[Bug 159636] PDF export and creation of bookmarks

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159636

--- Comment #1 from Uffe Kousgaard  ---
The Writer module does the same thing. Creates an empty bookmark section, when
exporting to PDF.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160019] Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java 21-temurin

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160019

--- Comment #6 from Jens Hausherr  ---
Linux used: Alpine 3.19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160019] Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java 21-temurin

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160019

Jens Hausherr  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Hardware|All |x86-64 (AMD64)
 OS|All |Linux (All)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||159375


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159375
[Bug 159375] Opening Tools > Options dialog takes too long
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159375] Opening Tools > Options dialog takes too long

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159375

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||aron.bu...@gmail.com
 Blocks||102187


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160019] Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java 21-temurin

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160019

--- Comment #5 from Jens Hausherr  ---
The font used in the sample document is
https://github.com/adobe-fonts/source-sans/releases/tag/3.052R

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160019] Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java 21-temurin

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160019

--- Comment #4 from Jens Hausherr  ---
Created attachment 192933
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192933=edit
PDF rendered with Libreoffice 7.6/JDK21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 142108] Calc chart loses data number formatting in new source Data Table when copied to non calc LibO document (Writer, Draw)

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142108

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11
   ||2245

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 112245] Copy paste XY chart with Points and Lines from Calc into Writer loses date format in data point tooltip

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112245

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||2108
Version|5.2.7.2 release |Inherited From OOo
 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
Summary|Copy paste XY chart with|Copy paste XY chart with
   |Points and Lines from Calc  |Points and Lines from Calc
   |into Writer loses date  |into Writer loses date
   |format when hovering|format in data point
   ||tooltip

--- Comment #16 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Same in OOo 3.3 -> inherited.
Still reproduced in recent trunk build:

Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 709866a3b8e073fab4937dcf91dcd33ff1d2bc13
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

Somewhat similar to bug 142108.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160019] Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java 21-temurin

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160019

--- Comment #3 from Jens Hausherr  ---
Created attachment 192932
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192932=edit
PDF rendered with Libreoffice 7.6/JDK17

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160019] Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java 21-temurin

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160019

--- Comment #2 from Jens Hausherr  ---
Created attachment 192931
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192931=edit
PDF rendered with O365

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160019] Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java 21-temurin

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160019

--- Comment #1 from Jens Hausherr  ---
Libreoffice 7.6 and 7.5 fail to find the OTF font used in this document with
JDK/JRE Version 21.x.

I have been running the PDF-Generation in a docker container using unoserver
with libreoffice headless.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

core.git: Branch 'distro/collabora/co-24.04' - svl/source

2024-03-03 Thread Caolán McNamara (via logerrit)
 svl/source/numbers/zforlist.cxx |   19 +--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 1af440ac558ab19e92302c99477f20829fa6888e
Author: Caolán McNamara 
AuthorDate: Thu Feb 29 20:01:26 2024 +
Commit: Miklos Vajna 
CommitDate: Mon Mar 4 08:20:13 2024 +0100

scope of MutexGuard can be reduced

These are just locals, except for IniLnge which is set once in the
ctor and is then immutable

Change-Id: I0d8ac0c3ca729003a3575dea39b2746dfc53b4bc
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/164173
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara 
(cherry picked from commit bc08b1fbbd00c6e4b086f6d95249e684ace6ae25)
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/164189
Tested-by: Jenkins CollaboraOffice 
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna 

diff --git a/svl/source/numbers/zforlist.cxx b/svl/source/numbers/zforlist.cxx
index fa9c83757eff..8d2d28b90b3f 100644
--- a/svl/source/numbers/zforlist.cxx
+++ b/svl/source/numbers/zforlist.cxx
@@ -3530,33 +3530,25 @@ SvNumberFormatterMergeMap 
SvNumberFormatter::ConvertMergeTableToMap()
 return aMap;
 }
 
-
 sal_uInt32 SvNumberFormatter::GetFormatForLanguageIfBuiltIn( sal_uInt32 
nFormat,
  LanguageType 
eLnge )
 {
-::osl::MutexGuard aGuard( GetInstanceMutex() );
 if ( eLnge == LANGUAGE_DONTKNOW )
-{
-eLnge = IniLnge;
-}
+eLnge = IniLnge;// IniLnge never changes
 if ( nFormat < SV_COUNTRY_LANGUAGE_OFFSET && eLnge == IniLnge )
-{
 return nFormat; // it stays as it is
-}
 sal_uInt32 nOffset = nFormat % SV_COUNTRY_LANGUAGE_OFFSET;  // relative 
index
 if ( nOffset > SV_MAX_COUNT_STANDARD_FORMATS )
-{
-return nFormat;// not a built-in format
-}
+return nFormat; // not a built-in format
+
+::osl::MutexGuard aGuard( GetInstanceMutex() );
 sal_uInt32 nCLOffset = ImpGenerateCL(eLnge);// create new standard 
formats if necessary
 return nCLOffset + nOffset;
 }
 
-
 sal_uInt32 SvNumberFormatter::GetFormatIndex( NfIndexTableOffset nTabOff,
   LanguageType eLnge )
 {
-::osl::MutexGuard aGuard( GetInstanceMutex() );
 if (nTabOff >= NF_INDEX_TABLE_ENTRIES)
 return NUMBERFORMAT_ENTRY_NOT_FOUND;
 
@@ -3566,12 +3558,11 @@ sal_uInt32 SvNumberFormatter::GetFormatIndex( 
NfIndexTableOffset nTabOff,
 if (indexTable[nTabOff] == NUMBERFORMAT_ENTRY_NOT_FOUND)
 return NUMBERFORMAT_ENTRY_NOT_FOUND;
 
+::osl::MutexGuard aGuard( GetInstanceMutex() );
 sal_uInt32 nCLOffset = ImpGenerateCL(eLnge);// create new standard 
formats if necessary
-
 return nCLOffset + indexTable[nTabOff];
 }
 
-
 NfIndexTableOffset SvNumberFormatter::GetIndexTableOffset( sal_uInt32 nFormat 
) const
 {
 sal_uInt32 nOffset = nFormat % SV_COUNTRY_LANGUAGE_OFFSET;  // 
relative index


core.git: sc/qa sc/source

2024-03-03 Thread Miklos Vajna (via logerrit)
 sc/qa/filter/html/html.cxx|   37 +
 sc/source/filter/html/htmlexp.cxx |   22 ++
 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)

New commits:
commit 17581e684ca701bfd96ed2bf16aa14c3903b74d4
Author: Miklos Vajna 
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 1 14:14:33 2024 +0100
Commit: Miklos Vajna 
CommitDate: Mon Mar 4 08:19:22 2024 +0100

tdf#159483 sc HTML copy: handle data-sheets-value attribute for the num case

Type 1000 and 2000 into cells in Calc, format them as e.g. a HUF
currency, the resulting formatted strings can be copied to google
sheets, but the SUM() on them will be 0 (and not 3000).

Our own import knows how to read metadata to get the original float
value, but our exporter didn't emit these.

Fix the problem by adding support for non-boolean float values + number
formats in the HTML export.

This is more or less export equivalent of commit
789964785a61daab5f8065f006dd7aaf843c7236 (tdf#159483 sc HTML import:
handle data-sheets-value attribute for the num case, 2024-02-09).

Change-Id: I5acb3724367ce38bd96056dbe4f846cd7bbc5fe2
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/164213
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Miklos Vajna 

diff --git a/sc/qa/filter/html/html.cxx b/sc/qa/filter/html/html.cxx
index fb9a436c72a0..916dd23981ec 100644
--- a/sc/qa/filter/html/html.cxx
+++ b/sc/qa/filter/html/html.cxx
@@ -239,6 +239,43 @@ CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(Test, testCopyBoolean)
 assertXPath(pHtmlDoc, "(//td)[1]"_ostr, "data-sheets-value"_ostr, "{ 
\"1\": 4, \"4\": 1}");
 assertXPath(pHtmlDoc, "(//td)[2]"_ostr, "data-sheets-value"_ostr, "{ 
\"1\": 4, \"4\": 0}");
 }
+
+CPPUNIT_TEST_FIXTURE(Test, testCopyFormattedNumber)
+{
+// Given a document with formatted numbers in A1-A2:
+createScDoc();
+ScDocument* pDoc = getScDoc();
+sal_Int32 nCheckPos;
+SvNumFormatType nType;
+sal_uInt32 nFormat;
+OUString aNumberFormat("#,##0.00");
+SvNumberFormatter* pFormatter = pDoc->GetFormatTable();
+pFormatter->PutEntry(aNumberFormat, nCheckPos, nType, nFormat);
+ScAddress aCellPos1(/*nColP=*/0, /*nRowP=*/0, /*nTabP=*/0);
+pDoc->SetNumberFormat(aCellPos1, nFormat);
+pDoc->SetString(aCellPos1, "1000");
+ScAddress aCellPos2(/*nColP=*/0, /*nRowP=*/1, /*nTabP=*/0);
+pDoc->SetNumberFormat(aCellPos2, nFormat);
+pDoc->SetString(aCellPos2, "2000");
+
+// When copying those values:
+ScImportExport aExporter(*pDoc, ScRange(aCellPos1, aCellPos2));
+SvMemoryStream aStream;
+CPPUNIT_ASSERT(aExporter.ExportStream(aStream, OUString(), 
SotClipboardFormatId::HTML));
+
+// Then make sure the values are numbers:
+aStream.Seek(0);
+htmlDocUniquePtr pHtmlDoc = parseHtmlStream();
+// Without the accompanying fix in place, this test would have failed with:
+// - XPath '(//td)[1]' no attribute 'data-sheets-value' exist
+// i.e. only a formatted number string was written, without a float value.
+assertXPath(pHtmlDoc, "(//td)[1]"_ostr, "data-sheets-value"_ostr, "{ 
\"1\": 3, \"3\": 1000}");
+assertXPath(pHtmlDoc, "(//td)[1]"_ostr, "data-sheets-numberformat"_ostr,
+"{ \"1\": 2, \"2\": \"#,##0.00\", \"3\": 1}");
+assertXPath(pHtmlDoc, "(//td)[2]"_ostr, "data-sheets-value"_ostr, "{ 
\"1\": 3, \"3\": 2000}");
+assertXPath(pHtmlDoc, "(//td)[2]"_ostr, "data-sheets-numberformat"_ostr,
+"{ \"1\": 2, \"2\": \"#,##0.00\", \"3\": 1}");
+}
 }
 
 CPPUNIT_PLUGIN_IMPLEMENT();
diff --git a/sc/source/filter/html/htmlexp.cxx 
b/sc/source/filter/html/htmlexp.cxx
index 1e5dcf24b6c5..c2554b7612f1 100644
--- a/sc/source/filter/html/htmlexp.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/filter/html/htmlexp.cxx
@@ -1146,6 +1146,7 @@ void ScHTMLExport::WriteCell( sc::ColumnBlockPosition& 
rBlockPos, SCCOL nCol, SC
 nFormat, *pFormatter, ));
 
 std::optional oJson;
+const SvNumberformat* pNumberFormat = nullptr;
 if (bValueData)
 {
 if (nFormat)
@@ -1161,6 +1162,14 @@ void ScHTMLExport::WriteCell( sc::ColumnBlockPosition& 
rBlockPos, SCCOL nCol, SC
 oJson->put("1", static_cast(4));
 oJson->put("4", static_cast(fVal));
 }
+else
+{
+// 3 is number.
+oJson.emplace();
+oJson->put("1", static_cast(3));
+oJson->put("3", static_cast(fVal));
+pNumberFormat = pFormatEntry;
+}
 }
 }
 }
@@ -1179,6 +1188,19 @@ void ScHTMLExport::WriteCell( sc::ColumnBlockPosition& 
rBlockPos, SCCOL nCol, SC
   + HTMLOutFuncs::ConvertStringToHTML(aJsonString) + "\"");
 }
 
+if (pNumberFormat)
+{
+// 2 is a number format.
+oJson.emplace();
+oJson->put("1", static_cast(2));
+oJson->put("2", pNumberFormat->GetFormatstring());
+// The 

[Bug 160019] New: Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java 21-temurin

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160019

Bug ID: 160019
   Summary: Rendering of O365 DOCX with OTF font fails with Java
21-temurin
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.5.2.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: LibreOffice
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: jens.haush...@pflege.de

Created attachment 192930
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192930=edit
O365 document wit Source Sans 3 OTF font

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 154861] scalc crash on long scrolling (PageDown) ; Skia/Vulkan / Extremely high RAM usage

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154861

a_san...@mail.ru changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 154861] scalc crash on long scrolling (PageDown) ; Skia/Vulkan / Extremely high RAM usage

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154861

--- Comment #9 from a_san...@mail.ru ---
Fixed in 7.6.0.0.alpha1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159809] Variable undefined error occurs when macro is password protected (Japanese)

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159809

--- Comment #4 from maruguchi_masahiro  ---
問題の詳細が見えてきたので追記いたします。
今回の問題は「パスワードを掛けたら動かない」ではなく「パスワードを掛けたらvba support 1が無効化される」というものでした。
具体的には、round関数・Workbooks(".ods").Sheets("").Cells(1, 2)等構文が使えないなどvba support
1を書かないことで起こるものと同じエラーが発生しています。

「パスワードを掛けたらvba support 1が無効化される」というバグはexcel
vbaから引っ越す際の大きなハードルになりそうです。どうにか回避できないものでしょうか。

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

core.git: include/linguistic include/unotools lingucomponent/source linguistic/source odk/examples qadevOOo/objdsc qadevOOo/tests

