Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Hi, Christian Lohmaier wrote on 2010-11-16 16.22: Do we want to have a support.libreoffice.org subsite, or do we want to havewww.libreoffice.org/support? for now, I'd go with the latter one, but that's just my feeling... Florian -- Florian Effenberger Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Christian Lohmaier wrote: > And "Your question may have already been answered - check the > Community Forum at http://www.documentfoundation.org/nabble/ " is > misleading, as that nabble is not a forum, but a mailing-list > interface in forum-style look and feel. > Bah, details. ;) (I think we refer to it as a forum in other places as well. But please feel free to follow-up with improved wording / extra links) Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpQ8W2DjZjc9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Hi Jon, *;
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:44 AM, John LeMoyne Castle wrote:
> [${PRODUCTNAME} source code was released back in October 2000. ]
Good catch - While the source is indeed available since 2000, I'm also
not sure about whether OpenOffice.org should be explicitly mentioned
here...
> Tried it in a browser and the links don't work -- yet.
Yes, the domain still has an additional "test" in it - so right now
the links would be www.test.libreoffice.org
I created placeholder pages of the pages mentioned in the readme on
the site, and put the readme up there as well (still with the
PRODUCTNAME placeholder and with no "only select passages matching xy"
controls though)
https://test.libreoffice.org/welcome/readme/ (plain http:// also works)
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Thanks for giving Libre Office it's very own readme. One thing that popped
out at me from the Getting Involved section was this: "familiarize yourself
with many of the topics covered since the ${PRODUCTNAME} source code was
released back in October 2000. " I dunno if you want OpenOffice for a
product there or a 2010 date on LibreOffice code release.
Tried it in a browser and the links don't work -- yet. Looks good - thanks
again.
LeMoyne
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/More-links-inherited-from-OOo-tp1909555p1958085.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Hi Thorste, *, On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > [...] Thanks for the updates > Latest readme for 3.3 attached for your reference. Many thanks for > the feedback! One point I missed when looking through the links the first time: The mailing list archives will be moved to some other location/domain, so libreoffice.org/lists/users/ will not be the location of the archive (but one can setup a redirect for that one of course - what the final domain name will be isn't decided yet - see corresponding mails on the admin list) And "Your question may have already been answered - check the Community Forum at http://www.documentfoundation.org/nabble/ " is misleading, as that nabble is not a forum, but a mailing-list interface in forum-style look and feel. ciao Christian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Sophie Gautier wrote:
> - the paragraph about changes on BerkeleyDB engine and extensions
> database incompatiliby seems strange when speaking about [for
> ${PRODUCTNAME} versions prior to 3.2]. May be we should namely
> speaks about OpenOffice.org.
>
Removed completely, LibO uses its own config dir name, so
downgrading should not pose any problems.
> - could we replace the link www.libreoffice.org/access by
> www.libreoffice.org/accessibility? Is there anybody already working
> on this page?
>
Done (the link change ;))
> - I think we should completely remove the paragraph about
> Registration and User Survey
>
Done.
> - it is mention that IssuZilla is on our website, this should be
> corrected by giving the right BugZilla address on Freedesktop.
>
Done.
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Technically it is OK - while silverstripe by default uses "directory"
> style links ( http://test.libreoffice.org/why/ ), you can also use it
> with added .html ( http://test.libreoffice.org/why.html ) so no
> problem from that side, but of course those pages don't exist yet.
> (and welcome/readme.html or home/readme.html or product/readme.html or
> home/readme.html... probably a matter of taste)
>
Unified to directory-style links. Also, changed all urls to be on
the libreoffice.org domain (except for central infrastructure, like
nabble).
> Do we want to have a support.libreoffice.org subsite, or do we want to
> have www.libreoffice.org/support?
>
Opted for the latter.
> Now to some content questions:
> * System requirements
> 1,5GB of free harddisk for the Mac/Intel version? 150MB for download
> package and 500MB for the installed product should be enough, so that
> seems a little exaggerated.
> And specifying an intel processor as the requirement for the Mac/Intel
> version seems pointless :-)
>
Done (rounded up to 800 megs)
> For both mac versions (Intel/PPC) the requirements are Mac OS X 10.4 or newer
>
> * Quirks
> How old is that entry wrt gnome and SESSION_MANAGER? I never
> encountered that myself, and I never heard of such a problem on the
> mailing lists...
>
Binned. Instead, added a hint regarding gfx performance (something I
get asked about infrequently)
> * Registration
> Readme mentions registrations, but for LO there is no registration, is there?
>
> * The readme talks about a survey online, but doesn't mention how to
> get there/hot to participate in that survey
>
Elided.
> * Bug reports
> Refers to issueZilla on the website - should be changed
> to fdo bugzilla
>
Done.
Latest readme for 3.3 attached for your reference. Many thanks for
the feedback!
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
${PRODUCTNAME} Readme
File
#Copyright_Trademark * {font-size: .7em;}
.note {border: 1px solid #99; padding: 3px;}
p { margin-top: .1em; margin-bottom: .1em;}
.code {font-family: monospace;}
${PRODUCTNAME}
${PRODUCTVERSION} ReadMe
For latest
updates to this readme file, see http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/readme/";>http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/readme/
This file contains
important information about this program. Please read this information very
carefully before starting work.
