18 individuals. 11 are deceased, 7 
are living. When I do a Search for either Living=YES or 
Living=NO I get the correct results. When I do the Calendar List 
Report, I get only 3 deceased listed out of an expected 11. I get 
only the home (living) person listed out of an expected 7 living.


I did File- Maintenance and Master List cleanup a couple times 
today, and again before  after testing this Calendar List Report. I 
can't see anything different about the way the dates appear on the individuals.


How can the Search function work correctly but the Calendar not work??

Legacy7 Deluxe v. 7.0.0.100 build date 17 Jul 2009
Vista Home Premium x64 bit

Marilyn


--- On Sun, 8/2/09, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:

 From: Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Calendar Report Errors
 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
 Date: Sunday, August 2, 2009, 4:01 PM
 Alan Jones wrote
  Just wanted to let everyone know that realized I still
 had the March 13 build so I updated to the latest and things
 are working good know.  Not sure if there was a bug
 that was fixed or if in the process of converting my file
 with the new information the problem was resolved but either
 way it is working.

 I was just about to say that I had a *very vague* idea that
 someone had reported a bug with the Calendar a while ago and
 to ask what version you were using.  Perhaps my memory
 was not as wobbly as I thought it might be!
 -- Jenny M Benson



 Legacy User Group 
guidelines:   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived 
messages:   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp








Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Efficient Conversion from PAF to Legacy

2009-08-03 Thread Russ McGillivray
LeRoy,
I recently converted from PAF to Legacy.

I did not have a problem transferring my sources and notes or transcriptions
(assuming you mean the Actual Text), or images attached to sources.
However, I think the sources only transfer as the 'old' Legacy style, not
the Master Source style. There are lots of emails regarding how to convert
these to the Master Source style in Legacy, but it is not a trivial process.

It also looks like my MRIN did not change (not something I was concerned
about at the time).

Some other cleanup work I had to do:

1. I had used the ~ to keep my research notes from printing. These had to
be manually cut and pasted into the Research notes tab
2. Change alternate name to quoted name. I did this only for those people
most familiar to me and my relatives, because I had too many in PAF to do
them all. I left the rest as the Legacy alternative name.
3. Restore the middle capitalization to names like LeRoy.

Russ McGillivray


-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of LeRoy Atkins
Sent: August 1, 2009 2:40 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Efficient Conversion from PAF to Legacy

Can you recommend the best way for me to convert from using PAF to using 
Legacy? I have had 4 or 5 false starts and am now concerned about choosing 
the best way to do it.



MY OBJECTIVES:

  1.. Keep the same MRINs
  2.. Incorporate Evidence Explained using SourceWriter
  3.. Use the most efficient means of transferring my sources and notes from

PAF
  4.. Keep my transcriptions associated with my sources


MY PAF DATABASE:

  1.. Individuals 1858
  2.. Sources 249
  3.. Citations 1040
  4.. Notes 5543


PAF HISTORY:



Years ago I started using the source feature and included actual text.



Three semesters ago I started incorporating my sources into a timeline in my

notes field in PAF along with a transcription of the document. I consider 
these notes my most valuable data; however I will need to reformat my 
citation to comply with Evidence Explained.



I own the training CDs volume I and II. Please give me your recommendation 
for the most effective and efficient way to convert.



LeRoy Atkins



Efficient




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Calendar Report Errors

2009-08-03 Thread Marilyn Clark
Cathy, Thank You! That must be it. Even when I ask the Calendar List to show me 
everyone, I just get 5 people. The item that the ones selected have in common, 
that none of the others have, is a *precise* date of birth. Ex: Sep 1935, or 11 
Dec 1932.

The others either have no dob, or the year is preceded by Abt -- Since this 
is a Calendar, and not really a listing of Living or Dead persons, this makes 
perfect sense.

Thanks so much for your insight. I was afraid it was another Vista x64 glitch!

Marilyn


--- On Mon, 8/3/09, Cathy Vallevieni cathyv...@cox.net wrote:

 From: Cathy Vallevieni cathyv...@cox.net
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Calendar Report Errors
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Date: Monday, August 3, 2009, 12:05 AM
 Marilyn:
 
 Do you have birth dates or anniversary dates (whichever you
 are searching for the Calendar) for everyone?  The
 Calendar report only finds individuals that have a date for
 the field you are searching to include in the Calendar.
 
 Cathy Vallevieni
 Orange County, CA
 
 
 At 04:43 PM 8/2/2009, you wrote:
  I thought I'd try the Calendar Report out and I am
 getting strange results. I'm only using a db with 18
 individuals. 11 are deceased, 7 are living. When I do a
 Search for either Living=YES or Living=NO I get the
 correct results. When I do the Calendar List Report, I get
 only 3 deceased listed out of an expected 11. I get only the
 home (living) person listed out of an expected 7 living.
  
  I did File- Maintenance and Master List cleanup a
 couple times today, and again before  after testing
 this Calendar List Report. I can't see anything different
 about the way the dates appear on the individuals.
  
  How can the Search function work correctly but the
 Calendar not work??
  
  Legacy7 Deluxe v. 7.0.0.100 build date 17 Jul 2009
  Vista Home Premium x64 bit
  
  Marilyn
  
  
  --- On Sun, 8/2/09, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
 wrote:
  
   From: Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk
   Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Calendar Report Errors
   To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
   Date: Sunday, August 2, 2009, 4:01 PM
   Alan Jones wrote
Just wanted to let everyone know that
 realized I still
   had the March 13 build so I updated to the latest
 and things
   are working good know.  Not sure if there
 was a bug
   that was fixed or if in the process of converting
 my file
   with the new information the problem was resolved
 but either
   way it is working.
  
   I was just about to say that I had a *very vague*
 idea that
   someone had reported a bug with the Calendar a
 while ago and
   to ask what version you were using.  Perhaps
 my memory
   was not as wobbly as I thought it might be!
   -- Jenny M Benson
  
  
  
   Legacy User Group 
   guidelines:   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
   Archived 
   messages:   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
   Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
   To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Legacy User Group guidelines:
     http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
  Archived messages:
     http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
  Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
  To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
 
 
 
 
 Legacy User Group guidelines:   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived 
 messages:   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
 
 
 
 






Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





[LegacyUG] Report problem

2009-08-03 Thread Elizabeth Cunningham
I am going to visit a place where a couple of cousins used to live.  I 
printed out individual reports for them, but got none of the residences 
or any thing else listed in events.  How do I get these things to print?


