On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:42:31AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> The upgrade feature does *not* inidcate whether the upgrade path is
> supported or not. It indicates that this realease is considered a newer
> version than the listed versions.
'indicate', 'release'
>
> This reverts commit 335cd8c70e0edadaaa1b5aefa8f138b5839a9639.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio
> ---
> data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
> b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
> index c3f45a2..20422f2 100644
> --- a/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
> +++ b/data/os/centos.org/centos-7.0.xml.in
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> <_vendor>CentOS
> linux
> centos
> +http://centos.org/centos/6.5"/>
Shouldn't it be latest centos 6 release though?
For the revert,
Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau
as this can be done in another commit
Christophe
> http://redhat.com/rhel/7.6"/>
>
> 2014-07-07
> --
> 2.19.2
>
> ___
> Libosinfo mailing list
> Libosinfo@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