2024-03-03 Thread Noel Grandin (via logerrit)
 include/linguistic/lngprophelp.hxx |   
 3 
 include/unotools/linguprops.hxx|   
62 --
 lingucomponent/source/spellcheck/macosxspell/macspellimp.mm|   
 2 
 lingucomponent/source/spellcheck/spell/sspellimp.cxx   |   
 3 
 linguistic/source/iprcache.cxx |   
 1 
 linguistic/source/lngopt.cxx   |   
 3 
 linguistic/source/lngopt.hxx   |   
 6 
 linguistic/source/lngprophelp.cxx  |   
21 ---
 odk/examples/DevelopersGuide/OfficeDev/Linguistic/PropChgHelper_Spell.java |   
 5 
 odk/examples/DevelopersGuide/OfficeDev/Linguistic/SampleSpellChecker.java  |   
 5 
 qadevOOo/objdsc/lng/com.sun.star.lingu2.LinguProps.csv |   
 1 
 qadevOOo/tests/java/ifc/linguistic2/_LinguProperties.java  |   
 1 
 12 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit ea4dfeb83889d5dc955646999e4b2b06693e631b
Author: Noel Grandin 
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 1 11:43:54 2024 +0200
Commit: Noel Grandin 
CommitDate: Mon Mar 4 08:01:05 2024 +0100

finish removing IsSpellCapitalisation property

which was partially removed in
commit 9bb9ba6ae02692e65498bae4598e3b63bb65c02e
Author: Samuel Mehrbrodt 
Date:   Mon Oct 2 12:33:34 2023 +0200
[API CHANGE] Remove deprecated IsSpellCapitalization

Change-Id: I861c8c484b77a041d91cb25ddeecb7027a2fd96c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/164183
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Samuel Mehrbrodt 
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin 

diff --git a/include/linguistic/lngprophelp.hxx 
b/include/linguistic/lngprophelp.hxx
index a3ad3d2665ac..6b06d5cd9628 100644
--- a/include/linguistic/lngprophelp.hxx
+++ b/include/linguistic/lngprophelp.hxx
@@ -165,14 +165,12 @@ class UNLESS_MERGELIBS(LNG_DLLPUBLIC) 
PropertyHelper_Spell final :
 // default values
 boolbIsSpellUpperCase;
 boolbIsSpellWithDigits;
-boolbIsSpellCapitalization;
 boolbIsSpellClosedCompound;
 boolbIsSpellHyphenatedCompound;
 
 // return values, will be set to default value or current temporary value
 boolbResIsSpellUpperCase;
 boolbResIsSpellWithDigits;
-boolbResIsSpellCapitalization;
 boolbResIsSpellClosedCompound;
 boolbResIsSpellHyphenatedCompound;
 
@@ -199,7 +197,6 @@ public:
 
 boolIsSpellUpperCase() const{ return 
bResIsSpellUpperCase; }
 boolIsSpellWithDigits() const   { return 
bResIsSpellWithDigits; }
-boolIsSpellCapitalization() const   { return 
bResIsSpellCapitalization; }
 boolIsSpellClosedCompound() const   { return 
bResIsSpellClosedCompound; }
 boolIsSpellHyphenatedCompound() const   { return 
bResIsSpellHyphenatedCompound; }
 };
diff --git a/include/unotools/linguprops.hxx b/include/unotools/linguprops.hxx
index b14376f5c43f..1f182cd3d487 100644
--- a/include/unotools/linguprops.hxx
+++ b/include/unotools/linguprops.hxx
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ inline constexpr OUString UPN_ACTIVE_DICTIONARIES 
= u"ActiveDictiona
 // UNO property names for SpellChecker
 inline constexpr OUString UPN_IS_SPELL_UPPER_CASE = 
u"IsSpellUpperCase"_ustr;
 inline constexpr OUString UPN_IS_SPELL_WITH_DIGITS= 
u"IsSpellWithDigits"_ustr;
-inline constexpr OUString UPN_IS_SPELL_CAPITALIZATION = 
u"IsSpellCapitalization"_ustr;
 
 // UNO property names for Hyphenator
 inline constexpr OUString UPN_HYPH_MIN_LEADING= 
u"HyphMinLeading"_ustr;
@@ -80,37 +79,36 @@ inline constexpr OUString UPN_IS_GRAMMAR_INTERACTIVE
  = u"IsInteractiveG
 #define UPH_IS_IGNORE_CONTROL_CHARACTERS 2
 #define UPH_IS_SPELL_UPPER_CASE  3
 #define UPH_IS_SPELL_WITH_DIGITS 4
-#define UPH_IS_SPELL_CAPITALIZATION  5
-#define UPH_HYPH_MIN_LEADING 6
-#define UPH_HYPH_MIN_TRAILING7
-#define UPH_HYPH_MIN_WORD_LENGTH 8
-#define UPH_DEFAULT_LOCALE   9
-#define UPH_IS_SPELL_AUTO   10
-#define UPH_IS_SPELL_CLOSED_COMPOUND11
-#define UPH_IS_SPELL_HYPHENATED_COMPOUND12
-#define UPH_IS_SPELL_SPECIAL13
-#define UPH_IS_HYPH_AUTO14
-#define UPH_IS_HYPH_SPECIAL 15
-#define UPH_IS_WRAP_REVERSE 16
-#define UPH_DATA_FILES_CHANGED_CHECK_VALUE  17
-#define UPH_DEFAULT_LANGUAGE21
-#define UPH_DEFAULT_LOCALE_CJK  22
-#define UPH_DEFAULT_LOCALE_CTL  23
-#define UPH_ACTIVE_DICTIONARIES 24
-#define UPH_ACTIVE_CONVERSION_DICTIONARIES  25
-#define UPH_IS_IGNORE_POST_POSITIONAL_WORD  

[Bug 160018] Defined Ranges in a single column with delimiting row corrupted by 7.6.5

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160018

--- Comment #1 from Colin  ---
Created attachment 192929
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192929=edit
Sample sheet must be compared between 7.5 & 7.6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160018] New: Defined Ranges in a single column with delimiting row corrupted by 7.6.5

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160018

Bug ID: 160018
   Summary: Defined Ranges in a single column with delimiting row
corrupted by 7.6.5
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.6.5.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: that.man.co...@gmail.com

Description:
Defined ranges with auto filters and a delimiting "Blank Row" between the
ranges has been corrupted by 7.6.5
Instead of the previous practice which permitted each individual range to sort
independantly of the ranges below, it now just consolidates everything in the
first column's filter and produces a "shotgun sort"

Steps to Reproduce:
You will need the attached sheet to be OPENED in 7.6.5 and then experiment with
hiding and revealing the data groups to experience the correct operation
Then open it in 7.5.9.2 and just try to sort the first Defined Range on the
first column's sort.
note: THE PINK FILLED CELL DEFINES THE ROW THAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE DEFINED
RANGE DEFINITION AND HAS ALSO BEEN PROTECTED. THIS WAS THE ONLY WORKAROUND FROM
A PREVIOUSLY REPORTED BUG WHERE DEFINED RANGES WOULD OVERFLOW INTO EACH OTHER.
Then "undo" the damage and try sorting on any of the other columns.
If you enjoy the same experience as I did the corruption will only occur with
the first column's sort.
Confession: I didn't experiment with opening any of the other defined ranges to
see if it was only impacted on the first "group" because it was so destructive
I needed to uninstall 7.6.5 and reinstal the earlier version before I could
proceed with my workload.

