[Bug 160800] Libreoffice App in F-Droid outdated

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160800

Michael Weghorn  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Michael Weghorn  ---
(In reply to Dominik Kupschke from comment #0)
> Description:
> The Libreoffice App for Android distributed over F-Droid is outdated.
> Version in F-Droid: 7.6.5.2
> Version in Google Play Store: 7.6.6.3
> 
> Is it possible to publish the newer version on F-Droid too?

Versions are published on F-Droid as well, but there's currently an
infra/connectivity issue causing the F-Droid build to fail, see
https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroiddata/-/merge_requests/14775#note_1843871640 .
This will hopefully be fixed when the tarballs have been migrated to a new
server.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160800] New: Libreoffice App in F-Droid outdated

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160800

Bug ID: 160800
   Summary: Libreoffice App in F-Droid outdated
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 7.6.6.3 release
  Hardware: All
OS: Android
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: minor
  Priority: medium
 Component: Android Viewer
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: domi...@kupschke.net

Description:
The Libreoffice App for Android distributed over F-Droid is outdated.
Version in F-Droid: 7.6.5.2
Version in Google Play Store: 7.6.6.3

Is it possible to publish the newer version on F-Droid too?

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install F-Droid
2. Search for Libreoffice in F-Droid and check the version.
3. Search for Libreoffice in Google Play Store and check the version.

Actual Results:
Outdated version distributed over F-Droid.

Expected Results:
Same version as in Google Play Store should be distributed.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160253] Heading numbering wrong on file reload

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160253

Mike Kaganski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |mikekagan...@hotmail.com
   |desktop.org |

--- Comment #16 from Mike Kaganski  ---
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166572

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 35595] Application.Wait = invalid procedure call

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35595

--- Comment #7 from KaneCharles  ---
(In reply to QA Administrators from comment #3)
> Please read this message in its entirety before responding.
> 
> Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity on
> it for over a year. Your bug is still set to NEW which means that it is open
> and confirmed. It would be nice to have the bug confirmed on a newer version
> than the version reported in the original report to know that the bug is
> still present -- sometimes a bug is inadvertently fixed over time and just
> never closed.
> 
> If you have time please do the following:
> 1) Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version
> of LibreOffice (preferably 4.2 or newer).
> 2) If it is present please leave a comment telling us what version of
> LibreOffice and your operating system.
> 3) If it is NOT present please set the bug to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave
> a short comment telling us your version and Operating System
> 
> Please DO NOT
> 1) Update the version field
> 2) Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
> 3) Set the bug to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning
> that is not appropriate in this case)
> 
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
> + 
> LibreOffice is powered by a team of volunteers, every bug is confirmed
> (triaged) by human beings who mostly give their time for free. We invite you
> to join our triaging by checking out this link:
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage
> https://time-calculator.io/
>
> There are also other ways to get involved including with marketing, UX,
> documentation, and of course developing - 
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/. 
> 
> Lastly, good bug reports help tremendously in making the process go
> smoother, please always provide reproducible steps (even if it seems easy)
> and attach any and all relevant material

Thank you for reaching out to us regarding this bug. We appreciate your
dedication to ensuring the quality of LibreOffice.

I will conduct the testing on the currently supported version of LibreOffice as
per your instructions and provide the necessary feedback on the bug tracker. I
understand the importance of keeping the bug reports up to date and will ensure
to follow the guidelines provided.

I will refrain from updating the version field, replying via email, or setting
the bug to RESOLVED - FIXED as per your instructions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160597] Attribute dr3d:vpn is incorrectly used. It determines view plane of 3D-Scene

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160597

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160602] LibreOffice Writer loses page margins and can't restore them normally

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160602

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157417] A table becomes write protected without the user choosing to set write protection.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157417

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear hicijew174,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157417] A table becomes write protected without the user choosing to set write protection.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157417

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157416] HyperLinks

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157416

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157184] Libre Office 7.6 breaks file associations (regression)

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157184

QA Administrators  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157416] HyperLinks

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157416

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear nik,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157184] Libre Office 7.6 breaks file associations (regression)

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157184

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear anixxsus,

Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.

Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately
reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest
your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still
present in the latest stable release, we need the following
information (please ignore any that you've already provided):

a) Provide details of your system including your operating
   system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have
   confirmed the bug to be present

b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better

c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem

d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help

e) Read all comments and provide any requested information

Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED
and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not:

a) respond via email 

b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details
   on the top section of our bug tracker

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157713] User-configuration location for language packs (new environment variable?)

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157713

--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear maxim.cournoyer,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 157925] JRE v21.0.1

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157925

--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear C,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 154835] When I insert a chart in any document and click the "Properties" button in the right side of the screen, its content shows up but instantly disappears.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154835

--- Comment #4 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear Ronnel Portugal,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 74206] large autocorrect lists: typing in 'Replace' field is slower than 'With' field

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74206

--- Comment #14 from QA Administrators  ---
Dear tommy27,

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget bugs and enhancements

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|160799  |


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799
[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used
background color
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 93813] Integration of a color picker/pipette dropper control into the sidebar and color picker dialog

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93813

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 |
   |0799|
 CC||trenttompk...@gmail.com

--- Comment #17 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
*** Bug 160799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo
 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 |
   |813 |
   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 Blocks|85184   |

--- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
With the existing two workarounds (Recent palette, and the copy-paste of colour
code), I see this as a clear duplicate of bug 93813. See also bug 130967, which
is already marked as duplicate
It might be added to the widgets as part of a fix, and if not, it would be a
follow-up enhancement request.
Let's consolidate.
Thank you!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93813 ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184
[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget
bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo
 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
   See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
   |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93 |
   |813 |
   Keywords|needsUXEval |
 Blocks|85184   |

--- Comment #3 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
With the existing two workarounds (Recent palette, and the copy-paste of colour
code), I see this as a clear duplicate of bug 93813. See also bug 130967, which
is already marked as duplicate
It might be added to the widgets as part of a fix, and if not, it would be a
follow-up enhancement request.
Let's consolidate.
Thank you!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 93813 ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184
[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget
bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350

--- Comment #19 from Justin L  ---
Created attachment 193829
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193829=edit
commentsInWord.docx: the source document for the previous screenshot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350

--- Comment #18 from Justin L  ---
Created attachment 193828
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193828=edit
commentsInWord2019.PNG: screenshot of single reply to thread in MSO

Likely our poor model is just a copy of what MSO does. It too is extremely
limited in comment replies. You can only reply to the thread, and comments
cannot be re-organized, etc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: Windows installer errors and warnings

2024-04-23 Thread Jakub Kościelak

Thank you Julien,
I sent patches to gerrit for review,
Jenkins has already commented +1 ;-)

https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166567

https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166568


Jakub Kościelak

W dniu 23.04.2024 o 15:42, Julien Nabet pisze:

Hello

I can't tell about your comment but since you seem to have some 
knowledge on this part and you even attached a patch, I propose you to 
follow https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GetInvolved.


You'll be able to submit the patch directly on the gerrit so it'll be 
easier for review.


Julien


[Bug 160791] Missing keyboard shortcuts for text formatting.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160791

--- Comment #3 from m_a_riosv  ---
What user interface do you use?
I can see the 'simple underline' just to the right of the italics. Same place
as in OpenOffice. Which is also customisable like LibreOffice.

