[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 48387] LibreOffice OpenGrok doesn't integrate well
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48387 --- Comment #16 from alisha oberoi --- Following the breakup, it is possible that your heart is being emptied of all emotion. You want a girl who can pamper you, pamper you, and make you feel valued and appreciated. But on the other side, your heart is weak, and it is challenging to be in a relationship. Your female udaipur escort will do everything perfectly. She will lavish you with all the romantic love and affection you'll never forget. https://www.udaipurescortservice.com https://www.udaipurescortservice.com/call-girls-udaipur-city.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: comphelper/source
comphelper/source/misc/accessiblewrapper.cxx |4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 7aa758b9f4c5153673cdbedd558289df8b0cbd14 Author: Michael Weghorn AuthorDate: Tue Sep 5 22:28:39 2023 +0200 Commit: Michael Weghorn CommitDate: Wed Sep 6 07:50:52 2023 +0200 a11y: Just use std::map::clear ... instead of creating an empty map and calling `std::map::swap`. Change-Id: Ieb53cc1a75d1e52452987ad234562d175f762ad0 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156582 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Michael Weghorn diff --git a/comphelper/source/misc/accessiblewrapper.cxx b/comphelper/source/misc/accessiblewrapper.cxx index af5cd50a378b..4c8d98977cd3 100644 --- a/comphelper/source/misc/accessiblewrapper.cxx +++ b/comphelper/source/misc/accessiblewrapper.cxx @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ namespace comphelper xComp->removeEventListener( this ); } // clear the map -AccessibleMap().swap(m_aChildrenMap); +m_aChildrenMap.clear(); } @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ namespace comphelper } // clear our children -AccessibleMap().swap(m_aChildrenMap); +m_aChildrenMap.clear(); }
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: accessibility/source
accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessibletoolbox.cxx | 41 +++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit e151ea63b0fb1d099410dab141953621a2d67328
Author: Michael Weghorn
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 5 15:12:43 2023 +0200
Commit: Michael Weghorn
CommitDate: Wed Sep 6 07:50:08 2023 +0200
a11y: Drop unnecessary casting/code for toolbox items
All (top-level) toolbox items have always been
`VCLXAccessibleToolBoxItem` ever since
commit f7da8972336b8ce3e0fb71b0c50464508837a5f3
Author: Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Date: Wed Jun 27 14:41:59 2007 +
INTEGRATION: CWS a11ysep (1.1.2); FILE ADDED
2007/02/28 07:29:13 fs 1.1.2.4: #i1#
2006/10/05 08:20:15 fs 1.1.2.3: MANUAL RESYNC m130->m185:
file had been modified in MWS, but moved herein in CWS
2005/09/28 11:35:38 fs 1.1.2.2: manual resync (files have been
moved herein from another location): licence change
2005/03/07 08:29:10 fs 1.1.2.1: #i44293# moved implementations
herein from toolkit module
, so the dynamic_cast to check whether an item is a
`OToolBoxWindowItem` is unnecessary and misleading
when reading the code.
This is even easier to see now after
commit af08e6c2f46a6d99b2e18fe176c15ec2b6edb2fd
Author: Noel Grandin
Date: Wed Aug 30 14:02:11 2023 +0200
use concrete type for ToolBoxItemsMap
`OToolBoxWindowItem`s are only set as children
for the `VCLXAccessibleToolBoxItem`s, s.
`VCLXAccessibleToolBox::getAccessibleChild`.
Also drop now unused
`OToolBoxWindowItem::getIndexInParent` and
`OToolBoxWindowItem::setIndexInParent`.
Change-Id: I7dcef304942ed25b77918f01cf9b679b6be6e23c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156566
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Michael Weghorn
diff --git a/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessibletoolbox.cxx
b/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessibletoolbox.cxx
index a3ea0ec99d72..acb1d2547133 100644
--- a/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessibletoolbox.cxx
+++ b/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessibletoolbox.cxx
@@ -83,10 +83,6 @@ namespace
private:
sal_Int32 m_nIndexInParent;
-public:
-sal_Int32getIndexInParent() const{ return
m_nIndexInParent; }
-void setIndexInParent( sal_Int32 _nNewIndex ){
m_nIndexInParent = _nNewIndex; }
-
public:
OToolBoxWindowItem(sal_Int32 _nIndexInParent,
const css::uno::Reference< css::uno::XComponentContext >&
_rxContext,
@@ -253,26 +249,17 @@ void VCLXAccessibleToolBox::UpdateIndeterminate_Impl(
ToolBox::ImplToolItems::si
void VCLXAccessibleToolBox::implReleaseToolboxItem( ToolBoxItemsMap::iterator
const & _rMapPos,
bool _bNotifyRemoval )
{
-Reference< XAccessible > xItemAcc( _rMapPos->second );
+rtl::Reference xItemAcc(_rMapPos->second);
if ( !xItemAcc.is() )
return;
if ( _bNotifyRemoval )
{
-NotifyAccessibleEvent( AccessibleEventId::CHILD, Any( xItemAcc ),
Any() );
+NotifyAccessibleEvent(AccessibleEventId::CHILD,
Any(Reference(xItemAcc)), Any());
}
-auto pWindowItem = dynamic_cast(xItemAcc.get());
-if ( !pWindowItem )
-{
-static_cast< VCLXAccessibleToolBoxItem* >( xItemAcc.get()
)->ReleaseToolBox();
-::comphelper::disposeComponent( xItemAcc );
-}
-else
-{
-Reference< XAccessibleContext > xContext(
pWindowItem->getContextNoCreate() );
-::comphelper::disposeComponent( xContext );
-}
+xItemAcc->ReleaseToolBox();
+xItemAcc->dispose();
}
void VCLXAccessibleToolBox::UpdateItem_Impl( ToolBox::ImplToolItems::size_type
_nPos)
@@ -292,24 +279,12 @@ void VCLXAccessibleToolBox::UpdateItem_Impl(
ToolBox::ImplToolItems::size_type _
//TODO: ToolBox::ImplToolItems::size_type -> sal_Int32!
