[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140702] It disappeared "To page" item from Anchor drop-down widget on Frame toolbar in Writer

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140702

Mike Kaganski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||1091

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141091] No Anchor to Page in pop up menu for images and objects in Writer

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141091

Mike Kaganski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||0702
 Blocks||135836


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135836
[Bug 135836] UI: Discourage usage of the to page anchor by hiding it from
toolbar/context menu
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 84456] Installer Warning 1946 on creating shortcuts on upgrade

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84456

--- Comment #12 from gwi60...@bigpond.net.au ---
2021-18-03 downloaded LibreOffice 7.1.1.2 for windows x86_64 (windows 7) and
had the message: Warning 1946 Property 'System.AppUserModel.ID' for shortcut
'LibreOffice Writer.ink' could not be set.  Acknowledged warning and install
continued OK.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141081] Unwanted lines around images inserted into ODT documents

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141081

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
 CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141083] writer problem with Keyscramler

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141083

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
 Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG

--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote  ---
You use third party (non-MS) apps encrypting keyboard entry at your own risk.
Take it up with QFX (supp...@qfxsoftware.com); no idea if their Pro version
would have support for norm win32 MFC program like LibreOffice.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135929] Increasing image size, makes a part of the text vanish from canvas (anchor to character is especially error prone)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135929

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135944] Selected table can't with splitted and merged cells can't be overwritten/ nor does it past in the cells as what happens with regular table

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135944

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140772] Crash in: swlo.dll

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140772

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135849] Image shuffle around when moving an image (another example)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135849

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135901] Missing space suggestion has an exception, where i would expect it too

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135901

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135869] Anchor a chart behaves differently/wonky compared to an image

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135869

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140777] Password protection conflicts with Autosave

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140777

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140770] Extention-icons create new toolbar in Print Preview

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140770

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140553] FIXED Function Documentation is not up to date

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140553

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140683] Shift of view, after export of the document to xml (Writer)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140683

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141081] Unwanted lines around images inserted into ODT documents

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141081

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|1   |0
 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141081] Unwanted lines around images inserted into ODT documents

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141081

--- Comment #7 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141061] Images are not working properly in LibreOffice Writer with .docx

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141061

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|1   |0
 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141061] Images are not working properly in LibreOffice Writer with .docx

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141061

--- Comment #8 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141041] Validity Cell Range Visibility Problem (can't increase the width of the drop down menu)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141041

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|1   |0
 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141041] Validity Cell Range Visibility Problem (can't increase the width of the drop down menu)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141041

--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136865] Toolbar icons looking broken/currupted on

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136865

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear oidiegosan...@protonmail.com,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136511] Writer eats all the CPU after a while until the user saves on older hardware

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136511

--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear rimrunner,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136315] LibreOffice 7.0.0 Refuses to Open After Using It Once on a Windows Session

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136315

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear bhiskins.1984.2,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 128993] Annoying delay of 10 seconds when opening Libreoffice Writer files

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128993

--- Comment #12 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear schregenb.u,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135520] new install of 7.0.0 causes endless restarts

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135520

--- Comment #9 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear cbolin,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 98412] SIDEBAR: Line properties not always updated

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98412

--- Comment #8 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Laurent BP,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 82117] Improve shortcut key list for German keyboard layout

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82117

--- Comment #19 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Kü,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 78955] Other: pasting composite selections with graphs from ods to odt-file does not preserve lines in charts linear and logarithmic

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78955

--- Comment #11 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear ErikMAkkerman,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 76785] User-defined colors in Excel not loaded properly from xls

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76785

--- Comment #10 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear M Welinder,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 72514] VaryColorsbyPoint changes legend colors, not point colors

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72514

--- Comment #13 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Dorien James,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68679] Bar charts do not allow timestamps

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68679

--- Comment #8 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear pinus,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 66617] chart2 unoapi test fails on sch.ChXDiagram::com::sun::star::chart::ChartStatistics::RegressionCurves

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66617

--- Comment #11 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Michael Stahl (CIB),

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 66217] Wrong formatting when pasting as HTML for a text copied from Notepad++ (win only)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66217

--- Comment #12 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear access2godzilla,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 65925] FILESAVE: Ugly HTML code when changing capital letters and bold text

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65925

--- Comment #15 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear matta2006,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 57642] Gradient lost when FILEOPEN .xls (MSO97)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57642

--- Comment #9 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Rainer Bielefeld Retired,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124140] Vector graphics are incorrectly shown in Impress.

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124140

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear sebastian.severin,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 116439] OS/2 multi-image bitmap does not display correctly

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116439

--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Chris Sherlock,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 116435] XML Form Document: Impossible to rename default-value "instanceData"

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116435

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Robert Großkopf,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101611] pdfimport filter does not honor page cropping (masking) as set in a PDF document, resulting pages in LO document are oversize (comment 4)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101611

--- Comment #10 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear E.Mi,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141091] New: No Anchor to Page in pop up menu for images and objects in Writer

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141091

Bug ID: 141091
   Summary: No Anchor to Page in pop up menu for images and
objects in Writer
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.1.1.2 release
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: pasi...@gmail.com

Description:
Version 7.1.1.2, upgrade from 7.0.? on Windows 10 Pro Build 19041 Laptop.
Paste image in Writer document. Right click image > Anchor.  Options listed: To
Paragraph, To Character, As Character. Option 'To Page' missing (omitted).
Right Click image > Properties > Type tab > Anchor includes 'To Page' option,
and it works.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Paste an image in Writer document.
2.Right click image.
3.Hover or click on Anchor to view options.

Actual Results:
1.Paste an image in Writer document.
2.Right click image.
3.Hover or click on Anchor to view list of options.
4.List: To Paragraph, To Character, As Character.

Expected Results:
4.List: To Page, To Paragraph, To Character, As Character.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
4.List: To Page, To Paragraph, To Character, As Character.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: vcl/CppunitTest_vcl_bitmap_test.mk vcl/inc vcl/qa vcl/source vcl/workben

2021-03-17 Thread Tomaž Vajngerl (via logerrit)
 vcl/CppunitTest_vcl_bitmap_test.mk  |1 
 vcl/qa/cppunit/XpmFilterTest.cxx|   76 ++
 vcl/qa/cppunit/data/XPM_1.xpm   |   15 ++
 vcl/qa/cppunit/data/XPM_4.xpm   |   23 +++
 vcl/qa/cppunit/data/XPM_8.xpm   |  263 
 vcl/source/filter/graphicfilter.cxx |2 
 vcl/source/filter/ixpm/xpmread.cxx  |3 
 vcl/workben/fftester.cxx|2 
 vcl/workben/xpmfuzzer.cxx   |2 
 9 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 80da19ae298b4b4d8802906f88fde0c0f9348765
Author: Tomaž Vajngerl 
AuthorDate: Wed Mar 17 14:20:43 2021 +0900
Commit: Tomaž Vajngerl 
CommitDate: Thu Mar 18 04:02:36 2021 +0100

vcl: test for reading the XPM format

Change-Id: I416a1c02d737dba716b55a7eb902181c3cff22b6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112598
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomaž Vajngerl 

diff --git a/vcl/CppunitTest_vcl_bitmap_test.mk 
b/vcl/CppunitTest_vcl_bitmap_test.mk
index 187bb6871845..3e28b96b62e9 100644
--- a/vcl/CppunitTest_vcl_bitmap_test.mk
+++ b/vcl/CppunitTest_vcl_bitmap_test.mk
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ $(eval $(call 
gb_CppunitTest_add_exception_objects,vcl_bitmap_test, \
 vcl/qa/cppunit/BitmapScaleTest \
 vcl/qa/cppunit/BitmapFilterTest \
 vcl/qa/cppunit/BmpFilterTest \
+vcl/qa/cppunit/XpmFilterTest \
 ))
 