Usually taking a light review of manuals is a great help, not to learn
everything, but to help remind you of something, when the need comes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792

--- Comment #6 from m_a_riosv  ---
Created attachment 193827
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193827=edit
Adjunto un pequeño ejemplo.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

core.git: helpcontent2

2024-04-23 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos (via logerrit)
 helpcontent2 |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit 9ad0eb9a62b572b15ae0bfd31674aedd77eb4761
Author: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 15:11:28 2024 -0600
Commit: Gerrit Code Review 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 23:11:28 2024 +0200

Update git submodules

* Update helpcontent2 from branch 'master'
  to 67dd141b0f05a334a51a36d14cbe666559949715
  - Remove a tautology and fix a grammar error

Change-Id: I6d8e582f2023c488ebd74a29aeac3360d621ed02
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/166566
Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
Tested-by: Jenkins

diff --git a/helpcontent2 b/helpcontent2
index d50121f44bc5..67dd141b0f05 16
--- a/helpcontent2
+++ b/helpcontent2
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Subproject commit d50121f44bc54b22ccc603093cf5fd0b75f26155
+Subproject commit 67dd141b0f05a334a51a36d14cbe666559949715


help.git: source/text

2024-04-23 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos (via logerrit)
 source/text/scalc/01/FormatSparklineMenu.xhp |2 +-
 source/text/scalc/01/sparklines.xhp  |2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 67dd141b0f05a334a51a36d14cbe666559949715
Author: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 15:10:14 2024 -0600
Commit: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 23:11:27 2024 +0200

Remove a tautology and fix a grammar error

Change-Id: I6d8e582f2023c488ebd74a29aeac3360d621ed02
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/help/+/166566
Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
Tested-by: Jenkins

diff --git a/source/text/scalc/01/FormatSparklineMenu.xhp 
b/source/text/scalc/01/FormatSparklineMenu.xhp
index bb77bab5cc..a98712e320 100644
--- a/source/text/scalc/01/FormatSparklineMenu.xhp
+++ b/source/text/scalc/01/FormatSparklineMenu.xhp
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 Deletes all 
sparklines of the group at the current cell or selection.
 
 Edit Sparkline Group
-Edits the 
properties of the sparkline group. The properties applies to all sparklines in 
the group.
+Edits the 
properties of the sparkline group. The properties apply to all sparklines in 
the group.
 
 Edit Sparkline
 Edits the 
properties of the sparkline at the current cell, if any.
diff --git a/source/text/scalc/01/sparklines.xhp 
b/source/text/scalc/01/sparklines.xhp
index a9126832fe..039f813f2c 100644
--- a/source/text/scalc/01/sparklines.xhp
+++ b/source/text/scalc/01/sparklines.xhp
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 
 
 Sparklines
-Opens the 
Sparklines Properties dialog to define sparklines 
properties.
+Opens the 
Sparklines Properties dialog to define sparkline 
settings.
 
 
 


core.git: sc/source

2024-04-23 Thread Justin Luth (via logerrit)
 sc/source/core/tool/token.cxx |   10 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 4ed26399e2c9a0d35a1f7e6f19f68a5bb0303109
Author: Justin Luth 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 13:38:08 2024 -0400
Commit: Justin Luth 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 23:00:56 2024 +0200

NFC ScRawToken::CreateToken: ocPush uses the same function

Ever since commit 87307aba9e8dbca16672e6df701d9f905b9e1786
Author: Jens-Heiner Rechtien on Thu Jan 8 10:47:13 2009 +
CWS-TOOLING: integrate CWS frmdlg
 case svSingleRef :
 if (eOp == ocPush)
 return new ScSingleRefToken( aRef.Ref1 );
 else
-return new ScSingleRefOpToken( eOp, aRef.Ref1 );
+return new ScSingleRefToken( aRef.Ref1, eOp );
 case svDoubleRef :
 if (eOp == ocPush)
 return new ScDoubleRefToken( aRef );
 else
-return new ScDoubleRefOpToken( eOp, aRef );
+return new ScDoubleRefToken( aRef, eOp );

Instead of using different functions, they now use the same function
where optional eOp = ocPush [sc/inc/token.hxx].

Change-Id: I3ee0f308bd983c3edd54fdd064b957b63ca4c0d6
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166564
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Justin Luth 

diff --git a/sc/source/core/tool/token.cxx b/sc/source/core/tool/token.cxx
index 33e520723213..364913e4fa99 100644
--- a/sc/source/core/tool/token.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/core/tool/token.cxx
@@ -370,15 +370,9 @@ FormulaToken* ScRawToken::CreateToken(ScSheetLimits& 
rLimits) const
 return new FormulaStringOpToken(eOp, std::move(aSS));
 }
 case svSingleRef :
-if (eOp == ocPush)
-return new ScSingleRefToken(rLimits, aRef.Ref1 );
-else
-return new ScSingleRefToken(rLimits, aRef.Ref1, eOp );
+return new ScSingleRefToken(rLimits, aRef.Ref1, eOp);
 case svDoubleRef :
-if (eOp == ocPush)
-return new ScDoubleRefToken(rLimits, aRef );
-else
-return new ScDoubleRefToken(rLimits, aRef, eOp );
+return new ScDoubleRefToken(rLimits, aRef, eOp);
 case svMatrix :
 IF_NOT_OPCODE_ERROR( ocPush, ScMatrixToken);
 return new ScMatrixToken( pMat );


[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792

--- Comment #5 from m_a_riosv  ---
I think the problem stems from the fact that you are not using the styles to
get the table of contents, nor are you applying them to the numbering, which
you seem to have done by direct formatting using the icons in the bar.

You are going to have to study a little bit the Writer documentation that I
indicated in comment #2. On page 13 it tells you how to modify the character
style of the list.

You can also do the query at https://ask.libreoffice.org/c/spanish/10

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Creo que el problema nace de que no estás utilizando estilos para obtener la
tabla de contenido, ni los estás aplicando a las numeraciones, lo cual parece
has hecho mediante formato directo mediante los iconos de la barra.

Vas a tener que estudiar un poco la documentación de Writer que te indique en
el comentario #2. En a página 13 indica como modificar el estilo de carácter de
la list.

También puedes hacer la consulta en https://ask.libreoffice.org/c/spanish/10

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160791] Missing keyboard shortcuts for text formatting.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160791

--- Comment #2 from vena.c...@virgin.net  ---
I did not know that about custom shortcuts, and I have been using OpenOffice
for years. Most users probably do not know about custom shortcuts. 

Nevertheless, built in strike-through and underline shortcuts would be useful. 

Double-underline has a shortcut, but single underline does not, so this seems
to be inconsistent and illogical.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 148192] Create a new option External Firebird file under Create new database

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148192

jcs...@libreoffice.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |jcs...@libreoffice.org
   |desktop.org |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

core.git: 2 commits - winaccessibility/source

2024-04-23 Thread Michael Weghorn (via logerrit)
 winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx |   17 +
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 31a4062bc0f3a751d3758a2d9b3ebb4fe9010590
Author: Michael Weghorn 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 09:26:34 2024 +0100
Commit: Michael Weghorn 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 20:52:57 2024 +0200

wina11y: Use AccessibleRelationType::MEMBER_OF constant

... instead of hard-coded 7.

Change-Id: I2ac44719043c827ce2a65687be021d7f823898d0
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166505
Reviewed-by: Michael Weghorn 
Tested-by: Jenkins

diff --git a/winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx 
b/winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx
index 3f261e9d4bd7..8694ef418bbc 100644
--- a/winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx
+++ b/winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx
@@ -1792,7 +1792,7 @@ static XAccessible* getTheParentOfMember(XAccessible* 
pXAcc)
 for(sal_Int32 i=0 ; igetRelation(i);
-if(accRelation.RelationType == 7)
+if (accRelation.RelationType == AccessibleRelationType::MEMBER_OF)
 {
 Sequence< Reference< XInterface > > xTargets = 
accRelation.TargetSet;
 return static_cast(xTargets[0].get());
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ COM_DECLSPEC_NOTHROW STDMETHODIMP 
CMAccessible::get_groupPosition(long __RPC_FAR
 for(int i=0 ; igetRelation(i);
-if(accRelation.RelationType == 7)
+if (accRelation.RelationType == 
AccessibleRelationType::MEMBER_OF)
 {
 Sequence< Reference< XInterface > > xTargets = 
accRelation.TargetSet;
 
commit b97ff95cc2ef4c1da83c5889690b7a703f5c0699
Author: Michael Weghorn 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 09:08:33 2024 +0100
Commit: Michael Weghorn 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 20:52:49 2024 +0200

wina11y: Use AccessibleRelationType constants

Use `AccessibleRelationType::LABELED_BY` and
`AccessibleRelationType::LABEL_FOR` instead of
hard-coded numbers 6 and 5.

