Help with Glib-c 2.11.1 Pass 1 (ch 5.7) in LFS 6.6
Hi there, im new to the mailing list, so please correct me if i make any mistakes. I have used linux for some time, and wanted to make my own, so ive gone for LFS. I am compiling onto a SanDisk Cruzer 4gb portable USB flash drive, so i am using /dev/sdb (without a specific partition) to save space. All seems to go fine, untill the 'make' command of glibc pass 1 (ch 5.7). i have tested it several times, each time on a clean install. specs: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS x64 with all needed utilities mentioned at the beginning of the book, running under VirtualBox on Win7x64 The following is the stuff it prints. if you need more info, i'll send more. (this is grabbed from a second run of 'make, but it is the same as the stuff it prints the first time) l...@ubuntu10-clean:/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build$ make make -r PARALLELMFLAGS= CVSOPTS= -C ../glibc-2.11.1 objdir=`pwd` all make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1' make subdir=csu -C csu ..=../ subdir_lib make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1/csu' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_lib'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1/csu' make subdir=iconv -C iconv ..=../ subdir_lib make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1/iconv' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 /mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build/../include/linux/limits.h /tools/include/linux/limits.h /usr/bin/install: `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build/../include/linux/limits.h' and `/tools/include/linux/limits.h' are the same file /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 /mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build/../include/asm/prctl.h /tools/include/asm/prctl.h /usr/bin/install: `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build/../include/asm/prctl.h' and `/tools/include/asm/prctl.h' are the same file make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1/iconv' make[1]: *** [iconv/subdir_lib] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 Thanks, Saxon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Help with Glib-c 2.11.1 Pass 1 (ch 5.7) in LFS 6.6
On 29/06/10 11:50, Saxon Landers wrote: Hi there, im new to the mailing list, so please correct me if i make any mistakes. I have used linux for some time, and wanted to make my own, so ive gone for LFS. I am compiling onto a SanDisk Cruzer 4gb portable USB flash drive, so i am using /dev/sdb (without a specific partition) to save space. Is that even possible? How are you going to mount it if it doesn't have a partition? All seems to go fine, untill the 'make' command of glibc pass 1 (ch 5.7). i have tested it several times, each time on a clean install. specs: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS x64 with all needed utilities mentioned at the beginning of the book, running under VirtualBox on Win7x64 The following is the stuff it prints. if you need more info, i'll send more. (this is grabbed from a second run of 'make, but it is the same as the stuff it prints the first time) l...@ubuntu10-clean:/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build$ make make -r PARALLELMFLAGS= CVSOPTS= -C ../glibc-2.11.1 objdir=`pwd` all make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1' make subdir=csu -C csu ..=../ subdir_lib make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1/csu' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `subdir_lib'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1/csu' make subdir=iconv -C iconv ..=../ subdir_lib make[2]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1/iconv' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 /mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build/../include/linux/limits.h /tools/include/linux/limits.h /usr/bin/install: `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build/../include/linux/limits.h' and `/tools/include/linux/limits.h' are the same file /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 /mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build/../include/asm/prctl.h /tools/include/asm/prctl.h /usr/bin/install: `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build/../include/asm/prctl.h' and `/tools/include/asm/prctl.h' are the same file make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1/iconv' make[1]: *** [iconv/subdir_lib] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-2.11.1' make: *** [all] Error 2 It appears that you are trying to compile inside /mnt/lfs/tools. Do you get the same error if you compile in /mnt/lfs/sources? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Help with Glib-c 2.11.1 Pass 1 (ch 5.7) in LFS 6.6
l...@ubuntu10-clean:/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build$ make I am also new to LFS, the book says we should always work in directory /mnt/lfs/sources and install temporary tools in directory /mnt/lfs/tools. So, the right build place of glibc-build pass1 should be /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build. -- littlebat -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Help with Glib-c 2.11.1 Pass 1 (ch 5.7) in LFS 6.6
Andrew Benton wrote:
On 29/06/10 11:50, Saxon Landers wrote:
Hi there, im new to the mailing list, so please correct me if i make any
mistakes.
I have used linux for some time, and wanted to make my own, so ive gone
for LFS.
I am compiling onto a SanDisk Cruzer 4gb portable USB flash drive, so i
am using /dev/sdb (without a specific partition) to save space.
Is that even possible? How are you going to mount it if it doesn't have
a partition?
The mount command should be able to mount anything with a file system
in it. CD-ROMS don't have partitions, nor do native USB sticks,
nor floppies, nor ISO images, nor other files with file systems
in them. AFAIK, there's no file system type defined for tapes,
but with the proper definitions and driver, one would be able
to mount a tape. I've done so with other operating systems
which have that capability.
If mount can't do it, then mount is broken.
Mike
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Help with Glib-c 2.11.1 Pass 1 (ch 5.7) in LFS 6.6
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 12:57:21 Mike McCarty wrote: Andrew Benton wrote: On 29/06/10 11:50, Saxon Landers wrote: Hi there, im new to the mailing list, so please correct me if i make any mistakes. I have used linux for some time, and wanted to make my own, so ive gone for LFS. I am compiling onto a SanDisk Cruzer 4gb portable USB flash drive, so i am using /dev/sdb (without a specific partition) to save space. Is that even possible? How are you going to mount it if it doesn't have a partition? The mount command should be able to mount anything with a file system in it. CD-ROMS don't have partitions, nor do native USB sticks, nor floppies, nor ISO images, nor other files with file systems in them. AFAIK, there's no file system type defined for tapes, but with the proper definitions and driver, one would be able to mount a tape. I've done so with other operating systems which have that capability. An explicit example: 'mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb /mnt'. Oh, some USB sticks have partitions, but perhaps they aren't 'native'? If one is clever, one can create partition tables within partitions. And mount those subpartition partitions once they contain filesystems. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Help with Glib-c 2.11.1 Pass 1 (ch 5.7) in LFS 6.6
Neal Murphy wrote:
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 12:57:21 Mike McCarty wrote:
[about partitions]
The mount command should be able to mount anything with a file system
in it. CD-ROMS don't have partitions, nor do native USB sticks,
[...]
An explicit example: 'mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb /mnt'. Oh, some USB sticks have
partitions, but perhaps they aren't 'native'?
I used that term for lack of knowledge of a better one. Perhaps raw
would have been better. I was trying to convey the idea that some,
though not all, USB sticks don't have PTs in them. Some USB sticks have
PTs in them with just one entry, which seems a waste of ROM to me,
unless one also puts boot code in there and intends to boot from it.
Mike
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
