Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Contributor Terms review

2010-08-27 Thread Florian Lohoff
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Lars Aronsson wrote:
 This is true, but it's also true that what OSM wants is to have
 something as similar as possible to GPL, but applied to maps.

I dont - Am i OSM?

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compatibility of new license with old

2010-08-27 Thread Rob Myers

On 08/27/2010 04:43 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:

Hello,

I would like to know if the new license is compatible with the old one.
will we be able to use CC-SA-2.0 licensed data or we will have to get
new contracts with the donators of data?
for example, we have gotten much of the data for Kosovo donated under
written contract for CC-SA-20, many users helped import this data into
osm.
even if those users agree to relicense, it does not mean that the
original data can be relicensed.


(I am not a lawyer, this is not legal advice.)

The new licence is incompatible with the old. BY-SA 2.0 data cannot be 
placed under it without the rightsholder agreeing to relicence.


But the new licence is more compatible with other licences (including 
the old) where you want to produce mash ups and other works that 
combine data from more than one source.


- Rob.

___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk