Re: LibreOffice problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/14/2013 08:18 AM, smbhatt wrote: We have started using LibreOffice 4.1.1 suite and have encountered several problems. Please help. 1. If we open Email attachment (.xls file) directly in Libre Calc (through file association) it will open as read only. If the file is an email attachment, LO probably won't have write access. Would it help clicking the Edit button? It's one similar to this image http://aveesplace.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/libreoffice-readonly.png?w=630 4. 'Page No' By default display in print page and there is no option to not display by default. For each sheet you have to set the footer manually. If you remove header and footer from a sheet (Format - Page) and add new sheet, it should You can save this as a template and specify it as default template, if you want header/footer off by default 6. In Writer the page formatting (where there are graphics, tables etc.) made in Word, gets lost along with the contents and entire Word document gets disturbed. Very poor quality of document is available. Do you have same fonts installed on both machines? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlI7SXcACgkQEMIGVCc8BjBtsACfetK2uXSCZP8vSfdNDe5NIc7z 5SgAoKVuLCsJWyQU8848LzEVZaxbeAzC =912n -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: The emails should by right, contain unsubscribe link.
On 27/01/13 17:23, wroger_wroger wroger_wroger wrote: And one should not have to go to websites, enter pass words etc., etc., etc.. Unsubscribe + Send = removed from list. Hmm YOU're the one spamming the list with UCE and yet you complain? ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice-ux-advise] including Ubuntu fonts in Windows/OSX installers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/01/13 20:56, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: Canonical is certainly free to do as it please with its creation... but let's not pretend that this is not, for all practical purpose, an advertising clause. What if we look at the fontwork itself: Suppose Canonical gives up on the Ubuntu distro. Sacks everyone. Deletes their backups. We could still use the font, it would still look good, and it would still have to be called Ubuntu. Right? I kind of agree with Ubuntu #1 bug anyway, even if I don't use ubuntu myself. best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlECEYcACgkQEMIGVCc8BjBdKgCfQcYOHAOvwUWDoHID/QbUwW9Q JfAAoMwKWLI7DqZckAVGJgVl+vw0Hw0+ =t9km -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
TextSections, DocInfo etc in LO Base Forms
I had the impression that LO Base Forms are actually writer documents. They behave mostly like that. But then I tried to access text sections with a macro, and ThisComponent.TextSections throws a Property or method not found: TextSections. Same happens with DocInfo (document variables) I can insert sections with Insert | Section... and hide/show them with Format|Sections... , but how can I access them with Macros? Can I? best Arno ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
License statement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All my contributions, past and future, to LibreOffice are licensed under the terms of the MPL1.1+ / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+ best Arno Teigseth (arnotixe) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlANuPoACgkQEMIGVCc8BjClIACg2J57PyNO7OMiqecZstXx/WTd mOIAn1pTEL12YZ3qyV1h3IF8pSX3L8mF =rK8e -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Changing sort order of language list box
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Figured out how to break my LO's language list box, so that it would only show languages with installed checkers: http://imgbin.org/index.php?page=imageid=8868 But, what I'm after is sorting the listbox by 1) Languages with Installed checkers then 2) Languages without Now, I can't find where in the listbox control source the actual sorting takes place? Any hints? best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlAN21wACgkQEMIGVCc8BjCIygCdFbzBKClAe+GUvCtrGObLNhHv YxwAnjAIJJwny55t32IBPakcaQrAzVaM =mHpi -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[PATCH] Fixing multiple email attachments with thunderbird on linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This fixes an issue with thunderbird on linux:
When using XSimpleMailMessage and attaching more than one attachment,
thunderbird picked up just one of the attached files.
Reason was that the file:// part should be enclosed in 's. Not
documented on mozilla's spec, as far as I can see (ambigous, at least).
example:
thunderbird -compose
to=a@b.c,subject=t,attachment=file:///tmp/1.doc,file:///tmp/2.doc
didn't work, while this works:
thunderbird -compose
to=a@b.c,subject=t,attachment='file:///tmp/1.doc,file:///tmp/2.doc'
best
Arno
- --
Attached is my digital signature. If your email program can't display
it, you don't need it.
