On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:28:11AM +1300, Samuel Williams
<space.ship.travel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there some reason why ev_set_allocator is defined as:
If I remember correctly, this was because size_t and ssize_t were not very
portable.
> Because this produces warnings when trying to use `realloc` style
> functions, defined as:
Well, "relloc style functions" is a rather fuzzy set - if you limit
yourself to realloc functions only, then this is probably a good thing,
as the semantic of a large number of realloc functions is not of the
required type, so you probably need a wrapper in any case to work around
incompatibilities (for example, libev itself uses such a wrapper by
default, called ev_realloc_emul).
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / schm...@schmorp.de
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
libev mailing list
libev@lists.schmorp.de
http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/libev