 Elizabeth C



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Report problem

2009-08-03 Thread Connie Sheets

Report Options (bottom center of report pop-up screen)  Include Tab  click on 
Event Information

--- On Mon, 8/3/09, Elizabeth Cunningham drybo...@netreach.net wrote:

 From: Elizabeth Cunningham drybo...@netreach.net
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Report problem
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Date: Monday, August 3, 2009, 5:08 PM
 I am going to visit a place where a
 couple of cousins used to live.  I printed out
 individual reports for them, but got none of the residences
 or any thing else listed in events.  How do I get these
 things to print?
 
          Elizabeth C
 
 
 
 Legacy User Group guidelines:   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived 
 messages:   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree..com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
 
 
 
 







Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Report problem

2009-08-03 Thread C.G. Ouimet
In Report Options, did you check Event Information? 


C.G. Ouimet
Kingston, ON

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Elizabeth Cunningham
Sent: Monday August-03-09 01:08 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Report problem

I am going to visit a place where a couple of cousins used to live.  I
printed out individual reports for them, but got none of the residences or
any thing else listed in events.  How do I get these things to print?

  Elizabeth C



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Report problem

2009-08-03 Thread ronald ferguson

Elizabeth,
 
On just about every screen there is a Help button, often on the bottom right. 
These give a context help for the screen which you are on, and describe the 
options available and how to use them.


Ron Ferguson

_

Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_






 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:08:18 -0400
 From: drybo...@netreach.net
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Report problem

 I am going to visit a place where a couple of cousins used to live. I
 printed out individual reports for them, but got none of the residences
 or any thing else listed in events. How do I get these things to print?

 Elizabeth C

_
Windows Live Messenger: Thanks for 10 great years—enjoy free winks and 
emoticons.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Report problem

2009-08-03 Thread Elizabeth Cunningham

Thanks very much.  It worked.  I am using Legacy 6.

 Elizabeth C

Connie Sheets wrote:

Report Options (bottom center of report pop-up screen)  Include Tab  click on 
Event Information

--- On Mon, 8/3/09, Elizabeth Cunningham drybo...@netreach.net wrote:

  

From: Elizabeth Cunningham drybo...@netreach.net
Subject: [LegacyUG] Report problem
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Monday, August 3, 2009, 5:08 PM
I am going to visit a place where a
couple of cousins used to live.  I printed out
individual reports for them, but got none of the residences
or any thing else listed in events.  How do I get these
things to print?

 Elizabeth C






Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





[LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Chick Lewis
I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
My previous program was Family Tree Maker.  Following are two features
that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
possible duplicate.

2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
slightly different.  Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
with a different name or name change.  I have had several instances
where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
birth dates.

If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
incorporate them into the next upgrade.

Chick Lewis
California



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread ronald ferguson

Chick,
 
I wouldn't want the first and the second you can already do by using the 
SearchFindDetailed Search option.



Ron Ferguson

_

Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_






 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0700
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different. Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change. I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California

_
Windows Live Messenger: Thanks for 10 great years—enjoy free winks and 
emoticons.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Randolph Clark
The first is easily avoidable by selecting Link to existing person to see
if they're already there.
The second is next to the person's name if you've so customized the Index
View.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Chick Lewis cglewi...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker.  Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different.  Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change.  I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California



 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp






RE: [LegacyUG] Adopted Children

2009-08-03 Thread CE Wood
When you enter him as a child of you and your 1st wife, he will be a full,
but when you also enter him as a child of you and your 2nd wife, he will be
listed both as 1/2 and regular under each family because that's what he is.

He is a biological child of both you and your first wife, so you enter him
as a child of you and your 1st wife.  Then right click the list of children,
and click on Children's Settings...  Highlight his name and specify
Relationship to Father:  Biological, and Relationship to Mother:
Biological.

H will now show up a 1/2 child when you display the Family View for you and
your 2nd wife.

Since your 2nd wife has adopted him, you want him to show up as a full child
for this Family View.  To have him show as a full child of you and your 2nd
wife, you must also enter him as a child of you and your 2nd wife.  Legacy
will warn you that he is already a child of another family and ask if you
want to enter him again.  You do.  Then, in Children's Settings, specify
Biological and Adopted, respectively.

He will up show up twice under each family, once as 1/2 and once as full,
which is correct.  On his family view page, it will show he has two sets of
parents.

Hope this is clear.


CE


From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Jim Stapleton
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:31 PM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Adopted Children

Wife #1 and I had a son. She passed away and I married Wife #2 and we had
two daughters. Wife #2 legally adopted my son. When I display myself and
Wife #1, my son shows up and I indicated his relationship to myself and Wife
#1 as Biological. When I display myself and Wife #2 he doesn't show up
unless I view 1/2 kids. But, now under Wife #1 my two daughters show up as
1/2 kids (I think this is wrong but that's a seperate issue). Anyway, I
can't find anyway to get to a screen to show my sons relationship with Wife
#2 as adopted. At one time I linked him as an existing son, but he sometimes
shows up twice when 1/2 kids is turned on. Is this as clear as mud?
Does anyone have any suggestions?
 
Jim Stapleton
jima...@surewest.net
Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Adopted Children

2009-08-03 Thread Bruce Jones
Let me see if I can help.
When you select to show 1/2 children, the Family View will show all
children who are *linked* to at least one of the two main persons
(usually husband  wife).
The 1/2 indicator means that child is only linked to one of the two
main persons, not both.  It doesn't mean anything about a
relationship, just the linkage.
I don't think this affects any of the *reports*, just the *view*.
So if you want your son to appear on *reports* with wife #2, you need
to link him to you and wife #2 (in addition to you and wife #1).
When you select show 1/2 children, it *will*, in fact, cause your son
to appear twice: he is linked to you and wife #1 so that is the 1/2,
he is also linked to you and wife #2 so that is the other entry,
without the 1/2 indicator.  But him appearing twice is only on the
view screen, not in reports.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong on any of this.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Jim Stapletonjima...@surewest.net wrote:
 Wife #1 and I had a son. She passed away and I married Wife #2 and we had
 two daughters. Wife #2 legally adopted my son. When I display myself and
 Wife #1, my son shows up and I indicated his relationship to myself and Wife
 #1 as Biological. When I display myself and Wife #2 he doesn't show up
 unless I view 1/2 kids. But, now under Wife #1 my two daughters show up as
 1/2 kids (I think this is wrong but that's a seperate issue). Anyway, I
 can't find anyway to get to a screen to show my sons relationship with Wife
 #2 as adopted. At one time I linked him as an existing son, but he sometimes
 shows up twice when 1/2 kids is turned on. Is this as clear as mud?
 Does anyone have any suggestions?