Min digitale signatur er vedlagt. Du trenger den ikke hvis ikke
epostprogrammet ditt kan vise den.
Mi firma digital está adjunta. Si su programa de correos no lo puede
mostrar, significa que no lo necesita.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAlALbpIACgkQEMIGVCc8BjCGZACaA4SbJu7xKawlRtnCW5QyFxfO
ZlgAn2QmZhX3OW8PZS4yX9+qtGzK3LTA
=YvXT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
From f2886ed13dfe03e5dd638dc6d21216cb4183d9ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arno Teigseth arnot...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 21:58:41 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed multiple attachment passing to thunderbird: file:// part needs 's
Change-Id: I365e559610e06c6ffe964121b3c45077bf6ca264
---
shell/source/unix/misc/senddoc.sh |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/shell/source/unix/misc/senddoc.sh b/shell/source/unix/misc/senddoc.sh
index f75e51d..2a4c414 100755
--- a/shell/source/unix/misc/senddoc.sh
+++ b/shell/source/unix/misc/senddoc.sh
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ case `basename $MAILER | sed 's/-.*$//'` in
COMMAND=${COMMAND:-}${COMMAND:+,}body=${BODY}
fi
if [ $ATTACH != ]; then
-COMMAND=${COMMAND:-}${COMMAND:+,}attachment=${ATTACH}
+COMMAND=${COMMAND:-}${COMMAND:+,}attachment=\'${ATTACH}\'
fi
run_mozilla $MAILER $COMMAND
--
1.7.4.1
0001-Fixed-multiple-attachment-passing-to-thunderbird-fil.patch.sig
Description: Binary data
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 remove a dog ! is a joke !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/12/11 08:26, Khaled Hosny wrote: certain culture is superior to others, and if we can remove a possibly offending item to certain people, what harm can be caused by that? This is the only time I'll comment on this thread, don't worry. Is this possibly offending, or _is it_ offending? Maybe there should be some kind of official reference to whom it would offend? One person only? I mean, if there's an official reference to some group actually being offended, I think it would add weight to the request. A mail from one single person saying it's possibly offending isn't very heavyweight, is it? best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7q3l0ACgkQEMIGVCc8BjB4XQCgy0pzA/Oy7nP0gcTUfWR5cR+4 iQYAoJbOwOkW3oBiWXjsqfxTJ9cI03rJ =93mr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Clipboard handling on Windows
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/12/11 11:28, Kohei Yoshida wrote: Hi fellow hackers, While investigating this bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 which involves Windows' clipboard handling, Don't want to hijack anything, but wonder if wine program-LO clipboard behaviour is related to this? When I copy stuff from from programs in wine and later paste them into writer with Ctrl+V, the paste is happening at _the end of_ the document (not where the cursor is). However, if I Ctrl+Shift+V and paste unformatted, paste is normal. my 2cents - sorry if this is misleading and/or unrelated... best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7ZOzAACgkQEMIGVCc8BjCM9ACggDOCCmp09Cooi8bpZ4TfQQIr ChwAn2zW47jeY7wjun8UEzWB2UgeYZhg =yQu+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] LO and address book wizard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Anyone else having trouble with adding address books to Libreoffice (File-Wizard-Address book). I'm getting SDBC error on my system, _git master LO_ on linux mint 11. Have both thunderbird (repo) and evolution (repo) installed. The more button says 'A connection for the following URL was requested sdbc:address:evolution:local.' Funny, since I did select Thunderbird. best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7KftQACgkQEMIGVCc8BjBBvwCdGpt8tTsVqH240pG7ptAdWf3X WjMAoPQ4w0iWFmWqrq3vl82PLGfECg9E =Lznh -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/11 23:59, Arno Teigseth wrote: 6000 calls/second to Application::Yield in core/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx (I think) ok I reverted to the commit 40360820036a5d6a3359d1b5ec748a47a7edd85f (from Tue Oct 25 13:50:37 2011 +0300), just before the Meeks' series of patches, rebuilt, and CPU load is now back to 0% when idling on a 3300 page text