Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using OSM data without modifying - are there any guidelines?

2015-06-29 Thread John Bergmayer
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 17:55:08 +0200, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:

 A condition of having a valid licence to use OSM data is providing a suitable 
 way of pointing out the conditions of use of said data to your 
 users/customers/etc (which is relaxed a bit for produced works). Don't 
 provide that, you don't have a valid licence with all the related 
 consequences. If you have information that this obligation is not being 
 fulfilled by distributors of OSM based products, please report it to the 
 OSMF/LWG.

The problem being, of course, assuming there is no property right, there's only 
a contract, not a license. Contracts are not enforceable against third parties. 

A person who makes OSM data available without conditioning it on acceptance of 
the same contract, may indeed be in violation of *his* contract. But the people 
who take that data aren't bound by anything. If someone obtains a stash of OSM 
data, stripped of all attribution and legalese, then, upstream, someone may 
have violated a contract. But unless there's some sort of intellectual property 
right, people who obtain OSM data in this way aren't bound by anything.

This is why IP rights are so valuable! You don’t require a continuous chain of 
legal documents.  If there is an IP right, then if the licensing info is 
stripped off, then a user has no right to the data to begin with. 

On the other hand, if everyone is being a good actor and, when they are further 
distributing OSM data, attaching the ODbL, there is a contract.  But I’m not 
sure who the contract is between—a third party can’t enter into a contract on 
behalf of OSM.  So the contract would probably be between the third-party 
distributor and whoever takes the data from it.  However, OSM might be able to 
enforce that contract, as a third-party beneficiary.  (Third parties who are 
the intended beneficiaries of a contract can sometimes enforce contracts they 
are not parties to—this is very different than third parties being bound by 
someone else’s contract.)

[I’m a new subscriber to this list, so apologies if this message isn’t 
formatted or threaded properly.  Also, this is just based on US law and common 
law generally.  Details might be different in civil law jurisdictions. Finally, 
while IAAL, this is not legal advice, and no one reading this is my client. ]

—
john

___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk


Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using OSM data without modifying - are there any guidelines?

2015-06-29 Thread John Bergmayer
On Jun 29, 2015, at 11:18 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:

 It's possible they may be. OSMF is based in England  Wales, and the
 Contributor Terms say This Agreement shall be governed by English law
 without regard to principles of conflict of law.
 
 Under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, a person who is not
 a party to a contract (a 'third party') may in his own right enforce a term
 of the contract if... the term purports to confer a benefit on him”.

Right, same in the US.  As I mentioned, intended third party beneficiaries may 
enforce a contract against one of the parties.  But a third party cannot be 
bound by a contract entered into by others.

--
j...@bergmayer.net






___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk