Re: [lfs-support] When I built LFS in chapter 8.8, I met extra fails.
And Sorry for top-posting. I’m not familiar with mailing list. -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] When I built LFS in chapter 8.8, I met extra fails.
Thanks for your reply, I ignored these extra fails. Until now, they are harmless. On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:28 AM Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 09:11:27PM +0800, FledgeShiu wrote: > > Description: > > > > When I built LFS 10 in chapter 8.8, I met some extra fails which not > mentioned in book. Thus, I would like to know if this is harmless. > > > > Host Info: > > Linux LFSHost 4.19.0-13-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.19.160-2 (2020-11-28) > i686 GNU/Linux > > Runs on VM Fusion > > > > Searching leads me to believe VM Fusion is for people who use a mac. > Running in a VM on a different platform always has the potential for > extra test failures. > > Also, 32-bit LFS gets much less testing these days and I think that > in the past people have reported more test failures on 32-bit. > > > LFS version: > > LFS 10 > > > > Logs: > > I'll strip out the unsupported and xfail, they are not errors. > > > FAIL: io/tst-lchmod > > As the book says, known to fail in the LFS chroot environment > > > FAIL: misc/tst-ttyname > > Ditto > > > FAIL: nptl/tst-cond24 > > FAIL: nptl/tst-mutex10 > > The first two of your extra fails. It seems that tst-cond24 has > failed over the years for some people. > > > FAIL: string/tst-memmove-overflow > > And the last of them. > > I think these are mostly harmless. > > ĸen > -- > (The Balancing Monks) use small brass weights, none of them bigger > than a fist. They work. Well, obviously they work. The world has not > tipped up yet. -- The Thief Of Time > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page > > Do not top post on this list. > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] When I built LFS in chapter 8.8, I met extra fails.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 09:11:27PM +0800, FledgeShiu wrote: > Description: > > When I built LFS 10 in chapter 8.8, I met some extra fails which not > mentioned in book. Thus, I would like to know if this is harmless. > > Host Info: > Linux LFSHost 4.19.0-13-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.19.160-2 (2020-11-28) i686 > GNU/Linux > Runs on VM Fusion > Searching leads me to believe VM Fusion is for people who use a mac. Running in a VM on a different platform always has the potential for extra test failures. Also, 32-bit LFS gets much less testing these days and I think that in the past people have reported more test failures on 32-bit. > LFS version: > LFS 10 > > Logs: I'll strip out the unsupported and xfail, they are not errors. > FAIL: io/tst-lchmod As the book says, known to fail in the LFS chroot environment > FAIL: misc/tst-ttyname Ditto > FAIL: nptl/tst-cond24 > FAIL: nptl/tst-mutex10 The first two of your extra fails. It seems that tst-cond24 has failed over the years for some people. > FAIL: string/tst-memmove-overflow And the last of them. I think these are mostly harmless. ĸen -- (The Balancing Monks) use small brass weights, none of them bigger than a fist. They work. Well, obviously they work. The world has not tipped up yet. -- The Thief Of Time -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