While at it, also rename the misspelt
"pRLebelContext" to "xLabelContext".

Change-Id: Id4e5cec0f04b9257eb141fd9bac64e7f01fa32ae
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166504
Reviewed-by: Michael Weghorn 
Tested-by: Jenkins

diff --git a/winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx 
b/winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx
index 6c1367185cac..3f261e9d4bd7 100644
--- a/winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx
+++ b/winaccessibility/source/UAccCOM/MAccessible.cxx
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 #include 
 #include 
 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
@@ -706,7 +707,7 @@ COM_DECLSPEC_NOTHROW STDMETHODIMP 
CMAccessible::get_accKeyboardShortcut(VARIANT
 AccessibleRelation accRelation;
 for(int i=0; igetRelation(i).RelationType == 
6 )
+if (pRrelationSet->getRelation(i).RelationType == 
AccessibleRelationType::LABELED_BY)
 {
 accRelation = pRrelationSet->getRelation(i);
 paccRelation = 
@@ -721,17 +722,17 @@ COM_DECLSPEC_NOTHROW STDMETHODIMP 
CMAccessible::get_accKeyboardShortcut(VARIANT
 
 XAccessible* pXAcc = 
static_cast(pRAcc.get());
 
-Reference pRLebelContext = 
pXAcc->getAccessibleContext();
-if(!pRLebelContext.is())
+Reference xLabelContext = 
pXAcc->getAccessibleContext();
+if (!xLabelContext.is())
 return S_FALSE;
 
-pRrelationSet = 
pRLebelContext->getAccessibleRelationSet();
+pRrelationSet = 
xLabelContext->getAccessibleRelationSet();
 nRelCount = pRrelationSet->getRelationCount();
 
 paccRelation = nullptr;
 for(int j=0; jgetRelation(j).RelationType == 
5 )
+if (pRrelationSet->getRelation(j).RelationType == 
AccessibleRelationType::LABEL_FOR)
 {
 accRelation = pRrelationSet->getRelation(j);
 paccRelation = 
@@ -746,7 +747,7 @@ COM_DECLSPEC_NOTHROW STDMETHODIMP 
CMAccessible::get_accKeyboardShortcut(VARIANT
 return S_FALSE;
 }
 
-Reference 
pRXIE(pRLebelContext,UNO_QUERY);
+Reference 
pRXIE(xLabelContext, UNO_QUERY);
 if(!pRXIE.is())
 return S_FALSE;
 


[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

--- Comment #12 from Jim Raykowski  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9)
> How about defaulting to off?
+1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

--- Comment #12 from Jim Raykowski  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #9)
> How about defaulting to off?
+1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 39468] translate German comments, removing redundant ones

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39468

--- Comment #368 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Ilmari Lauhakangas committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/7d13e62c3d468bd249db62cfdde14f28f74b3f59

tdf#39468 Translate German comments in vcl

It will be available in 24.8.0.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 39468] translate German comments, removing redundant ones

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39468

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|target:5.3.0 target:5.4.0   |target:5.3.0 target:5.4.0
   |target:5.5.0 target:6.0.0   |target:5.5.0 target:6.0.0
   |target:6.2.0 target:6.3.0   |target:6.2.0 target:6.3.0
   ||target:24.8.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

core.git: vcl/source

2024-04-23 Thread Ilmari Lauhakangas (via logerrit)
 vcl/source/window/split.cxx |4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 7d13e62c3d468bd249db62cfdde14f28f74b3f59
Author: Ilmari Lauhakangas 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 19:39:12 2024 +0300
Commit: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 20:30:46 2024 +0200

tdf#39468 Translate German comments in vcl

Change-Id: I783d924bffddb637eac1a3d89f4ee956955e0044
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166558
Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
Tested-by: Jenkins

diff --git a/vcl/source/window/split.cxx b/vcl/source/window/split.cxx
index df631b270bbf..d25e2b677e36 100644
--- a/vcl/source/window/split.cxx
+++ b/vcl/source/window/split.cxx
@@ -460,10 +460,10 @@ void Splitter::StartDrag()
 
 StartSplit();
 
-// Tracking starten
+// Start tracking
 StartTracking();
 
-// Start-Position ermitteln
+// Determine start position
 maDragPos = mpRefWin->GetPointerPosPixel();
 ImplSplitMousePos( maDragPos );
 if ( mbHorzSplit )


core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-7-6' - cui/source

2024-04-23 Thread Caolán McNamara (via logerrit)
 cui/source/dialogs/SpellDialog.cxx |   13 +
 cui/source/inc/SpellDialog.hxx |3 +++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

New commits:
commit 18e17288781f1b974d8b08ec1253271cd42e66ef
Author: Caolán McNamara 
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 29 16:22:10 2024 +
Commit: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 20:20:12 2024 +0200

Resolves: tdf#160159 update spellchecking area colors when style changes

so for the case of using "automatic" for the document background the
spelling checking textbox background area updates to match

Change-Id: I8723afb946176596b0a5fa43aa3bb3c036dee12c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/165476
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
Signed-off-by: Xisco Fauli 
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/165630

diff --git a/cui/source/dialogs/SpellDialog.cxx 
b/cui/source/dialogs/SpellDialog.cxx
index 0a50fbfb8cd7..fe2804c81151 100644
--- a/cui/source/dialogs/SpellDialog.cxx
+++ b/cui/source/dialogs/SpellDialog.cxx
@@ -1147,6 +1147,13 @@ void 
SentenceEditWindow_Impl::SetDrawingArea(weld::DrawingArea* pDrawingArea)
 // tdf#132288 don't merge equal adjacent attributes
 m_xEditEngine->DisableAttributeExpanding();
 
+SetDocumentColor(pDrawingArea);
+}
+
+void SentenceEditWindow_Impl::SetDocumentColor(weld::DrawingArea* pDrawingArea)
+{
+if (!pDrawingArea || !m_xEditView || !m_xEditEngine)
+return;
 // tdf#142631 use document background color in this widget
 Color aBgColor = 
svtools::ColorConfig().GetColorValue(svtools::DOCCOLOR).nColor;
 OutputDevice& rDevice = pDrawingArea->get_ref_device();
@@ -1155,6 +1162,12 @@ void 
SentenceEditWindow_Impl::SetDrawingArea(weld::DrawingArea* pDrawingArea)
 m_xEditEngine->SetBackgroundColor(aBgColor);
 }
 
+void SentenceEditWindow_Impl::StyleUpdated()
+{
+SetDocumentColor(GetDrawingArea());
+WeldEditView::StyleUpdated();
+}
+
 SentenceEditWindow_Impl::~SentenceEditWindow_Impl()
 {
 }
diff --git a/cui/source/inc/SpellDialog.hxx b/cui/source/inc/SpellDialog.hxx
index 3b8d2f9fa02f..da3870dad5eb 100644
--- a/cui/source/inc/SpellDialog.hxx
+++ b/cui/source/inc/SpellDialog.hxx
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ private:
 
 protected:
 virtual boolKeyInput( const KeyEvent& rKEvt ) override;
+virtual voidStyleUpdated() override;
 
 public:
 SentenceEditWindow_Impl();
@@ -113,6 +114,8 @@ public:
 voidMoveErrorEnd(tools::Long nOffset);
 
 voidResetIgnoreErrorsAt()   { m_aIgnoreErrorsAt.clear(); }
+
+voidSetDocumentColor(weld::DrawingArea* pDrawingArea);
 };
 
 // class SvxSpellDialog -


core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-24-2' - vcl/source

2024-04-23 Thread Noel Grandin (via logerrit)
 vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx |1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit 6b9cd13f502363c1784cdcb4538b6409a3a14c83
Author: Noel Grandin 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 09:20:22 2024 +0200
Commit: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 20:19:28 2024 +0200

tdf#160469 Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything

this used to be SV_SHORTCUT_DOCKUNDOCK, which was introduced in

commit b342b183aaea042ef0e6e1c75304072cb4e1375a
Author: Rüdiger Timm 
Date:   Tue Jul 24 09:03:18 2007 +
INTEGRATION: CWS mergesvp (1.1.2); FILE ADDED

I assume this was a solaris or something similar system hotkey, so
remove it as no longer being relevant.