 $(eval $(call gb_CppunitTest_use_externals,vcl_bitmap_test,\
diff --git a/vcl/source/filter/ixpm/xpmread.hxx b/vcl/inc/filter/XpmReader.hxx
similarity index 100%
rename from vcl/source/filter/ixpm/xpmread.hxx
rename to vcl/inc/filter/XpmReader.hxx
diff --git a/vcl/qa/cppunit/XpmFilterTest.cxx b/vcl/qa/cppunit/XpmFilterTest.cxx
new file mode 100644
index ..121dc62a4fd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vcl/qa/cppunit/XpmFilterTest.cxx
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- */
+/*
+ * This file is part of the LibreOffice project.
+ *
+ * This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+ * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+ * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+ */
+
+#include 
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+class XpmFilterTest : public test::BootstrapFixture
+{
+public:
+OUString maDataUrl;
+OUString getFullUrl(std::u16string_view sFileName)
+{
+return m_directories.getURLFromSrc(maDataUrl) + sFileName;
+}
+XpmFilterTest()
+: maDataUrl(u"/vcl/qa/cppunit/data/")
+{
+}
+};
+
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(XpmFilterTest, testXPM_8bit)
+{
+SvFileStream aFileStream(getFullUrl(u"XPM_8.xpm"), StreamMode::READ);
+Graphic aGraphic;
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(ImportXPM(aFileStream, aGraphic));
+auto aBitmap = aGraphic.GetBitmapEx();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(tools::Long(4), aBitmap.GetSizePixel().Width());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(tools::Long(4), aBitmap.GetSizePixel().Height());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(sal_uInt16(8), aBitmap.GetBitCount());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(COL_LIGHTBLUE, aBitmap.GetPixelColor(0, 0));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(COL_LIGHTRED, aBitmap.GetPixelColor(2, 0));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(COL_YELLOW, aBitmap.GetPixelColor(0, 2));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(COL_LIGHTGREEN, aBitmap.GetPixelColor(2, 2));
+}
+
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(XpmFilterTest, testXPM_4bit)
+{
+SvFileStream aFileStream(getFullUrl(u"XPM_4.xpm"), StreamMode::READ);
+Graphic aGraphic;
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(ImportXPM(aFileStream, aGraphic));
+auto aBitmap = aGraphic.GetBitmapEx();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(tools::Long(4), aBitmap.GetSizePixel().Width());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(tools::Long(4), aBitmap.GetSizePixel().Height());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(sal_uInt16(4), aBitmap.GetBitCount());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(COL_LIGHTBLUE, aBitmap.GetPixelColor(0, 0));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(COL_LIGHTRED, aBitmap.GetPixelColor(2, 0));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(COL_YELLOW, aBitmap.GetPixelColor(0, 2));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(COL_LIGHTGREEN, aBitmap.GetPixelColor(2, 2));
+}
+
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(XpmFilterTest, testXPM_1bit)
+{
+SvFileStream aFileStream(getFullUrl(u"XPM_1.xpm"), StreamMode::READ);
+Graphic aGraphic;
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(ImportXPM(aFileStream, aGraphic));
+auto aBitmap = aGraphic.GetBitmapEx();
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(tools::Long(10), aBitmap.GetSizePixel().Width());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(tools::Long(10), aBitmap.GetSizePixel().Height());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(sal_uInt16(1), aBitmap.GetBitCount());
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(Color(0xff), aBitmap.GetPixelColor(0, 0));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(Color(0x72d1c8), aBitmap.GetPixelColor(1, 1));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(Color(0x72d1c8), aBitmap.GetPixelColor(8, 8));
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(Color(0xff), aBitmap.GetPixelColor(9, 9));
+}
+
+/* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab: */
diff --git a/vcl/qa/cppunit/data/XPM_1.xpm b/vcl/qa/cppunit/data/XPM_1.xpm
new file mode 100644
index 

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141090] New: Direct Cursor causes instant slowdown in v7.xx of Writer

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141090

Bug ID: 141090
   Summary: Direct Cursor causes instant slowdown in v7.xx of
Writer
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.1.1.2 release
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: LibreOffice
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: m...@macktek.com

Description:
Enabling Direct Cursor automatically creates severe lag in writer.

In prior versions I have used Direct Cursor for all my documents. 
Resetting my Profile removed Direct Cursor. Lag was not present since Direct
Cursor was unchecked.
Upon re-activating direct cursor, the problem is very noticeable. There is a
lot of cursor lag and delay in typing especially with images in the document.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open any doc with images.
2. Go into tools/options/Libre Office Writer/Formatting Aids, and check Direct
Cursor under the Direct Cursor section.
3. Try moving and repositioning your cursor.

Actual Results:
VERY slow when Direct Cursor is on.

Expected Results:
If Direct Cursor is not active, then it works fine.

The expected result is that it should work well when Direct Cursor is
checked...


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes



Additional Info:
Version: 7.1.1.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: fe0b08f4af1bacafe4c7ecc87ce55bb426164676
CPU threads: 32; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 17763; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: CL

This explains why "resetting" my profile works... because direct cursor gets
unchecked when you reset.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 137741] Fields objects should be navigable in Navigator and the Find bar

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137741

--- Comment #9 from Jim Raykowski  ---
Created attachment 170541
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170541=edit
demo of navigator field category

Hi All,

Here is effort to realize the Navigator Field category part of this enhancement
request. It would be great if someone could provide a test document that is
more realistic than what is used in the demo. 

https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112560

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140752] .uno.DefaultNumbering and .uno:defaultBullet (on Formatting bar) modify a list style -- should it?

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140752

--- Comment #5 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Cannot follow. What I do is
> 
> 1. Add some lines of text a,b,c
> 2. Apply list style "Numbering 123" via stylist to these lines
> 3. Per "Toggle Ordered List" on the toolbar I switch to round brackets
4. Open Styles deck and edit list style Numbering 123 to confirm in the style
dialog that the change has also been registered for Numbering 123 List style.

Whether it was the developers intention or not (comment 4), it also seems like
a UI/UX problem. If you (by mistake) used the dropdown box in the Formatting
toolbar to change the numbering scheme of your list style, as in your example
(or even worse, choose the lower right corner in the Outline tab of B
dialog), then any formatting that you did with position and customize is lost
in your Numbering 123 list style. Afaict, all operations in the Bullets and
Numbering dialog (including Outline) will modify the settings in a list style. 
This is not consistent with the usual style interactions (i.e., with character
and paragraph, using character or paragraph dialog or using Formatting bar does
not modify CS or PS).

My aim with this bug report is to highlight this issue -- in the belief that
others will find it problematic - and might try to address the problem. Even if
the existing underlying implementation of lists is not changed, there are
probably a number of UI changes that could be done to preserve the "mythic"
beliefs around significant differences between DF and List Styles. Bug 140612
was one small UI suggestion in that direction. But now I think my aim is
achieved, so I will leave the matter to more qualified persons.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 140752] .uno.DefaultNumbering and .uno:defaultBullet (on Formatting bar) modify a list style -- should it?

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140752

--- Comment #5 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Cannot follow. What I do is
> 
> 1. Add some lines of text a,b,c
> 2. Apply list style "Numbering 123" via stylist to these lines
> 3. Per "Toggle Ordered List" on the toolbar I switch to round brackets
4. Open Styles deck and edit list style Numbering 123 to confirm in the style
dialog that the change has also been registered for Numbering 123 List style.

Whether it was the developers intention or not (comment 4), it also seems like
a UI/UX problem. If you (by mistake) used the dropdown box in the Formatting
toolbar to change the numbering scheme of your list style, as in your example
(or even worse, choose the lower right corner in the Outline tab of B
dialog), then any formatting that you did with position and customize is lost
in your Numbering 123 list style. Afaict, all operations in the Bullets and
Numbering dialog (including Outline) will modify the settings in a list style. 
This is not consistent with the usual style interactions (i.e., with character
and paragraph, using character or paragraph dialog or using Formatting bar does
not modify CS or PS).