 Jim Stapleton
 jima...@surewest.net

 Legacy User Group guidelines:
    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread 1familytree

Ron,

I have to agree with Chick. If you had ever used FTM you would realize how 
great time saving features those are.
The duplicate feature was really great and with a family who reuses the same 
names over and over again, I have to always check carefully.
The birth date sort in FTM is a simple click of a button, just like you can 
currently sort on RIN, First or Surname now in Legacy, the fact that you can 
do it as you suggested with the search function, is terribly time consuming.


Jay


--
From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:26 PM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See



Chick,

I wouldn't want the first and the second you can already do by using the 
SearchFindDetailed Search option.




Ron Ferguson

_

Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_







Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0700
Subject: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
From: cglewi...@gmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com

I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
possible duplicate.

2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
slightly different. Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
with a different name or name change. I have had several instances
where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
birth dates.

If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
incorporate them into the next upgrade.

Chick Lewis
California


_
Windows Live Messenger: Thanks for 10 great years—enjoy free winks and 
emoticons.

http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Rebecca Williams
I see what Chuck would like to do, as would I.  In index view, you can list
everyone by RIN, First name or surname.   There are five other fields that
could be sorted as simply as the RIN, First name and Surname sorts.  I can't
think, at the moment, why I would want to sort locations or sex on this
screen, however, the birth date and the death date sort would help to quicky
show duplicate names.

 

As an example:  Suppose I have a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and a T.
Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725.  I would be able to see at once that it is a
possibility that they might be the same person.  It would probably occur to
me that I need to check these names as possible duplicates. 

 

If I had many names in my family that began with the letters Ha, He, Hi,
Ho,  Hu the Hewes and Hughes surnames might not sort close enough together
for me to see this connection. 

 

 

 

Rebecca

 

From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Randolph Clark
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

 

The first is easily avoidable by selecting Link to existing person to see
if they're already there.
The second is next to the person's name if you've so customized the Index
View.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Chick Lewis cglewi...@gmail.com wrote:

I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
My previous program was Family Tree Maker.  Following are two features
that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
possible duplicate.

2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
slightly different.  Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
with a different name or name change.  I have had several instances
where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
birth dates.

If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
incorporate them into the next upgrade.

Chick Lewis
California



Legacy User Group guidelines:
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2279 - Release Date: 08/03/09
05:57:00





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread 1familytree
Randolph, 

The fact that FTM does it without you having to take the time to click on 
existing and look. Again, for those of us with large files, these features

 are efficient and worthwhile.


Jay 




From: Randolph Clark 
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com 
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See


The first is easily avoidable by selecting Link to existing person to see if 
they're already there.
The second is next to the person's name if you've so customized the Index View.


On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Chick Lewis cglewi...@gmail.com wrote:

  I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
  My previous program was Family Tree Maker.  Following are two features
  that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

  1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
  when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
  because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
  is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
  search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
  duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
  possible duplicate.

  2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
  alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
  often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
  slightly different.  Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
  name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
  with a different name or name change.  I have had several instances
  where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
  birth dates.

  If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
  incorporate them into the next upgrade.

  Chick Lewis
  California



  Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
  Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
  Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
  To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp









Legacy User Group guidelines: 

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages: 

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




RE: [LegacyUG] Adopted Children

2009-08-03 Thread CE Wood
If he is listed as full child in both families, which is normal when a child
has been adopted, then in the Children List of each Family View, he will
appear twice, once as Full child, once as 1/2 child.

On your Individual Report, he will be listed twice, once as the child of you
and your 1st wife, and once again as the child of you and your 2nd wife.  

You will probably want to check the option Show Child-parent relationships
found on the Include tab of Report Options.  Then the relationship will be
in parentheses after his name on the report.

For your 1st marriage, it will be:
Children:  Name (date-date) (Father: Biological) (Mother: Biological)

For your 2nd marriage, it will be:
Children: Name (date-date) (Father: Biological) (Mother: Adopted)

For the Family Report, he will show on each IF you have listed him as a full
child of both you and your 1st wife and of you and your 2nd wife.  You may
also want to check Child-parent relationships on the Include tab of Report
Options.

If you entered the adoption as an Event on your son's page, then you should
also check Events for children on the Include tab of Report Options.

Then, in each Family Report, under Children, son, the Event of his adoption
will be shown.


CE

-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of Bruce Jones
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 1:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Adopted Children

Let me see if I can help.
When you select to show 1/2 children, the Family View will show all
children who are *linked* to at least one of the two main persons
(usually husband  wife).
The 1/2 indicator means that child is only linked to one of the two
main persons, not both.  It doesn't mean anything about a
relationship, just the linkage.
I don't think this affects any of the *reports*, just the *view*.
So if you want your son to appear on *reports* with wife #2, you need
to link him to you and wife #2 (in addition to you and wife #1).
When you select show 1/2 children, it *will*, in fact, cause your son
to appear twice: he is linked to you and wife #1 so that is the 1/2,
he is also linked to you and wife #2 so that is the other entry,
without the 1/2 indicator.  But him appearing twice is only on the
view screen, not in reports.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong on any of this.

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Jim Stapletonjima...@surewest.net wrote:
 Wife #1 and I had a son. She passed away and I married Wife #2 and we had
 two daughters. Wife #2 legally adopted my son. When I display myself and
 Wife #1, my son shows up and I indicated his relationship to myself and
Wife
 #1 as Biological. When I display myself and Wife #2 he doesn't show up
 unless I view 1/2 kids. But, now under Wife #1 my two daughters show up as
 1/2 kids (I think this is wrong but that's a seperate issue). Anyway, I
 can't find anyway to get to a screen to show my sons relationship with
Wife
 #2 as adopted. At one time I linked him as an existing son, but he
sometimes
 shows up twice when 1/2 kids is turned on. Is this as clear as mud?
 Does anyone have any suggestions?

