Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-cz] czech republic: data wrongly marked as ODbL compatible was Re: Hromadné importy změna licence
Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote: Hello, I went through Pavel's changesets and I think I've found all the tainted data. Here is what I did: 1) I went through Pavel's changesets (except the big ones already identified as ODbL compatible imports). 2) Counted the number of created or modified nodes that had tags place=* or railway=station,halt,tram_stop. This gave me 17 changesets that have at least 10 such nodes. 3) Then I checked them manually and identified the mass imports. Pavel's tainted changesets incompatible with ODbL+CT: 720911, 720263, 187327, 189654, 188101, 197352, 593595 Special case of changeset 473203: contains mostly import of forests, but also 12 place nodes from wikipedia,etc., only 3 of them (27716, 27734, 27739) are still in the database. I would suggest we keep this changeset and remove only those 3 offending nodes when the database comes from read-only mode. In the process I've found another changeset with import of places from wikipedia,geonames,etc. performed by Bilbo. This should be marked for removal as well: 312633 Hello, I've deleted the incompatible nodes. Now, I wonder what's going to happen next? Will Pavel accept ODbL+CT in his profile? Or is it no longer possible? As far as I know there isn't a list of incompatible changesets yet (only the other way around - list of compatible changesets of decliners). But we need it at least because of the Bilbo's changeset 312633. Where should this be directed? Once Pavel's account is marked ODbL+CT compatible and the new list with incompatible changesets (total 8 changesets), 720911, 720263, 187327, 189654, 188101, 197352, 593595, 312633, is set into place, we no longer need to override Pavel's other bulk imports listed on [1]. Best regards, Petr Morávek aka Xificurk [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quick_History_Service/Changeset_Lists#Pavel_imports_in_Czech_Republic signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-cz] czech republic: data wrongly marked as ODbL compatible was Re: Hromadné importy změna licence
There is a list of incompatbile changesets here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quick_History_Service/Changeset_Lists#Tainted_Changesets IMHO the best would be for Pavel to accept, but that naturally depends on him. Simon Am 04.04.2012 11:53, schrieb Petr Morávek [Xificurk]: Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote: Hello, I went through Pavel's changesets and I think I've found all the tainted data. Here is what I did: 1) I went through Pavel's changesets (except the big ones already identified as ODbL compatible imports). 2) Counted the number of created or modified nodes that had tags place=* or railway=station,halt,tram_stop. This gave me 17 changesets that have at least 10 such nodes. 3) Then I checked them manually and identified the mass imports. Pavel's tainted changesets incompatible with ODbL+CT: 720911, 720263, 187327, 189654, 188101, 197352, 593595 Special case of changeset 473203: contains mostly import of forests, but also 12 place nodes from wikipedia,etc., only 3 of them (27716, 27734, 27739) are still in the database. I would suggest we keep this changeset and remove only those 3 offending nodes when the database comes from read-only mode. In the process I've found another changeset with import of places from wikipedia,geonames,etc. performed by Bilbo. This should be marked for removal as well: 312633 Hello, I've deleted the incompatible nodes. Now, I wonder what's going to happen next? Will Pavel accept ODbL+CT in his profile? Or is it no longer possible? As far as I know there isn't a list of incompatible changesets yet (only the other way around - list of compatible changesets of decliners). But we need it at least because of the Bilbo's changeset 312633. Where should this be directed? Once Pavel's account is marked ODbL+CT compatible and the new list with incompatible changesets (total 8 changesets), 720911, 720263, 187327, 189654, 188101, 197352, 593595, 312633, is set into place, we no longer need to override Pavel's other bulk imports listed on [1]. Best regards, Petr Morávek aka Xificurk [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quick_History_Service/Changeset_Lists#Pavel_imports_in_Czech_Republic ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Creative-Commons 4.0 (first draft)
I guess the number 1 requirement for CC4, from an OSM point of view, is that it be interoperable with the ODbL. Firstly so that those who are building applications using OSM data today would be able to keep doing what they are doing even if OSM started using CC4 in future, and secondly so that any such switchover would not have to delete any non-compliant data (such as imports where permission has been granted for ODbL but not for CC). This is something that Open Data Commons would have to take part in too, since Creative Commons cannot create an ODbL-to-CC migration path on their own. -- Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