Certainly nothing inside the vcl code is handling it specially.

Change-Id: I80b9d293e7db42e1ff523319862d44b93d3231c8
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166502
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin 
Tested-by: Jenkins
(cherry picked from commit bced98442d5e9c4b55ec6d4e5da3d549f8141359)
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166513
Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos 

diff --git a/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx b/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx
index e1e12dbc3e8a..71b884423af3 100644
--- a/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx
+++ b/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx
@@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ vcl::KeyCode const ReservedKeys[]
 vcl::KeyCode(KEY_F2,KEY_SHIFT)  ,
 vcl::KeyCode(KEY_F4,KEY_MOD1)   ,
 vcl::KeyCode(KEY_F4,KEY_MOD2)   ,
-vcl::KeyCode(KEY_F4,KEY_MOD1|KEY_MOD2)  ,
 vcl::KeyCode(KEY_F6,0)  ,
 vcl::KeyCode(KEY_F6,KEY_MOD1)   ,
 vcl::KeyCode(KEY_F6,KEY_SHIFT)  ,


[Bug 160469] Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160469

--- Comment #4 from Commit Notification 
 ---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-24-2":

https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/6b9cd13f502363c1784cdcb4538b6409a3a14c83

tdf#160469 Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything

It will be available in 24.2.4.

The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds

Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160469] Ctrl+Alt+F4 is marked reserved, but doesn't do anything

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160469

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|target:24.8.0   |target:24.8.0 target:24.2.4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160714] Exporting ODP file to PDF in Impress does not export PDF figures correctly

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160714

Patrick Luby (volunteer)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |guibomac...@gmail.com
   |desktop.org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #10 from Patrick Luby (volunteer)  ---
(In reply to Patrick Luby (volunteer) from comment #9)
> Created attachment 193825 [details]
> Exported PDF after fix

I have submitted a fix for this bug in the following patch:

https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166544

Attachment #193825 shows what the exported PDF looks like with the fix. I'll
post again when my fix is in a nightly master build.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160714] Exporting ODP file to PDF in Impress does not export PDF figures correctly

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160714

--- Comment #9 from Patrick Luby (volunteer)  ---
Created attachment 193825
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193825=edit
Exported PDF after fix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

dev-tools.git: help3/xhpeditor

2024-04-23 Thread Stéphane Guillou (via logerrit)
 help3/xhpeditor/js/snippets.js |2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit 41415015085fa144e7b94d85d9682c69d992bc1a
Author: Stéphane Guillou 
AuthorDate: Fri Apr 19 06:02:56 2024 +0200
Commit: Olivier Hallot 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 19:23:24 2024 +0200

remove another pesky double-space in bookmark snippet

looks like the last one according to:
grep -E "\w[ ]{2,}\w" snippets.js

Change-Id: Ice7ee3c8c82f0d9f7a3eef83dcc49d4689ef2a0f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/dev-tools/+/166214
Reviewed-by: Olivier Hallot 
Reviewed-by: Juan José González 
Tested-by: Olivier Hallot 

diff --git a/help3/xhpeditor/js/snippets.js b/help3/xhpeditor/js/snippets.js
index f2d4303e..70b1e483 100644
--- a/help3/xhpeditor/js/snippets.js
+++ b/help3/xhpeditor/js/snippets.js
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ function bookmarkValue() {
 }
 
 function bookmarkBranch() {
-var a1 = '
';
+var a1 = '
';
 editor.replaceRange(a1, editor.doc.getCursor());
 }
 


[Bug 93813] Integration of a color picker/pipette dropper control into the sidebar and color picker dialog

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93813

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
   ||0799

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget bugs and enhancements

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||160799


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799
[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used
background color
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
   ||813
 Blocks||85184

--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote  ---
In effect we already have this, just not in the "eyedropper" motif--and see
also bug 93813 to rework the SD color replacment.

That is, the 'Background Color' TB button opens the common color picker
displaying the active palette (usually 'Standard'). And across the bottom is a
swatch bar with the 12 most 'Recent' colors across the UI (so not just current
Calc session).

What is not obvious, is that for any cell on the sheet selected, launching the
'Background Color' picker's button link to the 'Custom color...' dialog will
show the bg color of the cell.

Likewise for the 'Font Color' picker's link to 'Custom color...' where dialog
will show the fg color for font in the cell.

Between the two, it is trivial to match colors for those occasions when the 12
swatch recent bar is insufficient, a textual copy/paste of the RGB. Not quite
dropper style, and could be enhanced to pass RGBA values back to the Recent
swatch bar for bg fill or fg text.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184
[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget
bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93
   ||813
 Blocks||85184

--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote  ---
In effect we already have this, just not in the "eyedropper" motif--and see
also bug 93813 to rework the SD color replacment.

That is, the 'Background Color' TB button opens the common color picker
displaying the active palette (usually 'Standard'). And across the bottom is a
swatch bar with the 12 most 'Recent' colors across the UI (so not just current
Calc session).

What is not obvious, is that for any cell on the sheet selected, launching the
'Background Color' picker's button link to the 'Custom color...' dialog will
show the bg color of the cell.

Likewise for the 'Font Color' picker's link to 'Custom color...' where dialog
will show the fg color for font in the cell.

Between the two, it is trivial to match colors for those occasions when the 12
swatch recent bar is insufficient, a textual copy/paste of the RGB. Not quite
dropper style, and could be enhanced to pass RGBA values back to the Recent
swatch bar for bg fill or fg text.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85184
[Bug 85184] [META] Color picker toolbar, dialog and sidebar drop-down widget
bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: Windows installer errors and warnings

2024-04-23 Thread Jakub Kościelak

ICE03   ERROR   Invalid identifier; Table: Directory, Column: Directory, 
Key(s): LO_progr_resou_ca@va_LCMES_c8cb7e943
ICE03   ERROR   Invalid identifier; Table: Directory, Column: Directory, 
Key(s): LO_progr_resou_kmr@l_LCMES_c75f6f5fa
[... and hundreds others ...]

These look very much derived from translation resources language tags,
where ca@va seems to stem from ca-valencia or kmr@l from kmr-Latn.
Whyever that is crippled that way..

   Eike



I now know where these "@" signs come from. We use this script 
C:\24.2.3.1\solenv\bin\localestr: #!/bin/sh case "$1" in ca-valencia) 
echo ca@valencia ;; kmr-Latn) echo kmr@latin ;; sr-Latn) echo sr@latin 
;; hu-hung) echo hu@hung ;; *) echo $1 | tr '-' '_' ;; esac in these 
places: C:\24.2.3.1\scp2\macros\macro.pl 
C:\24.2.3.1\solenv\gbuild\AllLangMoTarget.mk 
C:\24.2.3.1\solenv\gbuild\extensions\post_PackageInfo.mk and now out of 
curiosity I have 2 questions: 1. What was/is the reason that for 4 
languages we replace "-" with "@" instead of underscore? 2. Is it 
obsolete or is it still needed?


