Re: [Libreoffice] TextSection, TextCursor and component
2011/11/14 Cedric Bosdonnat cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr: Hi Knut, On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 00:02 +0100, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: Is it allowed to insert a TextSection in to a document which was created from another document? Honnestly, I don't know what is allowed and what is not in that area. Clearly, this doesn't sound good and if you can insert a section created by the target document instance it would be better. This is an unspecified behavior and may be subject to changes, so take care if you use it ;) Next question. Can I create a TextSection if I only have a xTextCursor or a xTextRange? The global factory can't create that service and the cursor / text range have no idea what document they're in... so I'ld say no. Would it be a good feature to let the cursor know which document their in? I hope this helps, Yes, thanx Best regards -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] TextSection, TextCursor and component
Hi, Is it allowed to insert a TextSection in to a document which was created from another document? Like this: doc1 = StarDesktop.loadComponentFromURL(private:factory/swriter, _blank, 0, Array()) doc2 = StarDesktop.loadComponentFromURL(private:factory/swriter, _blank, 0, Array()) oCursor = doc1.text.createTextCursor() oSect = doc2.createInstance(com.sun.star.text.TextSection) oSect.setName(SectionName) oCursor.getText.insertTextContent(oCursor, oSect, True) (It works, but is it not right to do it that way?) Next question. Can I create a TextSection if I only have a xTextCursor or a xTextRange? Best regards -- Knut Olav Bøhmer 41 000 108 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Properties not accessible
Hi, Why is it that some properties on some objects/services are not settable from BASIC? Like for example ThisComponent.getTextSections().getByName(sectionName).IsAutomaticUpdate = True has no effect Is it some way to fix it? I'm also trying to set oDoc.getTextSections().getByName(sectionName).FileLink.FileURL, but it's also not possible. Am i doing it the wrong way? I remember I've had this problem before, long time ago. I think I was trying to set some properties on a hyperlink. I did also make a java addon to test if it would be possible to do it from java. But it was not possible. Can we take some action to fix this kind of issues? Would it help to write my addons in C++? Or would that not make a difference? -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Patch for importing hyperliks from .doc files
Hello, Here is the LibreOffice bug report: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41255 I did not check if the patch was applied in latest LibreOffice git repository. If it is, I can just close the bug. Thank you for all the help :) Best regards Knut Olav Bøhmer 2011/9/8 Harald Kagerer har...@binder-kagerer.de: Hi, Hyperlinks in theese two location was wrong (as I already explaind in the bugreport): gsf cat buggy.doc WordDocument # (I guess this is where FormFields are located) gsf cat buggy.doc Data This was right: gsf cat buggy.doc DocumentSummaryInformation And that's what your patch is using. If LibreOffice would use anything else for this docs, it would be wrong. So if you change it again, I can not use it. Harald, can you confirm that this patch fixes the problem for your docs too? I would like to confirm, that Knut's patch would solve a serious problem we have to face at the Munic Limux Project converting *.doc documents with hyperlinks to ODF. At the moment our only workaround is to use the MSO buildin converter :-( I really would prefer to use LO for this task as soon as possible!!! Greetings Harald Kagerer -- Harald Kagerer har...@binder-kagerer.de PGP Key-ID: 0xB2792619 Fingerprint: 8763 31EA 65F8 D4BB 3501 E8D3 2728 CF77 B279 2619 () /\ -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Patch for importing hyperliks from .doc files
2011/9/7 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com: On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 23:57 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: 2011/9/5 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com: On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 00:29 +0200, Knut Olav Břhmer wrote: Hi, This patch solves a serious problem experienced by many companies and need to be included in libreoffice. I'm using this patch with my own build for my customers with ooo 3.2.1 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 Which patch exactly, my patch from #12 or #15 above or something additional ? I think I was using the update patch to handle real-world documents. But it was so long time ago that I compiled it so I don't remember. Do you remember what you needed to improve to make it correct? Is there any example where the patch would not work? The reason I didn't go ahead with that patch IIRC, is because there appear to be *three* places where the hyperlink gets set, and the patch sets two of them, but not the two that really matter. i.e. there's the inline hyperlink in the field itself, there's some hyperlinks stored in the DocumentSummaryStream metadata, and then there's hyperlinks in the data stream associated with basically some FormField structure linked to the field. I think my patch set the DocumentSummaryStream one, but hacking documents manually showed that word used the FormField one if it exists over the metadata one, so I don't think the patch is quite right. Well, in my buggy.doc the hyperlink was located 3 places. Hyperlinks in theese two location was wrong (as I already explaind in the bugreport): gsf cat buggy.doc WordDocument # (I guess this is where FormFields are located) gsf cat buggy.doc Data This was right: gsf cat buggy.doc DocumentSummaryInformation And that's what your patch is using. If LibreOffice would use anything else for this docs, it would be wrong. So if you change it again, I can not use it. Harald, can you confirm that this patch fixes the problem for your docs too? Noel was playing with the fieldfield stuff IIRC, new parsers and the like, which might have some bearing on these, at least on getting the parser right to read the same hyperlink value as word reads. I don't know, but if there is no hyperlink in DocumentSummaryInformation, then word might use the FormField link over the Data one. Best regartds -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] Patch for importing hyperliks from .doc files
Hi, This patch solves a serious problem experienced by many companies and need to be included in libreoffice. I'm using this patch with my own build for my customers with ooo 3.2.1 http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 Best regards -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Where did Setup.xcu go?