 Jim Stapleton
 jima...@surewest.net

 Legacy User Group guidelines:
    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2278 - Release Date: 08/02/09
17:56:00




Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread CE Wood
So you want to be able to sort everyone in your whole DB by birth date?

Take advantage of Legacy's secondary sorting in the Index.  Those with the
same name are sorted by  - no birth date, abt, bef, date, exact date.

Legacy stands apart in its capacity and facility with alternate names, which
is why I chose it over FTM, which limits not only the number of alternate
names, but how long they can be.

The way to use this to your advantage, as well as provide a record of name
variants, is to fully exploit Legacy's ability to have so many alternate
names.  That means any variation in name - first, middle, last.  It does
mean you need to enter all the alternate names, but then you have them, and
by choosing to Show Alternate Names, you can always find them.  

I have many medieaval persons who were know by many, many names as well as
many spelling variations and naming conventions (Elizabeth was
interchangeable with Isabel, for instance), and I put all of them in as
alternate names.  Then, unless it is a new variant, I can always find the
person in my DB, even if the research I am reading uses a name that is not
the variant that I have opted to designate the name.


CE


-Original Message-
From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
Of 1familytree
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 1:41 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

Ron,

I have to agree with Chick. If you had ever used FTM you would realize how 
great time saving features those are.
The duplicate feature was really great and with a family who reuses the same

names over and over again, I have to always check carefully.
The birth date sort in FTM is a simple click of a button, just like you can 
currently sort on RIN, First or Surname now in Legacy, the fact that you can

do it as you suggested with the search function, is terribly time consuming.

Jay


--
From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:26 PM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See


 Chick,

 I wouldn't want the first and the second you can already do by using the 
 SearchFindDetailed Search option.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0700
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different. Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change. I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California

 _
 Windows Live Messenger: Thanks for 10 great years-enjoy free winks and 
 emoticons.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/


 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


 



Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - 

Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Chick Lewis
Excellent example, Rebecca. Anyone who has ever used FTM can
appreciate these tools and see the value of them.  If you never used
them in FTM, then you don't know what you are missing.

Chick



On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Rebecca Williamsrebecca.w...@gmail.com wrote:
 I see what Chuck would like to do, as would I.  In index view, you can list
 everyone by RIN, First name or surname.   There are five other fields that
 could be sorted as simply as the RIN, First name and Surname sorts.  I can't
 think, at the moment, why I would want to sort locations or sex on this
 screen, however, the birth date and the death date sort would help to quicky
 show duplicate names.



 As an example:  Suppose I have a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and a T.
 Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725.  I would be able to see at once that it is a
 possibility that they might be the same person.  It would probably occur to
 me that I need to check these names as possible duplicates.



 If I had many names in my family that began with the letters Ha, He, Hi,
  Ho,  Hu the Hewes and Hughes surnames might not sort close enough together
 for me to see this connection.







 Rebecca



 From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
 Of Randolph Clark
 Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:43 PM

 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See



 The first is easily avoidable by selecting Link to existing person to see
 if they're already there.

 The second is next to the person's name if you've so customized the Index
 View.

 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Chick Lewis cglewi...@gmail.com wrote:

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker.  Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different.  Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change.  I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California



 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2279 - Release Date: 08/03/09
 05:57:00

 Legacy User Group guidelines:
    http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
    http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Chick Lewis
Ron,
Why wouldn't you want the program to detect a possible duplicate when
the name is entered?  It could be a great time-saver and its use
optional.  As to the SearchFind option, I think we had this
discussion once before.  It does work in a round-about sort of way but
is not the same thing and not near as effective.  Rebecca gave an
excellent example of this.

Chick


On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, ronald fergusonronfe...@msn.com wrote:

 Chick,

 I wouldn't want the first and the second you can already do by using the 
 SearchFindDetailed Search option.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0700
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different. Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change. I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California

 _
 Windows Live Messenger: Thanks for 10 great years—enjoy free winks and 
 emoticons.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/


 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Chick Lewis
CE,
Secondary sorting in the index does not sort the DB by birth date. It
sorts on names (or RIN) first. I would like to see sorting on birth
date completely independent of the name. Take a look at Rebecca's
example.  Sorting the index on another field should not pose a problem
for the programmers.
Chick


On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 2:30 PM, CE Woodwood...@msn.com wrote:
 So you want to be able to sort everyone in your whole DB by birth date?

 Take advantage of Legacy's secondary sorting in the Index.  Those with the
 same name are sorted by  - no birth date, abt, bef, date, exact date.

 Legacy stands apart in its capacity and facility with alternate names, which
 is why I chose it over FTM, which limits not only the number of alternate
 names, but how long they can be.

 The way to use this to your advantage, as well as provide a record of name
 variants, is to fully exploit Legacy's ability to have so many alternate
 names.  That means any variation in name - first, middle, last.  It does
 mean you need to enter all the alternate names, but then you have them, and
 by choosing to Show Alternate Names, you can always find them.

 I have many medieaval persons who were know by many, many names as well as
 many spelling variations and naming conventions (Elizabeth was
 interchangeable with Isabel, for instance), and I put all of them in as
 alternate names.  Then, unless it is a new variant, I can always find the
 person in my DB, even if the research I am reading uses a name that is not
 the variant that I have opted to designate the name.


 CE


 -Original Message-
 From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
 Of 1familytree
 Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 1:41 PM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

 Ron,

 I have to agree with Chick. If you had ever used FTM you would realize how
 great time saving features those are.
 The duplicate feature was really great and with a family who reuses the same

 names over and over again, I have to always check carefully.
 The birth date sort in FTM is a simple click of a button, just like you can
 currently sort on RIN, First or Surname now in Legacy, the fact that you can

 do it as you suggested with the search function, is terribly time consuming.

 Jay


 --
 From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
 Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 12:26 PM
 To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See


 Chick,

 I wouldn't want the first and the second you can already do by using the
 SearchFindDetailed Search option.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0700
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different. Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change. I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California

 _
 Windows Live Messenger: Thanks for 10 great years-enjoy free winks and
 emoticons.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/


 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: 

RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread ronald ferguson

Chuck,
 
We have had this discussion before, and I wonder why you have raised it agin. 
There is, as you know, a way of putting in an enhancement request on the Legacy 
Home Screen.
 
