Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for Wiki Loves Monuments
2011/5/15 Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com: On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Funny, based on my last question, the OSM will not be able to use cc-by-sa data in the future. Some say that we aren't able to use CC-BY-SA data now because we cannot provide proper attribution. I would be willing to looking into that, did anyone raise this issue with wikipedia or creative commons? Does it even matter now? AFAIK there is wikipedia derived publications which cite every single author that contributed. Cheers, Martin ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for Wiki Loves Monuments
Hi, Mike Dupont wrote: Funny, based on my last question, the OSM will not be able to use cc-by-sa data in the future. Some say that we aren't able to use CC-BY-SA data now because we cannot provide proper attribution. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33 ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for Wiki Loves Monuments
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Funny, based on my last question, the OSM will not be able to use cc-by-sa data in the future. Some say that we aren't able to use CC-BY-SA data now because we cannot provide proper attribution. I would be willing to looking into that, did anyone raise this issue with wikipedia or creative commons? Does it even matter now? mike ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
[OSM-legal-talk] license for Wiki Loves Monuments
This september will be a relative large event from Wikimedia-side across europe: Wiki Loves Monuments. It is a public photo contest around monuments (overview of the cultural heritage, also small houses) and we will create lists of monuments in Wikipedia: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011 We (Wikipedia-people) will ask different official side for the object lists they have as starting point for us. This lists will contains a lot of objects (10.000) with adresses, descriptions, coordinates (with luck), year of build, architect, My question is now under which license or terms we should ask for these list so that they later reusable for OpenStreetMap. Would a CC-BY-SA ok or should it be ODBL? Greatings Tim alias Kolossos P.S: Are there other ideas to involve OSM in this project? ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for Wiki Loves Monuments
On 05/14/2011 06:01 PM, Mike Dupont wrote: Funny, based on my last question, the OSM will not be able to use cc-by-sa data in the future. Hence the question, I imagine. :-) PDDL/CC0 for the data would avoid this question, or dual-licencing ODbL/BY-SA might be good. - Rob. ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for Wiki Loves Monuments
On 14 May 2011 18:49, Kolossos tim.al...@s2002.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: This september will be a relative large event from Wikimedia-side across europe: Wiki Loves Monuments. It is a public photo contest around monuments (overview of the cultural heritage, also small houses) and we will create lists of monuments in Wikipedia: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011 We (Wikipedia-people) will ask different official side for the object lists they have as starting point for us. This lists will contains a lot of objects (10.000) with adresses, descriptions, coordinates (with luck), year of build, architect, My question is now under which license or terms we should ask for these list so that they later reusable for OpenStreetMap. Would a CC-BY-SA ok or should it be ODBL? One additional thing OSM asks is that the coordinates be derived from a free source and not Google Maps and the like. I'm just mentioning it because it's often a surprise for wikipedians who want to contribute to OSM something they previously made for wikipedia. We had a discussion about the Wiki Loves Monuments project on osm Polish forums in the context of collaboration between Wikimedia local chapter and the osm to-be local chapter, and this Google question came up again. Cheers ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