My aim with this bug report is to highlight this issue -- in the belief that
others will find it problematic - and might try to address the problem. Even if
the existing underlying implementation of lists is not changed, there are
probably a number of UI changes that could be done to preserve the "mythic"
beliefs around significant differences between DF and List Styles. Bug 140612
was one small UI suggestion in that direction. But now I think my aim is
achieved, so I will leave the matter to more qualified persons.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sw/source

2021-03-17 Thread Jim Raykowski (via logerrit)
 sw/source/uibase/utlui/content.cxx |4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 005adbefc746f9024adcf572c287dc061acbcf00
Author: Jim Raykowski 
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 9 12:06:20 2021 -0900
Commit: Jim Raykowski 
CommitDate: Thu Mar 18 01:50:50 2021 +0100

Sw Navigator: fix table selection

Fixes table selection from the Navigator not selecting the whole table.

Change-Id: If6a9161d011a056aad02c3bd99c19e62802288c7
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112254
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Jim Raykowski 

diff --git a/sw/source/uibase/utlui/content.cxx 
b/sw/source/uibase/utlui/content.cxx
index d70494d64cc7..fe9da9cfc0e1 100644
--- a/sw/source/uibase/utlui/content.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/uibase/utlui/content.cxx
@@ -3953,7 +3953,7 @@ void SwContentTree::ExecuteContextMenuAction(const 
OString& rSelectedPopupEntry)
 case 804:
 ExecCommand("demote", true);
 break;
-case 805:
+case 805: // select document content
 {
 m_pActiveShell->KillPams();
 m_pActiveShell->ClearMark();
@@ -3973,7 +3973,7 @@ void SwContentTree::ExecuteContextMenuAction(const 
OString& rSelectedPopupEntry)
 else if (eTypeId == ContentTypeId::TABLE)
 {
 m_pActiveShell->GotoTable(pCnt->GetName());
-m_pActiveShell->SelAll();
+
m_pActiveShell->GetView().GetViewFrame()->GetDispatcher()->Execute(FN_TABLE_SELECT_ALL);
 }
 else if (eTypeId == ContentTypeId::REGION)
 {
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits


[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'distro/lhm/libreoffice-6-4+backports' - dbaccess/source xmlsecurity/CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing.mk xmlsecurity/qa

2021-03-17 Thread Samuel Mehrbrodt (via logerrit)
 dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx  |   11 -
 xmlsecurity/CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing.mk |1 
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/odb_signed_macros.odb |binary
 xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing2.cxx   |  127 +
 4 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 5a25faaa27cfed40bb6a9406146719599ba99e47
Author: Samuel Mehrbrodt 
AuthorDate: Thu May 7 12:03:48 2020 +0200
Commit: Thorsten Behrens 
CommitDate: Thu Mar 18 01:15:54 2021 +0100

tdf#97694 Add test for macro signature preservation in Base

Conflicts:
  dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx

Change-Id: I35fb8d499eed66f9a5e208a4778a1f0f12637079
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/93630
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Samuel Mehrbrodt 
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112638
Tested-by: Thorsten Behrens 
Reviewed-by: Thorsten Behrens 

diff --git a/dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx 
b/dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx
index d5c3b9b3e086..21e45033ea4f 100644
--- a/dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx
+++ b/dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx
@@ -856,14 +856,17 @@ bool 
ODatabaseModelImpl::commitStorageIfWriteable_ignoreErrors( const Reference<
 aTempFile.EnableKillingFile();
 OUString m_sTmpFileUrl = aTempFile.GetURL();
 SignatureState aSignatureState = getScriptingSignatureState();
-if (aSignatureState == SignatureState::OK
-|| aSignatureState == SignatureState::NOTVALIDATED
-|| aSignatureState == SignatureState::INVALID)
+OUString sLocation = getDocFileLocation();
+bool bIsEmbedded = sLocation.startsWith("vnd.sun.star.pkg:") && 
sLocation.endsWith("/EmbeddedDatabase");
+if (!bIsEmbedded && !sLocation.isEmpty()
+&& (aSignatureState == SignatureState::OK || aSignatureState == 
SignatureState::NOTVALIDATED
+|| aSignatureState == SignatureState::INVALID
+|| aSignatureState == SignatureState::UNKNOWN))
 {
 bTryToPreserveScriptSignature = true;
 // We need to first save the file (which removes the macro signature), 
then add the macro signature again.
 // For that, we need a temporary copy of the original file.
-osl::File::RC rc = osl::File::copy(getDocFileLocation(), 
m_sTmpFileUrl);
+osl::File::RC rc = osl::File::copy(sLocation, m_sTmpFileUrl);
 if (rc != osl::FileBase::E_None)
 throw uno::RuntimeException("Could not create temp file");
 }
diff --git a/xmlsecurity/CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing.mk 
b/xmlsecurity/CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing.mk
index 84e7a76c043b..7d0c5200ff27 100644
--- a/xmlsecurity/CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing.mk
+++ b/xmlsecurity/CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing.mk
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ $(eval $(call gb_CppunitTest_CppunitTest,xmlsecurity_signing))
 
 $(eval $(call gb_CppunitTest_add_exception_objects,xmlsecurity_signing, \
xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing \
+   xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing2 \
 ))
 
 $(eval $(call gb_CppunitTest_use_libraries,xmlsecurity_signing, \
diff --git a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/odb_signed_macros.odb 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/odb_signed_macros.odb
new file mode 100644
index ..3e90f4514599
Binary files /dev/null and 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/odb_signed_macros.odb differ
diff --git a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing2.cxx 
b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing2.cxx
new file mode 100644
index ..152d62a18974
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing2.cxx
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- */
+/*
+ * This file is part of the LibreOffice project.
+ *
+ * This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+ * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+ * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+ */
+
+#include 
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+#include 
+
+using namespace css;
+
+namespace
+{
+char const DATA_DIRECTORY[] = "/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/";
+}
+
+/// Testsuite for the document signing feature.
+class SigningTest2 : public test::BootstrapFixture, public 
unotest::MacrosTest, public XmlTestTools
+{
+protected:
+uno::Reference mxComponentContext;
+uno::Reference mxComponent;
+uno::Reference mxSEInitializer;
+uno::Reference mxSecurityContext;
+
+public:
+SigningTest2();
+virtual void setUp() override;
+virtual void tearDown() override;
+void registerNamespaces(xmlXPathContextPtr& pXmlXpathCtx) override;
+};
+
+SigningTest2::SigningTest2() {}
+
+void SigningTest2::setUp()
+{
+test::BootstrapFixture::setUp();
+
+// Initialize crypto after setting up the 

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: helpcontent2

2021-03-17 Thread Seth Chaiklin (via logerrit)
 helpcontent2 |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit 7053ec94b47432aad6c5d1d82dd85e41bc08d2ac
Author: Seth Chaiklin 
AuthorDate: Thu Mar 18 01:05:07 2021 +0100
Commit: Gerrit Code Review 
CommitDate: Thu Mar 18 01:05:07 2021 +0100

Update git submodules

* Update helpcontent2 from branch 'master'
  to 367a4f5cf3d78adaeec36715a37286a6a2cea694
  - tdf#139667 update numbering paragraphs; joining lists; chapter numbering

  ( swriter/01/0606.xhp )
+ variable to tip about using Chapter Numbering dialog
  to add numbering to headings, so that it can be embedded
  in other help pages.
+ add links in tip to Tools - Chapter Numbering and other
  icons, toolbars, and dialogs mentioned in the tip.
+ Emphasize in the tip to use the Chapter Numbering dialog instead
  of direct formatting, when adding numbering to Headings.