2011/8/10 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: Hi, Why does not LibreOffice have any Setup.xcu? And how can I set up LibreOffice to listens for uno connections? (like we did with openoffice and ooSetupConnectionURL in Setup.xcu) I'm refering to how to do this in LibreOffice: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/ProUNO/Starting_OpenOffice.org_in_Listening_Mode Best regards. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
On 27 July 2011 14:06, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Hi Knut, On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 23:20 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: Sadly I don't know. I imagine you need to avoid the splash binary - and run soffice.bin. I would be tempted to remove soffice.exe rename soffice.bin - soffice.exe and debug that way. I found it. devenv /debugexe program args Great ;-) I had to cd URE\bin\ because I got an error message about sal3.dll. Why does we have two binaries? Well - one in theory is a small binary that passes its arguments to the main 'factory' process that is running: this speeds up the 2nd launch. Unfortunately the 'small-ness' of that binary is bloated to (was it 3 or 6 Mb I forget) by all the embedded icons needed for associating that with the umpteen file-types we support [ or something ]. Oooh ! and if you can build / debug on windows :-) perhaps you could help fix the dumb-ness that we duplicate many megabytes of icons between soffice.bin and soffice.exe (?) it requires only a small set of hacks I think. Do you have more information? Those same icons are then all present in soffice.bin as well in order to get window icons correct. Instead of that we should just be loading the window icons from our images.zip [ where they also live ], and setting them on the window at run-time I think. That is what we do for the gtk+ backend, cf. GtkSalFrame::SetIcon and just needs replicating for Windows - so we can drop that duplication. gtk+ has a means of doing this for windows, so there is the API support there somewhere. Now that I have my DDEInitiate-bug-workaround tested (and it works) I have some more time to do this. I think I should first find a solution to the DDEInitiate bug in LibreOffice, then I could start to work on the icon isssue. It sounds doable, as I can look in to what the Gtk version does. I have updated the bug-report at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/process_bug.cgi Should the icon-issue be registered in the bugtracking system? -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] building Basis/sdk/examples/DeveloperGuide/ProfUNO/CppBinding on Windows
2011/7/29 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/28 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com: On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:31 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: On 28 July 2011 15:22, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:16 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: Now make says ../../../../settingss/stdtarget.mk:12 ** target pattern contains no '%'. Stop [15:08] That might be the bug fixed with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/sdk/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4id=dd0c9fdc119a991b8f08070316e86d44afac478d fix will be in 3.4.2, if its that, then apply that patch/replace spaces with tabs in the makefile. It's great to get responce so fast. Thank you. But it did not help. in which case google on target pattern contains no '%' suggests it might be a generic make-under-cygwin issue, dump the make version, and try with some extra -d flags to get some more info According to this: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00404.html Looks like it should work with 3.80, but it does not :( C:\PROGRA~1\LIBREO~1\Basis\sdk\examples\DEVELO~1\ProfUNO\CPPBIN~1c:\cygwin\usr\local\bin\make.exe -d GNU Make 3.80 Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Reading makefiles... Reading makefile `Makefile'... Reading makefile `../../../../settings/settings.mk' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Got a SIGCHLD; 1 unreaped children. Reading makefile `../../../../settings/std.mk' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Got a SIGCHLD; 