On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Diane Mercier <diane.merc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > I reiterate. It is the responsibility of OSM Foundation to instruct his > community of his CC 4.0 interpretation as it has done for the CC 2.0 and CC > 3.0 > And in my humble opinion, the tiles and the BD licenses should updates to > CC 4.0 to reduce proliferation of license, etc. Note that this is a substantially different task for 4.0 than for 3.0, because 4.0 (particularly BY-SA) now includes a database copyleft clause. Assessing how the ODBL and CC BY-SA 4.0 database clauses interact will be challenging. OSM/Open Data Commons could simplify the problem by declaring that CC 4.0 is a "compatible license" under ODBL 4.4(a)(iii), but there would still be some complexities to work through. Luis -- Luis Villa Deputy General Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6810 NOTICE: *This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity.*
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