doc :D so yes, I think the GTK patches has something to do with this Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6upK0ACgkQEMIGVCc8BjAG+wCfT4AFG30NyznxFKrscTgkGlJo VdUAn21SrZ+kUGnOFVQOP1HNYzOzd3Ew =Wazg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/11 16:38, Kevin Hunter wrote: At 1:12am -0400 Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Jean-baptiste Faure wrote: I already noticed these cpu problems in my own build since 2 or 3 days, but I can't be more precise. Does somebody has a clue about the cause (which commit?) of this CPU consumption? I don't specifically, but my hunch is that it's some interaction with the newly merged GTK code. I've noticed the same CPU utilization, but -- like you -- have been unable to say exactly what triggers it; I can only say when I started noticing it. +1 for I don't know either. here are my cents for behaviour (1 day old build): LO welcome screen: ~0% CPU. good. LO swriter with empty text doc: ~50% CPU (one core). Not so good LO impress, the first wizard window: ~100% CPU (one core). Not good. LO scalc, empty sheet: several %, can't remember right now. (all with zero input activity). What puzzles me is that LO isn't very slow, it's just using lots of CPU... best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6stG0ACgkQEMIGVCc8BjBZFACgrxyCM1APxkSEUbBzbi1OVKRg wNoAoOaVwKbKjhAJTa1+6/6OS6yIXiss =/H0M -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/11 21:20, Arno Teigseth wrote: What puzzles me is that LO isn't very slow, it's just using lots of CPU... Eh, I'd like to correct that. Just opened a document and it's very slow. The doc is just about 3200 pages, but it takes forever to search for a word. A few weeks ago this took maybe 1-2 secs for a searchreplace all. Now it takes like 2 minutes... Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6suAkACgkQEMIGVCc8BjC1PwCeLaxk/guFhJ0gb9y4YIaByszE uM4AnijgA6g0dgmMGQJqs9GWmaKZplMV =fT9c -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK thanks to moggi on libreoffice-dev irc, I installed valgrind. Found that running in one terminal: valgrind --trace-children=yes --tool=callgrind ./swriter and in another terminal, after about 2 mins of empty swriter document idle doing this: callgrind_control -b 28236 (the actual swriter PID) gives this: PID 28236: /home/arno/sys/libreoffice-git/core/solver/unxlngx6.pro/installation/opt/program/soffice.bin - --writer --splash-pipe=6 [requesting 'Status'...] Frame: Backtrace for Thread 1 [ 0] _int_free (967869 x) [ 1] free_check (983990 x) [ 2] free (449741 x) [ 3] operator delete(void*) (322182 x) [ 4] GtkHookedYieldMutex::ThreadsEnter() (322183 x) [ 5] GdkThreadsEnter (161078 x) [ 6] 0x00059cf0 (161078 x) [ 7] g_main_context_prepare (161147 x) [ 8] 0x00042ed0 (161130 x) [ 9] g_main_context_iteration (161010 x) [10] GtkData::Yield(bool, bool) (161010 x) [11] GtkInstance::Yield(bool, bool) (161010 x) [12] Application::Yield(bool) (161009 x) and a lot more, to be read at http://pastebin.com/YuEvQC4y I don't have a clue about how to interpret this. But if these are function calls, maybe about a million calls are much? Compared to GIMP running idle for 5 minutes, and it had just about 5500 calls to different things... Hope this tells someone something. best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6sv00ACgkQEMIGVCc8BjBDdQCfcKW5nLDZJkSQ3JFxt2waYkwc 9WsAoLqzdWTYKhGGDPqsUBmT6fpAVh3N =HmDk -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] master eat CPU even when it does nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29/10/11 22:06, Arno Teigseth wrote: I don't have a clue about how to interpret this. But if these are function calls, maybe about a million calls are much? tried with kcachegrind: 6000 calls/second to Application::Yield in core/vcl/source/app/svapp.cxx (I think) kcachegrind screenshot http://derp.co.uk/51b93 Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6s2bQACgkQEMIGVCc8BjCxOgCgiLvux5UHzDQdSsI18d2FzVKr N7IAnRk3oc5MVFQps2WnjuhSUwnjF8ae =PHwY -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Libreoffice's hunspell: Twofold affix stripping plus compound compatibility
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This patch enables hunspell to deal with two-level-inflexed compound
words.