while ( m_aAccessibleChildren.end() != aIndexAdjust )
{
-Reference< XAccessible > xItemAcc( aIndexAdjust->second );
-
-auto pWindowItem = dynamic_cast(xItemAcc.get());
-if ( !pWindowItem )
-{
-VCLXAccessibleToolBoxItem* pItem = static_cast<
VCLXAccessibleToolBoxItem* >( xItemAcc.get() );
-if ( pItem )
-{
-sal_Int32 nIndex = pItem->getIndexInParent( );
-nIndex++;
-pItem->setIndexInParent( nIndex );
-}
-}
-else
+rtl::Reference xItem(aIndexAdjust->second);
+if (xItem.is())
{
-sal_Int32 nIndex = pWindowItem->getIndexInParent( );
+sal_Int32 nIndex = xItem->getIndexInParent();
nIndex++;
-pWindowItem->setIndexInParent( nIndex );
+xItem->setIndexInParent(nIndex);
}
++aIndexAdjust;
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156584] Embedded database registered url rule
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156584 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Alex Thurgood --- Confirming, this problem has been around since the release of OOo first supporting embedded hsqldb, and became more acute as hsqldb has evolved in version of the years. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156584] Embedded database registered url rule
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156584 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ipla...@tuta.io, ||sberg...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Alex Thurgood --- @prrvchr: you might want to try to contact Stephan Bergmann about how the loading of the jars might be addressed across the various OSes that the project supports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 61189] PDF printing mode problem: HP LaserJet + media type + no tray + user prompt (refer comment #10)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61189 crx...@hotmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://atencionalclientees | |pana.com/instagram/ | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 61189] PDF printing mode problem: HP LaserJet + media type + no tray + user prompt (refer comment #10)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61189 paulscott changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://atencionalclientees ||pana.com/instagram/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Confusing unit test error
Hi,
We sent a patch to gerrit. Before sending it we did "make sw.check" and
passed. But after submitting Jenkins reported a unit test error. So we
tried to "make check" again.
It failed, but not the way Jenkins reported.
[CUT]i18npool_transliteration
[_RUN_] (anonymous namespace)::IndexEntry::testJapanese
unknown:0:(anonymous namespace)::IndexEntry::testJapanese
An uncaught exception of type
com.sun.star.loader.CannotActivateFactoryException
- no constructor symbol
"i18npool_IndexEntrySupplier_ja_phonetic_alphanumeric_first_by_consonant_get_imp
lementation" in component library
at
/opt/git/libreoffice.core/cppuhelper/source/shlib.cxx:344
(anonymous namespace)::IndexEntry::testJapanese finished in: 4ms
##Failure Location unknown## : Error
Test name: (anonymous namespace)::IndexEntry::testJapanese
An uncaught exception of type
com.sun.star.loader.CannotActivateFactoryException
- no constructor symbol
"i18npool_IndexEntrySupplier_ja_phonetic_alphanumeric_first_by_consonant_get_imp
lementation" in component library
at
/opt/git/libreoffice.core/cppuhelper/source/shlib.cxx:344
Failures !!!
Run: 1 Failure total: 1 Failures: 0 Errors: 1
on Jenkins https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_master_ml/2094/ the
error was:
Execution time for tdf147755.Tdf147755.test_tdf147755: 0.866
close
FAIL
==
FAIL: test_tdf147755 (tdf147755.Tdf147755)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/tdf/lode/jenkins/workspace/lo_gerrit/Config/linux_clang_dbgutil_64/uitest/math_tests/tdf147755.py",
line 30, in test_tdf147755
self.assertEqual("%ALPHA ", get_state_as_dict(xEditView)["Text"])
AssertionError: '%ALPHA ' != '%ALPHA'
- %ALPHA
? -
+ %ALPHA
--
Ran 5 tests in 9.984s
FAILED (failures=1)
Tests run: 5
Tests failed: 1
Tests errors: 0
Tests skipped: 0
tearDown: calling terminate()...
...done
Either one we have no idea what to do and how to solve it. Could anyone
please give us some hints and advice?
