Re: Hotplug, hotplug-ng, udev: Versions?

2005-07-11 Thread Declan Moriarty
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
 Declan Moriarty wrote:
 
 On the basis that udev-059 should have improved things, (but didn't);
 udev-060 should have fixed that (but didn't); So udev-061 must work...
 
 And our survey saidpossibly not :)  Try udev-062!

Too late... Udev-058 went in, and hotplug. By the time I type make
uninstall, there'll probably be udev-065 :-/.

Now whan hotplug runs, I get this from lsmod

af_packet  13128  2
usbhid 24772  0
radeonfb   21396  1
cfbcopyarea 3648  1 radeonfb
cfbimgblt   2752  1 radeonfb
cfbfillrect 3584  1 radeonfb
softcursor  1856  1 radeonfb
via_agp 7680  1
parport_pc 30212  1
snd_cmipci 29184  0
snd_pcm82276  1 snd_cmipci
snd_page_alloc  7620  1 snd_pcm
snd_opl3_lib9280  1 snd_cmipci
snd_timer  21188  2 snd_pcm,snd_opl3_lib
snd_hwdep   7136  1 snd_opl3_lib
snd_mpu401_uart 6144  1 snd_cmipci
snd_rawmidi20512  1 snd_mpu401_uart
snd_seq_device  6924  2 snd_opl3_lib,snd_rawmidi
snd45668  8
snd_cmipci,snd_pcm,snd_opl3_lib,snd_timer,snd_hwdep,snd_mpu401_uart,snd_rawmidi,snd_seq_device
soundcore   7392  1 snd
via_rhine  20164  0
usbmouse4352  0
uhci_hcd   30220  0
usbcore   119868  4 usbhid,usbmouse,uhci_hcd
udf84356  0
isofs  24452  0
vfat   10816  0
fat46108  1 vfat

AFTER I have manually removed the ehci_hcd module which gives me
continuous current warnings. I commented it out of the /etc/hotplug.d/
scripts, and checked it wasn't in /etc/rc.d/init.d either :-o.

I have a gigabyte of syslog messages about overcurrent.

Mind you, I STILL have no /dev/hdc, or /dev/hdd. /proc/ide/ide0 shows me
hda (all nodes present  correct). There is no hdb in the box.

/proc/ide/ide1 shows me hdc  hdd as cdroms in the media file. hdd is
actually a dvd. NO NODES :-((.

Also, btw, loading the 57 framebuffer modules (by running hotplug) seems
to cure the cursor thing, but gives me the ugliest 80x30 screen setting 
ever. How does a guy set up his framebuffer modes? It doesn't matter
what I boot on, hotplug screws it up on me :-(.

lad set up
-- 

With best Regards,


Declan Moriarty.
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page


Re: Hotplug, hotplug-ng, udev: Versions?

2005-07-11 Thread Joern Abatz
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:45:07PM +0100, Declan Moriarty wrote:
 
 Mind you, I STILL have no /dev/hdc, or /dev/hdd. /proc/ide/ide0 shows me
 hda (all nodes present  correct). There is no hdb in the box.
 
 /proc/ide/ide1 shows me hdc  hdd as cdroms in the media file. hdd is
 actually a dvd. NO NODES :-((.

See. That's technical progress. Without udev you had to have a zillion
'device files' (and MAKEDEV to help you), and with udev you have to have a
zillion 'rules' and nothing to help you. It's probably meant to improve your
learning abilities.

Check if you compiled a driver or module called 'idecd'. It's in Device
Drivers/Ata Atapi/IDE Atapi CDROM. Or maybe your drive is one of the 'old CD
Roms'? (I think not, though. I'm using old hardware here because of money
problems, but if it was _that_ old, the electrolytic capacitors would have
dried out by now anyway, wouldn't they.)

 Also, btw, loading the 57 framebuffer modules (by running hotplug) seems
 to cure the cursor thing, but gives me the ugliest 80x30 screen setting 
 ever. How does a guy set up his framebuffer modes?

Get fbset (from the Debian guys). But with 640x480 on the framebuffer I kept
getting 80x30 too, so maybe you need to load another font. I don't know how,
though. I guess 'setfont' won't do it, because you have to choose extra
framebuffer fonts in 'make menuconfig'. I think you would need a 8x20 font
to get 80x24 characters, but the biggest framebuffer font is 8x16, giving
the familiar 80x30 characters on 640x480 pixels.

I can only guess right now. I gave up on the whole framebuffer thing myself
on friday, concerning LFS 6.x. I found X11 on the framebuffer was even
slower than on the regular nvidia driver from kernel org. Damn. Everything
is different with kernel 2.6. (Not complaining, just ranting.)

Joern
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page