like kichwa:
wiñana - wiñashka (two levels of inflexion) + compounds =
wiñashka+kuna+ntin+mi
note, the file lingucomponent/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libspelllo.so must be
removed before rebuilding, or else this patch won't be picked up
Perhaps there are better ways to make the build process aware of the
need to rebuild libsepelllo.so?
as you've already figured out, this is one of my first patches o_O beware
Arno
- -
$ hunspell -d qu_EC -m
wiñashkakunantinmi
wiñashkakunantinmi pa:wiñashka st:wiñana # stem # Perfect 3rd person
singular pa:kuna st:kuna pa:ntin st:ntin pa:mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk5v6pkACgkQEMIGVCc8BjDLHwCggGEL66N/53csBRyuPDP+ITGs
/CoAoMqx7TgMYWhnBr5GliItDLUHSlqc
=X0J+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
From ecea3f9e53793140e10a4e6b79d7ef5cb3714f19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arno Teigseth arnot...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:34:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] added twofold affix+compound to hunspell, as the official fixed https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=3288562group_id=143754atid=756395
---
hunspell/hunspell-twoaffixcompound.patch | 80 ++
hunspell/makefile.mk |1 +
2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 hunspell/hunspell-twoaffixcompound.patch
diff --git a/hunspell/hunspell-twoaffixcompound.patch b/hunspell/hunspell-twoaffixcompound.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..71881a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hunspell/hunspell-twoaffixcompound.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+--- misc/hunspell-1.3.2/src/hunspell/affixmgr.cxx 2010-06-17 15:56:41.0 +0200
misc/build/hunspell-1.3.2/src/hunspell/affixmgr.cxx 2011-02-10 20:47:22.0 +0100
+@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
+ compoundroot = FLAG_NULL; // compound word signing flag
+ compoundpermitflag = FLAG_NULL; // compound permitting flag for suffixed word
+ compoundforbidflag = FLAG_NULL; // compound fordidden flag for suffixed word
++ compoundmoresuffixes = 0; // allow more suffixes within compound words
+ checkcompounddup = 0; // forbid double words in compounds
+ checkcompoundrep = 0; // forbid bad compounds (may be non compound word with a REP substitution)
+ checkcompoundcase = 0; // forbid upper and lowercase combinations at word bounds
+@@ -404,6 +405,10 @@
+ }
+}
+
++ if (strncmp(line,COMPOUNDMORESUFFIXES,20) == 0) {
++ compoundmoresuffixes = 1;
++ }
++
+if (strncmp(line,CHECKCOMPOUNDDUP,16) == 0) {
+checkcompounddup = 1;
+}
+@@ -1626,8 +1631,9 @@
+ if (onlycpdrule) break;
+ if (compoundflag
+ !(rv = prefix_check(st, i, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER : IN_CPD_BEGIN, compoundflag))) {
+-if ((rv = suffix_check(st, i, 0, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL,
+-FLAG_NULL, compoundflag, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER : IN_CPD_BEGIN)) !hu_mov_rule
++if (((rv = suffix_check(st, i, 0, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL,
++FLAG_NULL, compoundflag, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER : IN_CPD_BEGIN)) ||
++(compoundmoresuffixes (rv = suffix_check_twosfx(st, i, 0, NULL, compoundflag !hu_mov_rule
+ sfx-getCont()
+ ((compoundforbidflag TESTAFF(sfx-getCont(), compoundforbidflag,
+ sfx-getContLen())) || (compoundend
+@@ -1640,9 +1646,11 @@
+ if (rv ||
+ (((wordnum == 0) compoundbegin
+ ((rv = suffix_check(st, i, 0, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL, FLAG_NULL, compoundbegin, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER : IN_CPD_BEGIN)) ||
++(compoundmoresuffixes (rv = suffix_check_twosfx(st, i, 0, NULL, compoundbegin))) || // twofold suffixes + compound
+ (rv = prefix_check(st, i, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER : IN_CPD_BEGIN, compoundbegin ||
+ ((wordnum 0) compoundmiddle
+ ((rv = suffix_check(st, i, 0, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL, FLAG_NULL, compoundmiddle, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER : IN_CPD_BEGIN)) ||