For me, I would not wish to use this facility, and it would, therefore be 
program bloat. BTW, you did not indicate it would be optional in your first 
post.
 
I do not agree with your comment regarding the use of search; if it is used 
properly, one can, for example, use wildcards in a name should you wish, and 
use it in conjunction with a date of birth. Much more useful and more pwerful 
then your proposal.
 
Even in the indexes you can get all the people will the same surname, in date 
of birth order by selecting the RIN of the individual you wish to use as 
standard and then click the surname button at the top.



Ron Ferguson

_

Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_






 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:58:19 -0700
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 Ron,
 Why wouldn't you want the program to detect a possible duplicate when
 the name is entered? It could be a great time-saver and its use
 optional. As to the SearchFind option, I think we had this
 discussion once before. It does work in a round-about sort of way but
 is not the same thing and not near as effective. Rebecca gave an
 excellent example of this.

 Chick


 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, ronald ferguson wrote:

 Chick,

 I wouldn't want the first and the second you can already do by using the 
 SearchFindDetailed Search option.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0700
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different. Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change. I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California
_
Windows Live Messenger: Celebrate 10 amazing years with free winks and 
emoticons.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread John S. Adams
One way to do this would be to create a Calendar List Report for all 
individuals in you file.  This will sort everyone by birth date.  You can 
save a PDF of this report have it on hand to refer to at any time.


John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA

--
From: Chick Lewis cglewi...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See


CE,
Secondary sorting in the index does not sort the DB by birth date. It
sorts on names (or RIN) first. I would like to see sorting on birth
date completely independent of the name. Take a look at Rebecca's
example.  Sorting the index on another field should not pose a problem
for the programmers.
Chick 





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread MJ Harper


The Legacy add-on, GenViewer, does all of these things, and more, and 
in micro-second time.  I'm just back to doing my genealogy after 
several years.  In the meantime I'd lost contact with my 
GenViewer.  So just last night I bought it again at $19.95, and will 
testify that it is WELL worth the price.  Look for it at the Legacy Store page.


Jo Harper


At 01:43 PM 8/3/2009, you wrote:
I see what Chuck would like to do, as would I.  In index view, you 
can list everyone by RIN, First name or surname.   There are five 
other fields that could be sorted as simply as the RIN, First name 
and Surname sorts.  I can't think, at the moment, why I would want 
to sort locations or sex on this screen, however, the birth date and 
the death date sort would help to quicky show duplicate names.


As an example:  Suppose I have a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and a 
T. Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725.  I would be able to see at once that 
it is a possibility that they might be the same person.  It would 
probably occur to me that I need to check these names as possible duplicates.


If I had many names in my family that began with the letters Ha, He, 
Hi,  Ho,  Hu the Hewes and Hughes surnames might not sort close 
enough together for me to see this connection.




Rebecca

From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On 
Behalf Of Randolph Clark

Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

The first is easily avoidable by selecting Link to existing person 
to see if they're already there.
The second is next to the person's name if you've so customized the 
Index View.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Chick Lewis 
mailto:cglewi...@gmail.comcglewi...@gmail.com wrote:

I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
My previous program was Family Tree Maker.  Following are two features
that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
possible duplicate.

2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
slightly different.  Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
with a different name or name change.  I have had several instances
where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
birth dates.

If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
incorporate them into the next upgrade.

Chick Lewis
California



Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2279 - Release Date: 
08/03/09 05:57:00


Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:

http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread ronald ferguson

Jo,
 
I also use GenViewer and concur with your remarks. I was however, concentrating 
my remarks on Legacy itself. At present with Genviewer I am doing a multiple 
criteria search for duplicates in a file containing some 2000 Fergusons or 
similar.

The trick, of course, lies in defining the specifics of the criteria in order 
to produce a manageable list.

Ron Ferguson

_

Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_






 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:43:06 -0700
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 From: mjohar...@comcast.net
 Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See


 The Legacy add-on, GenViewer, does all of these things, and more, and
 in micro-second time. I'm just back to doing my genealogy after
 several years. In the meantime I'd lost contact with my
 GenViewer. So just last night I bought it again at $19.95, and will
 testify that it is WELL worth the price. Look for it at the Legacy Store page.

 Jo Harper


 At 01:43 PM 8/3/2009, you wrote:
I see what Chuck would like to do, as would I. In index view, you
can list everyone by RIN, First name or surname. There are five
other fields that could be sorted as simply as the RIN, First name
and Surname sorts. I can't think, at the moment, why I would want
to sort locations or sex on this screen, however, the birth date and
the death date sort would help to quicky show duplicate names.

As an example: Suppose I have a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and a
T. Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725. I would be able to see at once that
it is a possibility that they might be the same person. It would
probably occur to me that I need to check these names as possible duplicates.

If I had many names in my family that began with the letters Ha, He,
Hi, Ho,  Hu the Hewes and Hughes surnames might not sort close
enough together for me to see this connection.



Rebecca

From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On
Behalf Of Randolph Clark
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

The first is easily avoidable by selecting Link to existing person
to see if they're already there.
The second is next to the person's name if you've so customized the
Index View.
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Chick Lewis
 wrote:
I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
possible duplicate.

2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
slightly different. Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
with a different name or name change. I have had several instances
where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
birth dates.

If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
incorporate them into the next upgrade.

Chick Lewis
California

_

Upgrade to Internet Explorer 8 Optimised for MSN.  

http://extras.uk.msn.com/internet-explorer-8/?ocid=T010MSN07A0716U


Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Mary Young
2009/8/3 John S. Adams oldbr...@hotmail.com:
 One way to do this would be to create a Calendar List Report for all
 individuals in you file.  This will sort everyone by birth date.
Unfortunately, there is no sort order within each birth date, so it's
near-impossible to spot matches in a large data set.
Mary Young



Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread 1familytree

John,

I have 170,000 people in my database. A calendar including everyone is 626 
pages. That's not handy.


Jay

--
From: John S. Adams oldbr...@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:33 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

One way to do this would be to create a Calendar List Report for all 
individuals in you file.  This will sort everyone by birth date.  You can 
save a PDF of this report have it on hand to refer to at any time.