1 unreaped children. Reading makefile `../../../../settings/dk.mk' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile `../../../../settings/stdtarget.mk' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... ../../../../settings/stdtarget.mk:12: *** target pattern contains no `%'. Stop. C:\PROGRA~1\LIBREO~1\Basis\sdk\examples\DEVELO~1\ProfUNO\CPPBIN~1 Looks like I came one step closer by setting OO_SDK_OUT to a cygwin-path Now I have seeral other error messages. I'll need to continue tomorrow. I now copied the config.guess file from the SDK i have installed on Linux to windows, and placed it in c:\program files\LibreOffice3\Basis\sdk\ The fact that it is missing from the windows SDK is probably a bug. The Linux sdk installation is 3.4 and the Windows is 3.3. I hope it does not matter. Now I get the following errors (see attachment) make -d make.log 21 I don't know if it's able to find the right target to build. Another thing is that cppumaker gets C:/Program Files/LibreOffice 3/Basis/programoffapi.rdb as argument. Does not look like ti exsists. Any suggestions? Did I forget something? I've come some step closer to compile the examples. I have changed some make files to use static paths instead of environment variables, and added som slashes / two different places. for example C:/Program Files/LibreOffice 3/Basis/programoffapi.rdb file does not exsist it should be program/offapi.rdb. in my c:\UserAppData\setsdkenv_windows.bat I added a slash: REM Set office program path. if defined OFFICE_BASE_HOME ( set OFFICE_BASE_PROGRAM_PATH=%OFFICE_BASE_HOME%\program\ ) in sdk/settings/settings.mk i added a / at the end URE_MISC=$(OO_SDK_URE_HOME)/misc/ in sdk/settings/stdtarget.mk I changed an argument to use static output path: - $(CPPUMAKER) -Gc -BUCR -O$(OUT_INC) $(URE_TYPES) $(OFFICE_TYPES) + $(CPPUMAKER) -Gc -BUCR -OC:/libreoffice3.4_sdk $(URE_TYPES) $(OFFICE_TYPES) *Did anyone ever compile the examples in the LibreOffice SDK on Windows?* Not I get the following errors. And, which compiler should I use? also need to set CC c:\Program Files (x86)\LibreOffice 3.4\Basis\sdk\examples\DevelopersGuide\ProfUNO\SimpleBootstrap_cppmake cygdriveclibreoffice3.4_sdkWindows_NTexample.outobjSimpleBootstrap_cpp make: cygdriveclibreoffice3.4_sdkWindows_NTexample.outobjSimpleBootstrap_cpp: Command not found make: [/cygdrive/c/libreoffice3.4_sdk/Windows_NTexample.out/obj/SimpleBootstrap_cpp/SimpleBootstrap_cpp.] Error 127 (ignored) cc -c -g -fPIC -DPIC -fvisibility=hidden -O -I. -I/cygdrive/c/libreoffice3.4_sdk/Windows_NTexample.out/inc -I/cygdrive/c/libreoffice3.4_sdk/Windows_N Texample.out/inc/examples -I../../../../include -I/cygdrive/c/libreoffice3.4_sdk/Windows_NTexample.out/inc/SimpleBootstrap_cpp -DUNX -DGCC -DFREEBSD - DCPPU_ENV= -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH= -DHAVE_GCC_VISIBILITY_FEATURE -ocygdriveclibreoffice3.4_sdkWindows_NTexample.outobjSimpleBootstrap_cppSimpleBootstrap_c pp. SimpleBootstrap_cpp.cxx cc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory make: *** [/cygdrive/c/libreoffice3.4_sdk/Windows_NTexample.out/obj/SimpleBootstrap_cpp/SimpleBootstrap_cpp.] Error 1 c:\Program Files (x86)\LibreOffice 3.4\Basis\sdk\examples\DevelopersGuide\ProfUNO\SimpleBootstrap_cpp -- Knut
Re: [Libreoffice] [dev] Re: Debugging Hanging OOo
Hi,
After looking closer, it actually looks like it IS applied.
Sorry for the confusion.
2011/7/29 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com:
Hi,
It does not look like this patch is included in LibreOffice.
What can we do get it included?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Carsten Driesner carsten.dries...@oracle.com
Date: 6 December 2010 13:56
Subject: Re: [dev] Re: Debugging Hanging OOo
To: d...@openoffice.org
Am 06.12.2010 12:32, schrieb Knut Olav Bøhmer:
I will change the patch to make it work for OOo 3.2.1 so you can test it. My
tests with the latest DEV300 version looks very good and I cannot see a
deadlock anymore. Please stay tuned I will send it to you as soon as
possible.
Thank you :)
Hi Knut,
Please look below where I added the content of the patch file.
Unfortunately the mailing list removes attachments therefore you have
to copy the patch from this mail to a patch file.
The patch applies without a problem on OOO320m19.