Jakub Kościelak


Live streaming LibreOffice bug triaging (week 17)

2024-04-23 Thread Ilmari Lauhakangas
I will be live streaming a 1 hour LibreOffice bug triaging session in 
the Jitsi room https://jitsi.documentfoundation.org/ilmaritriages on


Wed, 24 April 2024 at 15:00 UTC

Times are in 24-hour notation.

Anyone is welcome to interrupt me during the session and ask questions 
about the process or request me to test something specific.


Note: if you want to record the session for your own use, ask me to make 
you a moderator and then you can click the "meatball menu" in Jitsi's 
bottom bar and select "Start recording". TDF members can become 
moderators simply by authenticating (Settings - Profile). Recording only 
works in Chrome and derivative browsers at the moment.


Ilmari


[Bug 109139] [META] Cell selection bugs and enhancements

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109139
Bug 109139 depends on bug 160787, which changed state.

Bug 160787 Summary: Calc active cell cursor has small transparent corners
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160787

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160787] Calc active cell cursor has small transparent corners

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160787

Noel Grandin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 133092] [META] Crash bugs

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133092
Bug 133092 depends on bug 160768, which changed state.

Bug 160768 Summary: Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set 
up, Crash
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160768

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 107742] [META] Form control bugs and enhancements

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107742
Bug 107742 depends on bug 160768, which changed state.

Bug 160768 Summary: Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set 
up, Crash
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160768

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160768] Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set up, Crash

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160768

Noel Grandin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160787] Calc active cell cursor has small transparent corners

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160787

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||target:24.8.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160768] Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set up, Crash

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160768

Commit Notification  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||target:24.8.0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

core.git: 2 commits - sc/source svx/source

2024-04-23 Thread Noel Grandin (via logerrit)
 sc/source/ui/unoobj/cellvaluebinding.cxx|   23 +++
 svx/source/sdr/overlay/overlayselection.cxx |   10 ++
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)

New commits:
commit 1f86fdd4b5428a8c7b253051cca93429dc71f894
Author: Noel Grandin 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 16:10:48 2024 +0200
Commit: Noel Grandin 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 18:50:35 2024 +0200

tdf#160787 Calc active cell cursor has small transparent corners

clearly I don't understand something about B2DPolyPolygon, revert part
of

commit 7b1405689d4246e0e37e8759f03e1962af964cec
Author: Noel Grandin 
Date:   Fri Apr 19 22:56:04 2024 +0200
reduce the number of drawing primitives we create in
OverlaySelection

Change-Id: If8f07d021543e2686a3acfc6a0d38b2ebc962de4
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166543
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin 

diff --git a/svx/source/sdr/overlay/overlayselection.cxx 
b/svx/source/sdr/overlay/overlayselection.cxx
index d4a7b45beb8f..a5598c1d2125 100644
--- a/svx/source/sdr/overlay/overlayselection.cxx
+++ b/svx/source/sdr/overlay/overlayselection.cxx
@@ -214,6 +214,16 @@ namespace sdr::overlay
 aRGBColor = basegfx::BColor(1.0, 1.0, 1.0);
 }
 
+aRetval.resize(nCount);
+for(sal_uInt32 a(0);a < nCount; a++)
+{
+basegfx::B2DPolygon 
aPolygon(basegfx::utils::createPolygonFromRect(maRanges[a]));
+aRetval[a] =
+new drawinglayer::primitive2d::PolyPolygonColorPrimitive2D(
+basegfx::B2DPolyPolygon(std::move(aPolygon)),
+aRGBColor);
+}
+
 basegfx::B2DPolyPolygon aPolyPolygon;
 aPolyPolygon.reserve(nCount);
 for(sal_uInt32 a(0);a < nCount; a++)
commit 979164938007e4774b7718abcb20fded9a00839f
Author: Noel Grandin 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 15:31:37 2024 +0200
Commit: Noel Grandin 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 18:50:20 2024 +0200

tdf#160768 Changing value in a text box control with a link cell set up, 
Crash

regression from
commit 7510cca63690ea97eb02a43f698fc183c3d0434a
Author: Noel Grandin 
Date:   Tue Mar 26 15:56:02 2024 +0200
convert OCellValueBinding to comphelper::WeakComponentImplHelper

Change-Id: I36ec4cca7a48992b29d6c2ff5c87fb0fed1c8c3f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166540
Reviewed-by: Noel Grandin 

diff --git a/sc/source/ui/unoobj/cellvaluebinding.cxx 
b/sc/source/ui/unoobj/cellvaluebinding.cxx
index d1fa61175557..c728f503a856 100644
--- a/sc/source/ui/unoobj/cellvaluebinding.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/ui/unoobj/cellvaluebinding.cxx
@@ -286,7 +286,12 @@ namespace calc
 OUString sText;
 aValue >>= sText;
 if ( m_xCellText.is() )
+{
+// might call back into us via modified(EventObject&)
+aGuard.unlock();
 m_xCellText->setString( sText );
+aGuard.lock();
+}
 }
 break;
 
@@ -302,7 +307,12 @@ namespace calc
 double nCellValue = bValue ? 1.0 : 0.0;
 
 if ( m_xCell.is() )
+{
+// might call back into us via modified(EventObject&)
+aGuard.unlock();
 m_xCell->setValue( nCellValue );
+aGuard.lock();
+}
 
 setBooleanFormat();
 }
@@ -315,7 +325,12 @@ namespace calc
 double nValue = 0;
 aValue >>= nValue;
 if ( m_xCell.is() )
+{
+// might call back into us via modified(EventObject&)
+aGuard.unlock();
 m_xCell->setValue( nValue );
+aGuard.lock();
+}
 }
 break;
 
@@ -327,7 +342,12 @@ namespace calc
 aValue >>= nValue;  // list index from control layer 
(0-based)
 ++nValue;   // the list position value in the cell 
is 1-based
 if ( m_xCell.is() )
+{
+// might call back into us via modified(EventObject&)
+aGuard.unlock();
 m_xCell->setValue( nValue );
+aGuard.lock();
+}
 }
 break;
 
@@ -341,7 +361,10 @@ namespace calc
 {
 Sequence aInner(1);// one 
empty element
 Sequence< Sequence > aOuter( , 1 ); // one 
row
+// might call back into us via modified(EventObject&)
+aGuard.unlock();
 xData->setDataArray( aOuter );
+aGuard.lock();
 }
 }

[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792

--- Comment #4 from Damaso  ---
Y cuando realicé el cambio, tampoco funcionó el atajo de techado ctrl + z para
deshacer el cambio inicial.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792

--- Comment #3 from Damaso  ---
Hola he intentado de todas las formas posibles deshacer los cambios al
cambiarle el color de fondo de los números de las listas con el procedimiento
inicial con hice el cambio, y simplemente no se puede.

Adicionalmente todas las listas están relacionadas y no se les puede cambiar el
color de fuente de manera individual a cada uno. Si puedes hacer las pruebas
con el archivo que mandé te lo agradecería. Versión 24.2.2.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160799] FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799

--- Comment #1 from ady  ---
Without relation to the eyedropper request, there is a way to copy the
background color of a cell from the "format cell" dialog, where you can see the
RGB/HEX values. There is also a way to copy the font color from the "font color
> custom color" dialog.

Of course there is the possibility of a simple copy format (clone) a cell,
which includes those properties.

Sure, an eyedropper feature might be simpler for users. I am just pointing out
that there are alternatives available (as oppose to being some random
try-and-error iteration attempts).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 38164] Allow scrolling through Slides by Mouse wheel

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38164

Sarper Akdemir (allotropia)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |sarper.akdemir.extern@allot
   |desktop.org |ropia.de
 CC||sarper.akdemir.extern@allot
   ||ropia.de

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 38164] Allow scrolling through Slides by Mouse wheel

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38164

Sarper Akdemir (allotropia)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160796] Conditional formating pb

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160796

ady  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159950] Offer to download missing fonts from relevant online sources (dynamically, after installation)

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Offer to download & install |Offer to download missing
   |missing fonts from online   |fonts from relevant online
   |sources |sources (dynamically, after
   ||installation)

--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #8)
> Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license.