John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA

--
From: Chick Lewis cglewi...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See


CE,
Secondary sorting in the index does not sort the DB by birth date. It
sorts on names (or RIN) first. I would like to see sorting on birth
date completely independent of the name. Take a look at Rebecca's
example.  Sorting the index on another field should not pose a problem
for the programmers.
Chick





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Chick Lewis
Ron,

I raised this question again because I think it is important and is a
strong feature if understood and used properly.  With all due respect,
(and I do respect your judgement, advice and excellent posts) your
suggestion of using wild cards in the name in conjunction with a birth
date search is at best a clumsy way of detecting possible duplicates.
In the case of Rebecca's example of a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and
a T. Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725, they would stand out as a possible
duplication by doing nothing more than sorting on birth date.  In
another example, I had a David Kerido and a floater Dave Crudo in my
data base, both with close, but not exactly the same birth dates. When
I sorted the index on birth date, the similarity was evident.  Upon
further investigation they turned out to be the same person.

Chick


On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM, ronald fergusonronfe...@msn.com wrote:

 Chuck,

 We have had this discussion before, and I wonder why you have raised it agin. 
 There is, as you know, a way of putting in an enhancement request on the 
 Legacy Home Screen.

 For me, I would not wish to use this facility, and it would, therefore be 
 program bloat. BTW, you did not indicate it would be optional in your first 
 post.

 I do not agree with your comment regarding the use of search; if it is used 
 properly, one can, for example, use wildcards in a name should you wish, and 
 use it in conjunction with a date of birth. Much more useful and more pwerful 
 then your proposal.

 Even in the indexes you can get all the people will the same surname, in date 
 of birth order by selecting the RIN of the individual you wish to use as 
 standard and then click the surname button at the top.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:58:19 -0700
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 Ron,
 Why wouldn't you want the program to detect a possible duplicate when
 the name is entered? It could be a great time-saver and its use
 optional. As to the SearchFind option, I think we had this
 discussion once before. It does work in a round-about sort of way but
 is not the same thing and not near as effective. Rebecca gave an
 excellent example of this.

 Chick


 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, ronald ferguson wrote:

 Chick,

 I wouldn't want the first and the second you can already do by using the 
 SearchFindDetailed Search option.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0700
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different. Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change. I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California
 _
 Windows Live Messenger: Celebrate 10 amazing years with free winks and 
 emoticons.
 http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/157562755/direct/01/


 Legacy User Group guidelines:
   

Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Chick Lewis
Why use an add-on to perform a simple task that could easily part of
the program?

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:43 PM, MJ Harpermjohar...@comcast.net wrote:

 The Legacy add-on, GenViewer, does all of these things, and more, and in
 micro-second time.  I'm just back to doing my genealogy after several years.
  In the meantime I'd lost contact with my GenViewer.  So just last night I
 bought it again at $19.95, and will testify that it is WELL worth the price.
  Look for it at the Legacy Store page.

 Jo Harper


 At 01:43 PM 8/3/2009, you wrote:

 I see what Chuck would like to do, as would I.  In index view, you can
 list everyone by RIN, First name or surname.   There are five other fields
 that could be sorted as simply as the RIN, First name and Surname sorts.  I
 can't think, at the moment, why I would want to sort locations or sex on
 this screen, however, the birth date and the death date sort would help to
 quicky show duplicate names.

 As an example:  Suppose I have a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and a T.
 Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725.  I would be able to see at once that it is a
 possibility that they might be the same person.  It would probably occur to
 me that I need to check these names as possible duplicates.

 If I had many names in my family that began with the letters Ha, He, Hi,
  Ho,  Hu the Hewes and Hughes surnames might not sort close enough together
 for me to see this connection.



 Rebecca

 From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf
 Of Randolph Clark
 Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:43 PM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

 The first is easily avoidable by selecting Link to existing person to
 see if they're already there.
 The second is next to the person's name if you've so customized the Index
 View.
 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Chick Lewis
 mailto:cglewi...@gmail.comcglewi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker.  Following are two features
 that I would like to see incorporated into Legacy:

 1. The ability for Legacy to recognize a possible duplicate person
 when he/she is being entered. I search for duplicates quite often
 because I have inadvertenly entered a person without realizing he/she
 is already in my database. I know how to use the merge function and
 search for duplicates, but it would be nice if Legacy would catch a
 duplication when the name is being entered and warn that it is a
 possible duplicate.

 2. The ability to sort/search the index by birth date as well as
 alphabetically or by RIN. This is one feature of FTM I really miss. I
 often found people who were the same, but had their names spelled
 slightly different.  Comparing individuals by birth date rather than
 name will sometimes reveal the existence of an un-connected individual
 with a different name or name change.  I have had several instances
 where I have been able to connect individuals to families by comparing
 birth dates.

 If enough of us request these features, maybe the powers to be will
 incorporate them into the next upgrade.

 Chick Lewis
 California



 Legacy User Group guidelines:


 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:


 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




 No virus found in this incoming message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.42/2279 - Release Date: 08/03/09
 05:57:00

 Legacy User Group guidelines:


 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:


 http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe:
 http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asphttp://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




 Legacy User Group guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Chick Lewis
John... That would be a complicated way to perform a simple task...


On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:33 PM, John S. Adamsoldbr...@hotmail.com wrote:
 One way to do this would be to create a Calendar List Report for all
 individuals in you file.  This will sort everyone by birth date.  You can
 save a PDF of this report have it on hand to refer to at any time.

 John S. Adams
 Hermosa Beach, CA

 --
 From: Chick Lewis cglewi...@gmail.com
 Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 3:13 PM
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

 CE,
 Secondary sorting in the index does not sort the DB by birth date. It
 sorts on names (or RIN) first. I would like to see sorting on birth
 date completely independent of the name. Take a look at Rebecca's
 example.  Sorting the index on another field should not pose a problem
 for the programmers.
 Chick




 Legacy User Group guidelines:  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
 Archived messages:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
 Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
 To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp







Legacy User Group guidelines:
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread jeffma...@orthohelp.com

MJ Harper wrote:

The Legacy add-on, GenViewer, does all of these things, and more, and
in micro-second time.  I'm just back to doing my genealogy after
several years.  In the meantime I'd lost contact with my
GenViewer.  So just last night I bought it again at $19.95, and will
testify that it is WELL worth the price.  Look for it at the Legacy
Store page.
Jo Harper


Is the Genviewer Legacy the same as the stand alone Genviewer and Genviewer 
lite?