Regards,
Carsten
---
diff -urp old/sfx2/inc/sfx2/viewsh.hxx new/sfx2/inc/sfx2/viewsh.hxx
--- old/sfx2/inc/sfx2/viewsh.hxx 2010-03-24 18:53:35.0 +0100
+++ new/sfx2/inc/sfx2/viewsh.hxx 2010-12-06 10:57:07.092319976 +0100
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
#include svtools/lstner.hxx
#include com/sun/star/ui/XContextMenuInterceptor.hpp
#include com/sun/star/datatransfer/clipboard/XClipboardListener.hpp
+#include com/sun/star/datatransfer/clipboard/XClipboardNotifier.hpp
#include cppuhelper/interfacecontainer.hxx
#include shell.hxx
#include tools/gen.hxx
@@ -304,6 +305,7 @@ public:
void
SetAdditionalPrintOptions( const com::sun::star::uno::Sequence
com::sun::star::beans::PropertyValue );
void
AddRemoveClipboardListener( const com::sun::star::uno::Reference
com::sun::star::datatransfer::clipboard::XClipboardListener, BOOL );
+ ::com::sun::star::uno::Reference
::com::sun::star::datatransfer::clipboard::XClipboardNotifier
GetClipboardNotifier();
#if _SOLAR__PRIVATE
SAL_DLLPRIVATE SfxInPlaceClient* GetUIActiveIPClient_Impl() const;
diff -urp old/sfx2/source/view/viewsh.cxx new/sfx2/source/view/viewsh.cxx
--- old/sfx2/source/view/viewsh.cxx 2010-03-24 18:53:36.0 +0100
+++ new/sfx2/source/view/viewsh.cxx 2010-12-06 13:31:03.663300701 +0100
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@
#include com/sun/star/system/SystemShellExecuteFlags.hpp
#include com/sun/star/container/XContainerQuery.hpp
#include com/sun/star/frame/XStorable.hpp
-#include com/sun/star/datatransfer/clipboard/XClipboardNotifier.hpp
#include com/sun/star/datatransfer/clipboard/XClipboard.hpp
#include cppuhelper/implbase1.hxx
@@ -115,7 +114,9 @@ DBG_NAME(SfxViewShell)
class SfxClipboardChangeListener : public ::cppu::WeakImplHelper1
datatransfer::clipboard::XClipboardListener
{
- SfxViewShell* pViewShell;
+public:
+ SfxClipboardChangeListener( SfxViewShell* pView, const
uno::Reference datatransfer::clipboard::XClipboardNotifier
xClpbrdNtfr );
+ virtual ~SfxClipboardChangeListener();
// XEventListener
virtual void SAL_CALL disposing( const lang::EventObject rEventObject
)
@@ -125,54 +126,112 @@ class SfxClipboardChangeListener : publi
virtual void SAL_CALL changedContents( const
datatransfer::clipboard::ClipboardEvent rEventObject )
throw ( uno::RuntimeException );
-public:
- SfxClipboardChangeListener( SfxViewShell* pView );
- virtual ~SfxClipboardChangeListener();
+ void DisconnectViewShell() { m_pViewShell = NULL; }
+ void ChangedContents();
+
+ enum AsyncExecuteCmd
+ {
+ ASYNCEXECUTE_CMD_DISPOSING,
+ ASYNCEXECUTE_CMD_CHANGEDCONTENTS
+ };
- void DisconnectViewShell() { pViewShell = NULL; }
+ struct AsyncExecuteInfo
+ {
+ AsyncExecuteInfo( AsyncExecuteCmd eCmd, uno::Reference
datatransfer::clipboard::XClipboardListener xThis,
SfxClipboardChangeListener* pListener ) :
+ m_eCmd( eCmd ), m_xThis( xThis ), m_pListener( pListener ) {}
+
+ AsyncExecuteCmd m_eCmd;
+ uno::Reference datatransfer::clipboard::XClipboardListener
m_xThis;
+ SfxClipboardChangeListener* m_pListener;
+ };
+
+private:
+ SfxViewShell* m_pViewShell;
+ uno::Reference datatransfer::clipboard::XClipboardNotifier
m_xClpbrdNtfr;
+ uno::Reference lang::XComponent m_xCtrl;
+
+ DECL_STATIC_LINK( SfxClipboardChangeListener,
AsyncExecuteHdl_Impl, AsyncExecuteInfo* );
};
-SfxClipboardChangeListener::SfxClipboardChangeListener( SfxViewShell* pView )
-: pViewShell( 0 )
+SfxClipboardChangeListener::SfxClipboardChangeListener( SfxViewShell*
pView, const uno::Reference
datatransfer::clipboard::XClipboardNotifier xClpbrdNtfr )
+ : m_pViewShell( 0 ), m_xClpbrdNtfr( xClpbrdNtfr )
{
- uno::Reference lang::XComponent xCtrl(
pView-GetController(), uno::UNO_QUERY );
- if ( xCtrl.is() )
- {
- xCtrl
Re: [Libreoffice] building Basis/sdk/examples/DeveloperGuide/ProfUNO/CppBinding on Windows
2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/28 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/28 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com: On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:31 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: On 28 July 2011 15:22, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:16 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: Now make says ../../../../settingss/stdtarget.mk:12 ** target pattern contains no '%'. Stop [15:08] That might be the bug fixed with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/sdk/commit/?h=libreoffice-3-4id=dd0c9fdc119a991b8f08070316e86d44afac478d fix will be in 3.4.2, if its that, then apply that patch/replace spaces with tabs in the makefile. It's great to get responce so fast. Thank you. But it did not help. in which case google on target pattern contains no '%' suggests it might be a generic make-under-cygwin issue, dump the make version, and try with some extra -d flags to get some more info According to this: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00404.html Looks like it should work with 3.80, but it does not :( C:\PROGRA~1\LIBREO~1\Basis\sdk\examples\DEVELO~1\ProfUNO\CPPBIN~1c:\cygwin\usr\local\bin\make.exe -d GNU Make 3.80 Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Reading