Agreed, but this bug doesn't suggest hosting fonts. Rather, it's about allowing
the download of fonts from known, stable, 3rd-party sources.

> Nor can
> we police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used. 

Also agreed, but I don't believe I suggested we do that.

> But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with unlicensed or illegal font
> bundling.

Again - this bug is not about bundling :-( I am not suggesting we bundle more
stuff. Let me try to clarify this in the phrasing of the title.

In fact, if anything, this may allow for a reduction in the number of bundled
fonts.

> I've
> suggested a TDF commissioned metric equivalent to Aptos under SIL Open Font
> License, host it for download and bundle it into LibreOffice.

A fine suggestion, which is mostly orthogonal to this bug. I mentioned Aptos as
an example of a font which users may like to have LibreOffice download when
they encounter it in a document - providing that this is possible license-wise
and availablility-wise, with a legit source. But if we can't do this for Aptos
- we can still do it for many other fonts.

> Otherwise facilitating access to "cloud hosted" or "centralized" (e.g. on
> premise) font repositories with dynamic font loading, and optional install
> to user profile, is a needed feature.

Hmm... that would be useful as well.

So, LO as bundled could have several publicly-accessible font download sources,
which could be searched when an unavailable font is encountered; but this list
could be made user-extensible, with a URL of a font repository which an
organization might offer/configure (or an individual user if they have access
to one).

How does that sound?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159950] Offer to download missing fonts from relevant online sources (dynamically, after installation)

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950

Eyal Rozenberg  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Offer to download & install |Offer to download missing
   |missing fonts from online   |fonts from relevant online
   |sources |sources (dynamically, after
   ||installation)

--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg  ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #8)
> Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license.

Agreed, but this bug doesn't suggest hosting fonts. Rather, it's about allowing
the download of fonts from known, stable, 3rd-party sources.

> Nor can
> we police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used. 

Also agreed, but I don't believe I suggested we do that.

> But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with unlicensed or illegal font
> bundling.

Again - this bug is not about bundling :-( I am not suggesting we bundle more
stuff. Let me try to clarify this in the phrasing of the title.

In fact, if anything, this may allow for a reduction in the number of bundled
fonts.

> I've
> suggested a TDF commissioned metric equivalent to Aptos under SIL Open Font
> License, host it for download and bundle it into LibreOffice.

A fine suggestion, which is mostly orthogonal to this bug. I mentioned Aptos as
an example of a font which users may like to have LibreOffice download when
they encounter it in a document - providing that this is possible license-wise
and availablility-wise, with a legit source. But if we can't do this for Aptos
- we can still do it for many other fonts.

> Otherwise facilitating access to "cloud hosted" or "centralized" (e.g. on
> premise) font repositories with dynamic font loading, and optional install
> to user profile, is a needed feature.

Hmm... that would be useful as well.

So, LO as bundled could have several publicly-accessible font download sources,
which could be searched when an unavailable font is encountered; but this list
could be made user-extensible, with a URL of a font repository which an
organization might offer/configure (or an individual user if they have access
to one).

How does that sound?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160786] Weird formatting in Calc 24.2

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160786

raal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
  Regression By||Khaled Hosny
 CC||kha...@libreoffice.org,
   ||r...@post.cz

--- Comment #6 from raal  ---
This seems to have begun at the below commit in bibisect repository/OS
linux-64-24.2.
Adding Cc: to Khaled Hosny ; Could you possibly take a look at this one?
Thanks

4ce9836c2406d6fc50482782ef4675b5e5078edb is the first bad commit
commit 4ce9836c2406d6fc50482782ef4675b5e5078edb
Author: Jenkins Build User 
Date:   Sun Jul 23 06:26:11 2023 +0200

source sha:4b743de97fc133623e46827869c4ea3eb845ad47

154292: tdf#156234: Don’t round glyph coordinates when doing subpixel
positioning | https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/154292

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote  ---
testing with

Version: 24.2.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: d56cc158d8a96260b836f100ef4b4ef25d6f1a01
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote  ---
testing with

Version: 24.2.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: d56cc158d8a96260b836f100ef4b4ef25d6f1a01
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 103030] [META] Navigator sidebar deck and floating window (also "Target in Document")

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103030
Bug 103030 depends on bug 160764, which changed state.

Bug 160764 Summary: Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings 
rather than Sections
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 144817] Navigator: Disable Sections tracking option

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144817

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||john.m.ast...@verizon.net

--- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote  ---
*** Bug 160764 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #10 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Oh crud! How'd I miss the persistent category tracking for all the categories
done for bug 145132 at 7.3 [1] all still set with true defaults as currently
refactored [2].

So the per content category context menu "tracking" toggle is toggled enabled
by default when inserting new Sections. And verified the attachment 193805
sample document 2 has it set, also that when I toggle it off, the Heading
category navigation behaves with no jump into the encompassing section.

Also verified that if toggled disabled, newly inserted sections observe the
persistent toggle disabled. 

In addition to the context menu toggle, the Navigator "SectionTracking" value
can be set via Expert Configuration, or manually edited in the LO
registrymodifications.xcu at:

false

Sorry for the noise Jim, *

=-ref-=
[1] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/122874
[2] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/129981

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 144817 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160764] Request: Set the Navigator viewport to default to Headings rather than Sections

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160764

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #10 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Oh crud! How'd I miss the persistent category tracking for all the categories
done for bug 145132 at 7.3 [1] all still set with true defaults as currently
refactored [2].

So the per content category context menu "tracking" toggle is toggled enabled
by default when inserting new Sections. And verified the attachment 193805
sample document 2 has it set, also that when I toggle it off, the Heading
category navigation behaves with no jump into the encompassing section.

Also verified that if toggled disabled, newly inserted sections observe the
persistent toggle disabled. 

In addition to the context menu toggle, the Navigator "SectionTracking" value
can be set via Expert Configuration, or manually edited in the LO
registrymodifications.xcu at:

false

Sorry for the noise Jim, *

=-ref-=
[1] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/122874
[2] https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/129981

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 144817 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160799] New: FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select previously used background color

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160799

Bug ID: 160799
   Summary: FORMATTING UI [Accessibility] Eyedropper to select
previously used background color
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: unspecified
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: enhancement
  Priority: medium
 Component: Calc
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: trenttompk...@gmail.com

In the box that lets you select the background color of a cell, it would be
nice if there was an eyedropper icon that you could click, that would select
the existing background color of a cell (this could apply to font color too).

I'm not colorblind, and even I have trouble differentiating between multiple
shades of green to pick the exact same green I used before. I can see that it
is wrong after I pick it, but then I have to pick it again. For someone who is
actually colorblind trying to work on an existing file made by someone else and
keep consistent colors.

I thought maybe the eyedropper was just missing from the drop down because it
isn't a modal, so the default behavior is to close when someone clicks outside
it. But even the Custom Color screen doesn't have that option.

So, I would add the change by:

Adding an eyedropper icon to the background color dropdown. When clicked, it
closes the dropdown and turns the users cursor into an eyedropper.
After they click a cell, the selected background color becomes the background
color of whatever cell they clicked and the cursor reverts to normal.

And that's it. And maybe give the option to blind that to a shortcut key, so if
you like hit CTRL+B, your cursor turns into an eyedropper, and the next cell
you click, it will 'suck up' its background color.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 132253] CHARACTER DIALOG: Drop hyperlink from character attributes

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132253

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |desktop.org |tion.org
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160796] Conditional formating pb

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160796

m_a_riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #2 from m_a_riosv  ---
I think you have not used properly relative/absolute references in
MAX(B1:B10)->MAX($B$1:$B$10)
E.g. for B2, the max value with relative reference is calculated MAX(B2:B11)

But please explain better with what value do you want to get with the
conditional format.