  ( swriter/guide/join_numbered_lists.xhp )
* "numbered" -> "ordered"
* "Numbering On/Off" -> "Toggle Ordered List"
* In paragraphs with changes, update to 
+ add a  about "Add to List", with link to
  relevant page.
* update to ,,

  ( swriter/guide/numbering_paras.xhp )
* "numbered" -> "ordered"
* replace tip about chapter numbering with embed from
  swriter/01/0606.xhp
* "Numbering On/Off" -> "No List"

Change-Id: I242bfef2535d5fbcd95355d79e77403ce0071679
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/112518
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 

diff --git a/helpcontent2 b/helpcontent2
index 5ed37664620c..367a4f5cf3d7 16
--- a/helpcontent2
+++ b/helpcontent2
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit 5ed37664620c9e664b06c4660529ad0f200bbc5e
+Subproject commit 367a4f5cf3d78adaeec36715a37286a6a2cea694
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits


[Libreoffice-commits] help.git: source/text

2021-03-17 Thread Seth Chaiklin (via logerrit)
 source/text/swriter/01/0606.xhp   |2 +-
 source/text/swriter/guide/join_numbered_lists.xhp |   17 +
 source/text/swriter/guide/numbering_paras.xhp |   16 
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 367a4f5cf3d78adaeec36715a37286a6a2cea694
Author: Seth Chaiklin 
AuthorDate: Mon Mar 15 17:42:29 2021 +0100
Commit: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
CommitDate: Thu Mar 18 01:05:07 2021 +0100

tdf#139667 update numbering paragraphs; joining lists; chapter numbering

  ( swriter/01/0606.xhp )
+ variable to tip about using Chapter Numbering dialog
  to add numbering to headings, so that it can be embedded
  in other help pages.
+ add links in tip to Tools - Chapter Numbering and other
  icons, toolbars, and dialogs mentioned in the tip.
+ Emphasize in the tip to use the Chapter Numbering dialog instead
  of direct formatting, when adding numbering to Headings.

  ( swriter/guide/join_numbered_lists.xhp )
* "numbered" -> "ordered"
* "Numbering On/Off" -> "Toggle Ordered List"
* In paragraphs with changes, update to 
+ add a  about "Add to List", with link to
  relevant page.
* update to ,,

  ( swriter/guide/numbering_paras.xhp )
* "numbered" -> "ordered"
* replace tip about chapter numbering with embed from
  swriter/01/0606.xhp
* "Numbering On/Off" -> "No List"

Change-Id: I242bfef2535d5fbcd95355d79e77403ce0071679
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/112518
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 

diff --git a/source/text/swriter/01/0606.xhp 
b/source/text/swriter/01/0606.xhp
index 677c488e1..8fef88075 100644
--- a/source/text/swriter/01/0606.xhp
+++ b/source/text/swriter/01/0606.xhp
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 
 
 Chapter 
numbering is linked to paragraph styles. By default, the "Heading" paragraph 
styles (1-10) are assigned to the corresponding chapter and outline number 
levels (1-10). If you want, you can assign different paragraph styles to the 
outline number level.
-If you want numbered headings, use 
the Chapter Numbering dialog. Do not use the Toggle Ordered List 
icon on the Formatting bar.
+If you want numbered headings, choose 
Tools - Chapter 
Numbering. This command opens a dialog where numbering 
schemes can be assigned to paragraph styles used for headings. Do not use the 
Toggle 
Ordered List icon on the Formatting Bar or the Format - 
Bullets and Numbering 
dialog.
 
 
 
diff --git a/source/text/swriter/guide/join_numbered_lists.xhp 
b/source/text/swriter/guide/join_numbered_lists.xhp
index 7fa6db49e..f343d4a52 100644
--- a/source/text/swriter/guide/join_numbered_lists.xhp
+++ b/source/text/swriter/guide/join_numbered_lists.xhp
@@ -35,22 +35,21 @@
   paragraphs;numbering non-consecutive
 
 
+Combining Ordered Lists
+You can 
combine two ordered lists into a single list.
 
-Combining Numbered Lists
-You can 
combine numbered lists into a single consecutively numbered list.
-
-To 
Combine Consecutive Numbered Lists
+To Combine Two Ordered Lists
 
 
   
 Select all 
of the paragraphs in the lists.
   
   
-On the 
Formatting Bar, click the Numbering On/Off icon twice.
+On the 
Formatting Bar, click the Toggle Ordered 
List icon twice.
   
 
 
-To 
Create a Numbered List From Non-consecutive Paragraphs:
+To Create a Ordered List From 
Non-consecutive Paragraphs
 
 
   
@@ -60,16 +59,18 @@
 Continue to 
hold down CommandCtrl,
 and drag a selection in each numbered paragraph of the lists you want to 
combine.
   
   
-On the 
Formatting Bar, click the Numbering On/Off icon twice.
+On the 
Formatting Bar, click the Toggle Ordered 
List icon twice.
   
 
-
+To add selected paragraphs to an existing 
list, use Format - Lists - Add to List.
+
 
 
 
 
 
 
+
 
 
 
diff --git a/source/text/swriter/guide/numbering_paras.xhp 
b/source/text/swriter/guide/numbering_paras.xhp
index 4bf7f70de..ddf4c84e8 100644
--- a/source/text/swriter/guide/numbering_paras.xhp
+++ b/source/text/swriter/guide/numbering_paras.xhp
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 
 
   
-Modifying Numbering in a Numbered 
List
+Modifying Numbering in an Ordered 
List
 /text/swriter/guide/numbering_paras.xhp
   
 
@@ -37,11 +37,11 @@
 
 MW changed "removing;..." to "deleting;...", and deleted 
"modifying;..."
 
-Modifying Numbering in a Numbered List
-You can remove 
the numbering from a paragraph in a numbered list or change the number that a 
numbered list starts with.
-If you want numbered headings, use 
the Tools - Chapter Numbering menu command to assign a 
numbering to a paragraph style. Do not use the Numbering icon on the Formatting 
toolbar.
+Modifying Numbering in an Ordered List
+You can remove 
the numbering from a paragraph in an ordered list or change the number that an 
ordered list starts with.
+
 

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140321] Fontwork: Change in surface has no effect

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140321

--- Comment #4 from Regina Henschel  ---
It seems, that this four materials correspond to the OOXML material presets
legacyMatte, legacyMetal, legacyPlastic and legacyWireframe, which are
specified in section 20.1.10.50 ST_PresetMaterialType (Preset Material Type) in
ISO/IEC 29500-1:2016(E). But in case someone really wants to implement it, I
suggest to use material presets, which are currently available in the UI of MS
Office.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141081] Unwanted lines around images inserted into ODT documents

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141081

--- Comment #6 from david.c@virgin.net ---
Wow.  Granted, not a bug.  It vanished when switched off.

That being said, add some hovering tooltip - I would _never_ have thought to
equate a random line around an image with "text boundary" visibility.  Just
looks like a random image aberration.  Hence the bug report.  

Thanks for explaining.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127463] FILEOPEN DOCX Table made from grouped shapes shows up in the table

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127463

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 |
   |8693|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96640] FORMATTING: (Grouped) drawing objects are rendered in a wrong way (.docx file)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96640

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 |
   |8693|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127370] FILEOPEN DOCX Images in header and footer lose alignment settings

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127370

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 |
   |8693|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 122717] FILEOPEN Horizontal line in DOCX has wrong size/position

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122717

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 |
   |8693|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140854] Base VIEWING - darkened columns for Memo [LONGVARCHAR]

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140854

--- Comment #8 from Yannick Chiron  ---
Bug still present in LibreOffice 7.1.2 RC1.
Bug not present in LibreOffice 7.0.5, so I reverted to it while a fix is found.
Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Thanks for your work.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127555] Formatting, regression. Grouped drawing object on a wrong page and overlaps another drawing object

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127555

--- Comment #8 from Aron Budea  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118693 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141089] Chart does not get inserted in LibreOffice Calc

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141089

An-Kh  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||anshukhar...@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from An-Kh  ---
Created attachment 170540
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170540=edit
Chart Insertion

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141089] New: Chart does not get inserted in LibreOffice Calc

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141089

Bug ID: 141089
   Summary: Chart does not get inserted in LibreOffice Calc
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: anshukhar...@gmail.com

Description:
If we insert a chart (let say bar chart), in calc it does not get inserted.
Please have a look at the attachment

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Open spreadsheet in LibreOffice Calc
2.Menubar -> Insert -> Chart

Actual Results:
Chart does not get inserted

Expected Results:
Chart should be inserted


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: d809066ff7cd2f75d1f8569085ae39f375a783fa
CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19041; UI render: default; VCL: win
Locale: en-IN (en_IN); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138706] [META] Regressions from "tdf106792 Get rid of SvxShapePolyPolygonBezier"

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138706
Bug 138706 depends on bug 96640, which changed state.