Jeff 





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





RE: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread ronald ferguson

Chick,
 
I guess I did not express myself too well, the wildcard was suggested as an 
additional feature.
 
Let us be realistic, one doesn't need any names at all to search by birth date, 
if two or more people are born on 16 Jan 1725 the odds are they are the same 
person or twins. This is not the problem. The problem arises mainly when the 
dates are different or no dates are available for at least one of the people.
 
In the first case additional proof is needed to confirm, or otherwise, but if 
the names are miles apart in the list, and they could be if there is no date of 
birth, they may well not even be noticed if the name is different - unless 
wildcards are used. For example I commonly use F?rg* for my surname because of 
all the variations (and even that doesn't cover all of them!).




Ron Ferguson

_

Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_






 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:30:25 -0700
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 Ron,

 I raised this question again because I think it is important and is a
 strong feature if understood and used properly. With all due respect,
 (and I do respect your judgement, advice and excellent posts) your
 suggestion of using wild cards in the name in conjunction with a birth
 date search is at best a clumsy way of detecting possible duplicates.
 In the case of Rebecca's example of a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and
 a T. Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725, they would stand out as a possible
 duplication by doing nothing more than sorting on birth date. In
 another example, I had a David Kerido and a floater Dave Crudo in my
 data base, both with close, but not exactly the same birth dates. When
 I sorted the index on birth date, the similarity was evident. Upon
 further investigation they turned out to be the same person.

 Chick


 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM, ronald ferguson wrote:

 Chuck,

 We have had this discussion before, and I wonder why you have raised it 
 agin. There is, as you know, a way of putting in an enhancement request on 
 the Legacy Home Screen.

 For me, I would not wish to use this facility, and it would, therefore be 
 program bloat. BTW, you did not indicate it would be optional in your 
 first post.

 I do not agree with your comment regarding the use of search; if it is used 
 properly, one can, for example, use wildcards in a name should you wish, and 
 use it in conjunction with a date of birth. Much more useful and more 
 pwerful then your proposal.

 Even in the indexes you can get all the people will the same surname, in 
 date of birth order by selecting the RIN of the individual you wish to use 
 as standard and then click the surname button at the top.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:58:19 -0700
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 Ron,
 Why wouldn't you want the program to detect a possible duplicate when
 the name is entered? It could be a great time-saver and its use
 optional. As to the SearchFind option, I think we had this
 discussion once before. It does work in a round-about sort of way but
 is not the same thing and not near as effective. Rebecca gave an
 excellent example of this.

 Chick


 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:26 PM, ronald ferguson wrote:

 Chick,

 I wouldn't want the first and the second you can already do by using the 
 SearchFindDetailed Search option.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0700
 Subject: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 I have been using Legacy for almost a year now (since V7 came out.)
 My previous program was Family Tree Maker. Following are two features
 that I would like 

Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread MJ Harper

At 05:14 PM 8/3/2009, you wrote:

MJ Harper wrote:

The Legacy add-on, GenViewer, does all of these things, and more, and
in micro-second time.  I'm just back to doing my genealogy after
several years.  In the meantime I'd lost contact with my
GenViewer.  So just last night I bought it again at $19.95, and will
testify that it is WELL worth the price.  Look for it at the Legacy
Store page.
Jo Harper
Is the Genviewer Legacy the same as the stand alone Genviewer and 
Genviewer lite?

Jeff


Yes, it is, but it says that the version sold through Legacy is in 
some way configured particularly for Legacy.  I've used all three, 
and really appreciate them.


jo




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread John S. Adams

Mary,
If you look carefully at the Calendar List, you will see that, within each 
date, the names are sorted by birth year.


John S. Adams
Hermosa Beach, CA

--
From: Mary Young m...@cmy.org.uk
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 4:02 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See


2009/8/3 John S. Adams oldbr...@hotmail.com:

One way to do this would be to create a Calendar List Report for all
individuals in you file. This will sort everyone by birth date.

Unfortunately, there is no sort order within each birth date, so it's
near-impossible to spot matches in a large data set.
Mary Young






Legacy User Group guidelines: 
  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
  http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp





Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Chick Lewis
Ron,

I agree the wildcard could be an additional feature, but a wild card
search for the name Querido, which is the one I was looking for, would
never turn up either Kerido or Crudo. However, those two names with
similar birth dates stood out when the index was sorted on birth date
and immediately raised a flag.

When I am trying to find an elusive ancestor and know his birth date
or approximate birth date, I use FTM to sort my DB by birth, and then
look for a likely name in that date range.

On occasion I have found a name that wasn't even close to the one I
was looking for, but I recognized it as a family name. Further
investigation found that person was living with a relative and using
their name. Subsequent records proved that person was the missing
ancestor.

I agree that it can be done in Legacy using a date range in search and
find, but just sorting the db by birth date is so much easier and
simpler.

As I'm sure you are aware, some cultures use the mother's maiden name
as the family name and as you trace back in time you will find that
they are sometimes interchanged. Surnames can also change from country
to country and in some places didn't even exist before 1800.  When
tracing Jewish ancestry it gets even more complicated and multiple
surnames may be found in the same family. I have seen cases where two
brothers have different surnames.

The ability to sort on birth date is a proven tool.

Chick



On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:44 PM, ronald fergusonronfe...@msn.com wrote:

 Chick,

 I guess I did not express myself too well, the wildcard was suggested as an 
 additional feature.

 Let us be realistic, one doesn't need any names at all to search by birth 
 date, if two or more people are born on 16 Jan 1725 the odds are they are the 
 same person or twins. This is not the problem. The problem arises mainly when 
 the dates are different or no dates are available for at least one of the 
 people.

 In the first case additional proof is needed to confirm, or otherwise, but if 
 the names are miles apart in the list, and they could be if there is no date 
 of birth, they may well not even be noticed if the name is different - unless 
 wildcards are used. For example I commonly use F?rg* for my surname because 
 of all the variations (and even that doesn't cover all of them!).