makefiles... Reading makefile `Makefile'... Reading makefile `../../../../settings/settings.mk' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Got a SIGCHLD; 1 unreaped children. Reading makefile `../../../../settings/std.mk' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Got a SIGCHLD; 1 unreaped children. Reading makefile `../../../../settings/dk.mk' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... Reading makefile `../../../../settings/stdtarget.mk' (search path) (no ~ expansion)... ../../../../settings/stdtarget.mk:12: *** target pattern contains no `%'. Stop. C:\PROGRA~1\LIBREO~1\Basis\sdk\examples\DEVELO~1\ProfUNO\CPPBIN~1 Looks like I came one step closer by setting OO_SDK_OUT to a cygwin-path Now I have seeral other error messages. I'll need to continue tomorrow. I now copied the config.guess file from the SDK i have installed on Linux to windows, and placed it in c:\program files\LibreOffice3\Basis\sdk\ The fact that it is missing from the windows SDK is probably a bug. The Linux sdk installation is 3.4 and the Windows is 3.3. I hope it does not matter. Now I get the following errors (see attachment) make -d make.log 21 I don't know if it's able to find the right target to build. Another thing is that cppumaker gets C:/Program Files/LibreOffice 3/Basis/programoffapi.rdb as argument. Does not look like ti exsists. Any suggestions? Did I forget something? -- Knut Olav Bøhmer make.log Description: Binary data ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] building Basis/sdk/examples/DeveloperGuide/ProfUNO/CppBinding on Windows
Hi, I'm trying to compile Basis/sdk/examples/DeveloperGuide/ProfUNO/CppBinding on Windows I have done the setsdkenv_windows.bat doing make in the CppBinding directory gives me first a message saying that ../../../../configure.guess is missing I don't know where this file comes from, if it is a standard file or special made for LibreOffice But I copied inn a configre.guess file I found. Error message is now gone. Now make says ../../../../settingss/stdtarget.mk:12 ** target pattern contains no '%'. Stop [15:08] What can I do to fix that? -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
On 25 July 2011 18:15, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote: Hi Knut, On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:25 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: 1. Where can I find the main-loop in LibreOffice Ah - that at one level easy - attach a debugger, and watch the backtrace for a bit ;-) the main main-loop lives inside vcl/ and handles 95% of the application code - living under the 'solar mutex'. Thanx. 2. How do I start a program (LibreOffice) to trace from Visual Studio C++ 2008? (I know how to attach to an exsisting process) Sadly I don't know. I imagine you need to avoid the splash binary - and run soffice.bin. I would be tempted to remove soffice.exe rename soffice.bin - soffice.exe and debug that way. I found it. devenv /debugexe program args I had to cd URE\bin\ because I got an error message about sal3.dll. Why does we have two binaries? Oooh ! and if you can build / debug on windows :-) perhaps you could help fix the dumb-ness that we duplicate many megabytes of icons between soffice.bin and soffice.exe (?) it requires only a small set of hacks I think. Do you have more information? -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
Hi, 1. Where can I find the main-loop in LibreOffice 2. How do I start a program (LibreOffice) to trace from Visual Studio C++ 2008? (I know how to attach to an exsisting process) On 21 July 2011 17:37, Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/21 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/21 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com: On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 11:06 +0200, Knut Olav Břhmer wrote: pImp-hConv = DdeConnect( pInst-hDdeInstCli,*pService,*pTopic, NULL); DdeConnect is not an OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice function. I guess it is in unicows. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/136218 Google says setting up a DDE connection involves sending a message to *every* top-level window to see if it will accept the conversation. You've got a process that is not clearing its message queue I guess the thing to try and find out is what process is the one not responding to the DdeConnect, whether its LibreOffice itself in some fashion or some other app. Thank you. It seams logical, as the 20 second delay is te standard timeout value for dde. I'll see what I can do using Spy++, something else or something similar :) Spy++ did not help me much. It just dies :( I presume your DdeServer there is working and not the one itself directly blocking the DdeConnect ? My DDEserver is working, but it is not (so) important. It's just used to reproduce the bug in the /real/ program, which I can not distribute, and which I don't have the source code for. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