Bug 96640 Summary: FORMATTING: (Grouped) drawing objects are rendered in a 
wrong way (.docx file)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96640

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136328] [META] DOCX Grouped shape related issues

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136328
Bug 136328 depends on bug 96640, which changed state.

Bug 96640 Summary: FORMATTING: (Grouped) drawing objects are rendered in a 
wrong way (.docx file)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96640

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96640] FORMATTING: (Grouped) drawing objects are rendered in a wrong way (.docx file)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96640

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #13 from Xisco Faulí  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118693 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138706] [META] Regressions from "tdf106792 Get rid of SvxShapePolyPolygonBezier"

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138706
Bug 138706 depends on bug 127370, which changed state.

Bug 127370 Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX Images in header and footer lose alignment 
settings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127370

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136328] [META] DOCX Grouped shape related issues

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136328
Bug 136328 depends on bug 127370, which changed state.

Bug 127370 Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX Images in header and footer lose alignment 
settings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127370

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104522] [META] DOCX (OOXML) header & footer-related issues

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104522
Bug 104522 depends on bug 127370, which changed state.

Bug 127370 Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX Images in header and footer lose alignment 
settings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127370

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127370] FILEOPEN DOCX Images in header and footer lose alignment settings

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127370

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #7 from Xisco Faulí  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118693 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138706] [META] Regressions from "tdf106792 Get rid of SvxShapePolyPolygonBezier"

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138706
Bug 138706 depends on bug 127463, which changed state.

Bug 127463 Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX Table made from grouped shapes shows up in 
the table
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127463

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136328] [META] DOCX Grouped shape related issues

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136328
Bug 136328 depends on bug 127463, which changed state.

Bug 127463 Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX Table made from grouped shapes shows up in 
the table
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127463

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127463] FILEOPEN DOCX Table made from grouped shapes shows up in the table

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127463

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #7 from Xisco Faulí  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118693 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138706] [META] Regressions from "tdf106792 Get rid of SvxShapePolyPolygonBezier"

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138706
Bug 138706 depends on bug 139651, which changed state.

Bug 139651 Summary: FILEOPEN Object layout shifts after import from docx into 
libreoffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139651

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104442] [META] OOXML shape (DrawingML and VML) related issues

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104442
Bug 104442 depends on bug 139651, which changed state.

Bug 139651 Summary: FILEOPEN Object layout shifts after import from docx into 
libreoffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139651

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139651] FILEOPEN Object layout shifts after import from docx into libreoffice

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139651

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #8 from Xisco Faulí  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118693 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138706] [META] Regressions from "tdf106792 Get rid of SvxShapePolyPolygonBezier"

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138706
Bug 138706 depends on bug 131275, which changed state.

Bug 131275 Summary: Fileopen DOCX: Organigram wrong again
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131275

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136328] [META] DOCX Grouped shape related issues

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136328
Bug 136328 depends on bug 131275, which changed state.

Bug 131275 Summary: Fileopen DOCX: Organigram wrong again
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131275

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131275] Fileopen DOCX: Organigram wrong again

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131275

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #5 from Xisco Faulí  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 118693 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141086] Password asked in a loop when open a file on a WebDav Server

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141086

--- Comment #2 from Uwe Auer  ---
repro

Version: 7.1.1.2 / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: fe0b08f4af1bacafe4c7ecc87ce55bb426164676
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.3; UI render: default; VCL: kf5
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 118693] FILEOPEN: Drawing has incorrect size

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118693

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
   |desktop.org |

--- Comment #14 from Xisco Faulí  ---
I think I know how to fix this...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579

--- Comment #42 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
Created attachment 170539
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=170539=edit
Possible final version for "Add to List" help

(In reply to Dieter from comment #41)
> So perhaps "target list" could be a solution? But it's up to you
> to decide. 
Left as is. Seems less problematic than other "solutions". "target" introduces
a new undefined term. (btw, this difficulty is related to the query in comment
23 about the necessity of a first step to "choose a list")

See attached for new version. 

> We should use it as a starting point and we will see if some
> modifications are needed later.
Agree.  This page is supposed to explain the operation of the command. 
But there are many interesting and useful ways that the command can be used.
For example, to add items "before" the list (see Test 2 in comment 33 for one
example). Perhaps you also imagine a "guide" page, that gives some examples of 
typical "use cases", that shows what the command can be used for, rather than
explaining the basic procedure for how the command works (which is still only
formulated empirically by induction from experiment - have not tried to find
the source code).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141081] Unwanted lines around images inserted into ODT documents

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141081

--- Comment #5 from Uwe Auer  ---
This looks like option View -> [ ] Text Boundaries visual aid and not a bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


Re: Unit Tests failing when built with clang 12

2021-03-17 Thread Luke Benes
Sounds like there is a headless or distro dependent aspect of this bug too. I 
can reproduce this on both my i686 openSUSE Tumbleweed (32-bit) laptop and on 
my x86-64 openSUSE Tumbleweed desktop. This issue has not been fixed in clang 
13 as today's build 402f2cae7dcab also fails. I also was able to reproduce the 
failures with this autogen.input: 

--enable-optimized
--disable-debug
--disable-dbgutil
CC=clang
CXX=clang++

What distro is this working on? I can try that in a VM.

-Luke
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134236] Enable Writer in "Web View" to keep focus on text cursor when resizing program window

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134236

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
   Keywords||needsUXEval

--- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Holding the Writer edit cursor position focus when moving between Normal view
and Web view would really be helpful.

But kind of expect that calculating the position in document reliably between
the two modes requires new dev effort.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 134236] Enable Writer in "Web View" to keep focus on text cursor when resizing program window

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134236

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
   Keywords||needsUXEval

--- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Holding the Writer edit cursor position focus when moving between Normal view
and Web view would really be helpful.

But kind of expect that calculating the position in document reliably between
the two modes requires new dev effort.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141086] Password asked in a loop when open a file on a WebDav Server

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141086

--- Comment #1 from Uwe Auer  ---
*** Bug 141087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141087] Password asked in a loop when open a file on a WebDav Server

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141087

Uwe Auer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Uwe Auer  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 141086 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141077] Writer Web mode should be one-column, instead it shows meaningless page breaks and column jumps

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141077

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
   Keywords||needsUXEval

--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote  ---
much like the requests to make the pagination in Web view relate to its Normal
view layout--eliminating the otherwise functional page layout in columns offers
no real benefit.

If you want to use the uncluttered Web view layout to write in, great. Just
accept that its VCL handling is calculated against an unisized page (10 meters
tall, at the current app frame width minus controls).

Reflowing from Web view to Normal view, or reverse, will otherwise honor the
page settings of the document.

If you don't want columns in Web view reformat the page style for the document
to single column--you can't have it both ways.  Single column in Web view and
multicolumn in Normal view.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 141077] Writer Web mode should be one-column, instead it shows meaningless page breaks and column jumps

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141077

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
   Keywords||needsUXEval

--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote  ---
much like the requests to make the pagination in Web view relate to its Normal
view layout--eliminating the otherwise functional page layout in columns offers
no real benefit.

If you want to use the uncluttered Web view layout to write in, great. Just
accept that its VCL handling is calculated against an unisized page (10 meters
tall, at the current app frame width minus controls).

Reflowing from Web view to Normal view, or reverse, will otherwise honor the
page settings of the document.

