Italian translation of LFS 6.1
Hi all I am pleased to announce that the italian translation of LFS 6.1 is available at: http://it.tldp.org/lfs/lfs/ Giulio Daprelà - Linux user #356310 LFS user #11031 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: jhalfs: Ready to go.
El Lunes, 17 de Octubre de 2005 15:06, Dan Nicholson escribió: I'm sure you knew this, but remember that set -e does not break for simple errors in while loops. Haven't looked at jhalfs to know if this is the case or not. Just wanted to give a heads up. Yeah, I read the bash man page before implement the change ;-) set -e is used only in the scripts self-generated from the books commands and, at least for now, there is no loops in the LFS instructions. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: jhalfs: Ready to go.
Seth W. Klein wrote:
case $i in *groff)
Manuel, do you mind if we switch over to this method of string
comparisons in jhalfs? David's method is nice, but the syntax Seth
suggests is easier to read and doesn't result in forks. Also it doesn't
require a specific string format.
For example:
'if [ ${i:4:11} = bootscripts -o ${i:4:6} = kernel ] ; then
do something
else
do something else
fi'
becomes:
'case $i in
*bootscripts* | *kernel*)
do something
;;
*)
do something else
;;
esac'
Can't think why I didn't think of this before, seeing that jhalfs' input
parser already uses the case syntax...
Oh well.
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: jhalfs: Ready to go.
El Lunes, 17 de Octubre de 2005 21:53, Jeremy Huntwork escribió: Seth W. Klein wrote: case $i in *groff) Manuel, do you mind if we switch over to this method of string comparisons in jhalfs? David's method is nice, but the syntax Seth suggests is easier to read and doesn't result in forks. Also it doesn't require a specific string format. Look nice and more simple to maintain. Feel free to do any changes you agree with, after that you are the jhalfs creator ;-) -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: jhalfs: Ready to go.
M.Canales.es wrote: El Lunes, 17 de Octubre de 2005 22:08, M.Canales.es escribió: after that That should read after all, my English sucks :-# No worries. I understood you. After living in NYC for several years, my Spanglish isn't so bad. :) -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
kbd - sparc
Hello I've obtained the following errorc while compiling Kbd-1.12 gcc -c -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -DDATADIR=\/usr/share /kbd\ kbdrate.c kbdrate.c: In function 'KIOCSRATE_ioctl_ok': kbdrate.c:167: error: 'struct kbd_rate' has no member named 'period' kbdrate.c:169: error: 'struct kbd_rate' has no member named 'period' kbdrate.c:170: error: 'struct kbd_rate' has no member named 'period' kbdrate.c:180: error: 'struct kbd_rate' has no member named 'period' make[1]: *** [kbdrate.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/kbd-1.12/src' make: *** [all] Error 1 root:/sources/kbd-1.12$ also the patch: patch -Np1 -i ../kbd-1.12-sparc_kbdrate-1.patch has been rejected: root:/sources/kbd-1.12$ patch -Np1 -i ../kbd-1.12-sparc_kbdrate-1.patch patching file src/psffontop.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch. 4 out of 4 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file src/psffontop.c.rej root:/sources/kbd-1.12$ How can fix this problem? I'm using book: Linux From Scratch - Version 7.0-cross-lfs-20051005-Sparc64-Multilib Jacek Herold -- INTERIA.PL | Kliknij po wiecej http://link.interia.pl/f18c1 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: kbd - sparc
On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, jaca wrote: Hello I've obtained the following errorc while compiling Kbd-1.12 gcc -c -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -DDATADIR=\/usr/share /kbd\ kbdrate.c kbdrate.c: In function 'KIOCSRATE_ioctl_ok': kbdrate.c:167: error: 'struct kbd_rate' has no member named 'period' also the patch: patch -Np1 -i ../kbd-1.12-sparc_kbdrate-1.patch has been rejected: root:/sources/kbd-1.12$ patch -Np1 -i ../kbd-1.12-sparc_kbdrate-1.patch patching file src/psffontop.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch. You've got the wrong patch! src/psffontop.c is in the gcc4_fixes patch, the sparc_kbdrate patch alters src/kbdrate.c to use kbdrate_s.rate. Ken -- das eine Mal als Trag?die, das andere Mal als Farce-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re[2]: kbd - sparc
Hello Ken, Tuesday, October 18, 2005, 12:00:49 AM, you wrote: KM On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, jaca wrote: Hello I've obtained the following errorc while compiling Kbd-1.12 gcc -c -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -DDATADIR=\/usr/share /kbd\ kbdrate.c kbdrate.c: In function 'KIOCSRATE_ioctl_ok': kbdrate.c:167: error: 'struct kbd_rate' has no member named 'period' also the patch: patch -Np1 -i ../kbd-1.12-sparc_kbdrate-1.patch has been rejected: root:/sources/kbd-1.12$ patch -Np1 -i ../kbd-1.12-sparc_kbdrate-1.patch patching file src/psffontop.c Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Skipping patch. KM You've got the wrong patch! src/psffontop.c is in the gcc4_fixes KM patch, the sparc_kbdrate patch alters src/kbdrate.c to use KM kbdrate_s.rate. KM Ken Sorry it was my fault. I've just typed the instructions from book but i have the same patch for gcc fix with name of kbrate patch. I've applied the proper patch and everything is OK -- Pozdrawiam, Jacek Herold -- INTERIA.PL | Kliknij po wiecej http://link.interia.pl/f18c1 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Glibc and gcc-4
Andrew Benton wrote: Hello people, I just updated my copy of glibc-cvs and for the first time in ages it passed all the tests. I don't remember the last time it passed all the tests. For the last couple of weeks there's been a problem with perl hanging when I ran configure, that's fixed too. I used gcc-4.0.2 and didn't apply any patches to glibc. I just thought you might be interested Date/Time? :-) -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