Actual Results:
I'm not prepared to use profanities - the impact will be obvious the moment you
sort the first group

Expected Results:
Conventional sorting of defined ranges as previously enjoyed yesterday


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Additional Info: THIS IS THE CORRUPT VERSION
Version: 7.6.5.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 38d5f62f85355c192ef5f1dd47c5c0c0c6d6598b
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: sv-SE (en_GB); UI: en-GB
Calc: threaded
AND THIS IS THE VERSION OF THE ATTACHED SAMPLE FILE
Version: 7.5.9.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: cdeefe45c17511d326101eed8008ac4092f278a9
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: sv-SE (en_GB); UI: en-GB
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158657] Revamp the online update dialog

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158657

--- Comment #6 from Stephan Bergmann  ---
(In reply to Philippe Cloutier from comment #3)
> (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #1)
> > 2  --enable-online-upate-mar, for the Mozilla-technology-based mechanism of
> > checking for updates periodically, downloading an update's mar file, and on
> > the next start of soffice automatically updating the LO installation with
> > that mar file.  The part of the option pane that is about this feature is
> > the bottom part "Automatic Update" and "Enable automatic update".
> 
> Thank you, but what do you mean by "an update's mar file"?

That file contains the actual data to carry out an update on the client side,
sent from LO's update server (all "behind the user's back", without needing
user interaction).

> I assume the option is --enable-online-update-mar.

Yes, sorry for the typo.  (And for LibreOffice 24.2 the feature in addition
also is experimental, as you describe in comment 5).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 33603] Presenter notes should be available in normal view as a scrolling pane

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33603

Sarper Akdemir (allotropia)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159985] Changing Macro Security level should warn about the need to reload the file to apply the settings

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159985

--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski  ---
IMO, it only needs a note in the Macro Security dialog, like "takes effect on
files opened after the change" (colored?) label shown at the moment of a change
(similar to "Search key not found" message in Find/Replace dialog). No need in
additional dialogs / infobars in documents.

Or an infobar could be an option - like "The macro security settings were
changed since opening of this document. They will only be active for the
document after a reload. Do that now? [Reload]". But it's an overkill IMO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159985] Changing Macro Security level should warn about the need to reload the file to apply the settings

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159985

--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski  ---
IMO, it only needs a note in the Macro Security dialog, like "takes effect on
files opened after the change" (colored?) label shown at the moment of a change
(similar to "Search key not found" message in Find/Replace dialog). No need in
additional dialogs / infobars in documents.

Or an infobar could be an option - like "The macro security settings were
changed since opening of this document. They will only be active for the
document after a reload. Do that now? [Reload]". But it's an overkill IMO.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

core.git: include/vcl

2024-03-03 Thread Stephan Bergmann (via logerrit)
 include/vcl/opengl/OpenGLHelper.hxx |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit 88c6e127b3b9d2c80bb3cf04e74c4152ddfe9674
Author: Stephan Bergmann 
AuthorDate: Sun Mar 3 19:32:16 2024 +0100
Commit: Stephan Bergmann 
CommitDate: Mon Mar 4 07:30:34 2024 +0100

Fix --enable-mergelibs=more --enable-sal-log build

...after 621e16205363c1eea0be57017997396dee63df4b "add 
UNLESS_MERGELIBS_MORE and
use to reduce symbol visibility" caused

> vcl/source/opengl/x11/context.cxx:118: error: undefined reference to 
'OpenGLHelper::debugMsgStream(std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator > const&)'
> vcl/source/opengl/x11/context.cxx:270: error: undefined reference to 
'OpenGLHelper::debugMsgStream(std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator > const&)'
> vcl/source/opengl/x11/context.cxx:370: error: undefined reference to 
'OpenGLHelper::debugMsgStream(std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator > const&)'
> vcl/source/opengl/x11/context.cxx:251: error: undefined reference to 
'OpenGLHelper::debugMsgStream(std::__cxx11::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator > const&)'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [vcl/Library_vclplug_gen.mk:20: 
instdir/program/libvclplug_genlo.so] Error 1

Change-Id: If27b1ffaad7b40dd3baffa8b3a33b1cc3a8e7153
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/164314
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stephan Bergmann 

diff --git a/include/vcl/opengl/OpenGLHelper.hxx 
b/include/vcl/opengl/OpenGLHelper.hxx
index 715636147747..e213bfccf14e 100644
--- a/include/vcl/opengl/OpenGLHelper.hxx
+++ b/include/vcl/opengl/OpenGLHelper.hxx
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ public:
 __attribute__ ((format (printf, 2, 3)))
 #endif
 static void debugMsgPrint(const int nType, const char *pFormat, ...);
-static void debugMsgStream(std::ostringstream const );
+IF_MERGELIBS_MORE(VCL_DLLPUBLIC) static void 
debugMsgStream(std::ostringstream const );
 static void debugMsgStreamWarn(std::ostringstream const );
 
 /**


[Bug 159985] Changing Macro Security level should warn about the need to reload the file to apply the settings

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159985

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org

--- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
I agree with Rafael something should change, because it always felt to me like
something was missing or inconsistent with other requests to restart.
I can see how users would expect to be able to press a button that triggers a
macro right after changing the security settings.
I always used to restart LO, not knowing a reload was enough.

The need for a reload is not mentioned in the corresponding help page:
https://help.libreoffice.org/24.8/en-US/text/shared/optionen/macrosecurity_sl.html

UX/Design team, would an extra string in the dialog + another one in the help
page suffice?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159985] Changing Macro Security level should warn about the need to reload the file to apply the settings

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159985

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org

--- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
I agree with Rafael something should change, because it always felt to me like
something was missing or inconsistent with other requests to restart.
I can see how users would expect to be able to press a button that triggers a
macro right after changing the security settings.
I always used to restart LO, not knowing a reload was enough.

The need for a reload is not mentioned in the corresponding help page:
https://help.libreoffice.org/24.8/en-US/text/shared/optionen/macrosecurity_sl.html

UX/Design team, would an extra string in the dialog + another one in the help
page suffice?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160017] HTML export: a paragraph having character border and color settings explicitly set create HTML tags closing out of order

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160017

Mike Kaganski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |mikekagan...@hotmail.com
   |desktop.org |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160017] New: HTML export: a paragraph having character border and color settings explicitly set create HTML tags closing out of order

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160017

Bug ID: 160017
   Summary: HTML export: a paragraph having character border and
color settings explicitly set create HTML tags closing
out of order
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Writer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: mikekagan...@hotmail.com

Created attachment 192928
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192928=edit
A paragraph defining character border (none) and color (black) explicitly

Open the attached sample document, and export as HTML.

The resulting HTML has closing tags out of order, like this:

foo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 158397] Freeze (beachball) when hovering with mouse above an animating gif or when opening presentation mode(macOS) with any backend

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158397

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
   Severity|normal  |major
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
   Keywords||perf
Summary|Freeze (beachball) when |Freeze (beachball) when
   |hoovering with mouse above  |hovering with mouse above
   |an animating gif or when|an animating gif or when
   |opening presentation|opening presentation
   |mode(macOS) with any|mode(macOS) with any
   |backend |backend

--- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
On both Windows and Linux, also reproduced the slowdown on hovering and moving
the cursor off the gif. Occasionally, I get a more serious slowdown or a
complete freeze, but unsure how to reproduce reliably.