If you don't want columns in Web view reformat the page style for the document
to single column--you can't have it both ways.  Single column in Web view and
multicolumn in Normal view.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 67698] VIEWING: Implement 'Normal View' that includes the real page numbers in a 'Web Layout'-type view (comment #7)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67698

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu

--- Comment #14 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Page numbers in Web view are recalculated against a 10 meter page size [1],
while paragraphs reflow with no margins to extent of canvas exposed in the app
frame at any selected zoom.

=-ref-=
[1]
https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sw/source/core/inc/frmtool.hxx?r=ebe1f639#54

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579

--- Comment #41 from Dieter  ---
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #40)
> Proposed alternative:
> 
> Select paragraphs to be added to a list. Paragraphs can be in a different
> list or no list at all.
I was talking about the "target" list and not the list where parapgraphs are
selected. So perhaps "target list" could be a solution? But it's up to you to
decide. We don't have to go in deeper discussion from my side.


> See top of help page (in attachment).  Ok?
Yes, O.K. I haven't seen this. Sorry for that.


> Ok. Something like "Add Selected Paragraphs to a Previous List" from bug
> 36220  attachment 169995 [details], but change title to:
> "Add Consecutive List Entries to an Immediately Prior List"
> 1. Select one or more consecutive list entries, starting from the first
> entry, that you want to add to the immediately prior list.
> 2. Right-click
O.K.

> Agree with both points.  But what do you think is still missing?
Don't know. We should use it as a starting point and we will see if some
modifications are needed later.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 116983] Paste is sometimes deactivated in (context) menu even though text is copied to clipboard and CTRL+V functioning (steps: Comment 0 and Comment 13 and Comment 28 and Comm

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116983

--- Comment #96 from Apt  ---
So far I can't replicate it in 7.2. Hopefully it stays that way!

Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: d97528da0c70c43fccd3239cbe8e064c3480bba8
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: CL

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 133786] enable Writer in its 'Web' view mode to display page numbering of its 'Normal' view

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133786

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #12 from V Stuart Foote  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 67698 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list
Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133786] enable Writer in its 'Web' view mode to display page numbering of its 'Normal' view

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133786

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #12 from V Stuart Foote  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 67698 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 67698] VIEWING: Implement 'Normal View' that includes the real page numbers in a 'Web Layout'-type view (comment #7)

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67698

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||tpy...@gmail.com

--- Comment #13 from V Stuart Foote  ---
*** Bug 133786 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: include/vcl vcl/source

2021-03-17 Thread Luboš Luňák (via logerrit)
 include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx   |   13 
 vcl/source/gdi/impglyphitem.cxx |   61 
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit d697e792c5b4b27aad8806694e1b8e22dcc70eae
Author: Luboš Luňák 
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 16 16:28:02 2021 +0100
Commit: Luboš Luňák 
CommitDate: Wed Mar 17 22:49:57 2021 +0100

optimize SalLayoutGlyphs for the common case

This should reduce memory usage (libstdc++ vector is 3 int's and
allocates dynamically). The usual case should be no font fallback.

Change-Id: I2e7981c0962f4f417fd024e3c27f01bc2a71127e
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112591
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Luboš Luňák 

diff --git a/include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx b/include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx
index 02d783a3e166..d928bb954ee7 100644
--- a/include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx
+++ b/include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx
@@ -31,7 +31,11 @@ class SalLayoutGlyphsImpl;
 
 class VCL_DLLPUBLIC SalLayoutGlyphs final
 {
-std::vector m_pImpls;
+SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* m_pImpl = nullptr;
+// Extra items are in a dynamically allocated vector in order to save 
memory.
+// The usual case should be that this stays unused (it should be only used
+// when font fallback takes place).
+std::vector* m_pExtraImpls = nullptr;
 
 public:
 SalLayoutGlyphs() = default;
@@ -42,11 +46,8 @@ public:
 SalLayoutGlyphs& operator=(const SalLayoutGlyphs&) = delete;
 SalLayoutGlyphs& operator=(SalLayoutGlyphs&&);
 
-SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* Impl(unsigned int nLevel) const
-{
-return nLevel < m_pImpls.size() ? m_pImpls[nLevel] : nullptr;
-}
-void AppendImpl(SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* pImpl) { m_pImpls.push_back(pImpl); }
+SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* Impl(unsigned int nLevel) const;
+void AppendImpl(SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* pImpl);
 
 bool IsValid() const;
 void Invalidate();
diff --git a/vcl/source/gdi/impglyphitem.cxx b/vcl/source/gdi/impglyphitem.cxx
index d271032e2ad6..e368305cdba1 100644
--- a/vcl/source/gdi/impglyphitem.cxx
+++ b/vcl/source/gdi/impglyphitem.cxx
@@ -25,35 +25,74 @@
 
 SalLayoutGlyphs::~SalLayoutGlyphs()
 {
-for (SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* impl : m_pImpls)
-delete impl;
+delete m_pImpl;
+if (m_pExtraImpls)
+for (SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* impl : *m_pExtraImpls)
+delete impl;
 }
 
-SalLayoutGlyphs::SalLayoutGlyphs(SalLayoutGlyphs&& rOther) { 
std::swap(m_pImpls, rOther.m_pImpls); }
+SalLayoutGlyphs::SalLayoutGlyphs(SalLayoutGlyphs&& rOther)
+{
+std::swap(m_pImpl, rOther.m_pImpl);
+std::swap(m_pExtraImpls, rOther.m_pExtraImpls);
+}
 
 SalLayoutGlyphs& SalLayoutGlyphs::operator=(SalLayoutGlyphs&& rOther)
 {
 if (this != )
-std::swap(m_pImpls, rOther.m_pImpls);
+{
+std::swap(m_pImpl, rOther.m_pImpl);
+std::swap(m_pExtraImpls, rOther.m_pExtraImpls);
+}
 return *this;
 }
 
 bool SalLayoutGlyphs::IsValid() const
 {
-if (m_pImpls.empty())
+if (m_pImpl == nullptr)
+return false;
+if (!m_pImpl->IsValid())
 return false;
-for (SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* impl : m_pImpls)
-if (!impl->IsValid())
-return false;
+if (m_pExtraImpls)
+for (SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* impl : *m_pExtraImpls)
+if (!impl->IsValid())
+return false;
 return true;
 }
 
 void SalLayoutGlyphs::Invalidate()
 {
 // Invalidating is in fact simply clearing.
-for (SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* impl : m_pImpls)
-delete impl;
-m_pImpls.clear();
+delete m_pImpl;
+m_pImpl = nullptr;
+if (m_pExtraImpls)
+{
+for (SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* impl : *m_pExtraImpls)
+delete impl;
+delete m_pExtraImpls;
+m_pExtraImpls = nullptr;
+}
+}
+
+SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* SalLayoutGlyphs::Impl(unsigned int nLevel) const
+{
+if (nLevel == 0)
+return m_pImpl;
+if (m_pExtraImpls != nullptr && nLevel - 1 < m_pExtraImpls->size())
+return (*m_pExtraImpls)[nLevel - 1];
+return nullptr;
+}
+
+void SalLayoutGlyphs::AppendImpl(SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* pImpl)
+{
+if (m_pImpl == nullptr)
+m_pImpl = pImpl;
+else
+{
+if (m_pExtraImpls == nullptr)
+m_pExtraImpls = new std::vector;
+m_pExtraImpls->push_back(pImpl);
+}
 }
 
 SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* SalLayoutGlyphsImpl::clone() const { return new 
SalLayoutGlyphsImpl(*this); }
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits


[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: include/vcl sc/source svtools/source sw/source vcl/inc vcl/qa vcl/source

