Re: [lfs-support] martin
hi... Need your Help again. In 6.25. E2fsprogs-1.42.7 /make check... i got
this error
f_mmp_garbage: repair MMP when it is corrupted: failed
5 tests succeeded 123 tests failed
Tests failed: d_loaddump d_special_files f_16384_block f_8192_block
f_bad_disconnected_inode f_bad_local_jnl f_badbblocks f_baddir f_baddir2
f_baddotdir f_badinode f_badjour_indblks f_badjourblks f_badorphan
f_badprimary f_badroot f_badsymlinks f_badtable f_bbfile f_bbinode
f_big_sparse f_bitmaps f_clear_xattr f_crashdisk f_dir_bad_mode f_dirlink
f_dup f_dup2 f_dup3 f_dup4 f_dup_ba f_dup_de f_dup_de2 f_dup_resize
f_dupdot f_dupfsblks f_dupsuper f_ea_checks f_end-bitmap f_eofblocks
f_expand f_ext_journal f_ext_zero_len f_extent_bad_node
f_extent_interior_start_lblk f_extents f_extents2 f_extra_journal
f_fast_symlink_extents f_file_acl_high f_filetype f_full_bg f_h_badnode
f_h_badroot f_h_normal f_h_reindex f_h_unsigned f_holedir f_holedir2 f_hurd
f_illbbitmap f_illibitmap f_illitable f_illitable_flexbg f_imagic
f_imagic_fs f_invalid_bad_inode f_jnl_32bit f_jnl_64bit f_jnl_errno
f_journal f_lotsbad f_lpf f_lpf2 f_lpffile f_messy_inode f_miss_blk_bmap
f_miss_journal f_misstable f_mke2fs2b f_mmp f_mmp_garbage f_noroot
f_okgroup f_orphan f_orphan_dotdot_ft f_orphan_extents_inode
f_orphan_indirect_inode f_overfsblks f_preen f_recnect_bad f_reconnect
f_rehash_dir f_resize_inode f_salvage_dir f_selinux f_special_ea
f_summary_counts f_uninit_ext_past_eof f_uninit_last_uninit f_unsorted_EAs
f_unused_itable f_valid_ea_in_inode f_zero_group f_zero_inode_size
f_zero_super i_e2image m_bigjournal m_dasd_bs m_extent_journal m_large_file
m_meta_bg m_mkfs_overhead m_mmp m_no_opt m_raid_opt m_std m_uninit
r_inline_xattr r_move_itable r_resize_inode t_mmp_1on t_mmp_2off
make[1]: *** [test_post] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/e2fsprogs-1.42.7/build/tests'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
What should i do? Your Help will much be appreciated..
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:03:11 +0800
Carl Martin Bacus simple.mart...@gmail.com wrote:
root:/sources/glibc-build# for tz in etcetera southamerica
northamerica europe africa antarctica \
asia australasia backward pacificnew solar87 solar88 solar89 \
systemv; do
zic -L /dev/null
-d $ZONEINFO
-y sh yearistype.sh ${tz}
zic -L /dev/null
-d $ZONEINFO/posix -y sh yearistype.sh ${tz}
zic -L leapseconds -d $ZONEINFO/right -y sh yearistype.sh ${tz}
done
[snip]
root:/sources/glibc-build# cp -v zone.tab iso3166.tab $ZONEINFO
'zone.tab' - '/usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab'
'iso3166.tab' - '/usr/share/zoneinfo/iso3166.tab'
root:/sources/glibc-build# zic -d $ZONEINFO -p America/New_York
zic: Can't link from /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/New_York to
/usr/share/zoneinfo/posixrules: No such file or directory
rply ASAP.. tnx
You REALLY shouldn't tell people when to reply to you. What if William
lives a quarter of the World away from you and has just gone to bed?
In fact, judging by the timezone stamps in your e-mail headers, you two
are *ten* timezones apart. So, in reality, William is half a World away
from you and is probably sleeping right now.
To answer your question: you forgot the backslashes at the end of some
of the lines. It should look like this:
... blah blah; do
zic -L /dev/null \
-d $ZONEINFO \
-y sh yearistype.sh ${tz}
zic -L /dev/null \
-d $ZONEINFO/posix -y sh yearistype.sh ${tz}
blah blah ...