 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 _





 
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:30:25 -0700
 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
 From: cglewi...@gmail.com
 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com

 Ron,

 I raised this question again because I think it is important and is a
 strong feature if understood and used properly. With all due respect,
 (and I do respect your judgement, advice and excellent posts) your
 suggestion of using wild cards in the name in conjunction with a birth
 date search is at best a clumsy way of detecting possible duplicates.
 In the case of Rebecca's example of a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and
 a T. Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725, they would stand out as a possible
 duplication by doing nothing more than sorting on birth date. In
 another example, I had a David Kerido and a floater Dave Crudo in my
 data base, both with close, but not exactly the same birth dates. When
 I sorted the index on birth date, the similarity was evident. Upon
 further investigation they turned out to be the same person.

 Chick


 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM, ronald ferguson wrote:

 Chuck,

 We have had this discussion before, and I wonder why you have raised it 
 agin. There is, as you know, a way of putting in an enhancement request on 
 the Legacy Home Screen.

 For me, I would not wish to use this facility, and it would, therefore be 
 program bloat. BTW, you did not indicate it would be optional in your 
 first post.

 I do not agree with your comment regarding the use of search; if it is used 
 properly, one can, for example, use wildcards in a name should you wish, 
 and use it in conjunction with a date of birth. Much more useful and more 
 pwerful then your proposal.

 Even in the indexes you can get all the people will the same surname, in 
 date of birth order by selecting the RIN of the individual you wish to use 
 as standard and then click the surname button at the top.



 Ron Ferguson

 _

 Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/
 View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
 http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
 For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
 http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
 

Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See

2009-08-03 Thread Don Varner
Chick,

Just curious.  Have you made use of the Suggest a new feature on the home
tab?  It would seem to me that if enough people suggested this then it would
be consider by Legacy.

Don

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Chick Lewis cglewi...@gmail.com wrote:

 Ron,

 I agree the wildcard could be an additional feature, but a wild card
 search for the name Querido, which is the one I was looking for, would
 never turn up either Kerido or Crudo. However, those two names with
 similar birth dates stood out when the index was sorted on birth date
 and immediately raised a flag.

 When I am trying to find an elusive ancestor and know his birth date
 or approximate birth date, I use FTM to sort my DB by birth, and then
 look for a likely name in that date range.

 On occasion I have found a name that wasn't even close to the one I
 was looking for, but I recognized it as a family name. Further
 investigation found that person was living with a relative and using
 their name. Subsequent records proved that person was the missing
 ancestor.

 I agree that it can be done in Legacy using a date range in search and
 find, but just sorting the db by birth date is so much easier and
 simpler.

 As I'm sure you are aware, some cultures use the mother's maiden name
 as the family name and as you trace back in time you will find that
 they are sometimes interchanged. Surnames can also change from country
 to country and in some places didn't even exist before 1800.  When
 tracing Jewish ancestry it gets even more complicated and multiple
 surnames may be found in the same family. I have seen cases where two
 brothers have different surnames.

 The ability to sort on birth date is a proven tool.

 Chick



 On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:44 PM, ronald fergusonronfe...@msn.com wrote:
 
  Chick,
 
  I guess I did not express myself too well, the wildcard was suggested as
 an additional feature.
 
  Let us be realistic, one doesn't need any names at all to search by birth
 date, if two or more people are born on 16 Jan 1725 the odds are they are
 the same person or twins. This is not the problem. The problem arises mainly
 when the dates are different or no dates are available for at least one of
 the people.
 
  In the first case additional proof is needed to confirm, or otherwise,
 but if the names are miles apart in the list, and they could be if there is
 no date of birth, they may well not even be noticed if the name is different
 - unless wildcards are used. For example I commonly use F?rg* for my surname
 because of all the variations (and even that doesn't cover all of them!).
 
 
 
 
  Ron Ferguson
 
  _
 
  Tutorials: Programme of adding videos commenced
  http://www.fergys.co.uk/
  View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
  http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
  For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
  http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
  _
 
 
 
 
 
  
  Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:30:25 -0700
  Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Things I Would Like to See
  From: cglewi...@gmail.com
  To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
 
  Ron,
 
  I raised this question again because I think it is important and is a
  strong feature if understood and used properly. With all due respect,
  (and I do respect your judgement, advice and excellent posts) your
  suggestion of using wild cards in the name in conjunction with a birth
  date search is at best a clumsy way of detecting possible duplicates.
  In the case of Rebecca's example of a Thomas Hughes b. 16 Jan 1725 and
  a T. Wilson Hewes b. 16 Jan 1725, they would stand out as a possible
  duplication by doing nothing more than sorting on birth date. In
  another example, I had a David Kerido and a floater Dave Crudo in my
  data base, both with close, but not exactly the same birth dates. When
  I sorted the index on birth date, the similarity was evident. Upon
  further investigation they turned out to be the same person.
 
  Chick
 
 
  On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:32 PM, ronald ferguson wrote:
 
  Chuck,
 
  We have had this discussion before, and I wonder why you have raised it
 agin. There is, as you know, a way of putting in an enhancement request on
 the Legacy Home Screen.
 
  For me, I would not wish to use this facility, and it would, therefore
 be program bloat. BTW, you did not indicate it would be optional in your
 first post.
 
  I do not agree with your comment regarding the use of search; if it is
 used properly, one can, for example, use wildcards in a name should you
 wish, and use it in conjunction with a date of birth. Much more useful and
 more pwerful then your proposal.
 
  Even in the indexes you can get all the people will the same surname,
 in date of birth order by selecting the RIN of the individual you wish to
 use as standard and then click the surname button at the top.
 
 
 
  Ron Ferguson
 
  

[LegacyUG] Index Sorting

2009-08-03 Thread Marlene Williamson
I have been following the discussion with interest and suggest the following
potential use for User Ids and index lists
I have more than 150 men in my database named William Snell, most of whom
have either no firm dates, or just a baptism or just a burial. Its really
difficult trying to retrieve the right one as the name list does not sort by
baptism date only by birth date, and that necessitates putting in
unnecessary data in the birth field - currently using EST 1755 for example.
However, I could create a User ID of WS1755 for this individual (or WS1755?
if the early date was a guess) AND one was able to sort on User ID in the
Index view, then I could see my individuals in the right order.. Then I
wouldn't have to use EST in the birth field at all...

I will suggest it to the powers that be. I guess if one could sort on user
ID, then it would also be the same process to enable a sort on baptism,
which would solve the problem.

Marlene
Pirongia, New Zealand





Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp