Re: Track0001:Build fail on formula-core-rework branch 05/24/2013.
Okay.Thanks,and now I have changed to another branch named feature/calc-group-interpreter and build it pass. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Track0001-Build-fail-on-formula-core-rework-branch-05-24-2013-on-SUSE12-3-tp4057562p4058238.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Track0001:Build fail on formula-core-rework branch 05/24/2013.
git show commit c982a228c02cd1c0fededa3191f1fabd1ce44d53 Author: Kohei Yoshida kohei.yosh...@gmail.com Date: Wed May 22 21:07:31 2013 -0400 .. cat autogen.input --disable-odk .. make .. [build CXX] desktop/source/app/app.cxx [build CXX] desktop/source/app/appfirststart.cxx [build CXX] desktop/source/app/appinit.cxx [build CXX] desktop/source/app/check_ext_deps.cxx [build CXX] desktop/source/app/cmdlineargs.cxx /home/leo/libreproj/zlibreoffice/core/sfx2/source/view/viewfrm.cxx: In static member function ‘static bool SfxViewFrame::IsSidebarEnabled()’: /home/leo/libreproj/zlibreoffice/core/sfx2/source/view/viewfrm.cxx:3416:57: error: ‘officecfg::Office::Common::Misc::ExperimentalSidebar’ has not been declared make[1]: *** [/home/leo/libreproj/zlibreoffice/core/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/CxxObject/sfx2/source/view/viewfrm.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs make: *** [build] Error 2 -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Track0001-Build-fail-on-formula-core-rework-branch-05-24-2013-tp4057562.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Build libreoffice error for xml2 on windows7.
These days, I'm trying to build the libreoffice on windows7(sp1,x64). I referenced to the wiki: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingOnWindows I download some software accoring to the wiki site: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Windows_Build_Dependencies 1.windows sdk 2.vs2012 3.DirectX sdk 4.GDI+ Redistributable (but not used according to the note) 5.Dot NET SDK v2.0 (Important: x86, not x64!!!) 6.Java Development Kit (use a 32bit SDK) 7.Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 SP1 Redistributable Package (x86) (but not used cause I used vs2012) 8.Apache ANT 9.Junit 4 10.Mozilla build tooling (only for stable LibreOffice versions 4.1) (but not used) 11.LO patched GNU make 3.82: install it at the cygwin path /opt/lo/bin/make 12.LO patched ccache: install it at the cygwin path /opt/lo/bin/ccache 13.Cygwin's setup.exe After installing and configuring them, I began to build source codes from site: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?h=feature/formula-core-rework I used: --with-parallelism=4 --disable-odk --with-junit=/opt/lo/misc/junit-4.10.jar --with-ant-home=/opt/lo/misc/apache-ant-1.9.0 --with-jdk-home=D:/x86/Java/jdk1.7.0_21 --enable-pch --enable-ccache --disable-activex --enable-symbols --disable-cve-tests --disable-atl --without-myspell-dicts as configure arguments in autogen.input file. $ ./autogen.sh (not work because the format isn't UNIX. and after transferred it to UNIX it works but failed again) need copy the two files from (xx\cygwin\usr\x86_64-pc-cygwin\sys-root\usr\share\libtool\config\config.guess) and (xx\cygwin\usr\x86_64-pc-cygwin\sys-root\usr\share\libtool\config\config.sub) into current path which is the same as auogen.sh; and then, try $ ./autogen.sh ... To build, issue: /opt/lo/bin/make run: /opt/lo/bin/make help for details * * WARNING : ccache's cache size is less than 1GB using it is counter-producive: auto-ccache detection disabled ... $ /opt/lo/bin/make (begin to download something automatically and after long time, failed) This time need notice the file named 'g', the format of g isn't all UNIX too, so that need transferred it to UNIX and $/opt/lo/bin/make clean $/opt/lo/bin/make It looks everything is stopping there but it's working now indeed. After a long time, it begins to scroll up by printing the build information. ... [build DEP]...xx ... [build CXX]...xx ... [build C ]...xx ... Now, the error comes as below: E:/core/workdir/wntmsci14.pro/UnpackedTarball/zlib/x64/zutil.c(137) : warning C4131: ??zError??: ?? E:/core/workdir/wntmsci14.pro/UnpackedTarball/zlib/x64/zutil.c(305) : warning C4131: ??zcalloc??: ?? E:/core/workdir/wntmsci14.pro/UnpackedTarball/zlib/x64/zutil.c(315) : warning C4131: ??zcfree??: ?? [build LNK] Executable/gcc-wrapper.exe [build LNK] Executable/g++-wrapper.exe Microsoft (R) Windows Script Host Version 5.8 ???(C) Microsoft Corporation 1996-2001??? libxml2 version: 2.7.6 Created Makefile. Created config.h. XML processor configuration --- Trio: no Thread safety: native FTP client: yes HTTP client: yes HTML processor: yes C14N support: yes Catalog support: yes DocBook support: yes XPath support: yes XPointer support: yes XInclude support: yes iconv support: no iso8859x support: no zlib support: no Debugging module: yes Memory debugging: no Runtime debugging: no Regexp support: yes Module support: yes Tree support: yes Reader support: yes Writer support: yes Walker support: yes Pattern support: yes Push support: yes Validation support: yes SAX1 support: yes Legacy support: yes Output support: yes XML Schema support: yes Schematron support: yes Python bindings: no Win32 build configuration - Compiler: msvc C-Runtime option: /MD Embed Manifest: no Debug symbols: no Static xmllint: no Install prefix: . Put tools in: $(PREFIX)\bin Put headers in: $(PREFIX)\include Put static libs in: $(PREFIX)\lib Put shared libs in: $(PREFIX)\lib Include path: . Lib path: . Microsoft (R) ?ù??? 11.00.50727.1 ?? ??? (C) Microsoft Corporation??? if not exist bin.msvc mkdir bin.msvc if not exist int.msvc mkdir int.msvc cl.exe /EP /nologo /I..\include /D _REENTRANT libxml2.def.src int.ms vc\libxml2.def libxml2.def.src cl.exe /nologo /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D _MBCS /W1 /MD /I.. /I..\inc c14n.c catalog.c chvalid.c debugXML.c dict.c DOCBparser.c encoding.c entities.c error.c globals.c hash.c HTMLparser.c HTMLtree.c legacy.c list.c nanoftp.c nanohttp.c parser.c parserInternals.c pattern.c ???... ???... relaxng.c
How can I obtain the data stored in variables of Calc ?
