Upcoming util-linux

2005-08-03 Thread steve crosby
Just a heads up - util-linux 2.13 will remove several items, as per
the following changelog entry for pre1

Changes:
GNU autoconf/automake/libtool are now used for building. schedutils
were added. Support for curses implementations other than ncurses was
removed. The arch, passwd, rescuept, and setfdprm programs were
removed. mkminix-0.1/ was removed. Misc fixes and documentation
updates were made. A translation was added for the vi locale. The
translations for the ca, de, fi, fr, it, nl, ru, and tr locales were
updated.

This may impact some apps that use arch in their configure stage (I
know at least perl used arch at some stage)
 
-- -
Steve Crosby
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Upcoming util-linux

2005-08-03 Thread Ken Moffat
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, steve crosby wrote:

 Just a heads up - util-linux 2.13 will remove several items, as per
 the following changelog entry for pre1

 Changes:
 GNU autoconf/automake/libtool are now used for building. schedutils
 were added. Support for curses implementations other than ncurses was
 removed. The arch, passwd, rescuept, and setfdprm programs were
 removed. mkminix-0.1/ was removed. Misc fixes and documentation
 updates were made. A translation was added for the vi locale. The
 translations for the ca, de, fi, fr, it, nl, ru, and tr locales were
 updated.

 This may impact some apps that use arch in their configure stage (I
 know at least perl used arch at some stage)


 Thanks for the heads-up Steve.  I know my scripts use arch to decide on
architecture-specific variations, but a quick look at the man page says
it's equivalent to 'uname -m' so shouldn't be a big deal anywhere.

Ken
-- 
 das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce

--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Upcoming util-linux

2005-08-03 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 12:46:15PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
 
  Thanks for the heads-up Steve.  I know my scripts use arch to decide on
 architecture-specific variations, but a quick look at the man page says
 it's equivalent to 'uname -m' so shouldn't be a big deal anywhere.

And if need be, a wrapper named arch that calls uname -m could be
created. I guess it just depends on how much stuff breaks with arch
missing.

-- 
Archaic

Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Upcoming util-linux

2005-08-03 Thread Archaic
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:54:34PM +1200, steve crosby wrote:
 Just a heads up - util-linux 2.13 will remove several items, as per
 the following changelog entry for pre1

Thanks, Steve. It's been BZ'd.

-- 
Archaic

Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Upcoming util-linux

2005-08-03 Thread Greg Schafer
steve crosby wrote:

 Just a heads up - util-linux 2.13 will remove several items, as per
 the following changelog entry for pre1
 
 Changes:
 GNU autoconf/automake/libtool are now used for building.

Yay! However, the autoconfigury in this pre1 release is busted. Most of
the --enable-xxx and -disable-xxx switches don't work.

In configure.ac for the AC_ARG_ENABLE switches, the developer has used
$withval when he should be using $enableval. This is covered in the
Autoconf manual.

I've sent a bug report upstream.

Regards
Greg
--
http://www.diy-linux.org/

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Upcoming util-linux

2005-08-03 Thread Greg Schafer
Greg Schafer wrote:

  - `setfdprm' is gone, yet `/etc/fdprm' is still installed. This looks
like a bug methinks.
 
  - these symlinks are installed in /sbin all pointing to `initctl':
`display-services' `need' `provide'. Bug? Prolly.
 
  - these symlinks are installed in /sbin all pointing to `shutdown':
`fastboot' `fasthalt' `halt' `reboot'. Bug? Prolly.

There is some missing `if BUILD_INIT' stuff in login-utils/Makefile.am
explaining those last 2 bugs. I've sent another bug report upstream
covering all of the above.

Regards
Greg
--
http://www.diy-linux.org/

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page