Kernel panic -not syncing
Hi All, While doing customized installation, after the completion of installation, we are getting on error Kernel panic - not syncing... what may be the reason for this.. help me out in this regard. Prasad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:31 AM To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: lfs-support Digest, Vol 728, Issue 1 Send lfs-support mailing list submissions to lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of lfs-support digest... Today's Topics: 1. Missing gmp.h for Binutils in Chapter 6 (Michael Kipper) 2. Re: Missing gmp.h for Binutils in Chapter 6 (Ken Moffat) 3. LFS-6.1: tst-clock2 problem while make check but not problem when running manually ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) 4. Re: Problem with hotplug.functions (Joseph M Dupre (AVAB Inc.)) 5. kernel config (Joseph M Dupre (AVAB Inc.)) 6. Re: kernel config (Ken Moffat) 7. ??-??? (Dowdy V. Flustering) 8. Chapter 5.22 ncurses won't compile (Kevin Connor) 9. sysklogd question (David Fix) 10. Re: Chapter 5.22 ncurses won't compile (Ken Moffat) 11. Re: sysklogd question (steve crosby) 12. RE: sysklogd question (David Fix) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 09:11:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Kipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Missing gmp.h for Binutils in Chapter 6 To: LFS Support lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Hello, I'm building LFS for my athlon64 natively, from FC4. I first built a standalone gcc-3.4.4/glibc-2.3.5 toolchain to build with, and then proceeded as normal, using --disable-multilib and --build/host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu where appropriate to get rid of the x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu annoyance. After glibc in chapter 6, on attempting to build binutils, after configuring like so: ../binutils-2.16.1/configure \ --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \ --prefix=/usr \ --libdir=/usr/lib64 \ --libexecdir=/usr/lib64/binutils \ --enable-shared \ --disable-nls \ --disable-multilib I make: make -C /usr/build/binutils-build tooldir=/usr And I get: make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/build/binutils-build' Configuring in libiberty configure: loading cache ./config.cache checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for makeinfo... makeinfo checking for perl... perl checking build system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ar... ar checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib... ranlib checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. See `config.log' for more details. So I check config.log, to see: snip configure:2260: checking for correct version of gmp.h configure:2273: gcc -c -g -O2 conftest.c 15 configure:2263:17: gmp.h: No such file or directory snip So I check for it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] makelfs]# find /mnt/lfs | grep gmp.h /mnt/lfs/usr/tools/include/linux/igmp.h /mnt/lfs/usr/tools/include/netinet/igmp.h /mnt/lfs/usr/include/linux/igmp.h /mnt/lfs/usr/include/netinet/igmp.h And check to see where it should have come from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] makelfs]# for archive in `find sources -name *.tar.bz2`; \ do tar jtf $archive | grep gmp.h; \ done linux-libc-headers-2.6.11.2/include/linux/igmp.h linux-2.6.11.2/include/linux/igmp.h glibc-2.3.5/include/gmp.h glibc-2.3.5/inet/netinet/igmp.h glibc-2.3.5/stdlib/gmp.h Lastly, making sure I didn't miss anything, I check the build log: [EMAIL PROTECTED] makelfs]# grep gmp.h /mnt/lfs/install.log checking for correct version of gmp.h... yes /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 netinet/igmp.h /tools/include/netinet/igmp.h checking for correct version of gmp.h... no /tools/bin/install -c -m 644 netinet/igmp.h /usr/include/netinet/igmp.h checking for correct version of gmp.h... no The only time anything called *gmp.h was installed was in the two iterations of glibc, where no installation of gmp.h was attempted, only igmp.h Why wasn't this installed? For reference, glibc was configured as follows: echo libc_cv_forced_unwind=yes config.cache \ echo libc_cv_c_cleanup=yes config.cache \ echo slibdir=/usr/lib64 configparms \ ../glibc-2.3.5/configure \ --config-cache \ --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \
Re: Kernel panic -not syncing
