Re: [lfs-support] gcc-4.9.0 failure
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > I could not compile 4.9.0 since it always fails when staring to > configure for 'libvtv' as showed next: > [snip] > > Any suggestion? > > Frans. http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/3552 Pierre seems to be on the case - so far, two extra configure switches in chapter 5 one extra switch in binutils pass 2. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] gcc-4.9.0 failure
I could not compile 4.9.0 since it always fails when staring to configure for 'libvtv' as showed next: ... make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libgcc' make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libgcc' Checking multilib configuration for libvtv... mkdir -p -- x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libvtv Configuring in x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libvtv configure: creating cache ./config.cache checking for --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs... no checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-bld-linux-gnu checking target system type... x86_64-bld-linux-gnu checking for --enable-vtable-verify... no checking for host support for vtable verification... yes checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for x86_64-bld-linux-gnu-strip... /tools/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/bin/strip checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for x86_64-bld-linux-gnu-gcc... /mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc -B/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/./gcc/ -B/tools/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/tools/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /tools/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/include -isystem /tools/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/sys-include checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: in `/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build/x86_64-bld-linux-gnu/libvtv': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. make[1]: *** [configure-target-libvtv] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-build' make: *** [all] Error 2 lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources-tc/gcc-4.9.0$ I first assumed that it was the gcc compiler not eating the -V switch, but apparently that's not the case because I intercepted that and changed it to '-v' to no avail. Any suggestion? Frans. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out
TheOldFellow wrote: > Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is > being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd > compiles? > > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. You may find http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/eudev-alt-hint.txt helpful. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:26 AM, TheOldFellow wrote: > > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. > Richard, Would you elaborate on alternatives to dbus? For example, I need to use okular (although I hate its terminal-spamming) and I believe (speaking from memory) that it requires dbus. Any alternative to dbus, in this case? Jorge -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out
Armin K. wrote: > On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote: >> 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow : >>> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being >>> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? >>> >>> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. >>> > > Both of you are correct, what you ask can be done. > > However, it might be a good idea not to drop non-systemd/non-dbus > packages (such as acl, attr, libcap, etc) so they can be asumed that > they're always installed and be removed from BLFS in the future. > Excellent point, I'd forgotten that. Usually though, complex software in BLFS has a 'better' mix of required and recommended dependencies, and includes instructions for those. Richard. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out
On 04/23/2014 12:04 PM, xinglp wrote: > 2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow : >> Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being >> avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? >> >> I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. >> >> Richard. > Viceversa, I'd like to know what can be removed if I don't want > sysvinit. I've removed > sysklogd sysvinit bootscript and some adjusting of chapter7. >> >> -- >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support >> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html >> Unsubscribe: See the above information page Both of you are correct, what you ask can be done. However, it might be a good idea not to drop non-systemd/non-dbus packages (such as acl, attr, libcap, etc) so they can be asumed that they're always installed and be removed from BLFS in the future. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out
sorry for typo. :-) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow : > Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being > avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? > > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. > > Richard. Viceversa, I'd like to know what can be removed if I don't want sysvinit. I've removed sysklogd sysvinit bootscript and some adjusting of chapter7. > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [lfs-support] missing systemd out
2014-04-23 17:26 GMT+08:00 TheOldFellow : > Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being > avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? > > I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. > > Richard. Viceversa, I'd like to know if I don't want sysvinit. I've removed sysklogd sysvinit bootscript and some adjusting of chapter7. > > -- > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[lfs-support] missing systemd out
Am I right in thinking that ACL, ATTR are not needed if systemd is being avoided? What else has had to be added so that systemd compiles? I'm also avoiding d-bus and sysklogd as I have better alternatives. Richard. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