++(compoundmoresuffixes (rv = suffix_check_twosfx(st, i, 0, NULL, compoundmiddle))) || // twofold suffixes + compound
+ (rv = prefix_check(st, i, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER : IN_CPD_BEGIN, compoundmiddle)
+ ) checked_prefix = 1;
+ // else check forbiddenwords and needaffix
+@@ -2118,8 +2126,9 @@
+ if (onlycpdrule) break;
+ if (compoundflag
+ !(rv = prefix_check(st, i, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER : IN_CPD_BEGIN, compoundflag))) {
+-if ((rv = suffix_check(st, i, 0, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL,
+-FLAG_NULL, compoundflag, hu_mov_rule ? IN_CPD_OTHER
[Libreoffice] Ctrl+D and Ctrl+R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi A friend of mine tries out libreoffice Calc and finds that Ctrl+D doesn't work. He's used to from other spreadsheet software that: 1) Ctrl+D copies the above cell's contents into the current cell. 2) If more cells in a row are selected, then Ctrl+D copies down the contents of all cells directly above the selected ones. 3) If cells from more than one row (C1:D2 range for example) is selected, Ctrl+D copies down the cell contents of the first row cells into the lower ones. 4) Multi-selection and Ctrl+D does nothing. *) Formulas are copied as they would be copied with normal copy/paste functions: references analogous. **) Ctrl+R does the same as Ctrl+D, but horizontally, to the right, instead of downwards. Seems there are no Copy Up or Copy Left shortcuts. (I can understand the no copyleft function hehe) Now, is it by design/decision that this isn't implemented in libreoffice? Should I file a bug to get it implemented? best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5Iyg0ACgkQEMIGVCc8BjAk2gCg9wGfh3YwdhtEd2fr13AvJznl vr8AoNxy+jgwNiuD0Z5cEI4sS+d73SPM =4TGf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Ctrl+D and Ctrl+R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi A friend of mine tries out libreoffice Calc and finds that Ctrl+D doesn't work. He's used to from other spreadsheet software that: 1) Ctrl+D copies the above cell's contents into the current cell. 2) If more cells in one same row are selected, then Ctrl+D copies down the contents of all cells directly above the selected ones. 3) If cells from more than one row (C1:D2 range for example) is selected, Ctrl+D copies down the cell contents of the first row cells into the lower ones. 4) Multi-selection and Ctrl+D does nothing. *) Formulas are copied as they would be copied with normal copy/paste functions: references analogous. **) Ctrl+R does the same as Ctrl+D, but horizontally, to the right, instead of downwards. - - Dennis H pointed out to me that the function 3) is there already, and also Fill right (and up and left). 4) is also covered in that nothing happens. But the difference from the other spreadsheet software is that - -when you sit on a blank cell below some content in excel and press Ctrl+D, the content is copied from the above cell and into the cell you're on. - -in LO, the cells /have/ to be selected first, the top one containing what you want copied. So we *force* user action 3) above. Wishlist: a) Copy the above cell's contents into the current cell's when only one cell is selected. (Behaviour 1+2 above) THIS IS THE EXTRA FEATURE b) Copy the topmost cell(s)' contents down into the row(s) below when more than one row is selected. THIS IS CURRENT BEHAVIOUR. Note: The extra here proposed behaviour does not crash with current behaviour, as nothing happens when you press Ctrl+D with only one cell selected. That's why I'm optimistic to this, even being my own suggestion. :P After first writing the developer mailing list, I now hope this is the correct list. ;) Now, is it by design/decision that this isn't implemented in libreoffice? Should I file a bug to get it implemented? best Arno -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5JegEACgkQEMIGVCc8BjBGdwCfZI0XuGav0TWnIB/tHxtWQQTV 8RQAoLl1rXb9RwjUVqk8Cx3M45NwOwLK =lfo/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Good hotel