Version: 24.2.1.1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 359ef544e625d2ffbfced462ab37bd593ca85fa7
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

Version: 24.2.0.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: da48488a73ddd66ea24cf16bbc4f7b9c08e9bea1
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22631; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

I also reproduce a slight slowdown in LO 6.0, so that issue has been around for
a while. But It has gotten worse along the way.

Is the issue in macOS a clear regression when comparing to 7.6, Telesto?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 77352] Copying cell range with chart results in incorrect clipboard, unless sheet renamed from "Sheet1"

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77352

--- Comment #16 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Verified that it indeed pastes the full chart with its labels into GIMP 2.10.36
and Inkscape 1.3.1 when copied from:

Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 709866a3b8e073fab4937dcf91dcd33ff1d2bc13
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

Thanks Mike!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 155939] LibreOffice-7.5.4.2 Writer hangs when changing language of text

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155939

--- Comment #15 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
*** Bug 156535 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156535] Continual crashing if I select Language/for all text

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156535

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #8 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Let's go with duplicate.
Fenton, if you can still reproduce in a recent version, please attach a sample
file / new steps, and set back to "unconfirmed".
Thank you!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 155939 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156588] Changing language crashes LO (Not Responding)

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156588

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

--- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
No response, let's go back to duplicate.
Peter, if you can still reproduce in a recent version, please provide a sample
file and set back to "unconfirmed"
Thank you!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 155939 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 155939] LibreOffice-7.5.4.2 Writer hangs when changing language of text

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155939

--- Comment #14 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
*** Bug 156588 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156446] extremely long loading or not loading at all using Linux Mint Mate desktop environment

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156446

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
OK, let's close as "works for me". Thanks for reporting back.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160016] GIF flipped vertically in ODP

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160016

--- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Created attachment 192927
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192927=edit
sample ODP with gif that shows another issue

>From same commit: many green and transparent pixels in this sample.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160016] GIF flipped vertically in ODP

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160016

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
File doesn't need to have been created with a previous version.
Simply inserting attachment 186976 into a presentation reproduced it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160016] GIF flipped vertically in ODP

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160016

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||qui...@gmail.com
  Regression By||Tomaž Vajngerl

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160016] New: GIF flipped vertically in ODP

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160016

Bug ID: 160016
   Summary: GIF flipped vertically in ODP
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 24.8.0.0 alpha0+ Master
  Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Keywords: bibisected, bisected, regression
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Impress
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org
Blocks: 104238

Created attachment 192926
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192926=edit
sample ODP

GIF image in attachment is flipped vertically when opened with a recent trunk
build:

Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 709866a3b8e073fab4937dcf91dcd33ff1d2bc13
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

Bibisected with linux-64-24.8 to first bad build
[2fcb5f0c18082bcae763de6a886b718bc288512c] which points to:

commit  6588c30ed4477627b2623560ca867682b189bc80
author  Tomaž Vajngerl  Mon Feb 26 21:45:35 2024 +0900
committer   Tomaž Vajngerl  Thu Feb 29 16:12:18 2024 +0100
vcl: separate scanline direction from ScanlineFormat
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/163943

Quikee, can you please have a look?


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104238
[Bug 104238] [META] Impress image bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 104238] [META] Impress image bugs and enhancements

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104238

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||160016


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160016
[Bug 160016] GIF flipped vertically in ODP
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160009] STYLES -- let's be able to see the style details without editing

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160009

m_a_riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #1 from m_a_riosv  ---
Sorry, can't you see them in the Sidebar, selecting Properties?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: Hoping to be part of GSoC 2024

2024-03-03 Thread Ilmari Lauhakangas

On 4.3.2024 5.08, Jonah Janzen wrote:
Hi there! My name is Jonah, and I'm a Canadian engineering student. I 
recently found out about Google Summer of Code, and after doing some 
more reading about it, it seems like a wonderful opportunity that I 
would love to be a part of. As a longtime user of LibreOffice, it's high 
on my list of organizations I want to give back to, and hence I'm 
reaching out to you today to start a conversation about doing so.
I've been programming since I was 8 doing everything from amateur 
gamedev to competitive programming. This past year, I worked as a web 
developer building a full-stack application with C#/Blazor, and I've 
also made occasional contributions to FOSS like Godot and LMMS.


There are a couple of ideas that I would be most interested in working 
on, which I'll list below:

_UNO Rust Bindings
_
I have vague familiarity with the Rust language and the ideas behind it, 
but I have little hands-on experience with it.
My initial thoughts about this idea are that it would almost certainly 
involve the use of the CXX.RS  utility, and that I would 
hope to be able to auto-generate as much of the code as possible, by 
using the public API specification.
I have a strong desire to get more familiar with Rust, and I love 
working on low-level backend stuff so this would probably be my top choice.


_Forgejo Migration (my own idea)_
 From the perspective of a newcomer to the project, between Gitiles, 
Gerrit, Bugzilla, Jenkins, etc., the different parts of LibreOffice 
development feel disjointed and initially challenging to grasp. I 
sincerely don't mean to cause offense, and I don't come across as 
abrasive rather than reflective.
What I would propose is to move the LibreOffice repository, issue 
tracker, code review process, and CI all onto the Forgejo platform. This 
would offer a more centralized experience for all aspects of project 
management that I think would make core developers' lives much easier, 
and provide another, more superficial benefit: young (and occasionally 
foolish) individuals like myself are used to the GitHub style of Git 
server, and things like Gitiles tend to feel outdated and 
unapproachable. Forgejo would provide a more familiar UX that would ease 
the process of onboarding new contributors.
Gitea is another possibility, because it seems to be more active and 
it's used by high-profile projects like Blender, although it's owned by 
a for-profit now. I've also heard about OneDev, but don't know as much 
about it.


Since this is my own idea, there are a couple potential challenges I'm 
not sure about that I'd appreciate input on:
- This would require transferring account data, and I understand that 
you might not be willing to entrust me with the power to access that.
- I would like for my GSoC project to be 350 hours, and I don't have an 
estimate for how long this would take. I guess we could tack on other 
stuff under the migration umbrella as well, like a shift from IRC to 
Matrix, for example.


_LibreOffice Theme_
Although I'm personally not as interested in this idea, it seems like it 
would offer a significant leap forward in LibreOffice's UI capabilities, 
and might make the software more appealing to a lot of people. If you 
think this would do the most good for the project overall, then I'd be 
glad to take it on for that reason. I would want to consider what the 
best way to store custom styles is (CSS? XML? and so on), and how this 
can be integrated as tightly as possible with the way Mozilla themes are 
used, so that the new setup can do all the same things.


-
I would really appreciate feedback on what you think the best of those 
ideas (or any others) might be for me to work on. I would also be 
curious to know how much interest from other GSoC applicants you have 
had thus far, and whether I would have a significant chance of being 
accepted if I actually were to work on a proposal. If the answer to that 
is yes, then I will start working on an easy hack as soon as possible, 
and collaborating with potential mentors to shape my proposal.