DNS, Prasad(GE Consumer Finance, Consultant) wrote: Hi All, While doing customized installation, after the completion of installation, we are getting on error Kernel panic - not syncing... what may be the reason for this.. help me out in this regard. Perhaps you didn't enable support for an important feature when you compiled your kernel? Did you enable support for the filesystem that you are asking the kernel to mount? Does the kernel work properly if you use it to boot your host system? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Problem on installing Xorg
Hi folks, FC3 Host BLFS 6.1 X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 MD5 sum: 8131cd7ea1e4566e6e05c438a93fcfe1 # md5sum /mnt/lfs/sources/X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 8131cd7ea1e4566e6e05c438a93fcfe1 /mnt/lfs/sources/X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 8131cd7ea1e4566e6e05c438a93fcfe1 MD5sum found matched. On chroot environment installed dependencies first Libpng-1.2.8 Fontconfig-2.3.2 FreeType-2.1.10 Expat-1.95.8 All went throught without problem Fontconfig Dependencies installing FreeType-2.1.10 and expat-1.95.8 also went through without problem Optional - Linux-PAM-0.80 Not installed Expat Dependencies Optional Check not installed. Steps performed :- root:/sources$ tar jxf X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 root:/sources$ cd xc root:/sources/xc$ sed -i '/^SUBDIRS =/s/ etc$//' programs/Xserver/Xprint/Imakefile root:/sources/xc$ pushd config/util make -f Makefile.ini lndir /sources/xc/config/util /sources/xc ln -s ../../include X11 cc -o lndir -O -I. lndir.c make: cc: Command not found root:/sources/xc/config/util$ cp -v lndir /usr/bin/ cp: cannot stat `lndir': No such file or directory root:/sources/xc/config/util$ Please advise how to fix the problem. TIA B.R. SL -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Gcc build failing in chapter 6.11
Hi. Im using Version SVN-20050816 of the Linux From scratch. I'm using LiveCD for LFS 6.1. When i try to configure glibc i get this error: configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile See `config.log' for more details. Here is the command i use: # ../glibc-2.3.5/configure --prefix=/usr --disable-profile \ --enable-add-ons --enable-kernel=2.6.0 \ --libexecdir=/usr/lib/glibc I've included the configure output and config.log ...martin configure.output Description: Binary data config.log Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: cross-compiling x86 64 i586 Howto?
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Jean Razack wrote: Hi, my host system is a x86_64 and I want to compile LFS 6.1 with Suse 9.3 Professional. I have installed the required software (32-bit + 64-bit) over yast. Now I dont know what for modification and/or prarameter I musst use, to get the 32 bit applications? thx Hi Jean, I'm not sure if I understand your question correctly, but I think you are asking how to build a system with 32-bit libraries in lib and 64-bit in lib64 ? I'll point you to the multilib part of cross-lfs at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/cross-lfs/ and also to Ryan's scripts at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ryan/scripts/cross-lfs/ Basically, if you are doing a multilib build you have to build the libraries twice (32-bit first, then 64-bit) using some of the host/build/target modifiers. You may also need e.g. the multilib genscripts patch for binutils. Disclaimer - I haven't used a multilib host, I'm currently on pure64 (64-bit only, in lib) cross-compiled from i686. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Gcc build failing in chapter 6.11
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Martin Olsen wrote: When i try to configure glibc i get this error: configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile See `config.log' for more details. Here is the command i use: # ../glibc-2.3.5/configure --prefix=/usr --disable-profile \ --enable-add-ons --enable-kernel=2.6.0 \ --libexecdir=/usr/lib/glibc I've included the configure output and config.log ...martin Martin, your /tools/bin/gcc is broken. This the first compile in chroot, it's where packages that got linked against the host system start to give problems. From your config.log |configure:2361: checking for gcc |configure:2377: found /tools/bin/gcc |configure:2387: result: gcc |configure:2651: checking for suffix of object files |configure:2672: gcc -c conftest.c 5 |../glibc-2.3.5/configure: line 2673: /tools/bin/gcc: No such file or directory |configure:2675: $? = 127 I was going to point you to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#any-no-such-file but I'm not sure it is specific enough - /tools/bin/gcc is using something from the host. First, confirm that readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter shows /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 Then, on the host run ldd /tools/bin/gcc to see what it is linked against. I'm slightly surprised that you got into chroot - usually, /tools/bin/env trips people up if they have things linked against the host. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Gcc build failing in chapter 6.11
