Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
2014-04-23 13:55 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs : > xinglp wrote: >> 2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. : >>> On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch not found. There's only svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch > >> I don't care about the online book, there's no such file in the svn > > I fixed it just now. Saw it, thanks. > >-- Bruce > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] error when trying to cross compile glibc-2.19
Thanks all. Indeed changing the target name, was the solution to be able to build. Marian > > On Apr 19, 2014, at 12:42 AM, mar...@byteanywhere.com wrote: > >> Thanks all for the replays. >> I am trying to create a cross compiler using the steps for building >> LFS >> when the temporary tools are build. > > I suggest you look at how we do that in CLFS at > http://cross-lfs.org/view/git/index.html > or our current > http://cross-lfs.org/~kb0iic/CLFS-GIT-SYSTEMD/html/index.html > > Those will provide you a better understanding of what you may be doing > wrong. > > One critical step is changing your target triplet so the tools know > that it is cross compiling. > > Sincerely, > > William Harrington > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
xinglp wrote: > 2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. : >> On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: >>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch >>> not found. >>> >>> There's only >>> svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch > I don't care about the online book, there's no such file in the svn I fixed it just now. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. : > On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch >> not found. >> >> There's only >> svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch >> > > Patches get copied when online book is generated and that still wasn't > the case since the patch was added. I don't care about the online book, there's no such file in the svn $ svn ls svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils|grep 8.22 coreutils-8.22-i18n-1.patch coreutils-8.22-i18n-2.patch coreutils-8.22-i18n-3.patch coreutils-8.22-i18n-4.patch coreutils-8.22-shuf_segfault.patch > > -- > Note: My last name is not Krejzi. > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote: > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch > not found. > > There's only > svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch > Patches get copied when online book is generated and that still wasn't the case since the patch was added. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] missing coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch not found. There's only svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?
Pierre Labastie wrote: > Le 22/04/2014 17:51, Hazel Russman a écrit : >> On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:42:58 +0200 >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >>> It seems that the "bin" group membership >>> of the "daemon" user is not needed. Could you confirm? >> >> Confirmed. It is also not necessary to set real home directories or >> shells for the bin and daemon users as specified in BLFS. /dev/null >> and /bin/false work perfectly well for these. >> >> Hazel >> > Thanks for checking. Well I did some more checking. daemon does need to be a member of bin to pass all the 'make root-tests', but reall home directories/shells are not required. I'll update the book. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?
Le 22/04/2014 17:51, Hazel Russman a écrit : > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:42:58 +0200 > Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> It seems that the "bin" group membership >> of the "daemon" user is not needed. Could you confirm? > > Confirmed. It is also not necessary to set real home directories or > shells for the bin and daemon users as specified in BLFS. /dev/null > and /bin/false work perfectly well for these. > > Hazel > Thanks for checking. Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:42:58 +0200 Pierre Labastie wrote: > It seems that the "bin" group membership > of the "daemon" user is not needed. Could you confirm? Confirmed. It is also not necessary to set real home directories or shells for the bin and daemon users as specified in BLFS. /dev/null and /bin/false work perfectly well for these. Hazel -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?
Le 22/04/2014 13:31, Hazel Russman a écrit : > On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:14:31 +0100 > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> From memory (so, I might be wrong) the book doesn't ever create a >> 'users' group in LFS... >> >> So, I _guess_ that the 'users' group exists on your host system and >> you will need to create it in LFS to get these tests to work. >> >> ĸen > You're right. I do have a users group on my host system. But how does > that affect the lfs partition? At this stage, we are in a chroot jail, > using freshly-built software. Doesn't that mean complete independence > from the host except for the running kernel and its virtual file > systems? > > There would have been no previous need for a "users" group or a "daemon" > user on LFS because acl was not included in the basic system and > therefore there were no acl tests to be run. That must still be the > case for LFS with sysVinit. But acl is apparently required for systemd, > so I think it would make sense for section 6.6 to be different in the > systemd edition of the book. > > I filed a ticket about that. It seems that the "bin" group membership of the "daemon" user is not needed. Could you confirm? Regards Pierre -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] ACL check errors: are they important?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 22:14:31 +0100 Ken Moffat wrote: > From memory (so, I might be wrong) the book doesn't ever create a > 'users' group in LFS... > > So, I _guess_ that the 'users' group exists on your host system and > you will need to create it in LFS to get these tests to work. > > ĸen You're right. I do have a users group on my host system. But how does that affect the lfs partition? At this stage, we are in a chroot jail, using freshly-built software. Doesn't that mean complete independence from the host except for the running kernel and its virtual file systems? There would have been no previous need for a "users" group or a "daemon" user on LFS because acl was not included in the basic system and therefore there were no acl tests to be run. That must still be the case for LFS with sysVinit. But acl is apparently required for systemd, so I think it would make sense for section 6.6 to be different in the systemd edition of the book. Hazel -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