The backslash at the end of the line means that the command does not
end, but continues on the next line. When you ommited that, the shell
thought that the second command of the loop was to execute the program
`-d' with $ZONEINFO as its argument. And that is where all those errors
came out of.
--
You don't need an AI for a robot uprising.
Humans will do just fine.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] martin
On Aug 31, 2013, at 4:02, Carl Martin Bacus simple.mart...@gmail.com wrote: What should i do? Your Help will much be appreciated.. Running the tests with an ext file system or not? Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] martin
i run it with ext file system I've already done recompiling the E2fsprogs-1.42.7 but still i got the same error.. On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 5:40 PM, William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.orgwrote: On Aug 31, 2013, at 4:02, Carl Martin Bacus simple.mart...@gmail.com wrote: What should i do? Your Help will much be appreciated.. Running the tests with an ext file system or not? Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] martin
On Aug 31, 2013, at 4:02 AM, Carl Martin Bacus wrote: 5 tests succeeded 123 tests failed Run the tests and again and post a test log somewhere. There should be messages as to why the tests fail. Also, check that all of the virtual kernel filesystems are mounted. Sincerely, William Harrington-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Check 0.9.9 error LFS 7.3: pthread.so problem
thanks On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.frwrote: Le 31/08/2013 05:08, Mitchell Verter a écrit : I get this error when I try to make Check0.9.9 [...] Have you read and applied http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/errata/stable? Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] Check 0.9.9 error LFS 7.3: pthread.so problem
thanks :) it works :) From: Mitchell Verter mitchell.ver...@gmail.com To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Sent: Sunday, September 1, 2013 12:36 AM Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Check 0.9.9 error LFS 7.3: pthread.so problem thanks On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Pierre Labastie pierre.labas...@neuf.fr wrote: Le 31/08/2013 05:08, Mitchell Verter a écrit : I get this error when I try to make Check0.9.9 [...] Have you read and applied http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/errata/stable? Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] 6.17 GCC-4.7.2 error :(
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Pwn Me wrote: now i'm stuck with this kind of errors. when i type make -k check.. it appears: === libitm Summary === # of unexpected failures15 # of unresolved testcases14 # of unsupported tests1 make[4]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm/testsuite' make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm/testsuite' make[3]: Entering directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm' true DO=all multi-do # make make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm' make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm' make[1]: *** [check-target-libitm] Error 2 make[1]: Target `check-target' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [do-check] Error 2 make: Target `check' not remade because of errors. i'm afraid to proceed to next step because of this.. can you help me guys please? :( thanks by the way. Did you log it ? If so, which tests were marked as FAIL ? If you didn't, it is possible there might have been other failures in other directories. But assuming these libitm failures are the only problem - is there anything in gcc-4.7.2/libitm/testsuite which records what failed ? You might do better looking from the host system, where you will have 'less' or 'view'. Errors in libitm seem to be uncommon. What is your processor, your host distro, and your kernel version ? I've had a look at google - your results look surprisingly close to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-06/msg00695.html which was on OSX not linux. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] LFS 7.3: 6.9 GLibC2.17 undefined hidden symbol `__strcasecmp_avx'