This site is used in English, you have good translators for that, like
https://www.deepl.com/translator if you don't like Google translator.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

core.git: svx/uiconfig

2024-04-23 Thread Heiko Tietze (via logerrit)
 svx/uiconfig/ui/themecoloreditdialog.ui |3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 8f3a19ce3a2dea548f644a8925bfe0718424ac21
Author: Heiko Tietze 
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 23 15:45:20 2024 +0200
Commit: Heiko Tietze 
CommitDate: Tue Apr 23 17:22:12 2024 +0200

Resolves tdf#160050 - Overlapping controls in 'add themes' dialog

Change-Id: I196ef4b445dcae5d6fc9891c8f9c0d0b2976d583
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166541
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Heiko Tietze 

diff --git a/svx/uiconfig/ui/themecoloreditdialog.ui 
b/svx/uiconfig/ui/themecoloreditdialog.ui
index 96276093a75a..ac0114ab4be1 100644
--- a/svx/uiconfig/ui/themecoloreditdialog.ui
+++ b/svx/uiconfig/ui/themecoloreditdialog.ui
@@ -3,13 +3,12 @@
 
   
   
-400
-300
 False
 True
 True
 6
 Theme Color Edit
+False
 True
 dialog
 


[Bug 107331] [META] Document themes bugs and enhancements

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107331
Bug 107331 depends on bug 160050, which changed state.

Bug 160050 Summary: CONFIGURATION: In Writer, on theme format, adding a theme 
shows window with covered text/graphics
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160050

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160792] List ordered error on writer when i change the backgroud color of numbers list and try to restore o change agai the backgroud color.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160792

m_a_riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #2 from m_a_riosv  ---
I think you need to review the documentation about work with list.
Chapter 12 about list.
https://documentation.libreoffice.org/es/documentacion-en-espanol/writer/
there is also a very good book about writer:
https://elpinguinotolkiano.wordpress.com/domando-al-escritor-2/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160791] Missing keyboard shortcuts for text formatting.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160791

m_a_riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #1 from m_a_riosv  ---
You can define your own shortcut:
Menu/Tools/Customize/Keyboard

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160788] LibreOffice made my computer glitch out randomly and I lost everything I'd typed.

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160788

m_a_riosv  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
   ||rg

--- Comment #1 from m_a_riosv  ---
Please test in safe mode, Menu/Help/Restart in Safe Mode

Please paste here the information on Menu/Help/About LibreOffice (There is an
icon to copy)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 77141] leaks a fd on closed odb: locks file on Windows share

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77141

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #26 from Julien Nabet  ---
Lionel: following the fix for tdf#144256, any update for this one?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 144256] Missing destruction of FirebirdDriver::~FirebirdDriver, OSDBCDriverManager::~OSDBCDriverManager, OPoolCollection::~OPoolCollection opening and closing an ODB

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144256

--- Comment #12 from Julien Nabet  ---
Badfully, it doesn't fix the console logs when closing odb with hsql embedded.
I still got:
warn:vcl.schedule.deinit:171962:171962:vcl/source/app/scheduler.cxx:176: DeInit
task: Timer a: 1 p: 1 framework::AutoRecovery m_aTimer 60ms
(0x55896d1038e0)
warn:vcl.schedule.deinit:171962:171962:vcl/source/app/scheduler.cxx:176: DeInit
task: Timer a: 1 p: 1 drawinglayer ImpTimedRefDev destroy mpVirDev 18ms
(0x55896e0c86a0)
warn:vcl.schedule.deinit:171962:171962:vcl/source/app/scheduler.cxx:176: DeInit
task: Timer a: 1 p: 1 MemoryManager::MemoryManager maSwapOutTimer 1000ms
(0x7f657a860d20)
warn:vcl.schedule.deinit:171962:171962:vcl/source/app/scheduler.cxx:197: DeInit
active tasks: 3 (ignored: 0)
warn:dbaccess:171962:171962:dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx:859:
DBG_UNHANDLED_EXCEPTION in commitStorageIfWriteable_ignoreErrors exception:
com.sun.star.embed.StorageWrappedTargetException message:
"/home/julien/lo/libreoffice/package/source/xstor/xstorage.cxx:3569: Problems
on commit! at
/home/julien/lo/libreoffice/package/source/xstor/xstorage.cxx:3569" context:
OStorage
wrapped: com.sun.star.lang.WrappedTargetException message:
"/home/julien/lo/libreoffice/package/source/zippackage/ZipPackage.cxx:1427:
Problem writing the original content! at
/home/julien/lo/libreoffice/package/source/zippackage/ZipPackage.cxx:1426"
context: ZipPackage
wrapped: com.sun.star.uno.DeploymentException message: "component context
fails to supply service com.sun.star.packages.manifest.ManifestWriter of type
com.sun.star.packages.manifest.XManifestWriter at
/home/julien/lo/libreoffice/workdir/UnoApiHeadersTarget/offapi/normal/com/sun/star/packages/manifest/ManifestWriter.hpp:46"
context: cppu::(anonymous namespace)::ComponentContext
warn:dbaccess:171962:171962:dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx:920: 
com.sun.star.uno.DeploymentException message: "component context fails to
supply service com.sun.star.security.DocumentDigitalSignatures of type
com.sun.star.security.XDocumentDigitalSignatures at
/home/julien/lo/libreoffice/workdir/UnoApiHeadersTarget/offapi/normal/com/sun/star/security/DocumentDigitalSignatures.hpp:80"
context: cppu::(anonymous namespace)::ComponentContext
warn:dbaccess:171962:171962:dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/ModelImpl.cxx:746:
ODatabaseModelImpl::commitRootStorage: could not commit the storage!
warn:legacy.osl:171962:171962:dbaccess/source/core/dataaccess/databasecontext.cxx:489:
ODatabaseContext::storeTransientProperties: a non-empty data source which I do
not know?!
warn:unotools.config:171962:171962:unotools/source/config/configmgr.cxx:147:
ConfigManager not empty

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: Windows installer errors and warnings

2024-04-23 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Jakub,

On Tuesday, 2024-04-23 14:14:30 +0200, Jakub Kościelak wrote:

> 1.
> 
> ICE03 ERROR Invalid Language Id;
> 
> Example:
> 
> sd87.mo
> gid_file_res_sd_lang__libreoffice_program_resource_sat_lc_messages_sat sd.mo
> 55167 1606 16384 15468
> 
> We use a Languge Id that is not in the documentation ;-) e.g. 1553 or 1606.

Yes. As MS doesn't support all languages, we define LCIDs in the
user-defined ranges, see include/i18nlangtag/lang.h for documentation.
Here
1553 = 0x0611 = {eo} = EsperantoLANGUAGE_USER_ESPERANTO
1606 = 0x0646 = {sat-IN} = Santali (India)  LANGUAGE_USER_SANTALI_INDIA

> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/office_standards/ms-oe376/6c085406-a698-4e12-9d4d-c3b0ee3dbc4a

Oh great, yet another place they simultaneously update, where so far
I assumed that finally this evolved to the canonical place:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-lcid/70feba9f-294e-491e-b6eb-56532684c37f

Someone might want to check for differences..


> Here they also wrote that language identifiers are outdated and locale names
> should be used:
> 
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/intl/language-identifier-constants-and-strings
> 
> However, when I used en-US instead of 1033, it reported an error. Maybe
> someone knows how it should be done?

Maybe that's not even applicable to the installer. Or if, then to be
used with some different mechanism than LCIDs.


> ICE03 ERROR   Invalid identifier; Table: Directory, Column: Directory, 
> Key(s): LO_progr_resou_ca@va_LCMES_c8cb7e943
> ICE03 ERROR   Invalid identifier; Table: Directory, Column: Directory, 
> Key(s): LO_progr_resou_kmr@l_LCMES_c75f6f5fa
> [... and hundreds others ...]

