[libdbi-devel] Request for automake update
Hi, libdbi ships with archaic version of automake which doesn't support e.g. aarch64 which is currently officially supported in many (not-only Linux) distributions (Fedora, Gentoo, etc.). Could you please update the automake scripts (config.guess, config.sub, depcomp etc.)? Kind regards -- Jan Pacner -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ libdbi-devel mailing list libdbi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-devel
Re: [libdbi-devel] Request for automake update
Up until now, I've used version automake-1.12.5 with timestamp 2012-09-25. But it's possible (and I'd rather prefer it) to use a newer one (IMHO a half-year old one should be enough stable). -- Jan Pacner On 01/21/2014 07:33 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Tuesday 2014-01-21 10:27, jpac...@redhat.com wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> libdbi ships with archaic version of automake which doesn't support e.g. >> aarch64 which is currently officially supported in many (not-only Linux) >> distributions (Fedora, Gentoo, etc.). >> >> Could you please update the automake scripts (config.guess, config.sub, >> depcomp etc.)? > > Do you happen to know the minimum version needed to bring the features > you seek? > -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ libdbi-devel mailing list libdbi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-devel
Re: [libdbi-devel] Request for automake update
> It certainly make sense > to use that as it seems to do the right thing automagically. However, > I'd prefer to keep autogen.sh around, even if it contains just a single > call to autoreconf, for the sake of backwards compatibility. You must be right. I agree with this decision. Thanks -- Jan Pacner -- CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ libdbi-devel mailing list libdbi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libdbi-devel