Thanks again for all the help. This happens when I do the make on GLib for the second time. Did I screw up the toolchain somewhere? if so, what would I have to rebuild? Thanks Mitchell gcc -shared -static-libgcc -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-dynamic-linker=/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -B/sources/glibc-build/csu/ -Wl,--version-script=/sources/glibc-build/libc.map -Wl,-soname=libc.so.6 -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--hash-style=both -nostdlib -nostartfiles -e __libc_main -L/sources/glibc-build -L/sources/glibc-build/math -L/sources/glibc-build/elf -L/sources/glibc-build/dlfcn -L/sources/glibc-build/nss -L/sources/glibc-build/nis -L/sources/glibc-build/rt -L/sources/glibc-build/resolv -L/sources/glibc-build/crypt -L/sources/glibc-build/nptl -Wl,-rpath-link=/sources/glibc-build:/sources/glibc-build/math:/sources/glibc-build/elf:/sources/glibc-build/dlfcn:/sources/glibc-build/nss:/sources/glibc-build/nis:/sources/glibc-build/rt:/sources/glibc-build/resolv:/sources/glibc-build/crypt:/sources/glibc-build/nptl -o /sources/glibc-build/libc.so -T /sources/glibc-build/shlib.lds /sources/glibc-build/csu/abi-note.o /sources/glibc-build/elf/soinit.os /sources/glibc-build/libc_pic.os /sources/glibc-build/elf/sofini.os /sources/glibc-build/elf/interp.os /sources/glibc-build/elf/ld.so -lgcc /sources/glibc-build/libc_pic.os: In function `__libc_ifunc_impl_list': /sources/glibc-2.17/misc/../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/ifunc-impl-list.c:96: undefined reference to `__strcasecmp_avx' /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /sources/glibc-build/libc_pic.os: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined hidden symbol `__strcasecmp_avx' can not be used when making a shared object /tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.2/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/libc.so] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.17/elf' make[1]: *** [elf/subdir_lib] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/glibc-2.17' make: *** [all] Error 2 root:/sources/glibc-build# -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] 6.17 GCC-4.7.2 error :(
thanks for the reply.. all were marked as FAIL my processor is Intel® Core™2 Duo CPU T6400 @ 2.00GHz × 2 i'm working in Linux Ubuntu 13.04 i can't find the kernel version. :3 From: Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com To: Pwn Me pwn_m...@yahoo.com; LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Sent: Sunday, September 1, 2013 9:25 AM Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 6.17 GCC-4.7.2 error :( On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 05:21:31PM -0700, Pwn Me wrote: now i'm stuck with this kind of errors. when i type make -k check.. it appears: === libitm Summary === # of unexpected failures15 # of unresolved testcases14 # of unsupported tests1 make[4]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm/testsuite' make[3]: *** [check-am] Error 2 make[3]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm/testsuite' make[3]: Entering directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm' true DO=all multi-do # make make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm' make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Target `check' not remade because of errors. make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libitm' make[1]: *** [check-target-libitm] Error 2 make[1]: Target `check-target' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/gcc-build' make: *** [do-check] Error 2 make: Target `check' not remade because of errors. i'm afraid to proceed to next step because of this.. can you help me guys please? :( thanks by the way. Did you log it ? If so, which tests were marked as FAIL ? If you didn't, it is possible there might have been other failures in other directories. But assuming these libitm failures are the only problem - is there anything in gcc-4.7.2/libitm/testsuite which records what failed ? You might do better looking from the host system, where you will have 'less' or 'view'. Errors in libitm seem to be uncommon. What is your processor, your host distro, and your kernel version ? I've had a look at google - your results look surprisingly close to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-06/msg00695.html which was on OSX not linux. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] martin