Thank you Egor Are you referring to a web hotel ;) On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:12 +0400, Egor Miliukov wrote: Hello! My name is Egor Miliukov, I visited your hotel with my family when we were in your town, I really liked it, see how well your team is working harmoniously and now I will always stay with you and will advise all my friends have I have a request - could send me your promotional materials, souvenirs with your logo, that can remind of your hotel. sounds like any linux web hotel. see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LAMP_% 28software_bundle%29 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] bugs from openoffice
Hi This might be a stupid question, so I'd better ask it quick and get over with it: This here very data-destructive bug is also living in libreoffice's fur somewhere: http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232 My version: LibreOffice 3.3.2 OOO330m19 (Build:202) tag libreoffice-3.3.2.2 Good news are, it's been fixed in openoffice. :) So I wonder if bug fixes from openoffice taken into libreoffice automagically? (If not, I vote for this bug. per mail. hehe) Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] extensions rant
Hi all Are there any plans of launching a LO extensions site to take over? The openoffice one is more and more often offline... http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/ was down yesterday, and today too. I know of http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:OpenOfficeExtensions/List but it's actually linking to the openoffice server. I wouldn't mind if I didn't have my extension sitting there... best Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] fix for twofold suffix stripping + compound in hunspell
Hi I've just hacked the hunspell sources I got from CVS so that I could get rid of this hunspell bug: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3288562group_id=143754atid=756395 The issue was that hunspell would accept words with one suffix+compound, but not two suffixes+compound. Patch attached in the above link. --- Since most words in Quichua have stem+suffix_level1+suffix_level2 +lots_of_compounds, this was a showstopper for my spellchecker. At first I wrote a generator script that would create all the different inflexes and stick it into a dictionary, but it was a bad hack and very slow with a dictionary file of 17+entries for only some 3000 words... But now also analysis benefits :D hunspell -d qu_EC -m mikunakuykunatakapash pa:mikunakuy st:mikuna # base plur # Nounification amongst us pa:kuna st:kuna pa:ta st:ta pa:ka st:ka pa:pash [For the curious the word means something like for to the big feasts, also] The patch is just two lines, one for each of two functions in affixmgr.cxx, compound_check() and compound_check_morph(). For LO only the one in AffMgr::compound_check() is needed, I think, haven't seen the morphology analysis being used anywhere in LO... best Arno Teigseth signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] installing on ubuntu
Hi Wanted to tell about two problems I've noted. 1) Libreoffice writer crashes when I press F1 without the help pack installed. Since the help pack is optional, this is a bit strange behaviour. 2) So I just downloaded today (2 apr 2011 12:00) the latest x86 debs. Installing them goes fine until I try and install the helppack. That's when I get sudo dpkg -i libobasis3.3-en-us-help_3.3.2-19_i386.deb (Reading database ... 354556 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libobasis3.3-en-us-help 3.3.0-4 (using libobasis3.3-en-us-help_3.3.2-19_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libobasis3.3-en-us-help ... error: trying to overwrite '/opt/libreoffice/basis3.3/help/en/sdraw.cfg', which is also in package libobasis3.3-en-us-draw 0:3.3.0-4 Now, I can override it with --force-overwrite, but it will be hard explaining that to my father, who's used to doubleclick the package... Do I do anything wrong? best Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] It's not a dev topic, but please read it.