2011/7/21 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/21 Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com: On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 11:06 +0200, Knut Olav Břhmer wrote: pImp-hConv = DdeConnect( pInst-hDdeInstCli,*pService,*pTopic, NULL); DdeConnect is not an OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice function. I guess it is in unicows. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/136218 Google says setting up a DDE connection involves sending a message to *every* top-level window to see if it will accept the conversation. You've got a process that is not clearing its message queue I guess the thing to try and find out is what process is the one not responding to the DdeConnect, whether its LibreOffice itself in some fashion or some other app. Thank you. It seams logical, as the 20 second delay is te standard timeout value for dde. I'll see what I can do using Spy++, something else or something similar :) Spy++ did not help me much. It just dies :( I presume your DdeServer there is working and not the one itself directly blocking the DdeConnect ? My DDEserver is working, but it is not (so) important. It's just used to reproduce the bug in the /real/ program, which I can not distribute, and which I don't have the source code for. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
2011/7/15 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: 2011/7/13 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com: Hi Knut, On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:54 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: Now, fight! :D This is a developers forum, not a place for sending E-mails about reported bugs :-) It is only on-topic if you have a patch, or you want advice and code pointers to help chase the issue down. I have debuged this in OOo321, as this is the version I've been able to compile. I have found out where the delay happens (I think). Line 183 in \svtools\source\svdde\ddecli.cxx pImp-hConv = DdeConnect( pInst-hDdeInstCli,*pService,*pTopic, NULL); DdeConnect is not an OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice function. I guess it is in unicows. What can I do now to make progress? According to this document: http://www.techsoft.de/htbasic/support/dde_man.pdf Default timeout for dde connections is 20 seconds. As described in the bug report, this happens when an new soffice process is used to start the macro. So I have a theory about that the new soffice process blocks the DDE activity of the main soffice process for 20 seconds, and when it times-out, the macro call to DDEInitiate is allowed to continue. Is there anyone who could help me with some brainstorming on which tactics to use fighting this bug? -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
2011/7/13 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com: Hi Knut, On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:54 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: Now, fight! :D This is a developers forum, not a place for sending E-mails about reported bugs :-) It is only on-topic if you have a patch, or you want advice and code pointers to help chase the issue down. I have debuged this in OOo321, as this is the version I've been able to compile. I have found out where the delay happens (I think). Line 183 in \svtools\source\svdde\ddecli.cxx pImp-hConv = DdeConnect( pInst-hDdeInstCli,*pService,*pTopic, NULL); DdeConnect is not an OpenOffice.org/LibreOffice function. I guess it is in unicows. What can I do now to make progress? Best regard. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
Hi, I posted a bug-report at OpenOffice.org http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 Do I need to create the bug-report at libreoffice as well? The bug is also there. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194 Now, fight! :D 2011/7/13 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: Hi, I posted a bug-report at OpenOffice.org http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 Do I need to create the bug-report at libreoffice as well? The bug is also there. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
2011/7/13 Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com: Hi Knut, On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:54 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: Now, fight! :D This is a developers forum, not a place for sending E-mails about reported bugs :-) It is only on-topic if you have a patch, or you want advice and code pointers to help chase the issue down. OK. The question was if I needed to post the bugreport in both places. I was not able to log in to bugs.freedesktop.org, it took about an hour and a half before I got the confirmation mail from the registration at freedesktop.org. That's why I was asking. I should have clarified that. It'd be great to work out where you found out about the dev list from - we could perhaps clarify the blurb there. I don't understand. Do you want to know where I found the dev list? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/qa-testers/ (I guess. I don't remember.) I don't understand what blurb mean. blurb – noun - a brief advertisement or announcement, especially a laudatory one: She wrote a good blurb for her friend's novel Best regards -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
