Re: LFS 6.1 schedule

2005-06-29 Thread Matthew Burgess

Matthew Burgess wrote:
I'll be doing a 6.1 pre-release tomorrow night 
(~19:00-20:00 UTC).


Well, the astute amongst you will have noticed this never happened! 
Archaic and I are busy doing a final review of the text.  This should be 
all done by tomorrow night...honest!


Given that slippage, I'm aiming at an official 6.1 release for Saturday 
9th July.


Regards,

Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LFS 6.1 schedule

2005-06-28 Thread Matthew Burgess

Archaic wrote:


Those are contradictory. 1586 required command changes.


Of course it did.  I was just testing you :)  Errm, what can I say? 
Whoops :)

--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LFS 6.1 schedule

2005-06-27 Thread M.Canales.es
El Lunes, 27 de Junio de 2005 19:53, Matthew Burgess escribió:
 Hi folks,

 After a very long delay [1] it looks as if we really are nearly there.
 There are two bugs remaining to be fixed (1582 and 1586) which are
 simply textual changes.  I'll be doing a 6.1 pre-release tomorrow night
 (~19:00-20:00 UTC).  I'd like to get 6.1 out this weekend, 

Good :-))

I will start the last PDF review just after that two bugs will be fixed.


-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:   http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:   http://es.tldp.org
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LFS 6.1 schedule

2005-06-27 Thread Archaic
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
 
 There are two bugs remaining to be fixed (1582 and 1586) which are 
 simply textual changes.

 Editors, I think it goes without saying, strictly no package upgrades or 
 command changes now please.

Those are contradictory. 1586 required command changes. 1582 is done in
both trunk and testing. 1586 awaits review for testing.


-- 
Archaic

Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page