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 09:16 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: Hi revol, Thanks for posting, though the subject is not something that makes us happy of course. There have been some contacts in the Steering Committee on the subject - quite obviously. I have the hope - anyway that is the intention - that we find a way to handle the situation with most respect for all the people involved, and that it does not affect peoples possibilities to cooperate in TDF and find joy in that. Could someone just briefly tell us what is the problem? Government/business trying to take over development or something? best Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] template missing
Hi This might be a corner case, but I have this problem: To not have to go through the import template process every time I change a template, I symlinked it. So, ln -s mynicetemplate.ots ~/.libreoffice/3/user/template/ That worked fine until I moved the template. Of course it disappeared from the select template dialog. The problem is, if I now try to _import_ the template with the Organize|Import template menu, I get the message the template may already exist. This could be confusing to some users, since libreoffice claims the template exists while it actually is nowhere to be found in the template selection box. Why not give the user the option of do you want to overwrite the already existing template? in these cases? Could be a Good Thing (tm) even when users aren't doing strange things like symlinking like I did. Suppose some [small] organization updates a template. Seems to me a bit unnecessary having to first delete the old and then import the new template. Could even lead some users do delete the wrong template etc etc. best Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Bug in bulleted/numbered list functions
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 18:39 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: If you have a paragraph with some formatted text (bold, italic etc), put the cursor inside the paragraph and press the Bullet list or the Numbered list buttons, all the formatting is lost and goes back to normal (is it called roman?). The -character style and -size is left untouched, just bold and italics disappear. -Underline survives. Is this on Writer? Yes it was Assuming it is: Tried this on LibreOffice master branch on Debian Sid, and couldn't reproduce. Tried this on packaged OpenOffice.org from Debian Sid, and couldn't reproduce. OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 OOO320m19 (Build:9505) ooo-build 3.2.1.4, Debian package 1:3.2.1-10 I just tried it as described, directly on a new document. Is any other parameter or changed needed before that to reproduce the problem? Yep I tried on a new document, too, and it seems ok. Should have written down what document I was playing with, but I didn't and now sadly I can't remember. Since I write quite a lot of documents the history is long gone... I'll get back to this if it ever turns out a problem again. I suspect this was some old document, but just can't reproduce it myself for the moment. Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Upgrade packages for windows
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 09:18 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Or to some other project, dedicated to generic Windows packaging. (cygwin folks already have done a lot in this area, so that'd be a good starting point). Aha I didn't know that existed. As long as the user experience isn't deteriorated [much]. However, the request was originally from a sysadmin guy, wanting to roll out upgrades across large organizations with many ooo/LO installs. In these cases it's probably more important for him to know what computers actually were upgraded. For the independent end user it's probably easier just telling him to install the new package, than installing a packet management system to his computer. (Just thinking of what happens when he's used to upgrading with a packet management system and then gets a new computer - without it...) best Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Upgrade packages for windows
Hi This might be the correct list to post this: A microsoft fanboy/employee complains on a norwegian discussion site that you have to download the whole openoffice to upgrade or to fix problems (guess this applies to libreoffice too) That is, he's complaining that to go from 3.2 to 3.2.1 he had to download the whole installer and run it. Someone pointed out that on linux, the distribution is (can be) package-based, so that he would avoid that. Now, is it possible/interesting to have such a feature, that people can download fixes (Microsoft would call them hotfixes) to Libreoffice? To me it looks a bit ugly, but it could be just a question of replacing the binaries/files that differ from last version. I don't know enough about this to say if it's a Good Idea or a Bad Idea (tm) [The microsoft guy didn't mention whether you need to download the whole thing when you upgrade office, nor if you have to pay, nor the MS office installer size: some 500M just for the student edition] just a few of my cents, best Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Upgrade packages for windows