On 13 July 2011 19:57, Luuk luu...@gmail.com wrote: On 13-07-2011 16:54, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194 Now, fight! :D 2011/7/13 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com: Hi, I posted a bug-report at OpenOffice.org http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 Do I need to create the bug-report at libreoffice as well? The bug is also there. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer i thought DDE was dead? Looks to me that it is used quite much in LibreOffice. I might be wrong. It is used in an applications MS Office is communicating with. The BASIC macros are ported to LibreOffice. Now we got to make it run smooth. Users don't like waiting for 20 seconds. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Data_Exchange NetDDE was still included with Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP Service Pack 2, although it was disabled by default. It has been removed entirely in Windows Vista.[3] However, this will not prevent existing versions of NetDDE from being installed and functioning on later versions of Windows. Well, this is only DDEML. And DDEML will never be removed from windows. It's part of it's core, as far as I know. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] DDEInitiate bug
On 13 July 2011 21:00, Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:54:32PM +0200, Knut Olav B?hmer boh...@gmail.com wrote: http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118283 vs. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39194 Now, fight! :D If there is a relation we try to avoid with OOo developers, then that's fighting, I think. I'm very sorry I said this now. It was suppose to be funny. I regret it. Best regards. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Bugs from OpenOffice.org to LibreOffice
Hi, How can I check if a bug that is fixed in OpenOffice.org 3.4 is also fixed in LibreOffice 3.4? Especially interested in http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115795 But if there is a general way to find out this things, I'd like to know. -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] - One line patche - Export hyperlinks to .doc
Hi, Related to this bug. http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115297 2011/5/20 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com Hi, Exporting hyperlinks to .doc is done wrong in LibreOffice Writer. There is a flag (hlstmfIsAbsolute) that is set to 1. It should be 0, because all links are exported relative. Before I make a patch, give me input on this. B - hlstmfIsAbsolute (1 bit): A bit that specifies whether this hyperlink is an absolute path or relative path. Value Meaning 0 This hyperlink is a relative path. 1 This hyperlink is an absolute path. The patch I have used for some time, that works for me and some hundred users is: diff --git a/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx b/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx index 4db4999..d5f7327 100644 --- a/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx +++ b/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bool WW8AttributeOutput::StartURL( const String rUrl, const String rTarget ) SwWW8Writer::WriteLong( *m_rWW8Export.pDataStrm, 0x0002); sal_uInt32 nFlag = bBookMarkOnly ? 0 : 0x01; if ( bAbsolute ) -nFlag |= 0x02; +nFlag |= 0x00; if ( sMark.Len() ) nFlag |= 0x08; SwWW8Writer::WriteLong( *m_rWW8Export.pDataStrm, nFlag ); But I guess a better patch would be (which I have not tested): The following was suppose to do if ( !bAbsolute ) insted of if ( bAbsolute ) diff --git a/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx b/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx index 4db4999..d5f7327 100644 --- a/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx +++ b/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bool WW8AttributeOutput::StartURL( const String rUrl, const String rTarget ) SwWW8Writer::WriteLong( *m_rWW8Export.pDataStrm, 0x0002); sal_uInt32 nFlag = bBookMarkOnly ? 0 : 0x01; if ( bAbsolute ) -nFlag |= 0x02; +nFlag |= 0x00; if ( sMark.Len() ) nFlag |= 0x08; SwWW8Writer::WriteLong( *m_rWW8Export.pDataStrm, nFlag ); Anyway, this is very easy to test for anyone. 1. Create a document with a hyperlink. 2. Save it as .doc 3. Open it in MS Word 4. Ctrl Click on the link 5 and, look.. It does not work 6. Apply my patch 7. repeat point 1,2,3,4 8. and look.. It works :) -- Knut Olav Bøhmer -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] Export hyperlinks to .doc
