Re:Kernel module programming

2010-12-17 Thread JimD.


 Now that I have a bare-bones LFS (6.7) system running, I've begun to use it
 to learn the rudiments of kernel module programming, using the Linux Kernel
 Programming Guide (May 2007) as a guide.  But the Hello, World project
 fails to build, right off the bat.  In case this is the right forum for
 raising this question, here is what I get:

 Makefile:
 obj?m += hello?1.o
 all:
        make ?C /lib/modules/$(shell uname ?r)/build M=$(PWD) modules

 clean:
        make ?C /lib/modules/$(shell uname ?r)/build M=$(PWD) clean

 These errors are hand-copied, since I'm doing the work in the LFS console:

 First I get a warning:
 WARNING: Symbol version dump /sources/linux-2.6.35.4/Module symvers is
 missing; modules will have no dependencies and modversions.

 Then a real error:
 scripts/Makefile.build:235: target '/home/daryl/kernel/hello-1/hello-1.c'
 doesn't match the target pattern

 And right after the 'MODPOST 0 modules' output line, I get:
 /bin/sh: scripts/mod/modpost: No such file or directory.

First, this really is not the correct place to ask this, *but*
although you show:
obj-m += hello-1.o
(which would be correct)
The error seems to indicate that you put:
obj-m += hello-1.c
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


bootloaders and USB

2010-06-28 Thread JimD.


 do most of the standard bootloaders (grub/,lilo, etc) have the ability to
 boot to usb even when the BIOS doesn't natively support boot to usb or
 floppy emulation?


A qualified no.
The qualifier is you could use a plop cd to boot to USB.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: urgent (Neal Murphy)

2010-06-21 Thread JimD.
  It would take hundreds of gifted people more than a decade to achieve
   such a thing.
 
  Or Linus about a year.

 Sorry, but I have to comment on this. It is just too interesting.
Linus's real genius was in scoping and managing the project so it could get
done.
The 1.0 release took more like 2 years plus, and involved many people.
So, your goal would be something far less that Linux 1.0.
It also has to be recognized that at the time an IBM PC was a simple
machine, and that expectations were much less as to what an OS would do.

http://www.tuxradar.com/content/linux-kernel-10-turns-15-years-old

As for the book on the IA64 Kernel, bad advice. Based on the title, I would
guess that this book would focus on the details of porting to this
architecture - a complex one that failed to meet expectations. (It was
supposed to the 64 bit PC).
Also, it is unlikely that  you will even get you hands on this chip.
As for Minux, another endeavor that failed to meet expectations. If you want
to study micro-kernels, I suppose that would be a good book, but to date
this form of architecture has not worked out to be usable.(IBM spent
billions in the 90's to find this out).

So your *real* problem is to figure out what you can really do in the time
you have to do it and define carefully just what you mean by an OS.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


urgent (Neal Murphy)

2010-06-21 Thread JimD.
  As for Minux, another endeavor that failed to meet expectations.

It depends on what you think the expectations were.  My book on Minix is
dated 1988 and included a 5.25 floppy with the entire source code, about
13000 lines.  Tannenbaum said he wrote it for instructional reasons, not
commercial, and by that standard was quite successful.

I agree that it depends on what your expectations are and I've heard those
goals before.
I'm sure your book is excellent, but I just don't think it would the the
ideal starting place.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


How to Improve the LFS book

2010-05-27 Thread JimD.
On this topic, I too had a notion that what I call Lab Notes would have
been an improvement and perhaps call users attention to important
procedures.

I did this for my self, as the text does a good job of explaining the what
and the how,but the how is embedded in the text, and not as easily followed.

I printed the book and then made notes as to what to do. I have a duplex
laser and paid Office Depot about 4.00 to bind it with wire. It cost me
about 6.00 to make it, and I put about 10 blank pages at the end to jot down
lab notes.

So, perhaps there is some way to tag sections of the book so that a separate
document could be generated that just has the step by step instructions (
AND important notes).

I have to admit, I had to learn to hard way to just delete the un-tar and
build directories after each step (and, if a step fails).

Jim
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


RE: gcc Pass 2 configure: error: unsupported system, cannot find sizeof (omp_lock_t)

2010-04-25 Thread JimD.
Yes the problem was downlevel book usage. Lesson learned.
As soon as I went the to dev book, I found the make command was
different and  that fixed it.
Thanks to all of you for great support.
JimD
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


gcc Pass 2 configure: error: unsupported system, cannot find sizeof (omp_lock_t)

2010-04-24 Thread JimD.
gcc-4.5.0 (as per the current wget-list)
Patch applied gcc-4.5.0-startfiles_fix-1.patch
using mpc-0.8.1, not in the book but required.
- Clean directory from pass 1
- All the scripts from LFS 6.6 section 5.10 run. except for the one a
pg 45 for x86_64

checking for strtoull... yes
checking for clock_gettime in -lrt... yes
checking whether the target supports thread-local storage... no
checking whether the target supports hidden visibility... yes
checking whether the target supports dllexport... no
checking whether the target supports symbol aliases... yes
checking for ld used by /mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/ -B/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include   ... (cached)
/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/collect-ld
checking if the linker (/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build/./gcc/collect-ld)
is GNU ld... (cached) yes
checking for shared libgcc... yes
checking whether the target supports .symver directive... yes
configure: versioning on shared library symbols is gnu
checking whether the target supports __sync_*_compare_and_swap... yes
configure: updating cache ./config.cache
configure: error: unsupported system, cannot find sizeof (omp_lock_t)
make[1]: *** [configure-target-libgomp] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/gcc-build'
make: *** [all] Error 2
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page