Bro i dont know how to test log.. I just run the test again and this is what its look like: -test_filesys: * FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED * -test_filesys: 12/32 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 57/100 blocks -Exit status is 1 +Exit status is 127 --- ../../tests/f_lotsbad/expect.2 2009-08-13 01:39:58.0 + +++ f_lotsbad.2.log 2013-09-01 01:42:50.338579684 + @@ -1,7 +1 @@ -Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes -Pass 2: Checking directory structure -Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity -Pass 4: Checking reference counts -Pass 5: Checking group summary information -test_filesys: 12/32 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 57/100 blocks -Exit status is 0 +Exit status is 127 f_okgroup: 8193 block long filesystem: failed --- ../../tests/f_okgroup/expect.1 2012-07-06 13:37:27.0 + +++ f_okgroup.1.log 2013-09-01 01:42:50.562580795 + @@ -1,9 +1 @@ -Filesystem did not have a UUID; generating one. - -Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes -Pass 2: Checking directory structure -Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity -Pass 4: Checking reference counts -Pass 5: Checking group summary information -test_filesys: 11/2048 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 274/8193 blocks -Exit status is 0 +Exit status is 127 --- ../../tests/f_okgroup/expect.2 2009-08-13 01:39:58.0 + +++ f_okgroup.2.log 2013-09-01 01:42:50.574580855 + @@ -1,7 +1 @@ -Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes -Pass 2: Checking directory structure -Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity -Pass 4: Checking reference counts -Pass 5: Checking group summary information -test_filesys: 11/2048 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 274/8193 blocks -Exit status is 0 +Exit status is 127 f_dupdot: duplicate '.' and '..' entries: failed --- ../../tests/f_dupdot/expect.1 2012-07-06 13:37:27.0 + +++ f_dupdot.1.log 2013-09-01 01:42:50.722581588 + @@ -1,22 +1 @@ -Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes -Pass 2: Checking directory structure -Entry '.' in 14/12 (12) is duplicate '.' entry. -Fix? yes - -Entry '..' in 14/12 (12) is duplicate '..' entry. -Fix? yes - -Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity -Pass 4: Checking reference counts -Unattached inode 13 -Connect to /lost+found? yes - -Inode 13 ref count is 2, should be 1. Fix? yes - -Unattached zero-length inode 14. Clear? yes - -Pass 5: Checking group summary information - -test_filesys: * FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED * -test_filesys: 13/16 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 22/100 blocks -Exit status is 1 +Exit status is 127 --- ../../tests/f_dupdot/expect.2 2009-08-13 01:39:57.0 + +++ f_dupdot.2.log 2013-09-01 01:42:50.734581648 + @@ -1,7 +1 @@ -Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes -Pass 2: Checking directory structure -Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity -Pass 4: Checking reference counts -Pass 5: Checking group summary information -test_filesys: 13/16 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 22/100 blocks -Exit status is 0 +Exit status is 127 f_mmp_garbage: repair MMP when it is corrupted: failed 5 tests succeeded 123 tests failed Tests failed: d_loaddump d_special_files f_16384_block f_8192_block f_bad_disconnected_inode f_bad_local_jnl f_badbblocks f_baddir f_baddir2 f_baddotdir f_badinode f_badjour_indblks f_badjourblks f_badorphan f_badprimary f_badroot f_badsymlinks f_badtable f_bbfile f_bbinode f_big_sparse f_bitmaps f_clear_xattr f_crashdisk f_dir_bad_mode f_dirlink f_dup f_dup2 f_dup3 f_dup4 f_dup_ba f_dup_de f_dup_de2 f_dup_resize f_dupdot f_dupfsblks f_dupsuper f_ea_checks f_end-bitmap f_eofblocks f_expand f_ext_journal f_ext_zero_len f_extent_bad_node f_extent_interior_start_lblk f_extents f_extents2 f_extra_journal f_fast_symlink_extents f_file_acl_high f_filetype f_full_bg f_h_badnode f_h_badroot f_h_normal f_h_reindex f_h_unsigned f_holedir f_holedir2 f_hurd f_illbbitmap f_illibitmap f_illitable f_illitable_flexbg f_imagic f_imagic_fs f_invalid_bad_inode f_jnl_32bit f_jnl_64bit f_jnl_errno f_journal f_lotsbad f_lpf f_lpf2 f_lpffile f_messy_inode f_miss_blk_bmap f_miss_journal f_misstable f_mke2fs2b f_mmp f_mmp_garbage f_noroot f_okgroup f_orphan f_orphan_dotdot_ft f_orphan_extents_inode f_orphan_indirect_inode f_overfsblks f_preen f_recnect_bad f_reconnect f_rehash_dir f_resize_inode f_salvage_dir f_selinux f_special_ea f_summary_counts f_uninit_ext_past_eof f_uninit_last_uninit f_unsorted_EAs f_unused_itable f_valid_ea_in_inode f_zero_group f_zero_inode_size f_zero_super i_e2image m_bigjournal m_dasd_bs m_extent_journal m_large_file m_meta_bg m_mkfs_overhead m_mmp m_no_opt m_raid_opt m_std m_uninit r_inline_xattr r_move_itable r_resize_inode t_mmp_1on t_mmp_2off make[1]: *** [test_post] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/e2fsprogs-1.42.7/build/tests' make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1 Thats all what i've got.. On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:15 AM, William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.orgwrote: On Aug 31, 2013, at 4:02 AM, Carl Martin Bacus wrote: 5 tests succeeded 123 tests failed Run the tests and again and post a