Hi, Exporting hyperlinks to .doc is done wrong in LibreOffice Writer. There is a flag (hlstmfIsAbsolute) that is set to 1. It should be 0, because all links are exported relative. Before I make a patch, give me input on this. B - hlstmfIsAbsolute (1 bit): A bit that specifies whether this hyperlink is an absolute path or relative path. Value Meaning 0 This hyperlink is a relative path. 1 This hyperlink is an absolute path. The patch I have used for some time, that works for me and some hundred users is: diff --git a/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx b/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx index 4db4999..d5f7327 100644 --- a/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx +++ b/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bool WW8AttributeOutput::StartURL( const String rUrl, const String rTarget ) SwWW8Writer::WriteLong( *m_rWW8Export.pDataStrm, 0x0002); sal_uInt32 nFlag = bBookMarkOnly ? 0 : 0x01; if ( bAbsolute ) -nFlag |= 0x02; +nFlag |= 0x00; if ( sMark.Len() ) nFlag |= 0x08; SwWW8Writer::WriteLong( *m_rWW8Export.pDataStrm, nFlag ); But I guess a better patch would be (which I have not tested): diff --git a/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx b/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx index 4db4999..d5f7327 100644 --- a/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx +++ b/sw/source/filter/ww8/wrtw8nds.cxx @@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ bool WW8AttributeOutput::StartURL( const String rUrl, const String rTarget ) SwWW8Writer::WriteLong( *m_rWW8Export.pDataStrm, 0x0002); sal_uInt32 nFlag = bBookMarkOnly ? 0 : 0x01; if ( bAbsolute ) -nFlag |= 0x02; +nFlag |= 0x00; if ( sMark.Len() ) nFlag |= 0x08; SwWW8Writer::WriteLong( *m_rWW8Export.pDataStrm, nFlag ); Anyway, this is very easy to test for anyone. 1. Create a document with a hyperlink. 2. Save it as .doc 3. Open it in MS Word 4. Ctrl Click on the link 5 and, look.. It does not work 6. Apply my patch 7. repeat point 1,2,3,4 8. and look.. It works :) -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Export hyperlinks to .doc
2011/5/20 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com Hi, Exporting hyperlinks to .doc is done wrong in LibreOffice Writer. There is a flag (hlstmfIsAbsolute) that is set to 1. It should be 0, because all links are exported relative. My patch is tested in OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 -cut- Anyway, this is very easy to test for anyone. 1. Create a document with a hyperlink. Create it in LibreOffice 2. Save it as .doc 3. Open it in MS Word or in MS WordViewer 4. Ctrl Click on the link 5 and, look.. It does not work 6. Apply my patch 7. repeat point 1,2,3,4 8. and look.. It works :) -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Export hyperlinks to .doc
It's related to this bug: http://openoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115297 However, don't use the attachments on the bug-report, they are wrong. 2011/5/20 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com 2011/5/20 Knut Olav Bøhmer boh...@gmail.com Hi, Exporting hyperlinks to .doc is done wrong in LibreOffice Writer. There is a flag (hlstmfIsAbsolute) that is set to 1. It should be 0, because all links are exported relative. My patch is tested in OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 -cut- Anyway, this is very easy to test for anyone. 1. Create a document with a hyperlink. Create it in LibreOffice 2. Save it as .doc 3. Open it in MS Word or in MS WordViewer 4. Ctrl Click on the link 5 and, look.. It does not work 6. Apply my patch 7. repeat point 1,2,3,4 8. and look.. It works :) -- Knut Olav Bøhmer -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] Patch to fix bug in exporting relative hyperlinks to MS Word 97/2000/XP
2010/11/3 Cédric Bosdonnat cedric.bosdonnat@free.fr Hi Knut, On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 23:30 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote: I would be very happy if someone could take a look at the attached patch, and maybe improve it. First I couldn't reproduce the original problem neither with Word 97 nor Word 2007+. It seems that Word perfectly handles the / as directory separator (at least in the HYPERLINK fields). Could you provide documents to help me reproduce it? Yes, it looks like the '/' and '\' was not the problem. The problem is that Libo/OOo sets an attribute that tells MS Office that the hyperlink is absolute, not relative. But the path is still relative. I'll provide a patch today. I'll make a new patch soon. Libo/OOo exports hyperlinks with / as directory separator. MS Office does not understand that kind of paths, so / has to be rewritten to \ Description is here: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=115297 Hum... That patch doesn't seem to harm anybody, but I'll push it after having understood the problem ;) I discovered another problem that may be related to your troubles: relative hyperlinks with spaces in their path can't be opened. The reason is that the space character is transformed into a %20 in the HYPERLINK value... which word doesn't understand as a space but as the %20 string. Could you check that you don't fall into that problem? If you're interested in fixing those doc path problems, then that one should be easy for you given the nice patch you already provided ;) Regards, -- Cedric ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- Knut Olav Bøhmer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