Thank you so much, and I hope to work with you soon!


I have invited you to an interview.

Ilmari


[Bug 139898] [META] PPTX Master slides / notes / handouts related issues

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139898

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||159931


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159931
[Bug 159931] Exported pptx cannot be opened in PowerPoint because a referenced
part does not exist
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 104787] [META] Saved PPTX files that MS Powerpoint can't open

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104787

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||159931


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159931
[Bug 159931] Exported pptx cannot be opened in PowerPoint because a referenced
part does not exist
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159931] Exported pptx cannot be opened in PowerPoint because a referenced part does not exist

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159931

Aron Budea  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|24.8.0.0 alpha0+ Master |7.6.5.2 release
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
   ||7740
   Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
 CC||balazs.varga...@gmail.com
 Blocks||139898, 104787

--- Comment #2 from Aron Budea  ---
I bibisected the change when 'slideLayout0.xml' first exists in the unzipped
output PPTX using repo bibisect-linux-64-24.2 (haven't tested the result in
PP), and it is the 24.2 backport of the following commit. Adding CC: to Balazs
Varga.

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=bff76421e234df7246a7f49c71a11432f86e09d1
author  Balazs Varga
2023-12-03 23:41:01 +0100
committer   Balazs Varga
2023-12-18 15:10:54 +0100

tdf#157740 FILESAVE PPTX: fix explosion of the number of master slides


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104787
[Bug 104787] [META] Saved PPTX files that MS Powerpoint can't open
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139898
[Bug 139898] [META] PPTX Master slides / notes / handouts related issues
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 117865] image caption disappears randomly when moving whole frame, reappears when switching focus

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117865

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Regression By||Armin Le Grand

--- Comment #13 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Still reproduced in recent trunk build:

Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 709866a3b8e073fab4937dcf91dcd33ff1d2bc13
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 97391] [META] OpenCL and "Software Interpreter" issues in Calc

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97391

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||151144


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151144
[Bug 151144] Options dialog. Move "Allow use of OpenCL" option to LibreOffice
Calc > Calculate subsection
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 151144] Options dialog. Move "Allow use of OpenCL" option to LibreOffice Calc > Calculate subsection

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151144

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||97391


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97391
[Bug 97391] [META] OpenCL and "Software Interpreter" issues in Calc
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 151144] Options dialog. Move "Allow use of OpenCL" option to LibreOffice Calc > Calculate subsection

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151144

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
   ||5106

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103580] UI - Enabling OpenCL in Options-OpenCL has no effect on macOS

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103580

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
   ||5106

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 99453] OpenCL: more readable profile, log file with device information

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99453

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
   ||5106

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 105106] LO should inform if and why it's unable to enable OpenCL

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105106

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Unable to enable OpenCL and |LO should inform if and why
   |LO never explains why   |it's unable to enable
   ||OpenCL
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
   ||3580,
   ||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99
   ||453,
   ||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
   ||1144
 Blocks||102187

--- Comment #6 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
>From my duplicate:

---

Since 5.3[1], we have automatic tests to decide if OpenCL is safe to use.

However, the user is not informed of if and why "Tools > Options > LibreOffice
> OpenCL > Allow use of OpenCL" was turned off after turning it on and
restarting - regardless of the reason (tests failed, not on device whitelist,
OpenCL not installed...).
The only way to find out it was actually turned back off is to go back to the
dialog.

We don't want to bother the user with too much information, but silently
turning off what the user turned on is poor UX (and makes troubleshooting
difficult).

We have reports about this issue:
- bug 103580 on macOS
- bug 106162 on Linux
- bug 133449 on Windows

And on ask.LO:
- https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/opencl-could-not-be-enabled/25011
- https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/unable-to-activate-opencl/45714

If the option remains exposed in the UI[2], the UX needs improving. Because
OpenCL might be updated (or even just installed!) after LO was installed, I
think it's OK to keep the workflow of automatically turning off after a check.
However, we'd also need:
- so the user is aware that it did not work, a dialog at startup with the
message:

"OpenCL was turned off because:
"

- In the Options dialog, a message like:

"Last attempt to use OpenCL failed: ."

A link to a full log of failed tests would also be useful (similar to what we
have for Skia since 7.6 for bug 155070). We have relevant user profile files
opencl_profile.xml and opencl_devices.log[3], but I understand they are only
available if OpenCL was able to be used.

Easy access to a short error message, + a full log with useful info, would be
useful for the user to solve the issue themself (e.g. OpenCL not installed) or
for QA to more efficiently troubleshoot.

[1]: https://meeksfamily.uk/~michael/blog/2017-02-01-under-the-hood-5-3.html
[2]: because of poor support on e.g. macOS, it has been suggested to remove the
option from the GUI. See bug 103580 comment 12
[3]: see 8d3dd678bf9fd50a736cc0ff956f1efd7e660502 for bug 99453, and
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps#Computation-related_issues_in_Calc_(_OpenCL_)


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||105106


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105106
[Bug 105106] LO should inform if and why it's unable to enable OpenCL
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 99453] OpenCL: more readable profile, log file with device information

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99453

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 |
   |0013|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103580] UI - Enabling OpenCL in Options-OpenCL has no effect on macOS

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103580

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 |
   |0013|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|160013  |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013
[Bug 160013] Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 105106] Unable to enable OpenCL and LO never explains why

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105106

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org

--- Comment #5 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
*** Bug 160013 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 97391] [META] OpenCL and "Software Interpreter" issues in Calc

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97391

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|160013  |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013
[Bug 160013] Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160013] Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 |
   |3580,   |
   |https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99 |
   |453 |
   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Blocks|97391, 102187   |
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Ha, we already have the request in bug 105106, I somehow missed it.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105106 ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97391
[Bug 97391] [META] OpenCL and "Software Interpreter" issues in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160013] Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 |
   |3580,   |
   |https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99 |
   |453 |
   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Blocks|97391, 102187   |
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Ha, we already have the request in bug 105106, I somehow missed it.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105106 ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97391
[Bug 97391] [META] OpenCL and "Software Interpreter" issues in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159380] close all (documents / windows) Writer

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159380

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #5 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Thanks for clarifying.
On which operating system are you? Because how the Start Center and components
behave might differ slightly.

(In reply to peter josvai from comment #3)
> and you couldn't get there otherwise, but by exiting, opening, and closing
> the blank document :) :) 
It should be possible to open directly the Start Center (the grey document icon
in your applications), no need to create a new document then close it.

UX/Design team, thoughts on a "close all documents and open start center"
command?
I think that, once more, this fits into your original request in bug 117237. If
we are able to keep track of a group of documents aka a "session", we should
also be able to close them all at once.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 159380] close all (documents / windows) Writer

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159380

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||needsUXEval
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #5 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Thanks for clarifying.
On which operating system are you? Because how the Start Center and components
behave might differ slightly.

(In reply to peter josvai from comment #3)
> and you couldn't get there otherwise, but by exiting, opening, and closing
> the blank document :) :) 
It should be possible to open directly the Start Center (the grey document icon
in your applications), no need to create a new document then close it.