Thanks, Dev
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 43227] FILEOPEN: UI to set workgroup (system DB) for opening MS Access (.mdb) files
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43227 Adlair Cerecedo-Mendez changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |adl...@linuxmail.org |desktop.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156863] Warning message reported during PDF/A-1b (ISO 19005) export
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156863 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156983] Autocorrect not working on Windows 11
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156983 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156860] installing routine for "LibreOffice-Help Pack (German)" shows buggy message
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156860 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156983] Autocorrect not working on Windows 11
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156983 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153412] No lines for translate of "Insert Rows About" button
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153412 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153412] No lines for translate of "Insert Rows About" button
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153412 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear neurofreak-alt, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153381] External links in Data tab of LibreOffice 7.5.0.3 returns nothing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153381 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153331] Base Database files no longer working after update
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153331 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153381] External links in Data tab of LibreOffice 7.5.0.3 returns nothing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153381 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Temitope, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153331] Base Database files no longer working after update
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153331 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear lexi_q, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 55571] [META] ACCESSIBILITY: Tracking bug for issues related to the macOS Accessibility API
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55571 Bug 55571 depends on bug 152395, which changed state. Bug 152395 Summary: [Accessibility] LibreOffice Writer immediately crashes when entering characters and VoiceOver is running. https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152395 What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152395] [Accessibility] LibreOffice Writer immediately crashes when entering characters and VoiceOver is running.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152395 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152395] [Accessibility] LibreOffice Writer immediately crashes when entering characters and VoiceOver is running.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152395 --- Comment #10 from QA Administrators --- Dear Marco Zehe, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107701] [META] Table border bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107701 Bug 107701 depends on bug 146784, which changed state. Bug 146784 Summary: Border of Table show blurry in libreoffice writer https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146784 What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146784] Border of Table show blurry in libreoffice writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146784 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152320] Unreadable default Breeze theme if system has dark theme
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152320 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear a.geno, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 146784] Border of Table show blurry in libreoffice writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146784 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- Dear recobayu, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153665] After Windows 11 sleeping Calc crashes, recover feature does not work
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153665 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Siarhei Kuchuk, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154083] LibreOffice & Calc 7.4.5 don't start
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154083 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Ron Larkin, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154093] The Liberation Sans font seems to disable the spell-check while typing.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154093 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear chrislschroed, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149046] Error in the description of the mathematical formula
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149046 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Pier, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148774] Autofilter confusing input search with Standard filter (UX)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148774 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear MichaelB, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90953] Brochure printing adds blank pages
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90953 --- Comment #12 from QA Administrators --- Dear Shem Pasamba, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143963] UNO Object Inspector: Cannot inspect selected object (e.g. paragraph)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143963 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Olivier Hallot, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139148] Open file from share in Read Mode locks the file for other users
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139148 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Marco, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 121617] RTF rendering fails to float the text around a shape despite \shpwr2\shpwr3 as part of the \shp block
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121617 --- Comment #10 from QA Administrators --- Dear poul.steen, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127297] EPUB: recorded changes are included even if View of them is off
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127297 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear Gerhard Weydt, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120867] First file save after opening slower compared to previous versions
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120867 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117352] Firebird: Migration: LibO does not fully release file when ODB file closed without saving after failed migration attempt until LibO session is closed.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117352 --- Comment #16 from QA Administrators --- Dear Drew Jensen, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107203] Name box: copied named expressions not updated after renaming sheet
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107203 --- Comment #11 from QA Administrators --- Dear Oliver Brinzing, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157094] Calc miscalculating addition subtraction multiplication division in row
