Re: [lfs-support] LFS Problem Section 5.4 Version 7.2

2012-11-06 Thread Mark Mark
Thanks for the help! I failed to realize the dash/bash difference. I assumed 
mint uses bash -_-' oops. and i'll get on to installing texinfo as well. Thanks!



 From: Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org 
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2012 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS Problem Section 5.4 Version 7.2
 
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:33:06PM -0800, Mark Mark wrote:
 Hi there! 
 
 When I try to prepare Binutils for configuration on the first pass (section 
 5.4.1) I get this strange error that prohibits me from making it later

Please don't number the lines or insert a tab in front of them - it
wastes space.  It's perfectly acceptable to paste a block of lines,
which will be easier for you if you are using a mouse.
 
     13. configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
     14. See `config.log' for more details.
 
 I got the config.log file, however all I saw was gcc a gcc problem.

I was going to point out that if configure reports the C compiler
cannot create executables (on a linux system) it seems pretty likely
that gcc is involved, and I was going to ask for details of the
error message immediately before this when configure tried to
compile the code fragment and failed.  But on balance I think you
have answered this below.

 I also did the bash version check
 
     3. bash, version 4.2.24(1)-release
     4. /bin/sh - /bin/dash

/bin/sh should be symlinked to /bin/bash : dash is unlikely to be
good enough.

     25. version-check.sh: line 30: makeinfo: command not found
     26. Texinfo:

That doesn't look like a useful version of texinfo, does it ?

     27. xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.0alpha
     28. gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
     29. gcc compilation failed
 

You appear to be missing 'cc1'.  apt-get install build-essential.
$DEITY knows why ubuntu package things like this (a compiler, but
not able to compile!).

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-support] LFS Problem Section 5.4 Version 7.2

2012-11-06 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Mark Mark wrote:
 Thank you very much for your help! I didn't notice the bash being
dash. I'll get on to that. I thought gcc was installed due to the
version check

 gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3

 But I'll definitely try installing it. also, if you don't mind me
asking, if mint simply isn't the right host system to use, do you have
any suggestions?

First of all, don't send support requests directly to me.  LFS Support 
is the proper forum.

Second, don't top post.

Third, Mint is probably fine if the host requirements are met.

   -- Bruce

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-support] LFS Problem Section 5.4 Version 7.2

2012-11-05 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Mark Mark wrote:

 I got the config.log file, however all I saw was gcc a gcc problem.
 Ialso did the bash version check

   1.
   2. lfs@mint /mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build $ bash version-check.sh
   3. bash, version 4.2.24(1)-release
   4. /bin/sh - /bin/dash

Needs to be bash

   5. Binutils: (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22
   6. bison (GNU Bison) 2.5
   7. /usr/bin/yacc - /usr/bin/bison.yacc
   8. bzip2,  Version 1.0.6, 6-Sept-2010.
   9. Coreutils:  8.13
   10. diff (GNU diffutils) 3.2
   11. find (GNU findutils) 4.4.2
   12. GNU Awk 3.1.8
   13. /usr/bin/awk - /usr/bin/gawk
   14. gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3
   15. (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.15-0ubuntu10.3) 2.15
   16. grep (GNU grep) 2.10
   17. gzip 1.4
   18. Linux version 3.2.0-23-generic (buildd@palmer) (gcc version 4.6.3 
 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu4) ) #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:41:14 UTC 2012
   19. m4 (GNU M4) 1.4.16
   20. GNU Make 3.81
   21. patch 2.6.1
   22. Perl version='5.14.2';
   23. GNU sed version 4.2.1
   24. tar (GNU tar) 1.26
   25. version-check.sh: line 30: makeinfo: command not found

Needs the texinfo package

   26. Texinfo:
   27. xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.0alpha
   28. gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
   29. gcc compilation failed

It appears that gcc is not installed.

 It seems to be a gcc problem, however, it is installed.
 I am using Mint 13 Cinnamon as my host computer. Any ideas as to what
 I need to do to fix this problem?

What makes you think gcc is installed?

I don't know how mint handles packages, but The three above need to be 
installed.  For gcc Google says:

sudo apt-get install gcc g++ autoconf automake bison flex libtool


You probably want to add bash and texinfo to that.

   -- Bruce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-support] LFS Problem Section 5.4 Version 7.2

2012-11-05 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:33:06PM -0800, Mark Mark wrote:
 Hi there! 
 
 When I try to prepare Binutils for configuration on the first pass (section 
 5.4.1) I get this strange error that prohibits me from making it later

 Please don't number the lines or insert a tab in front of them - it
wastes space.  It's perfectly acceptable to paste a block of lines,
which will be easier for you if you are using a mouse.
 
   13. configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
   14. See `config.log' for more details.
 
 I got the config.log file, however all I saw was gcc a gcc problem.

 I was going to point out that if configure reports the C compiler
cannot create executables (on a linux system) it seems pretty likely
that gcc is involved, and I was going to ask for details of the
error message immediately before this when configure tried to
compile the code fragment and failed.  But on balance I think you
have answered this below.

 I also did the bash version check
 
   3. bash, version 4.2.24(1)-release
   4. /bin/sh - /bin/dash

 /bin/sh should be symlinked to /bin/bash : dash is unlikely to be
good enough.

   25. version-check.sh: line 30: makeinfo: command not found
   26. Texinfo:

 That doesn't look like a useful version of texinfo, does it ?

   27. xz (XZ Utils) 5.1.0alpha
   28. gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
   29. gcc compilation failed
 

 You appear to be missing 'cc1'.  apt-get install build-essential.
$DEITY knows why ubuntu package things like this (a compiler, but
not able to compile!).

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: [lfs-support] LFS Problem Section 5.4 Version 7.2

2012-11-05 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:02:06PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
 
  28. gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1': execvp: No such file or directory
  29. gcc compilation failed
 
 It appears that gcc is not installed.
 
  It seems to be a gcc problem, however, it is installed.
  I am using Mint 13 Cinnamon as my host computer. Any ideas as to what
  I need to do to fix this problem?
 
 What makes you think gcc is installed?
 
 There are enough examples of this on google to suggest that ubuntu
mispackaged gcc, or even broke their packaging during gcc-4.4 - it
seems to be fairly common that ubuntu users end up with gcc but
without cc1 !

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page