2005/8/18, Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED]: but I'm not sure it is specific enough - /tools/bin/gcc is using something from the host. First, confirm that readelf -l /tools/bin/gcc | grep interpreter shows /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 No it's linked against /lib/ld-config.so.2 ... Guess i'll have to do it all over again! Thanks for the answer. ...martin -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Rotating log files
Hey folks, any quick hints on how to rotate my logfiles? :) I can't remember how it was done in the past. :( Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
RE: Rotating log files
Hey folks, any quick hints on how to rotate my logfiles? :) I can't remember how it was done in the past. :( You know what? I just remembered. :P Logrotate. :) I'll look around and find something for it. :) Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Rotating log files
On 8/18/2005 08:52, David Fix wrote: Hey folks, any quick hints on how to rotate my logfiles? :) I can't remember how it was done in the past. :( There's logrotate and also, I've used lumberjack which worked ok. ~Jason -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
RE: Rotating log files
Yea, pretty funny, eh? :) ~Jason Definitely. :) Man pages usually have something like that in there. :) Anyhow, I couldn't find lumberjack for download, so I opted for a simple logrotate available at http://iain.cx/src/logrotate/. That worked for me. :) Dave -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
spec file modification problem, cross-compiling
Hi, I try a cross-compiling (x86_64 i386). My first question is, is it correct that gcc print-file specs print /usr/lib64/ ? Then the other is that in $LFS/tools/lib/ isnt a ld-linux-so.2 file. But the file is in /lib/. My dynamic Linker is /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. What I can do ?!? thx -- GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis! 2000 MB nur 2,99, Flatrate ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: spec file modification problem, cross-compiling
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Jean Razack wrote: Hi, I try a cross-compiling (x86_64 i386). OK, if you want to build a wholly 32-bit LFS from a 64-bit Suse you can *try* using the 32-bit options from Ryan's cross-lfs scripts that I referred to in my previous reply. That is, give it the host/target/build options, but only build 32-bit wherever Ryan builds 32 and 64 stuff. Clearly, at some point just passing -m32 to a multilib gcc will work, but I've no experience of what you are trying to achieve. If what you want is a fast 32-bit-only machine running LFS-6.1, why not build from a 32-bit host system (with a 32-bit kernel) and save yourself a lot of aggravation ? My first question is, is it correct that gcc print-file specs print /usr/lib64/ ? Sounds correct for the Suse multilib gcc (your host). Then the other is that in $LFS/tools/lib/ isnt a ld-linux-so.2 file. But the file is in /lib/. The straight x86 book is not wholly appropriate to building x86 from a multilib x86_64. In theory, you don't need to build cross- tools because your host's gcc can build them correctly with -m32. But, you need to be clear what you are trying to achieve. Is /lib/ld-linux.so.2 the file installed by Suse for 32-bit applications ? Did you install ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 into either /tools/lib or /tools/lib64 ? Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Gcc build failing in chapter 6.11
2005/8/18, Doug Ronne [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 8/18/05, Martin Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. Im using Version SVN-20050816 of the Linux From scratch. I'm using LiveCD for LFS 6.1. When i try to configure glibc i get this error: configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile See `config.log' for more details. Hey! I got that same error last night. Do you have optimization on? -Doug -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Stright from the book. I must have missed something somewhere, i just through the pages quikcly and copy pasted the green fields... Did it all from scratch and it works like a charm now! ... _for_ now! ...olsen PS. Congrats on the LXF stuff! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Chapter 5.22 ncurses won't compile