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157094 --- Comment #4 from ady --- (In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #3) > With this kind of dudes, please go first to ask.libreoffice.org FWIW, by "dudes" you probably meant "doubts". I'm just mentioning this because someone might (mis)understand comment 3 as rude in some way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157036] libreoffice portable V7.6 calc program can not achieve the following function insert->filed(date, sheet name, document_title)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157036 --- Comment #4 from ady --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > > I guess that...the sub-menu could also be displayed... > Don't get this. Please elaborate :-) 1. Open new Calc. 2. (Do _not_ enter into cell edit mode) Click menu Insert > move mouse to "Field" entry within the Insert menu. There is an arrow pointing to the right, indicating that there is a sub-menu for "Field", but when the mouse pointer is focused on the Field entry, the sub-menu does not display the possible entries. Now repeat the steps but with a minor difference: 1. Open new Calc. 2. Press F2 (in order to enter cell's edit mode) and then click menu Insert > move mouse to "Field" entry within the Insert menu. With this modified steps, the field entry is allowed (i.e. not grayed out), and when pointing the mouse to it, the sub-menu entries are displayed (not grayed out, as expected because they can be used in this case). I am trying to suggest that, even when the Field entry of the Insert menu is grayed out, it could still allow to show the sub-entries, also grayed-out when that's the expected case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157036] libreoffice portable V7.6 calc program can not achieve the following function insert->filed(date, sheet name, document_title)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157036 --- Comment #4 from ady --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > > I guess that...the sub-menu could also be displayed... > Don't get this. Please elaborate :-) 1. Open new Calc. 2. (Do _not_ enter into cell edit mode) Click menu Insert > move mouse to "Field" entry within the Insert menu. There is an arrow pointing to the right, indicating that there is a sub-menu for "Field", but when the mouse pointer is focused on the Field entry, the sub-menu does not display the possible entries. Now repeat the steps but with a minor difference: 1. Open new Calc. 2. Press F2 (in order to enter cell's edit mode) and then click menu Insert > move mouse to "Field" entry within the Insert menu. With this modified steps, the field entry is allowed (i.e. not grayed out), and when pointing the mouse to it, the sub-menu entries are displayed (not grayed out, as expected because they can be used in this case). I am trying to suggest that, even when the Field entry of the Insert menu is grayed out, it could still allow to show the sub-entries, also grayed-out when that's the expected case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/tags/mimo-7.3.7.2.M6'
Tag 'mimo-7.3.7.2.M6' created by Aron Budea at 2023-09-06 02:14 + mimo-7.3.7.2.M6 Changes since mimo-7.3.7.2.M5-10: --- 0 files changed ---
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Changes to 'refs/tags/mimo-7.2.7.2.M14'
Tag 'mimo-7.2.7.2.M14' created by Aron Budea at 2023-09-06 02:12 + mimo-7.2.7.2.M14 Changes since mimo-7.2.7.2.M13-8: --- 0 files changed ---
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157109] open .csv changes content
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157109 CSV changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pelardona...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from CSV --- Created attachment 189376 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189376=edit sample file that shows error sample list plain text. Upon further examination, the erroneous conversion is to scientific notation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157109] New: open .csv changes content
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157109 Bug ID: 157109 Summary: open .csv changes content Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.7.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: pelardona...@gmail.com Description: Calc dialog offer an import option to "Detect Special Numbers", which cannot be turned off. Steps to Reproduce: 1.File > Open a .csv file with numbers and text mixed in groups, select separation criteria. 2. Uncheck "detect special numbers" 3. Uncheck ALL auto correction features Actual Results: letter+text combinations looking like hex code, IE3, 2E5, 2E6 etc, are converted to decimal, or scientific notation Expected Results: 2E22 is converted to 2E+22, etc etc etc Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Calc should have imported the numbers exactly like they where in the original file. Moreover, Paste> Paste Special > brings up the same import dialog, with the same results. Manually checking a list with like 4000 numbers is 3$%$#!. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156717] Add minor version / OS to PDF producer metadata
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156717 Adlair Cerecedo-Mendez changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |adl...@linuxmail.org |desktop.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157107] cant save my file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157107 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv --- Please, could you put your question in ask.libreoffice.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157108] "New Style From Selection" for Frames does not seem to copy properties
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157108 Jim Avera changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|"Anchor" corrupted by "New |"New Style From Selection" |Style From Selection" for |for Frames does not seem to |Frames |copy properties -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157108] "Anchor" corrupted by "New Style From Selection" for Frames
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157108 --- Comment #1 from Jim Avera --- Created attachment 189375 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189375=edit demo.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157108] New: "Anchor" corrupted by "New Style From Selection" for Frames
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157108 Bug ID: 157108 Summary: "Anchor" corrupted by "New Style From Selection" for Frames Product: LibreOffice Version: 24.2.0.0 alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: jim.av...@gmail.com Description: I]m wondering if I fundamentally don't understand something about selecting frames and applying frame styles. If the border of a frame is clicked and the resize handles appear, is the Frame selected? Format->Frame and Objects->Properties seems to display the correct props for that frame, so it seems to be selected. HOWEVER, If "New Style From Selection" is then performed in the Styles panel, the resulting named style is not the same as what is shown in Properties of the selected Frame. Shouldn't it be? Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open attached demo.odt 2. View->Styles 3. Select the frame containing "In original Frame" Format->Frame and Objects->Properties ==> Confirm that Anchor is set to "As character" Close the Properties dialog 5. In the Style panel: click the 3rd icon to select "Frame" styles 6. In the Styles menu (tiny triangle at upper right), do "New Style from Selection". Give it a name. 7. Select the new Frame style; rightclick->Edit Style Click the "Type" tab Actual Results: The new style has Anchor set to "To paragraph" Expected Results: Anchor "As character", as it is in the Frame the style was created from Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes Additional Info: Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 78d9d0d8dccb6fd8952435b8a13d525c7606f467 CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 6.2; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155875] [LOCALHELP] - Writer - Help pages about dialogs should provide instructions for the Tabbed UI
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155875 --- Comment #60 from Commit Notification --- Olivier Hallot committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/help/commit/cd6faa2767ad72d56c94259cf100cab49591b209 tdf#155875 UI cmds Writer/Table in Help(31) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] help.git: AllLangHelp_scalc.mk AllLangHelp_shared.mk AllLangHelp_swriter.mk source/text