UX/Design team, thoughts on a "close all documents and open start center"
command?
I think that, once more, this fits into your original request in bug 117237. If
we are able to keep track of a group of documents aka a "session", we should
also be able to close them all at once.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159764] Implement AVERAGE.WEIGHTED Function in LibreOffice Calc

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159764

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159757] Complex script word-by-word navigation and selection does not work at all

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159757

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156535] Continual crashing if I select Language/for all text

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156535

--- Comment #7 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Fenton Heirtzler,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159380] close all (documents / windows) Writer

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159380

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156446] extremely long loading or not loading at all using Linux Mint Mate desktop environment

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156446

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 147484] Group shape content cannot be exported

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147484

--- Comment #2 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear NISZ LibreOffice Team,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156426] Gregorian Date before 1582

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156426

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear rwk,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 156316] Position and Size command is not working properly in Writer RC1.

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156316

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear TseRigs,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 155270] [ Calc - 7.5.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community ] [ 3x issues identified while using Pivot table, 2x EDITING / FORMATTING and 1x UI ]

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155270

--- Comment #8 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear James,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 133322] General Error importing PDF with filled in signature

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133322

--- Comment #9 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Alexander,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 140127] Impossible to reach content because oversized cell caused by Wrap

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140127

--- Comment #6 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Telesto,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 127833] Field shading in comments not properly refreshed

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127833

--- Comment #10 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Heiko Tietze,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 124539] poor resolution of PDF in the background

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124539

--- Comment #7 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Wolf,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 117865] image caption disappears randomly when moving whole frame, reappears when switching focus

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117865

--- Comment #12 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear stragu,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Hoping to be part of GSoC 2024

2024-03-03 Thread Jonah Janzen
Hi there! My name is Jonah, and I'm a Canadian engineering student. I
recently found out about Google Summer of Code, and after doing some more
reading about it, it seems like a wonderful opportunity that I would love
to be a part of. As a longtime user of LibreOffice, it's high on my list of
organizations I want to give back to, and hence I'm reaching out to you
today to start a conversation about doing so.
I've been programming since I was 8 doing everything from amateur gamedev
to competitive programming. This past year, I worked as a web developer
building a full-stack application with C#/Blazor, and I've also made
occasional contributions to FOSS like Godot and LMMS.

There are a couple of ideas that I would be most interested in working on,
which I'll list below:

*UNO Rust Bindings*
I have vague familiarity with the Rust language and the ideas behind it,
but I have little hands-on experience with it.
My initial thoughts about this idea are that it would almost certainly
involve the use of the CXX.RS utility, and that I would hope to be able to
auto-generate as much of the code as possible, by using the public API
specification.
I have a strong desire to get more familiar with Rust, and I love working
on low-level backend stuff so this would probably be my top choice.

*Forgejo Migration (my own idea)*
>From the perspective of a newcomer to the project, between Gitiles, Gerrit,
Bugzilla, Jenkins, etc., the different parts of LibreOffice development
feel disjointed and initially challenging to grasp. I sincerely don't mean
to cause offense, and I don't come across as abrasive rather than
reflective.
What I would propose is to move the LibreOffice repository, issue tracker,
code review process, and CI all onto the Forgejo platform. This would offer
a more centralized experience for all aspects of project management that I
think would make core developers' lives much easier, and provide another,
more superficial benefit: young (and occasionally foolish) individuals like
myself are used to the GitHub style of Git server, and things like Gitiles
tend to feel outdated and unapproachable. Forgejo would provide a more
familiar UX that would ease the process of onboarding new contributors.
Gitea is another possibility, because it seems to be more active and it's
used by high-profile projects like Blender, although it's owned by a
for-profit now. I've also heard about OneDev, but don't know as much about
it.

Since this is my own idea, there are a couple potential challenges I'm not
sure about that I'd appreciate input on:
- This would require transferring account data, and I understand that you
might not be willing to entrust me with the power to access that.
- I would like for my GSoC project to be 350 hours, and I don't have an
estimate for how long this would take. I guess we could tack on other stuff
under the migration umbrella as well, like a shift from IRC to Matrix, for
example.

*LibreOffice Theme*
Although I'm personally not as interested in this idea, it seems like it
would offer a significant leap forward in LibreOffice's UI capabilities,
and might make the software more appealing to a lot of people. If you think
this would do the most good for the project overall, then I'd be glad to
take it on for that reason. I would want to consider what the best way to
store custom styles is (CSS? XML? and so on), and how this can be
integrated as tightly as possible with the way Mozilla themes are used, so
that the new setup can do all the same things.

-
I would really appreciate feedback on what you think the best of those
ideas (or any others) might be for me to work on. I would also be curious
to know how much interest from other GSoC applicants you have had thus far,
and whether I would have a significant chance of being accepted if I
actually were to work on a proposal. If the answer to that is yes, then I
will start working on an easy hack as soon as possible, and collaborating
with potential mentors to shape my proposal.

Thank you so much, and I hope to work with you soon!

Jonah


[Bug 160015] Janky / slow window resizing and redrawing under Wayland

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160015

--- Comment #2 from Jeff Fortin Tam  ---
Created attachment 192925
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192925=edit
Demonstration video - Calc 24.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160015] Janky / slow window resizing and redrawing under Wayland

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160015

--- Comment #1 from Jeff Fortin Tam  ---
Created attachment 192924
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192924=edit
Demonstration video - Writer 24.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 127963] Toolbar flickers while the window is resized

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127963

Jeff Fortin Tam  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
   ||0015

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 112889] [META] Screen flickering when hovering on items or selecting text with default rendering

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112889

Jeff Fortin Tam  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||160015


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160015
[Bug 160015] Janky / slow window resizing and redrawing under Wayland
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 91488] [META] RenderContext related issues

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91488

Jeff Fortin Tam  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||160015


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160015
[Bug 160015] Janky / slow window resizing and redrawing under Wayland
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160015] Janky / slow window resizing and redrawing under Wayland

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160015

Jeff Fortin Tam  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
   ||7963
 Blocks||91488, 112889
   Keywords||perf


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
[Bug 91488] [META] RenderContext related issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112889
[Bug 112889] [META] Screen flickering when hovering on items or selecting text
with default rendering
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160015] New: Janky / slow window resizing and redrawing under Wayland

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160015

Bug ID: 160015
   Summary: Janky / slow window resizing and redrawing under
Wayland
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: Inherited From OOo
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: UI
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: nekoh...@gmail.com

Description:
LibreOffice applications (I've tested at least Calc and Writer) are very slow
to resize and redraw their windows on Linux, even under a well-optimized
Wayland GNOME 45.4 and open source Mesa drivers for my AMD Radeon R9 270.

No other applications (particularly GTK4 apps) have this problem, other apps
resize butter-smoothly.

Steps to Reproduce:
Super+middle-click to resize any window without needing to be super precise,
otherwise grab the window's edges to resize.

Actual Results:
Laggy and janky resizing, not just of toolbars (bug #127963) but also the
document's canvas, statusbar, scrollbars, etc.