On Wed, 17 Aug 2005 22:07:28, Ken Moffat wrote: Somehow, your PATH hs got screwed up - /tools/bin/g++ is the version of g++ that should have been used. I think you've come back to this and missed something when you set up your environment ? If you aren't sure exactly where you restarted, or if you don't agree that is why your PATH got changed, run ldd on example binaries to make sure they are linking against /tools/lib/whatever. I think that my Kubuntu 5.04 host system was messing me up somehow. I started over using an LFS live disk as a host system and didn't mount the partitions that contain the Kubuntu system. I completed Chapter 5 without any problem. Once I had $LFS/tools set up I was able to return the the more comfortable and familiar Kubuntu system and complete Chapter 6. Tomorrow I hope to have a bootable LFS system. Thanks for the help -Kevin Connor -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Problem on installing Xorg
Hi Uli, Tks for your advice. just do ln -s gcc /usr/bin/cc In chroot environment root:/$ ln -s gcc /usr/bin/cc (no printout) root:/$ ls -l /usr/bin/cc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 2005-08-19 06:16 /usr/bin/cc - gcc Xorg-6.8.2 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/x/installing.html#xorg went through without problem except the last step as follow; ... root:/sources/xc/config/util$ cp -v lndir /usr/bin/ `lndir' - `/usr/bin/lndir' root:/sources/xc/config/util$ mkdir ../xcbuild cd ../xcbuild lndir ../xc ../xc: No such file or directory root:/sources/xc/config/xcbuild$ root:/sources/xc/config/xcbuild$ ls BUILD config doc LABEL lib nls programs README README.crypto registry xf86Date.h ../xc may not find it. I think full path /sources/xc may find it. Please advise how to fix this last step. Also, building X while in chroot is normally not recommended, you should be booted into your new shiny LFS system for doing that. I'm trying to build all essential packages such as xorg, firefox, lynx, PPP-2.4.3, WvDial-1.54.0, RP-PPPoE-3.5, GTK+-1.2.10, GTK+-2.6.7 first before booting to LFS 6.1. So I don't need to print the whole BLFS 6.1 book and download all packages in advance or burn them on CDs. B.R. SL -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: (no subject)
Pubudu wrote: Hi . This problem occurred when i was building LFS when i entered the command in my chrooted environment expect -c spawn ls it displayed the message The system has no more ptys. Ask your system administrator to create more Then i tried the same command in my host system (fedora core 3) .It executed correctly. Can anyone help me to create ptys in my chrooted environment. - This mail sent is sent from ENTC WebMail system using IMP: http://horde.org/imp/ Did you see this? http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html#no-ptys At one point I remember getting this message even after reviewing this FAQ. I was building the system in X. I didn't have the problem if I didn't run X. I guess X must have used the ptys in my instance. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
No rule to make target `install'
Hi folks, Installing GLib-1.2.10 problem http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/general/glib.html root:/sources/glib-1.2.10$ patch -Np1 -i ../glib-1.2.10-gcc34-1.patch ./configure --prefix=/usr make root:/sources/glib-1.2.10$ make install chmod -v 755 /usr/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0.0.10 make: *** No rule to make target `install'. Stop. root:/sources/glib-1.2.10$ make check make: *** No rule to make target `check'. Stop. root:/sources/glib-1.2.10$ make install chmod -v 755 /usr/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0.0.10 make: *** No rule to make target `install'. Stop. Please advise how to fix it. TIA B.R. SL -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: hi, every one , i have a problem when i compile gcc in chapter 6
i have solved this problem. rm -rf gcc-build ; rm -fr gcc-3.4.4; then i compile the gcc again, it successed. thanks all 2005/8/16, Doug Ronne [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 8/15/05, guo tie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:79:19: stdio.h: No such file or directory ../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:82:23: sys/types.h: No such file or directory ../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:85:19: errno.h: No such file or directory ../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:92:20: string.h: No such file or directory ../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:93:20: stdlib.h: No such file or directory ../../gcc-3.4.4/gcc/tsystem.h:94:20: unistd.h: No such file or directory ... well those are all installed by glibc, so either something went wrong with the glibc installation in chapter 6, or the compiler can't find it. Are the files there? If not, the glibc installation failed. If they are there, then I'd check all the toolchain adjustments. -Doug -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Problem on installing Xorg - solved