AllLangHelp_scalc.mk|2 AllLangHelp_shared.mk |2 AllLangHelp_swriter.mk |5 source/text/scalc/01/0503.xhp |7 source/text/scalc/01/05030200.xhp | 53 source/text/scalc/01/0504.xhp |7 source/text/scalc/01/05040200.xhp | 54 source/text/scalc/guide/row_height.xhp |6 source/text/shared/00/00040500.xhp | 296 +++- source/text/shared/01/05110600m.xhp | 11 source/text/shared/01/05120600.xhp |3 source/text/shared/01/SetOptimalColumnWidth.xhp | 88 +++ source/text/shared/01/SetOptimalRowHeight.xhp | 85 ++ source/text/shared/01/minimal_column_width.xhp | 41 +-- source/text/shared/01/minimal_row_height.xhp| 17 - source/text/shared/02/0421.xhp |8 source/text/swriter/00/0405.xhp | 36 ++ source/text/swriter/01/0511.xhp | 46 --- source/text/swriter/01/05110100.xhp | 31 +- source/text/swriter/01/05110200.xhp | 50 source/text/swriter/01/0512.xhp | 45 --- source/text/swriter/01/05120100.xhp | 32 +- source/text/swriter/01/05120200.xhp | 81 -- source/text/swriter/01/05120500.xhp |4 source/text/swriter/01/TableAutoFitMenu.xhp | 41 +++ source/text/swriter/main0110.xhp| 30 -- source/text/swriter/main0204.xhp|2 27 files changed, 539 insertions(+), 544 deletions(-) New commits: commit cd6faa2767ad72d56c94259cf100cab49591b209 Author: Olivier Hallot AuthorDate: Tue Sep 5 20:37:35 2023 -0300 Commit: Olivier Hallot CommitDate: Wed Sep 6 01:39:14 2023 +0200 tdf#155875 UI cmds Writer/Table in Help(31) + refactoring + Table - Size menu (part 31) + Merges optimal row/height into shared file + delete obsolete help pages + delete pages with no HID (obsolete) + Some pages will be revisited Change-Id: I06593f96f3953f0de43a290a956acab94af09b34 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/156584 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Olivier Hallot diff --git a/AllLangHelp_scalc.mk b/AllLangHelp_scalc.mk index 9165ee3fbb..9557466f22 100644 --- a/AllLangHelp_scalc.mk +++ b/AllLangHelp_scalc.mk @@ -96,11 +96,9 @@ $(eval $(call gb_AllLangHelp_add_helpfiles,scalc,\ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/0502 \ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/05020600 \ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/0503 \ -helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/05030200 \ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/05030300 \ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/05030400 \ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/0504 \ -helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/05040200 \ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/0505 \ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/05050100 \ helpcontent2/source/text/scalc/01/05050300 \ diff --git a/AllLangHelp_shared.mk b/AllLangHelp_shared.mk index e77a7c92cf..c40c7c4209 100644 --- a/AllLangHelp_shared.mk +++ b/AllLangHelp_shared.mk @@ -401,6 +401,8 @@ $(eval $(call gb_AllLangHelp_add_helpfiles,shared,\ helpcontent2/source/text/shared/01/securitywarning \ helpcontent2/source/text/shared/01/selectcertificate \ helpcontent2/source/text/shared/01/SelectTable \ +helpcontent2/source/text/shared/01/SetOptimalColumnWidth \ +helpcontent2/source/text/shared/01/SetOptimalRowHeight \ helpcontent2/source/text/shared/01/select_template_category \ helpcontent2/source/text/shared/01/signexistingpdf \ helpcontent2/source/text/shared/01/signsignatureline \ diff --git a/AllLangHelp_swriter.mk b/AllLangHelp_swriter.mk index f39c1ca243..26ffea7b41 100644 --- a/AllLangHelp_swriter.mk +++ b/AllLangHelp_swriter.mk @@ -131,14 +131,10 @@ $(eval $(call gb_AllLangHelp_add_helpfiles,swriter,\ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/0510 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05100300 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05100400 \ -helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/0511 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05110100 \ -helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05110200 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05110300 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05110500 \ -helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/0512 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05120100 \ -helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05120200 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05120300 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05120400 \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/05120500 \ @@ -211,6 +207,7 @@ $(eval $(call gb_AllLangHelp_add_helpfiles,swriter,\ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/spotlight_styles \ helpcontent2/source/text/swriter/01/spotlight_chars_df \
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: helpcontent2
helpcontent2 |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 2ae9eb8be8d7eb9c3a72953a295d128b45639ea3 Author: Olivier Hallot AuthorDate: Tue Sep 5 20:39:14 2023 -0300 Commit: Gerrit Code Review CommitDate: Wed Sep 6 01:39:14 2023 +0200 Update git submodules * Update helpcontent2 from branch 'master' to cd6faa2767ad72d56c94259cf100cab49591b209 - tdf#155875 UI cmds Writer/Table in Help(31) + refactoring + Table - Size menu (part 31) + Merges optimal row/height into shared file + delete obsolete help pages + delete pages with no HID (obsolete) + Some pages will be revisited Change-Id: I06593f96f3953f0de43a290a956acab94af09b34 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/156584 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Olivier Hallot diff --git a/helpcontent2 b/helpcontent2 index 2ae7099c3ba4..cd6faa2767ad 16 --- a/helpcontent2 +++ b/helpcontent2 @@ -1 +1 @@ -Subproject commit 2ae7099c3ba435fc466b2483d2d63d5e1bf493f6 +Subproject commit cd6faa2767ad72d56c94259cf100cab49591b209
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157107] New: cant save my file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157107 Bug ID: 157107 Summary: cant save my file Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.5.3.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: ja1rocastri...@gmail.com can´t save my file after entering data in a box whith comments -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157101] New "Use background" option makes Area dialog too wide in Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157101 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv --- Agree, bTW 'Use background' tab it's empty. Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 410632ac4b8a280e0993e665ffa9cfede8326b49 CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22621; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded Jumbo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157094] Calc miscalculating addition subtraction multiplication division in row
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157094 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from m.a.riosv --- With this kind of dudes, please go first to ask.libreoffice.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157093] Search function(ctrl + H) no finding the words with graphic accent in Portuguese Brazilian
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157093 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #4 from m.a.riosv --- I can reproduce now (I was testing in writer where it works fine me) in Version: 7.6.2.0.0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: a70b613e6b5d95362f34f57df5cda22a74cb670e CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22621; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded Versión: 6.4.7.2 (x64) Id. de compilación: 639b8ac485750d5696d7590a72ef1b496725cfb5 Subprocs. CPU: 16; SO: Windows 10.0 Build 22621; Repres. IU: GL; VCL: win; Configuración regional: es-ES (es_ES); Idioma de IU: es-ES Calc: CL I think it is since its introduction. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156282] Outline Folding Toggle not available for entire Headings outline
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156282 --- Comment #9 from bathsheba --- Thank you very much Jim! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94024] ZOrder of Shapes stops increment after 65535 Shapes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94024 --- Comment #8 from Julien Nabet --- I tried to reproduce this on pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today but either I missed something or it seems to work. Could someone give a try at least with LO 7.5.5 or with LO 7.6.0 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sfx2/uiconfig