Expected Results:
Butter-smooth resizing.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Version: 24.2.1.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: db4def46b0453cc22e2d0305797cf981b68ef5ac
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Flatpak
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160014] Infobar widgets don't respect dark mode on startup on Linux

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160014

--- Comment #1 from Jeff Fortin Tam  ---
Created attachment 192923
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=192923=edit
Screenshot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 143344] [META] Linux Dark Mode bugs and enhancements

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143344

Jeff Fortin Tam  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||160014


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160014
[Bug 160014] Infobar widgets don't respect dark mode on startup on Linux
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160014] Infobar widgets don't respect dark mode on startup on Linux

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160014

Jeff Fortin Tam  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||143344


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143344
[Bug 143344] [META] Linux Dark Mode bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160014] New: Infobar widgets don't respect dark mode on startup on Linux

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160014

Bug ID: 160014
   Summary: Infobar widgets don't respect dark mode on startup on
Linux
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 24.2.0.3 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: UI
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: nekoh...@gmail.com

Description:
See attached screenshot.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have your freedesktop environment set to "prefer dark" mode (i.e. with
GNOME's dark mode switched on)
2. Launch a new version of LibreOffice or somehow make infobars appear

Actual Results:
* Bright sky-blue background color for the infobars
* Symbolic lightbulb icons on the left of those infobars are white on light
blue, making them near invisible

Expected Results:
Dark blue infobar background, on startup or when live switching to dark theme.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Version: 24.2.1.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: db4def46b0453cc22e2d0305797cf981b68ef5ac
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.7; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: fr-CA (en_CA.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Flatpak
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160013] Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Because of support from various users in bug 103580, setting to "new".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160013] Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Because of support from various users in bug 103580, setting to "new".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||103580


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103580
[Bug 103580] UI - Enabling OpenCL in Options-OpenCL has no effect on macOS
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103580] UI - Enabling OpenCL in Options-OpenCL has no effect on macOS

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103580

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||102187
 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org

--- Comment #18 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
I've followed up in bug 160013.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 103580] UI - Enabling OpenCL in Options-OpenCL has no effect on macOS

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103580

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
   ||0013

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 99453] OpenCL: more readable profile, log file with device information

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99453

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
   ||0013

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||160013


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013
[Bug 160013] Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 97391] [META] OpenCL and "Software Interpreter" issues in Calc

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97391

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||160013


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013
[Bug 160013] Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160013] New: Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013

Bug ID: 160013
   Summary: Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned
off
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 5.3.0.3 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Keywords: needsUXEval
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: LibreOffice
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org
CC: libreoffice-ux-adv...@lists.freedesktop.org
Blocks: 97391, 102187

Since 5.3[1], we have automatic tests to decide if OpenCL is safe to use.

However, the user is not informed of if and why "Tools > Options > LibreOffice
> OpenCL > Allow use of OpenCL" was turned off after turning it on and
restarting - regardless of the reason (tests failed, not on device whitelist,
OpenCL not installed...).
The only way to find out it was actually turned back off is to go back to the
dialog.

We don't want to bother the user with too much information, but silently
turning off what the user turned on is poor UX (and makes troubleshooting
difficult).

We have reports about this issue:
- bug 103580 on macOS
- bug 106162 on Linux
- bug 133449 on Windows

And on ask.LO:
- https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/opencl-could-not-be-enabled/25011
- https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/unable-to-activate-opencl/45714

If the option remains exposed in the UI[2], the UX needs improving. Because
OpenCL might be updated (or even just installed!) after LO was installed, I
think it's OK to keep the workflow of automatically turning off after a check.
However, we'd also need:
- so the user is aware that it did not work, a dialog at startup with the
message:

"OpenCL was turned off because:
"

- In the Options dialog, a message like:

"Last attempt to use OpenCL failed: ."

A link to a full log of failed tests would also be useful (similar to what we
have for Skia since 7.6 for bug 155070). We have relevant user profile files
opencl_profile.xml and opencl_devices.log[3], but I understand they are only
available if OpenCL was able to be used.

Easy access to a short error message, + a full log with useful info, would be
useful for the user to solve the issue themself (e.g. OpenCL not installed) or
for QA to more efficiently troubleshoot.

[1]: https://meeksfamily.uk/~michael/blog/2017-02-01-under-the-hood-5-3.html
[2]: because of poor support on e.g. macOS, it has been suggested to remove the
option from the GUI. See bug 103580 comment 12
[3]: see 8d3dd678bf9fd50a736cc0ff956f1efd7e660502 for bug 99453, and
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps#Computation-related_issues_in_Calc_(_OpenCL_)


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97391
[Bug 97391] [META] OpenCL and "Software Interpreter" issues in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160013] New: Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned off

2024-03-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160013

Bug ID: 160013
   Summary: Inform user if and why OpenCL had to be turned turned
off
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 5.3.0.3 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Keywords: needsUXEval
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: LibreOffice
  Assignee: libreoffice-b...@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org
CC: libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org
Blocks: 97391, 102187

Since 5.3[1], we have automatic tests to decide if OpenCL is safe to use.

However, the user is not informed of if and why "Tools > Options > LibreOffice
> OpenCL > Allow use of OpenCL" was turned off after turning it on and
restarting - regardless of the reason (tests failed, not on device whitelist,
OpenCL not installed...).
The only way to find out it was actually turned back off is to go back to the
dialog.

We don't want to bother the user with too much information, but silently
turning off what the user turned on is poor UX (and makes troubleshooting
difficult).

We have reports about this issue:
- bug 103580 on macOS
- bug 106162 on Linux
- bug 133449 on Windows

And on ask.LO:
- https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/opencl-could-not-be-enabled/25011
- https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/unable-to-activate-opencl/45714

If the option remains exposed in the UI[2], the UX needs improving. Because
OpenCL might be updated (or even just installed!) after LO was installed, I
think it's OK to keep the workflow of automatically turning off after a check.
However, we'd also need:
- so the user is aware that it did not work, a dialog at startup with the
message:

"OpenCL was turned off because:
"

- In the Options dialog, a message like:

"Last attempt to use OpenCL failed: ."

A link to a full log of failed tests would also be useful (similar to what we
have for Skia since 7.6 for bug 155070). We have relevant user profile files
opencl_profile.xml and opencl_devices.log[3], but I understand they are only
available if OpenCL was able to be used.

Easy access to a short error message, + a full log with useful info, would be
useful for the user to solve the issue themself (e.g. OpenCL not installed) or
for QA to more efficiently troubleshoot.

[1]: https://meeksfamily.uk/~michael/blog/2017-02-01-under-the-hood-5-3.html
[2]: because of poor support on e.g. macOS, it has been suggested to remove the
option from the GUI. See bug 103580 comment 12
[3]: see 8d3dd678bf9fd50a736cc0ff956f1efd7e660502 for bug 99453, and
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps#Computation-related_issues_in_Calc_(_OpenCL_)


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97391
[Bug 97391] [META] OpenCL and "Software Interpreter" issues in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102187
[Bug 102187] [META] Options dialog bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

  1   2   >