Hi Chris, /usr/bin you're supposed to run another command before mkdir ../xcbuild. Oh sorry, I missed popd. Problem now solved. root:/sources/xc$ mkdir ../xcbuild cd ../xcbuild lndir ../xc .. ../../xc/util/misc: ../../xc/util/memleak: root:/sources/xcbuild$ root:/sources/xc/config/xcbuild$ ls BUILD config doc LABEL lib nls programs README README.crypto registry xf86Date.h Tks B.R. SL -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Problem with dummy.c
Hello - this is my first attempt at LFS. (And my first post to this mailing list.) I'm wanting to build LFS for a very small system I'm putting together. I've always wanted to try LFS so I figured this would be the perfect opportunity. The system is an embedded computer and will only need a very basic environment. I've been reading the LFS Stable PDF for quite a while now, following along with each step as carefully as I can. Everything was going smoothly until I got to the point of doing a test compile on dummy.c This is what I'm getting: /mnt/lfs/sources $ cc dummy.c /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: warning: ld-linux.so.2, needed by /tools/lib/libc.so.6, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /tools/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /tools/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /tools/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /tools/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /tools/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /tools/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /tools/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /tools/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I'm really not sure what the problem is. I went back through the specfile step very carefully, and tried to compile again - but I got the same result. I also tried gcc instead of cc, but I got the same result. I'm using my Desktop system to build my LFS system. I have a 1.5GB spare partition set aside for the LFS build. My Desktop is running Gentoo. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Problem with dummy.c
Verify that your /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 exists. -- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] LFS User # 2577 Registered Linux User # 299986 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Problem with dummy.c
Verify that your /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 exists. /mnt/lfs/sources $ ls -al /tools/lib/ld-* -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 352811 Aug 19 00:50 /tools/lib/ld-2.3.4.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 lfs lfs 11 Aug 19 00:50 /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 - ld-2.3.4.so -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
OT Re: X libraries or include files not found - gtk+-1.2.10
Randy McMurchy wrote: Please folks, trim the original stuff from the messages before you reply. It is a PIA to have to scroll down hundreds of lines to read one line of original message. OT: I know it doesn't fix the problem, but it does help a bit when you are absolutely sick of telling people to trim their replies. :-) Give the extension QuoteCollapse a try. http://quotecollapse.mozdev.org/ -- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Problem with dummy.c
Verify that your /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 exists. /mnt/lfs/sources $ ls -al /tools/lib/ld-* -rwxr-xr-x 1 lfs lfs 352811 Aug 19 00:50 /tools/lib/ld-2.3.4.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 lfs lfs 11 Aug 19 00:50 /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2 - ld-2.3.4.so I think I'll probably have to start over. I was just looking at my BASH history. I found a typo in one of my commands. It didn't report an error so I didn't notice it. After compiling binutils, I accidentally typed make -C ld LIB_PATH=/toosl/lib (toosl instead of tools) I went on to compile/install gcc, install the Linux headers, patch/compile/install glibc ... then, per the directions, I removed binutils-build. I doubt I can just unarchive binutils, recompile, and then retype that command I screwed up. Or maybe I can? But I'm thinking since everything else needed binutils, the mistake is probably deeply embedded in gcc and glibc. So I might as well rm -rf everything and start over. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
