Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Add support for DragonFly in configure.in

2011-02-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 31/01/11 11:46, Francois Tigeot wrote:
 Sure.
 
 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ says LO is licensed
 under both LGPLv3 and GPL. Shouldn't it be LGPLv3 and MPL ?
 
Where?

I've just taken a look (since I wrote a fair chunk of that). It says
LibreOffice is LGPL3. It has to be, because it contains an awfully large
amount of code (from OpenOffice) that is only available to us under the
LGPL.

It also says the project is using a dual LGPL/MPL licence, so all the
code we have added is dual-licenced.

We can't say LibreOffice is MPL, because large chunks of it aren't.

Cheers,
Wol
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Add support for DragonFly in configure.in

2011-02-02 Thread Wols Lists
On 02/02/11 19:07, Wols Lists wrote:
 It also says the project is using a dual LGPL/MPL licence, so all the
 code we have added is dual-licenced.

Oops - hit send and then realise Michael had already corrected it :-(

Cheers,
Wol
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] Add support for DragonFly in configure.in

2011-01-31 Thread Michael Meeks

On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 12:46 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
 It was a low-hanging fruit; I'll collect patches locally for a while
 until I can get a more complete build.
..
 Sure.

Great :-) thanks.

 http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/ says LO is licensed
 under both LGPLv3 and GPL. Shouldn't it be LGPLv3 and MPL ?

Great catch; fixed.

Thanks,

Michael.

-- 
 michael.me...@novell.com  , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice