Re: LFS 6.7 + BLFS SVN pure 64bit

2010-11-16 Thread Stuart Stegall
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Ken Moffat k...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 07:01:23PM +0100, loki wrote:
 Hello,

 has anyone tried lfs 6.7 on a 64bit platform. I had great problems
 with some packages from BLFS after I installed LFS 6.7. And during
 the compile of 6.7 I had some problems but somehow I circumvented them.
 And the system ran. But when I tried to compile Open-Office 3.2.1,
 mysql 5.1.45, Python 2.6.4 and some others I had great problems,
 actually I couldn't compile these packagaes and some more. GLIBC always
 segfaulted on me. After trying for 2 weeks I reverted to LFS 6.6 and
 everything went smoothly.
 Am I the only one?

 Regards,
 Daniel

  I'm worried about how you worked around the problems you had
 building 6.7.  For me, building LFS-6.7 and a few almost-6.7 svn
 versions on x86_64 was straightforward.

  For the record, I'm seeing intermittent segfaults in X with both
 radeon r100 and r200 video cards since I moved to a newer xorg-server
 / radeon driver, and yes, the last thing mentioned is libc, but that
 doesn't necessarily mean the problem started there.  In my case I
 suspect the radeon driver (my problem is unpredictable, sometimes I
 can be using X for over 12 hours without a problem, and I suspect
 one of the screensavers is what triggers it).  A couple of times,
 I've left a machine compiling something, and come back to find X had
 crashed during the compile, but each time the next compile worked.

  I don't use OOo, but I have compiled that version of python, and
 more-recent versions of mysql, without segfaults.

  Care to mention what problems you had when you were building 6.7 ?

  There are undoubtedly still things in BLFS which don't build on
 x86_64, but your problem seems to be different.

 ĸen
 --
 das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
 --
 http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
 FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
 Unsubscribe: See the above information page

This is my personal experience of course, but ...

The LFS 6.7/SVN builds on x86_64 with no problems.  I can test with
little problem, though I do have to install glibc before testing will
work properly, this is probably a host system problem.  libxml-2.7.5
and 2.7.6 caused quite a few problems for me, but that was related to
zlibc+x86_64 data structures.  Unzip needs to be built with
linux_noasm instead of linux (because it uses x86 asm).  I've done X,
Gnome, mysql, ruby, python-2.7, nginx, cups, alsa, the full gstreamer
stack (ok some media stuff did take some massaging), Boost, Firefox,
and QT4.5.

If someone would like, I could submit the instructions for Nginx and Boost.

Other than the media stuff and Unzip, nothing segfaults, and
everything compiles as is.  I'm using nouveau+kms for X
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


LFS 6.7 + BLFS SVN pure 64bit

2010-11-13 Thread loki
Hello,

has anyone tried lfs 6.7 on a 64bit platform. I had great problems 
with some packages from BLFS after I installed LFS 6.7. And during 
the compile of 6.7 I had some problems but somehow I circumvented them.
And the system ran. But when I tried to compile Open-Office 3.2.1, 
mysql 5.1.45, Python 2.6.4 and some others I had great problems, 
actually I couldn't compile these packagaes and some more. GLIBC always
segfaulted on me. After trying for 2 weeks I reverted to LFS 6.6 and 
everything went smoothly.
Am I the only one?

Regards,
Daniel



__ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus signature 
database 5617 (20101113) __

The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
http://www.eset.com


-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: LFS 6.7 + BLFS SVN pure 64bit

2010-11-13 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 07:01:23PM +0100, loki wrote:
 Hello,
 
 has anyone tried lfs 6.7 on a 64bit platform. I had great problems 
 with some packages from BLFS after I installed LFS 6.7. And during 
 the compile of 6.7 I had some problems but somehow I circumvented them.
 And the system ran. But when I tried to compile Open-Office 3.2.1, 
 mysql 5.1.45, Python 2.6.4 and some others I had great problems, 
 actually I couldn't compile these packagaes and some more. GLIBC always
 segfaulted on me. After trying for 2 weeks I reverted to LFS 6.6 and 
 everything went smoothly.
 Am I the only one?
 
 Regards,
 Daniel
 
 I'm worried about how you worked around the problems you had
building 6.7.  For me, building LFS-6.7 and a few almost-6.7 svn
versions on x86_64 was straightforward.

 For the record, I'm seeing intermittent segfaults in X with both
radeon r100 and r200 video cards since I moved to a newer xorg-server
/ radeon driver, and yes, the last thing mentioned is libc, but that
doesn't necessarily mean the problem started there.  In my case I
suspect the radeon driver (my problem is unpredictable, sometimes I
can be using X for over 12 hours without a problem, and I suspect
one of the screensavers is what triggers it).  A couple of times,
I've left a machine compiling something, and come back to find X had
crashed during the compile, but each time the next compile worked.

 I don't use OOo, but I have compiled that version of python, and
more-recent versions of mysql, without segfaults.

 Care to mention what problems you had when you were building 6.7 ?

 There are undoubtedly still things in BLFS which don't build on
x86_64, but your problem seems to be different.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page