There are two cases which I meet normally. One is creating one or more new data-sheets in one workbook, and then fill some data into the cells of these data-sheets; the other is opening one *.xlsx (or *.xls,*.slsm,*.xls) file with a amount of data which have been in data-sheets of this file already. My question: Which structures from source codes will the data be stored in on the two cases separately ? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-can-I-obtain-the-data-stored-in-variables-of-Calc-tp4055743.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
How to build libreoffice source codes on windows ?
I saw that there is windows version of the libreoffice. But there are a lot of dependent packages in linux to build the source codes. So I want to know what will be prepared and how to build the libreoffice source codes on windows ? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-to-build-libreoffice-source-codes-on-windows-tp4055759.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: How to remake a modified source codes, not the first time, based on source codes core which has been made successfully?
I checked again and found that: using the make module-name, for example, If I modify the module named desktop, I will use: xxx/core make desktop And it shows as below: === xxx/core* make desktop* cd xxx/core/desktop /usr/bin/make -j 4 -rs [build DEP] LNK:Executable/soffice.bin [build C ] desktop/source/app/main.c [build CHK] loaded modules: desktop ... [build LNK] Executable/soffice.bin [build MOD] desktop [build ALL] top level modules: desktop [build ALL] loaded modules: desktop ... It can save some time. I run the command: xxx/core *./install/program/soffice* No effects work in the results. Next, there are two methods which can get to the same goal. /Method-1:/ And I used *make dev-install*. It works well; /Method-2:/ And I used make dev-install-nocheck (or *make dev-install -o build*) And then,run the command: xxx/core *./install/program/soffice*. It works well. Obviously, method-2 is part of method1, so that it can save some time. And what the side effect of the method-2 was, I couldn't meet it yet. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-to-remake-a-modified-source-codes-not-the-first-time-based-on-source-codes-core-which-has-been-m-tp4053499p4054020.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: How to remake a modified source codes, not the first time, based on source codes core which has been made successfully?
It works now, Thank you for your kind suggestions! -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-to-remake-a-modified-source-codes-not-the-first-time-based-on-source-codes-core-which-has-been-m-tp4053499p4053690.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
How to remake a modified source codes,not the first time,based on source codes core which has been made successfully?
I went to the website: http://www.libreoffice.org/developers-2/
http://www.libreoffice.org/developers-2/
And $ git clone http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/core.git
Did as Build and Run It:
=
sudo zypper si -d libreoffice # for OpenSUSE 12.3
./autogen.sh #wrong format for UNIX and I modify it to UNIX format
locally and then pass
make#download some packages and then compile,link...
long time to do this automatically
make dev-install #Developer installation finished, you can now execute:
xxx/core/install/program/soffice
make debugrun#show (gdb)
And then,I used : xxx/core ./install/program/soffice
It started one graphic interface and there are some icons which need me to
click(writer,calc,impress...)
===
Now, I want to add some codes into file(desktop/source/app/main.c) to track
the codes working flow.
Some simple print codes to print something to watch how it worked.
And after the adding and saving, I use the make command : *xxx/coremake*
Wait for some times and finished the make, and then I use the 'make
dev-install' again :
xxx/coremake dev-install
And I check the generated date of the soffice in xxx/core/install/program/
,modified time is the same as which
I made successfully on the first time(no matter I delete it or not,but
visited time is new,same as now)
And I tried to run the same commands as my first time after my first make:
xxx/core ./install/program/soffice
And nothing shows on the terminal.So I think the '*make*' not worked to
rebuild the codes which I modified just now as below:
===
desktop/source/app/main.c
..
SAL_IMPLEMENT_MAIN() {*
char c = getchar();
printf(SAL_IMPLEMENT_MAIN in main...%c\n,c);
getchar();*
int ret = soffice_main();
#ifdef DBG_UTIL
#ifdef __gnu_linux__
g_Exiting = 1;
#endif
#endif
return ret;
}
What's wrong to the method which I added the new codes to track and make it
with the same configure as before ?
(I didn't use 'make clean' and autogen.sh because it'll take long time to
re-build the libreoffice codes through
make again.)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-to-remake-a-modified-source-codes-not-the-first-time-based-on-source-codes-core-which-has-been-m-tp4053499.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: How to remake a modified source codes, not the first time, based on source codes core which has been made successfully?
I have done make dev-install after make when I updated one file's source codes. But no effect on the results as I expected. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-to-remake-a-modified-source-codes-not-the-first-time-based-on-source-codes-core-which-has-been-m-tp4053499p4053560.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: How to remake a modified source codes, not the first time, based on source codes core which has been made successfully?
I have done make dev-install after make when I updated one file's source codes. But no effect on the results as I expected. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/How-to-remake-a-modified-source-codes-not-the-first-time-based-on-source-codes-core-which-has-been-m-tp4053499p4053562.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