2021-03-17 Thread Luboš Luňák (via logerrit)
 include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx   |   19 ++
 include/vcl/outdev.hxx  |6 ++-
 include/vcl/vcllayout.hxx   |6 +--
 sc/source/ui/view/output2.cxx   |4 +-
 svtools/source/control/ruler.cxx|6 ---
 sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx |6 ---
 vcl/inc/impglyphitem.hxx|7 +--
 vcl/inc/sallayout.hxx   |   13 --
 vcl/qa/cppunit/complextext.cxx  |   10 ++---
 vcl/source/control/imp_listbox.cxx  |6 ---
 vcl/source/gdi/CommonSalLayout.cxx  |   68 ++--
 vcl/source/gdi/impglyphitem.cxx |   42 ++
 vcl/source/gdi/sallayout.cxx|   64 +++--
 vcl/source/outdev/font.cxx  |9 ++--
 vcl/source/outdev/text.cxx  |4 +-
 vcl/source/window/menuitemlist.cxx  |6 ---
 vcl/source/window/status.cxx|   16 
 17 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 145 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 7439cabc643de2f07c18adc35056f802997f484a
Author: Luboš Luňák 
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 16 15:04:08 2021 +0100
Commit: Luboš Luňák 
CommitDate: Wed Mar 17 22:49:33 2021 +0100

make SalLayoutGlyphs work with MultiSalLayout

Code that needs to lay out texts repeatedly can cache the result
of SalLayout::GetGlyphs() can reuse it. But GetGlyphs() returns
nullptr for MultiSalLayout, so caching for it doesn't work. Worse
still, it actually increases the number of layout calls, because
there's the initial layout for caching and then each call
will need to do the layout again because of the nullptr that's
not cached.

This commit changes SalLayoutGlyphs to possibly include multiple
SalLayoutGlyphsImpl objects, one for each SalLayout handled
by MultiSalLayout. Changes include making GenericSalLayout
work directly with the Impl class, which avoids an indirection
and simplifies code.

Change-Id: Ic4b19934a8a06d4955b51527fe3777c5e91107b2
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112590
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Luboš Luňák 

diff --git a/include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx b/include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx
index 7634bd3a4413..02d783a3e166 100644
--- a/include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx
+++ b/include/vcl/glyphitem.hxx
@@ -23,23 +23,30 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 
+#include 
+
 typedef sal_uInt16 sal_GlyphId;
 
 class SalLayoutGlyphsImpl;
 
 class VCL_DLLPUBLIC SalLayoutGlyphs final
 {
-friend class SalLayoutGlyphsImpl;
-SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* m_pImpl;
+std::vector m_pImpls;
 
 public:
-SalLayoutGlyphs();
-SalLayoutGlyphs(const SalLayoutGlyphs&);
+SalLayoutGlyphs() = default;
+SalLayoutGlyphs(const SalLayoutGlyphs&) = delete;
+SalLayoutGlyphs(SalLayoutGlyphs&&);
 ~SalLayoutGlyphs();
 
-SalLayoutGlyphs& operator=(const SalLayoutGlyphs&);
+SalLayoutGlyphs& operator=(const SalLayoutGlyphs&) = delete;
+SalLayoutGlyphs& operator=(SalLayoutGlyphs&&);
 
-SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* Impl() const { return m_pImpl; }
+SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* Impl(unsigned int nLevel) const
+{
+return nLevel < m_pImpls.size() ? m_pImpls[nLevel] : nullptr;
+}
+void AppendImpl(SalLayoutGlyphsImpl* pImpl) { m_pImpls.push_back(pImpl); }
 
 bool IsValid() const;
 void Invalidate();
diff --git a/include/vcl/outdev.hxx b/include/vcl/outdev.hxx
index a8d77c77b30e..ce7d54e75689 100644
--- a/include/vcl/outdev.hxx
+++ b/include/vcl/outdev.hxx
@@ -1352,11 +1352,13 @@ public:
  SalLayoutFlags flags 
= SalLayoutFlags::NONE,
  vcl::TextLayoutCache 
const* = nullptr) const;
 SAL_DLLPRIVATE std::unique_ptr
-ImplGlyphFallbackLayout( 
std::unique_ptr, ImplLayoutArgs& ) const;
+ImplGlyphFallbackLayout( 
std::unique_ptr,
+ ImplLayoutArgs&,
+ const 
SalLayoutGlyphs* ) const;
 SAL_DLLPRIVATE std::unique_ptr
 getFallbackLayout(
 LogicalFontInstance* pLogicalFont, int 
nFallbackLevel,
-ImplLayoutArgs& rLayoutArgs) const;
+ImplLayoutArgs& rLayoutArgs, const 
SalLayoutGlyphs* ) const;
 
 
 // Enabling/disabling RTL only makes sense for OutputDevices that use a 
mirroring SalGraphicsLayout
diff --git a/include/vcl/vcllayout.hxx b/include/vcl/vcllayout.hxx
index 7d53d12bd40b..e09e54f59d65 100644
--- a/include/vcl/vcllayout.hxx
+++ b/include/vcl/vcllayout.hxx
@@ -24,13 +24,13 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 
 class ImplLayoutArgs;
 class PhysicalFontFace;
 class SalGraphics;
 class GlyphItem;
-class SalLayoutGlyphs;
 
 // all positions/widths are in font units
 // one exception: drawposition is in pixel 

[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sw/source

2021-03-17 Thread Luboš Luňák (via logerrit)
 sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx |   18 --
 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 9d02d86e8a9111b7a689062eb9a856146a9e80b1
Author: Luboš Luňák 
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 12 14:08:11 2021 +0100
Commit: Luboš Luňák 
CommitDate: Wed Mar 17 22:49:05 2021 +0100

do not disable Writer font caching on zoom mismatch

This code disables font caching for some cases, e.g. when exporting
to PDF if the zoom is set to anything else than 100%, or also when
loading a document.

It unfortunately comes from the OOo initial import, so it's
impossible to find out why it should be needed. SwFntObj instances
are created only using SwFntAccess ctor, which checks any SwFntObj
it tries to reuse, so if this some additional factor to consider
when reusing SwFntObj, then it can be checked there. But when I
remove the code, I cannot see any breakage. Tests pass, normal
rendering is fine, document thumbnail is fine, printing is fine,
PDF export is fine, embedding in a spreadsheet is fine.

We had a look at this with Miklos and concluded that it is not
needed (until proven otherwise, in which case it'll be also known
why it would be needed).

Change-Id: I59d375229a265a4353c1da6dd067d892dd4ecfb6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112589
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Luboš Luňák 

diff --git a/sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx 
b/sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx
index b0ed8eb4d72b..2327ce0de4ce 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx
@@ -591,24 +591,6 @@ void SwFntObj::CreateScrFont( const SwViewShell& rSh, 
const OutputDevice& rOut )
 m_pScrFont = m_pPrtFont;
 }
 
-// check zoom factor, e.g. because of PrtOle2 during export
-{
-// In case the zoom factor of the output device differs from the
-// one in the ViewOptions, this Font must not be cached,
-// hence set zoom factor to an invalid value
-tools::Long nTmp;
-if( pOut->GetMapMode().GetScaleX().IsValid() &&
-pOut->GetMapMode().GetScaleY().IsValid() &&
-pOut->GetMapMode().GetScaleX() == pOut->GetMapMode().GetScaleY() )
-{
-nTmp = tools::Long(100 * pOut->GetMapMode().GetScaleX());
-}
-else
-nTmp = 0;
-if( nTmp != m_nZoom )
-m_nZoom = USHRT_MAX - 1;
-}
-
 m_nScrAscent = static_cast(pOut->GetFontMetric().GetAscent());
 if ( USHRT_MAX == m_nScrHeight )
 m_nScrHeight = static_cast(pOut->GetTextHeight());
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 140579] It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579

--- Comment #40 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Dieter from comment #39)
> "1. Select ... added to a different list."
Because selected paragraphs do not have to be in a list, "different list" would
not always be meaningful.

Proposed alternative:

Select paragraphs to be added to a list. Paragraphs can be in a different list
or no list at all.

> After step 3: "Result:  Selected paragraphs get the labelling and...
See top of help page (in attachment).  Ok?