sfx2/uiconfig/ui/managestylepage.ui |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) New commits: commit fdb2a457708f345affa6dd254180220b08393c2e Author: Seth Chaiklin AuthorDate: Mon Sep 4 17:29:41 2023 +0200 Commit: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos CommitDate: Tue Sep 5 23:02:59 2023 +0200 (related) tdf#149796 align labels left - according to design guidelines Change-Id: If9973b94b19635efd607d4c057e098021eca474e Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156532 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Seth Chaiklin Reviewed-by: Heiko Tietze Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos diff --git a/sfx2/uiconfig/ui/managestylepage.ui b/sfx2/uiconfig/ui/managestylepage.ui index b4583292f09c..8afab2559c62 100644 --- a/sfx2/uiconfig/ui/managestylepage.ui +++ b/sfx2/uiconfig/ui/managestylepage.ui @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ _Name: True name -1 +0 0 @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Ne_xt style: True nextstyle -1 +0 0 @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Inherit from: True linkedwith -1 +0 0 @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ _Category: True category -1 +0 0
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7106 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157106] Inconsisten tracking behavior when switching paragraph styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157106 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7105 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7106 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157106] New: Inconsisten tracking behavior when switching paragraph styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157106 Bug ID: 157106 Summary: Inconsisten tracking behavior when switching paragraph styles Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.6.0.3 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: eyalr...@gmx.com Created attachment 189374 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189374=edit Document for reproducing the bug When in track changes mode, * If we select an entire paragraph and switch its paragraph style, no change is recorded. * If we place the cursor at some point within the paragraph and switch the paragraph style, at least one change is tracked (and perhaps sometimes more than one? Or - applying Undo results in yet another tracked change?) In the attached document, try selecting the entire second paragraph and change it from foo to bar. Then, undo, and try doing the same with no selection and the cursor in the middle of the second paragraph. Note the active icons on the Changes toolbar as you do so. Note: This bug is not about DF, i.e. not about Format | Paragraph but about switching between named styles. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114441] Convert use of sal_uLong to better integer types
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114441 --- Comment #69 from Commit Notification --- sahil committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/b4dd91f3a10610924e736445e17506b49b619a70 tdf#114441 - Convert use of sal_uLong to better integer types It will be available in 24.2.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: include/vcl sd/source vcl/source
include/vcl/commandevent.hxx|2 +-
sd/source/ui/view/viewshel.cxx |2 +-
vcl/source/control/imivctl1.cxx |2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit b4dd91f3a10610924e736445e17506b49b619a70
Author: sahil
AuthorDate: Sun Aug 13 14:17:20 2023 +0530
Commit: Hossein
CommitDate: Tue Sep 5 22:51:55 2023 +0200
tdf#114441 - Convert use of sal_uLong to better integer types
Updated scrolling related variables to double from sal_uLong
Change-Id: Ibf4bb3d55b074b5d2e369e4bc708b87bdfa302b2
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/155644
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Hossein
diff --git a/include/vcl/commandevent.hxx b/include/vcl/commandevent.hxx
index fc6ba290793f..9491137acea8 100644
--- a/include/vcl/commandevent.hxx
+++ b/include/vcl/commandevent.hxx
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ enum class CommandWheelMode
};
// Magic value used in mnLines field in CommandWheelData
-#define COMMAND_WHEEL_PAGESCROLL(sal_uLong(0x))
+#define COMMAND_WHEEL_PAGESCROLL(double(0x))
class VCL_DLLPUBLIC CommandWheelData
{
diff --git a/sd/source/ui/view/viewshel.cxx b/sd/source/ui/view/viewshel.cxx
index d4007eb77510..91fa6a2e4b53 100644
--- a/sd/source/ui/view/viewshel.cxx
+++ b/sd/source/ui/view/viewshel.cxx
@@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ bool ViewShell::HandleScrollCommand(const CommandEvent&
rCEvt, ::sd::Window* pWi
{
if( mpContentWindow.get() == pWin )
{
-sal_uLong nScrollLines = pData->GetScrollLines();
+double nScrollLines = pData->GetScrollLines();
if(IsPageFlipMode())
nScrollLines = COMMAND_WHEEL_PAGESCROLL;
CommandWheelData aWheelData(
pData->GetDelta(),pData->GetNotchDelta(),
diff --git a/vcl/source/control/imivctl1.cxx b/vcl/source/control/imivctl1.cxx
index ae297a82e107..1364dc4f44d0 100644
--- a/vcl/source/control/imivctl1.cxx
+++ b/vcl/source/control/imivctl1.cxx
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ bool SvxIconChoiceCtrl_Impl::HandleScrollCommand( const
CommandEvent& rCmd )
const CommandWheelData* pData = rCmd.GetWheelData();
if( pData && (CommandWheelMode::SCROLL == pData->GetMode()) &&
!pData->IsHorz() )
{
-sal_uLong nScrollLines = pData->GetScrollLines();
+double nScrollLines = pData->GetScrollLines();
if( nScrollLines == COMMAND_WHEEL_PAGESCROLL )
{
nScrollDY = GetScrollBarPageSize( aVisSize.Width() );
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 --- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #2) > I can reproduce for frames, pages and lists, but switching a paragraph style > _does_ get recorded. > Can you please check again? Actually, I'm getting inconsistent behavior! If I select the entire paragraph and apply the style change, I don't get a tracked change; but if the cursor is at some point in the paragraph and there is no selection - I do get a tracked change! In fact, multiple such changes. I'm going to file a separate bug about this. So, for now, let's say that Paragraph style changes are not always tracked / not reliably tracked. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 --- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #2) > I can reproduce for frames, pages and lists, but switching a paragraph style > _does_ get recorded. > Can you please check again? Actually, I'm getting inconsistent behavior! If I select the entire paragraph and apply the style change, I don't get a tracked change; but if the cursor is at some point in the paragraph and there is no selection - I do get a tracked change! In fact, multiple such changes. I'm going to file a separate bug about this. So, for now, let's say that Paragraph style changes are not always tracked / not reliably tracked. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > Duplicate of bug 157098? No, not at all. That bug is about visual indication of changes that are already tracked. This is about tracking changes which are currently untracked (regardless of whether the tracking is visually indicated or not). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > Duplicate of bug 157098? No, not at all. That bug is about visual indication of changes that are already tracked. This is about tracking changes which are currently untracked (regardless of whether the tracking is visually indicated or not). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 --- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #2) > I can imagine e.g. some reviewers only caring about the actual contents but > leaving the formatting to someone else. I see it as a good feature for > collaborative work where different people have different roles. > However, I don't think we need such granularity. Style/formatting changes vs > content is enough in my opinion. I'll first say that non-granular visibility would already be a big improvement. I believe the granularity is merited, because: * Without granularity, the amount of displayed changes could be overwhelming; with it, the changes can be considered more piecemeal. * The UI locus of change indicators is different: For text, it's the text itself (though it could also be balloons); for paragraphs it's the line in the margin and maybe balloons; for definitions-of-styles - it will likely be in the Styles sidebar; etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 --- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #2) > I can imagine e.g. some reviewers only caring about the actual contents but > leaving the formatting to someone else. I see it as a good feature for > collaborative work where different people have different roles. > However, I don't think we need such granularity. Style/formatting changes vs > content is enough in my opinion. I'll first say that non-granular visibility would already be a big improvement. I believe the granularity is merited, because: * Without granularity, the amount of displayed changes could be overwhelming; with it, the changes can be considered more piecemeal. * The UI locus of change indicators is different: For text, it's the text itself (though it could also be balloons); for paragraphs it's the line in the margin and maybe balloons; for definitions-of-styles - it will likely be in the Styles sidebar; etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > Why? Because sometime I want to see the places where the text changed and don't care about the styling, and sometimes I want to see the places where the style changed and I don't care about the text. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > Why? Because sometime I want to see the places where the text changed and don't care about the styling, and sometimes I want to see the places where the style changed and I don't care about the text. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96078] rsid should not be added to automatic styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96078 --- Comment #8 from Jim Avera --- Has more clarity emerged about how to fix the RSID problem? The presence of rsid properties in many styles and the associated spans is wreaking havoc with downstream applications. In my case I need to clone existing content, such as an existing paragraph or table, but that later crashes LO because, I guess, LO expects rsid-bearing styles to be used exactly once. An old bug https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68183 says that LO 4.5.0 got an option to prevent using rsids altogether, or at least remove them when saving a document. However if that feature still exists is is not documented -- the Help system returns nothing when searching for "rsid". I think the following is needed: 1. If an option to omit rsid exists, document it so it can be used. 2. Evaluate the original request in this bug. If the function can be handled without polluting styles used for other purposes then it would be a big improvement. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: svx/source
svx/source/sdr/primitive2d/sdrdecompositiontools.cxx |4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 300dc54b0424add2dbab5443dcbd46ba12f418fc
Author: Sarper Akdemir
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 5 17:41:42 2023 +0300
Commit: Sarper Akdemir
CommitDate: Tue Sep 5 22:05:16 2023 +0200
related tdf#150557: fix unified transparence initialization with alpha
In 98319164284c4a25d6a2313e6b8a35d244d94e91, shadow alpha
was passed in to UnifiedTransparencePrimitive2D instead of
shadow transparence mistakenly.
Fix that and pass shadow transparence instead.
Change-Id: Idabedade5d753961648683869cb077de0e4523eb
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156573
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Sarper Akdemir
diff --git a/svx/source/sdr/primitive2d/sdrdecompositiontools.cxx
b/svx/source/sdr/primitive2d/sdrdecompositiontools.cxx
index 33e42efc6d23..50f66391d95e 100644
--- a/svx/source/sdr/primitive2d/sdrdecompositiontools.cxx
+++ b/svx/source/sdr/primitive2d/sdrdecompositiontools.cxx
@@ -856,10 +856,8 @@ sal_uInt32
SlideBackgroundFillPrimitive2D::getPrimitive2DID() const
if (rShadow.getTransparence() != 0.0)
{
Primitive2DContainer aTempContent{ aRetval.back() };
-
-double fShadowAlpha = 1.0 - rShadow.getTransparence();
aRetval.back() = Primitive2DReference(new
UnifiedTransparencePrimitive2D(
-std::move(aTempContent), fShadowAlpha));
+std::move(aTempContent),
rShadow.getTransparence()));
}
}
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||157096 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157096 [Bug 157096] CRASH: removing everything in document -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103100] [META] Writer table bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103100 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||157096 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157096 [Bug 157096] CRASH: removing everything in document -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157096] CRASH: removing everything in document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157096 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||133092, 103100 Regression By||Michael Stahl Severity|normal |critical Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103100 [Bug 103100] [META] Writer table bugs https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092 [Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: 2 commits - accessibility/inc accessibility/source
accessibility/inc/extended/textwindowaccessibility.hxx| 13 ---
accessibility/inc/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.hxx |6 +--
accessibility/source/extended/textwindowaccessibility.cxx | 17 +++--
accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.cxx | 24 +++---
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 277c651875604a98032b70d6b0bd0f274cfe5d12
Author: Noel Grandin
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 5 16:15:48 2023 +0200
Commit: Noel Grandin
CommitDate: Tue Sep 5 22:00:15 2023 +0200
use more concrete type in VCLXAccessibleBox
and avoid some casting
Change-Id: I755caf9ba5a333862d1a89a054359781544930f7
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156570
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin
diff --git a/accessibility/inc/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.hxx
b/accessibility/inc/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.hxx
index 6c86491a5422..3825be0d4f22 100644
--- a/accessibility/inc/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.hxx
+++ b/accessibility/inc/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.hxx
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include
#include
+class VCLXAccessibleList;
/** Base class for list- and combo boxes. This class manages the box'
children. The classed derived from this one have only to implement the
@@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ public:
virtual css::uno::Any SAL_CALL getMinimumIncrement( ) override;
protected:
-virtual ~VCLXAccessibleBox() override = default;
+virtual ~VCLXAccessibleBox() override;
/** Returns true when the object is valid.
*/
@@ -129,8 +130,7 @@ private:
m_xText;
/// The child that contains the items of this box.
-css::uno::Reference< css::accessibility::XAccessible>
-m_xList;
+rtl::Reference m_xList;
/** This flag specifies whether an object has a text field as child
regardless of whether that child being currently instantiated or
diff --git a/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.cxx
b/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.cxx
index 4f4972a04477..cbc68fb2d19a 100644
--- a/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.cxx
+++ b/accessibility/source/standard/vclxaccessiblebox.cxx
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ VCLXAccessibleBox::VCLXAccessibleBox (VCLXWindow* pVCLWindow,
BoxType aType, boo
m_bHasTextChild = true;
}
+VCLXAccessibleBox::~VCLXAccessibleBox() {}
+
void VCLXAccessibleBox::ProcessWindowChildEvent( const VclWindowEvent&
rVclWindowEvent )
{
uno::Any aOldValue, aNewValue;
@@ -106,11 +108,11 @@ void VCLXAccessibleBox::ProcessWindowEvent (const
VclWindowEvent& rVclWindowEven
case VclEventId::ListboxSelect:
{
// Forward the call to the list child.
