[lfs-support] [LFS 10.0] Unexpected failures (filesystem) when testing GCC-10.2.0 in Chapter 8.26
Hello, I am in an attempt to build LFS using Debian 10.7 buster in VMware Workstation 16 (using Windows 10 HyperV backend): # uname -a Linux debian-host 4.19.0-13-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.19.160-2 (2020-11-28) x86_64 GNU/Linux I have not seen any unexpected failure in the prior test, except in Chapter 8.8 Glibc-2.32, I have unexpected failure not documented in the book as below: FAIL: nptl/tst-cond24 FAIL: nptl/tst-mutex10 A quick search suggest that these failures might be harmless and expected under VMware [1], so I proceed as normal. However, in Chapter 8.26. GCC-10.2.0, I meet multiple unexpected failure regarding libstdc++ and file system, the log is fellow: LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from git: releases/gcc-10.2.0 revision ee5c3db6c5b2c3332912fb4c9cfa2864569ebd9a Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu .. Running target unix FAIL: 22_locale/numpunct/members/char/3.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/2.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_env.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/char/wrapped_locale.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/2.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/wrapped_env.cc execution test FAIL: 22_locale/time_get/get_time/wchar_t/wrapped_locale.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/exists.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/is_empty.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/remove.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/remove_all.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/status.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/symlink_status.cc execution test FAIL: 27_io/filesystem/operations/temp_directory_path.cc execution test FAIL: experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc execution test FAIL: experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc execution test FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/exists.cc execution test FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/is_empty.cc execution test FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/remove.cc execution test FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/remove_all.cc execution test FAIL: experimental/filesystem/operations/temp_directory_path.cc execution test === libstdc++ Summary === # of expected passes14217 # of unexpected failures23 # of expected failures93 # of unsupported tests343 Compiler version: 10.2.0 (GCC) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu configure flags: --prefix=/usr LD=ld --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap --with-system-zlib How should I proceed? Thanks in advance. Reka [1]: https://www.mail-archive.com/lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org/msg07019.html -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] [LFS 10.0] Unexpected failures (filesystem) when testing GCC-10.2.0 in Chapter 8.26
On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 22:41, S. Reka wrote: > However, in Chapter 8.26. GCC-10.2.0, I meet multiple unexpected > failure regarding libstdc++ and file system, the log is fellow: Furthermore, I attempt to continue, and faced another failure in Chapter 8.29. Sed-4.8: FAIL: testsuite/panic-tests === --- exp-err-temp2021-01-07 23:40:55.654884316 +1030 +++ err-temp2021-01-07 23:40:55.654884316 +1030 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -sed: couldn't open temporary file FAIL testsuite/panic-tests.sh (exit status: 1) Reka -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Re: [lfs-support] [LFS 10.0] Unexpected failures (filesystem) when testing GCC-10.2.0 in Chapter 8.26
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 04:33, Ken Moffat wrote: > For testsuite failures, you need to look at whatever is available > afterwards (for some packages the actual output files get deleted, > and what is being run, and expected, is often hard to work out). > > But since you are running on hyperv, perhaps this link (re running > on ntfs) might be relevant: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-sed/2018-10/msg00013.html > > I also note that google has links to past issues with this test in > older versions of LFS. > > ĸen > -- > Lu-Tze had long considered that everything happens for a reason, > except possibly football. -- The Thief Of Time Thank you. I processed and didn't see any issue in the end, the system boot and most functions seems to be working. I am exploring BLFS now. Cheers. Reka -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page Do not top post on this list. A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