> I also propose to add a more simplier solution, 
Ok. Something like "Add Selected Paragraphs to a Previous List" from bug 36220 
attachment 169995, but change title to:

"Add Consecutive List Entries to an Immediately Prior List"
1. Select one or more consecutive list entries, starting from the first entry,
that you want to add to the immediately prior list.
2. Right-click

(that formulation will exclude the non-functional Technique D).

> Perhaps we still don't have a 100% solution but better than no help.
Agree with both points.  But what do you think is still missing?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sw/source

2021-03-17 Thread Luboš Luňák (via logerrit)
 sw/source/core/inc/fntcache.hxx |   23 ++
 sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx |  136 +---
 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 3f69ec9ab4236de13d229f675943123aeb42ea29
Author: Luboš Luňák 
AuthorDate: Thu Mar 11 15:34:41 2021 +0100
Commit: Luboš Luňák 
CommitDate: Wed Mar 17 22:48:45 2021 +0100

improve font caching in SwFntObj

The code previously cached only SalGlyphItems, but such caching
fails if SalLayout::GetGlyphs() does not return valid glyphs,
which is the case with MultiSalLayout. Worse, it not only fails,
but layout is once computed for caching, that fails, and is computed
a second time for actual use.

This improved cache caches the result of GetTextWidth(), which
itself improves the performance a bit, but it also allows caching
the value for GetGlyph() not returning valid glyphs. Moreover this
also caches failures to get valid glyphs from GetGlyphs().

There are quite some calls to GetTextArray(), I didn't cache those,
but it might be added if needed.

Change-Id: Ia2589fb1b778f4f154c88f65d9906584284239da
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/112588
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Luboš Luňák 

diff --git a/sw/source/core/inc/fntcache.hxx b/sw/source/core/inc/fntcache.hxx
index 61564de93e72..848ad3611c10 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/inc/fntcache.hxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/inc/fntcache.hxx
@@ -60,19 +60,9 @@ void SwClearFntCacheTextGlyphs();
 extern SwFntCache *pFntCache;
 extern SwFntObj *pLastFont;
 
-/**
- * Defines a substring on a given output device, to be used as an std::map<>
- * key.
- */
-struct SwTextGlyphsKey
-{
-VclPtr m_pOutputDevice;
-OUString m_aText;
-sal_Int32 m_nIndex;
-sal_Int32 m_nLength;
-
-};
+struct SwTextGlyphsKey;
 bool operator<(const SwTextGlyphsKey& l, const SwTextGlyphsKey& r);
+struct SwTextGlyphsData;
 
 class SwFntObj : public SwCacheObj
 {
@@ -95,8 +85,8 @@ class SwFntObj : public SwCacheObj
 bool m_bSymbol : 1;
 bool m_bPaintBlank : 1;
 
-/// Cache of already calculated layout glyphs.
-std::map m_aTextGlyphs;
+/// Cache of already calculated layout glyphs and text widths.
+std::map m_aTextGlyphs;
 
 static tools::Long nPixWidth;
 static MapMode *pPixMap;
@@ -125,7 +115,10 @@ public:
 sal_uInt16   GetZoom() const { return m_nZoom; }
 sal_uInt16   GetPropWidth() const { return m_nPropWidth; }
 bool IsSymbol() const { return m_bSymbol; }
-std::map& GetTextGlyphs() { return 
m_aTextGlyphs; }
+
+tools::Long GetCachedTextWidth(const SwTextGlyphsKey& key, const 
vcl::TextLayoutCache* vclCache);
+SalLayoutGlyphs* GetCachedSalLayoutGlyphs(const SwTextGlyphsKey& key);
+void ClearCachedTextGlyphs();
 
 void   DrawText( SwDrawTextInfo  );
 /// determine the TextSize (of the printer)
diff --git a/sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx 
b/sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx
index 5b8661b4cf5a..b0ed8eb4d72b 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/txtnode/fntcache.cxx
@@ -71,6 +71,28 @@ tools::Long SwFntObj::nPixWidth;
 MapMode* SwFntObj::pPixMap = nullptr;
 static vcl::DeleteOnDeinit< VclPtr > s_pFntObjPixOut( new 
VclPtr );
 
+/**
+ * Defines a substring on a given output device, to be used as an std::map<>
+ * key.
+ */
+struct SwTextGlyphsKey
+{
+VclPtr m_pOutputDevice;
+OUString m_aText;
+sal_Int32 m_nIndex;
+sal_Int32 m_nLength;
+
+};
+
+/**
+ * Glyphs and text width for the given SwTextGlyphsKey.
+ */
+struct SwTextGlyphsData
+{
+SalLayoutGlyphs m_aTextGlyphs;
+tools::Long m_nTextWidth = -1; // -1 = not computed yet
+};
+
 namespace
 {
 
@@ -93,36 +115,6 @@ tools::Long EvalGridWidthAdd( const SwTextGridItem *const 
pGrid, const SwDrawTex
 return nGridWidthAdd;
 }
 
-/**
- * Pre-calculates glyph items for the rendered subset of rKey's text, assuming
- * outdev state does not change between the outdev calls.
- */
-SalLayoutGlyphs* lcl_CreateLayout(const SwTextGlyphsKey& rKey, 
SalLayoutGlyphs& rTextGlyphs)
-{
-// Use pre-calculated result.
-if (rTextGlyphs.IsValid())
-return 
-
-if (rKey.m_nIndex >= rKey.m_aText.getLength())
-// Same as in OutputDevice::GetTextArray().
-return nullptr;
-
-// Calculate glyph items.
-std::unique_ptr pLayout
-= rKey.m_pOutputDevice->ImplLayout(rKey.m_aText, rKey.m_nIndex, 
rKey.m_nLength, Point(0, 0), 0,
- nullptr, 
SalLayoutFlags::GlyphItemsOnly);
-if (!pLayout)
-return nullptr;
-
-const SalLayoutGlyphs* pGlyphs = pLayout->GetGlyphs();
-if (!pGlyphs)
-return nullptr;
-
-// Remember the calculation result.
-rTextGlyphs = *pGlyphs;
-
-return 
-}
 }
 
 bool operator<(const SwTextGlyphsKey& l, const SwTextGlyphsKey& r)
@@ -223,6 +215,72 @@ void SwFntObj::CreatePrtFont( const OutputDevice& rPrt )
 
 

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141088] New: Freeze rows and colums act like hide columns and rows with the frozen part

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141088

Bug ID: 141088
   Summary: Freeze rows and colums act like hide columns and rows
with the frozen part
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.1.1.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: assamite4e...@gmail.com

Home
Version: 7.1.1.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: fe0b08f4af1bacafe4c7ecc87ce55bb426164676
CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: hu-HU (en_GB); UI: en-GB
Calc: CL

Freeze rows and colums act like hide columns and rows if apply when the not all
the  columns and rows visible what i want too freeze. I don't know this is a
valid behavior but unlogical. There isn't possibility to scroll back to make
them visible . I experienced with columns but is the same with rows... Unhide
columns or rows don't work because they really aren't hide. only solution the
unfreeze and freeze again with the wanted screen position. The problem that as
i see freeze work with selected row or column or cell if both but not position
of the sheet. The problem appears at work computer x86 OS x86 libreoffice and
home with x64 OS & Libreoffice.

Screen Capture
2021-03-17 22-04-04.mkv 5,6 MB
https://mega.nz/file/N1pygJyT#1FWPzYfS09f6eSQfmUOwEEReCYKMIx-ZTQUdWOIXboY

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88859] LO Writer math formulas disappear or shrink

2021-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88859

Vincent Bamps  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |---
 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

--- Comment #15 from Vincent Bamps  ---
The problem still occurs with latest version:
Version: 7.1.1.2 / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: fe0b08f4af1bacafe4c7ecc87ce55bb426164676
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: fr-BE (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL

The formula isn't editable anymore.
The formula appaers squished to the new random size

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   >