-VCLXAccessibleList* pList =
static_cast(m_xList.get());
+VCLXAccessibleList* pList = m_xList.get();
if ( pList == nullptr )
{
getAccessibleChild ( m_bHasTextChild ? 1 : 0 );
-pList = static_cast(m_xList.get());
+pList = m_xList.get();
}
if ( pList != nullptr )
{
@@ -126,11 +128,11 @@ void VCLXAccessibleBox::ProcessWindowEvent (const
VclWindowEvent& rVclWindowEven
}
case VclEventId::DropdownOpen:
{
-VCLXAccessibleList* pList =
static_cast(m_xList.get());
+VCLXAccessibleList* pList = m_xList.get();
if ( pList == nullptr )
{
getAccessibleChild ( m_bHasTextChild ? 1 : 0 );
-pList = static_cast(m_xList.get());
+pList = m_xList.get();
}
if ( pList != nullptr )
{
@@ -141,11 +143,11 @@ void VCLXAccessibleBox::ProcessWindowEvent (const
VclWindowEvent& rVclWindowEven
}
case VclEventId::DropdownClose:
{
-VCLXAccessibleList* pList =
static_cast(m_xList.get());
+VCLXAccessibleList* pList = m_xList.get();
if ( pList == nullptr )
{
getAccessibleChild ( m_bHasTextChild ? 1 : 0 );
-pList = static_cast(m_xList.get());
+pList = m_xList.get();
}
if ( pList != nullptr )
{
@@ -162,7 +164,7 @@ void VCLXAccessibleBox::ProcessWindowEvent (const
VclWindowEvent& rVclWindowEven
}
case VclEventId::ComboboxSelect:
{
-VCLXAccessibleList* pList =
static_cast(m_xList.get());
+VCLXAccessibleList* pList = m_xList.get();
if (pList != nullptr && m_xText.is())
{
Reference xText
(m_xText->getAccessibleContext(), UNO_QUERY);
@@ -191,11 +193,11 @@ void VCLXAccessibleBox::ProcessWindowEvent (const
VclWindowEvent& rVclWindowEven
case VclEventId::ComboboxItemRemoved:
{
// Forward the call to the list child.
-VCLXAccessibleList* pList =
static_cast(m_xList.get());
+
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 119605] Document comparison is missing an option not to take into account (or show) style (or formatting) changes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119605 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7104 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50 ||447, ||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 ||9605 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 50447] Text formatting changes (in docx-file) are not shown with track changes (and not recorded by the way)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50447 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7104 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50 ||447, ||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 ||9605 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 --- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I can imagine e.g. some reviewers only caring about the actual contents but leaving the formatting to someone else. I see it as a good feature for collaborative work where different people have different roles. However, I don't think we need such granularity. Style/formatting changes vs content is enough in my opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 --- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I can imagine e.g. some reviewers only caring about the actual contents but leaving the formatting to someone else. I see it as a good feature for collaborative work where different people have different roles. However, I don't think we need such granularity. Style/formatting changes vs content is enough in my opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org --- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I can reproduce for frames, pages and lists, but switching a paragraph style _does_ get recorded. Can you please check again? Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 410632ac4b8a280e0993e665ffa9cfede8326b49 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org --- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I can reproduce for frames, pages and lists, but switching a paragraph style _does_ get recorded. Can you please check again? Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 410632ac4b8a280e0993e665ffa9cfede8326b49 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157098] No visual indication of non-character paragraph-style direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157098 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7105 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157098] No visual indication of non-character paragraph-style direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157098 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7105 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7098 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Duplicate of bug 157098? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157105] Support tracking changes to style choices
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157105 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7098 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Duplicate of bug 157098? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Why? Hopefully not because MS is doing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157104] Support partial visibility of tracked changes (at least like MS Word)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157104 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Why? Hopefully not because MS is doing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157098] No visual indication of non-character paragraph-style direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157098 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.st...@allotropia.de --- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze --- Michael, is the modification of any attribute tracked as a change? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157098] No visual indication of non-character paragraph-style direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157098 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.st...@allotropia.de --- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze --- Michael, is the modification of any attribute tracked as a change? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157098] No visual indication of non-character paragraph-style direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157098 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg --- I claim this is a bug, not an enhancement request. All changes to a document are supposed to be trackable, and revertible. That's necessary both for review of styling changes (as opposed to textual changes), and for being able to account for the full set of differences between documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157098] No visual indication of non-character paragraph-style direct formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157098 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #1 from Eyal Rozenberg --- I claim this is a bug, not an enhancement request. All changes to a document are supposed to be trackable, and revertible. That's necessary both for review of styling changes (as opposed to textual changes), and for being able to account for the full set of differences between documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: xmloff/source
xmloff/source/core/xmlexp.cxx |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 6d9b793512a60f18db624452d8773f0e52c00081
Author: Caolán McNamara
AuthorDate: Tue Sep 5 15:21:59 2023 +0100
Commit: Caolán McNamara
CommitDate: Tue Sep 5 21:39:43 2023 +0200
drop a stray printf
Change-Id: Ie9b48ab2db03c7c45aa4ffc24ca4532522bb60a1
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156571
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara
diff --git a/xmloff/source/core/xmlexp.cxx b/xmloff/source/core/xmlexp.cxx
index eb173fc4d98c..1f0f5a9780d8 100644
--- a/xmloff/source/core/xmlexp.cxx
+++ b/xmloff/source/core/xmlexp.cxx
@@ -1070,7 +1070,6 @@ void SvXMLExport::ImplExportSettings()
void SvXMLExport::ImplExportStyles()
{
-printf ("SvXMLExport::ImplExportStyles\n");
CheckAttrList();
{