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 09:25 -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Now, is it possible/interesting to have such a feature, that people can download fixes (Microsoft would call them hotfixes) to Libreoffice? hotfixes are a completely different technology, not suitable for upgrades of large complex software libe OOo or LibreOffice at all. What exists, and could in theory be used, is Windows Installer patches (.msp files). But, they are so horribly hard to produce and get to work yea? reliably oh. Yes that would be an issue ;) I had the same feeling from just looking at my cow-orkers' windows computers, with updates failing and breaking everything, leaving you worse off than before. I guess it would be different if the whole windows system was set up with packages, with version controls and this-package-depends-on stuff. And real super-user privileges that normal lusers could not take on... best Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Upgrade packages for windows
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 22:36 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: To me it looks a bit ugly, but it could be just a question of replacing the binaries/files that differ from last version. I don't know enough about this to say if it's a Good Idea or a Bad Idea (tm) Inherently unreliable. The only thing you *could* do is to compare the generated files and only ship those which did. It seems to end up with the problem being Windows lacking a system-wide package management system, and - no one wants to make such a system just for libreoffice - it's more work figuring out the problems that probably will arise from an upgrade package than actually just installing the newer version of openoffice. These would probably be good reasons to give if anyone asks? #1 answer also puts the responsibility for building a package management system to where it belongs: the system owners, Microsoft. Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Bug in bulleted/numbered list functions
Hi If you have a paragraph with some formatted text (bold, italic etc), put the cursor inside the paragraph and press the Bullet list or the Numbered list buttons, all the formatting is lost and goes back to normal (is it called roman?). The -character style and -size is left untouched, just bold and italics disappear. -Underline survives. Now, if you /select the whole paragraph/ before clicking bullet/numbered list, then the formatting is kept just fine. all this on LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:5) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.3 on ubuntu linux 9.10 best Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] LanguageTool (dev) crashes Libreoffice
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 01:28 -0500, Arno Teigseth wrote: Hmm I might have been too quick there. Disabled all the extensions and then enabled one by one. It seems that when I have two spanish dictionaries, the one installed system-wide and one in my personal folder, is when this happens. But when I right-click a word that is just fine, then Libreoffice crashes entirely and impressively fast See also strace on http://pastebin.com/SecZ2q8A I've also tried adding more than one english dictionary, but then all is fine. It's only when I set language to spanish that it crashes. Again, an error message would probably be best :) Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Strange behaviour in GNOME when toolboxes are detached
I'm having an issue with libreoffice when toolboxes are detached from their toolbar. When switching windows _with the MOUSE_, 1) the keyboard focus gets messed up (seems the keypresses go nowhere) 2) switching away from libreoffice I have to click the minimized application twice to switch to it. 3) seems I need to click inside the applications to make them receive keyboard focus. 4) The toolbox is stuck above other applications. Workaround/fix: Switch back and forth a few times with Alt+Tab, and libreoffice will get back its focus. Steps to reproduce: Dropdown the Font Color, Background color or Highlighter tool, and drag the toolbox to detach it from the toolbar. Click something on the GNOME status bar, see if it's maximized at once or if you have to click some more. Watch keyboard focus. Switch back, same trouble LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m17 (Build:3) libreoffice-build 3.3.0.1 I've tried with both compiz and metacity; the behaviour is the same. Trouble ends when I close the detached Font color box. Seems that those color boxes are stealing focus a little too much, or is a little too present on the desktop. Can anyone else confirm the problem? best Arno attachment: stuck-color-box.png signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] LibreOffice 3.3 release blockers / stoppers
I [still] don't know how to submit bugs on bugzilla, but is the bug that causes libreoffice hangs when opening oxt from command line fixed yet? if I do libreoffice qu_EC.oxt (to install the qu_EC dictionary extension) then libreoffice opens, shows me the extension manager and the license text, and .. hangs. Adding extensions works ok if done from the menu, just not from the cmdline. My version is LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m9 (Build:1) libreoffice-build 3.2.99.2 Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] opening oxt from command line
Hi I have LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m9 (Build:1) libreoffice-build 3.2.99.2 It hangs when I do libreoffice extension.oxt from the command line. No error messages on stdout. Adding the extension from the menu Tools | Extension manager works fine. Arno signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Language selection
I find the language selector on the bottom of the writer UI not so efficient. I have installed just a few languages, but still all the wrong languages show up. Could it be an idea to show the -last used languages first or -installed languages first in that box? Also, I don't see the logic behind the Set language for paragraph submenu. It looks very redundant at least for me. See attached. best Arno attachment: unknown-NH4ILE.png signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