These look very much derived from translation resources language tags,
where ca@va seems to stem from ca-valencia or kmr@l from kmr-Latn.
Whyever that is crippled that way..

  Eike

-- 
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350

--- Comment #17 from Justin L  ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #15)
> Separately, please explain that all "replies" are replies of a top comment
> and never a reply to a reply.
The only thing that suggests you have "replied to a reply" is some free-form
answer-text that says 'Reply to xyz (04/23/2024, 09:29): "..."' 

However, that answer-text is NOT composed by the actions of hitting the reply
button (FN_REPLY) and there is NOTHING in the comment itself that points to the
comment that you think you replied to. INSTEAD, the answer-text is composed
during its first LAYOUT, and is compiled FROM THE COMMENT IT FOLLOWS. This all
happens long after the comment has been created. The internals of the comment
indicate that its ParentPostItId is the top level comment - which is why the
navigator shows only two levels of comments.

Therefore, when I changed "MoveCaret" to move the reply to the end of the
thread instead of the beginning of the thread, the answer-text "replied" to the
second-last comment instead of the first comment.

In other words, the entire comment design is based on the assumption that
replies go to the top of the thread.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160050] CONFIGURATION: In Writer, on theme format, adding a theme shows window with covered text/graphics

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160050

Heiko Tietze  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||qui...@gmail.com
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
   |desktop.org |tion.org

--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze  ---
Tomaz defined a fix width and height for the dialog; I removed this in
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/166541. The alternative could be a
GtkScrollWindow behind the grid.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: Windows installer errors and warnings

2024-04-23 Thread Julien Nabet

Hello

I can't tell about your comment but since you seem to have some 
knowledge on this part and you even attached a patch, I propose you to 
follow https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GetInvolved.


You'll be able to submit the patch directly on the gerrit so it'll be 
easier for review.


Julien


[Bug 159950] Offer to download & install missing fonts from online sources

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950

--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license. Nor can we
police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used. 

But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with unlicensed or illegal font
bundling. "Free" or "Available" have to be kept at arms length. Why I've
suggested a TDF commissioned metric equivalent to Aptos under SIL Open Font
License, host it for download and bundle it into LibreOffice.

Otherwise facilitating access to "cloud hosted" or "centralized" (e.g. on
premise) font repositories with dynamic font loading, and optional install to
user profile, is a needed feature.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 159950] Offer to download & install missing fonts from online sources

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159950

--- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote  ---
Neither the project nor TDF can host fonts of questionable license. Nor can we
police the Intellectual Property rights of how LibreOffice is used. 

But we don't want to "poison" LibreOffice with unlicensed or illegal font
bundling. "Free" or "Available" have to be kept at arms length. Why I've
suggested a TDF commissioned metric equivalent to Aptos under SIL Open Font
License, host it for download and bundle it into LibreOffice.

Otherwise facilitating access to "cloud hosted" or "centralized" (e.g. on
premise) font repositories with dynamic font loading, and optional install to
user profile, is a needed feature.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160350] Replies to comment are in reverse order

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160350

--- Comment #16 from Justin L  ---
Created attachment 193824
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193824=edit
Reply to someone else's comment in OOo 3.3.png: screenshot of replying in OOo.

Using Comment Reply Example.docx (attachment 145913 from bug 119229) and
bibisect-releases git checkout oldest (openoffice-3.3.0), I see a reply button.
(Until recently, there was code that prevent someone from replying to their own
comments - I assume that code is related to why your screenshot doesn't show a
reply option.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160798] Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798

--- Comment #4 from Roland Baudin  ---
I forgot the LO version and system:

Version: 24.2.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: d56cc158d8a96260b836f100ef4b4ef25d6f1a01
CPU threads: 48; OS: Linux 6.5; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

System: Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS 64 bits

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160798] Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798

--- Comment #3 from Roland Baudin  ---
Created attachment 193823
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193823=edit
Screenshot of test.pptx opened in PowerPoint 2016

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160798] Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798

--- Comment #2 from Roland Baudin  ---
Created attachment 193822
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193822=edit
Converted presentation

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160798] Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798

--- Comment #1 from Roland Baudin  ---
Created attachment 193821
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=193821=edit
Test presentation with some arrows

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160353] List images in order of document appearance in Calc Navigator

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160353

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|List images in order of |List images in order of
   |document appearance in  |document appearance in Calc
   |navigator   |Navigator
 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
   Severity|normal  |enhancement
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||rayk...@gmail.com,
   ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
I'd call this an enhancement.
UX/Design, Jim, what do you think?

Relevant fixed bugs (all Writer):
Bug 146419
Bug 143569  
Bug 134960 
Bug 86395
Bug 52115
Bug 40427

Relevant patches from bug 134960 comment 27:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133101
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133342
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133350
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133359
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131448

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160353] List images in order of document appearance in Calc Navigator

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160353

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|List images in order of |List images in order of
   |document appearance in  |document appearance in Calc
   |navigator   |Navigator
 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
   Severity|normal  |enhancement
 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
   ||.freedesktop.org,
   ||rayk...@gmail.com,
   ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
   Keywords||needsUXEval

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
I'd call this an enhancement.
UX/Design, Jim, what do you think?

Relevant fixed bugs (all Writer):
Bug 146419
Bug 143569  
Bug 134960 
Bug 86395
Bug 52115
Bug 40427

Relevant patches from bug 134960 comment 27:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133101
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133342
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133350
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/133359
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/131448

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160798] New: Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become double head when exporting to MS Office

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160798

Bug ID: 160798
   Summary: Heads of arrows that were converted to contours become
double head when exporting to MS Office
   Product: LibreOffice
   Version: 24.2.2.2 release
  Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
  Severity: normal
  Priority: medium
 Component: Impress
  Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
  Reporter: rolan...@free.fr

Description:
When exporting a document (here an Impress presentation) to MS Office (here in
PowerPoint 2016), if arrows were converted to contours, then their heads become
double in PowerPoint (see attached screenshot).

Moreover, this seems to appear only when the line thickness is 0. And when the
line thickness is not zero, the arrow head don't have the right size, they are
too big.

I did tests in Impress and PowerPoint (or Draw), but I guess the issue will be
in Writer and Word too.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a blank presentation in Impress and insert an arrow somewhere

2. Select the arrow and convert it to contour (not curve or any another format)

3. Save the presentation to test.odp and convert it to PowerPoint 2007-365
.pptx format.

4. Open the test.pptx file in PowerPoint and check that the arrow has a double
head

Actual Results:
The arrow has a double head in PowerPoint.

Expected Results:
In PowerPoint, the arrow should have the same shape and size as in Impress.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: Yes

Additional Info:
If the arrow has a thickness > 0, then there is no double head, but a single
bigger head in PowerPoint.

I did the tests with fresh LibreOffice profile.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732

--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> The close naming is a source of confusion. How about "History" or
> "Navigation History"?

Eww, no. "Recency" would be most correct TB name, but a horrible burden for
l10n/i18n to localize.

So instead "Recent Positions" for TB name, keeping current button names "Back"
/ "Forward"? That would remove any Navigation vs. Navigator ambiguity.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 160732] Rename "Navigation" toolbar to clarify its role, avoid confusion, and relate to "Recency"

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160732

--- Comment #3 from V Stuart Foote  ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> The close naming is a source of confusion. How about "History" or
> "Navigation History"?

Eww, no. "Recency" would be most correct TB name, but a horrible burden for
l10n/i18n to localize.

So instead "Recent Positions" for TB name, keeping current button names "Back"
/ "Forward"? That would remove any Navigation vs. Navigator ambiguity.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 160556] Crash in: ntdll.dll

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160556

Stéphane Guillou (stragu)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
   ||0525
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic
   ||e.org
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
 ---
Can you please provide a minimal sample file with steps to get this different
crash signature? Otherwise we might just merge with bug 160525.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

  1   2   >