The LibreOffice Community,
responsible for the development of this product, would like to invite you to
participate as a community member. As a new user, you can check out the
${PRODUCTNAME} site with helpful user information at http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/introduction/";>http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/introduction/
Also read the sections
below about getting involved in the LibreOffice project.
Is ${PRODUCTNAME} really
free for any user?
${PRODUCTNAME} is free for
use by everybody. You may take this copy of ${PRODUCTNAME} and install it on as
many computers as you like, and use it for any purpose you like (including
commercial, government, public administration and educational use). For further
details see the license text delivered together with ${PRODUCTNAME} or http://www.libreoffice.org/license/";>http://www.libreoffice.org/license/
Why is ${PRODUCTNAME}
free for any user?
You can use this copy of
${PRODUCTNAME} today free of charge because individual contributors and
corporate sponsors have designed, developed, tested, translated, documented,
supported, marketed, and helped in many other ways to make ${PRODUCTNAME} what
it is today - the world's leading open-source office software.
If you appreciate their
efforts, and would like to ensure LibreOffice continues into the future, pl
Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Hi Thorsten, all,
On 16/11/2010 08:14, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi folks,
after some more grepping, also adapted the readmes to only reference
documentfoundation/libreoffice links. File is attached, would be
cool if you could review it for correctness, language - and whether
the links as such make sense.
Thanks for the work on this. Some remarks:
- the paragraph about changes on BerkeleyDB engine and extensions
database incompatiliby seems strange when speaking about [for
${PRODUCTNAME} versions prior to 3.2]. May be we should namely speaks
about OpenOffice.org.
- could we replace the link www.libreoffice.org/access by
www.libreoffice.org/accessibility? Is there anybody already working on
this page?
- I think we should completely remove the paragraph about Registration
and User Survey
- it is mention that IssuZilla is on our website, this should be
corrected by giving the right BugZilla address on Freedesktop.
Hope this helps :)
Kins regards
Sophie
--
Founding member of The Document Foundation
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Hi Thorsten, *, On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > after some more grepping, also adapted the readmes to only reference > documentfoundation/libreoffice links. File is attached, would be > cool if you could review it for correctness, language - and whether > the links as such make sense. Technically it is OK - while silverstripe by default uses "directory" style links ( http://test.libreoffice.org/why/ ), you can also use it with added .html ( http://test.libreoffice.org/why.html ) so no problem from that side, but of course those pages don't exist yet. (and welcome/readme.html or home/readme.html or product/readme.html or home/readme.html... probably a matter of taste) And it probably should then use a unified scheme (the accessibility link uses the directory-style link) The contributing one points to documentfoundation.org And more important: Do we want to have a support.libreoffice.org subsite, or do we want to have www.libreoffice.org/support? # Now to some content questions: * System requirements 1,5GB of free harddisk for the Mac/Intel version? 150MB for download package and 500MB for the installed product should be enough, so that seems a little exaggerated. And specifying an intel processor as the requirement for the Mac/Intel version seems pointless :-) For both mac versions (Intel/PPC) the requirements are Mac OS X 10.4 or newer * Quirks How old is that entry wrt gnome and SESSION_MANAGER? I never encountered that myself, and I never heard of such a problem on the mailing lists... * Registration Readme mentions registrations, but for LO there is no registration, is there? * The readme talks about a survey online, but doesn't mention how to get there/hot to participate in that survey * Bug reports Refers to issueZilla on the website - should be changed to fdo bugzilla ciao Christian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
[Libreoffice] More links inherited from OOo
Hi folks,
after some more grepping, also adapted the readmes to only reference
documentfoundation/libreoffice links. File is attached, would be
cool if you could review it for correctness, language - and whether
the links as such make sense.
Thanks,
-- Thorsten
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
${PRODUCTNAME} Readme
File
#Copyright_Trademark * {font-size: .7em;}
.note {border: 1px solid #99; padding: 3px;}
p { margin-top: .1em; margin-bottom: .1em;}
.code {font-family: monospace;}
${PRODUCTNAME}
${PRODUCTVERSION} ReadMe
For latest
updates to this readme file, see http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/readme.html";>http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/readme.html
This file contains
important information about this program. Please read this information very
carefully before starting work.
The LibreOffice Community,
responsible for the development of this product, would like to invite you to
participate as a community member. As a new user, you can check out the
${PRODUCTNAME} site with helpful user information at http://www.libreoffice.org/about_us/introduction.html";>http://www.libreoffice.org/about_us/introduction.html
Also read the sections
below about getting involved in the LibreOffice project.
Is ${PRODUCTNAME} really
free for any user?
${PRODUCTNAME} is free for
use by everybody. You may take this copy of ${PRODUCTNAME} and install it on as
many computers as you like, and use it for any purpose you like (including
commercial, government, public administration and educational use). For further
details see the license text delivered together with ${PRODUCTNAME} or http://www.libreoffice.org/license.html";>http://www.libreoffice.org/license.html
Why is ${PRODUCTNAME}
free for any user?
You can use this copy of
${PRODUCTNAME} today free of charge because individual contributors and
corporate sponsors have designed, developed, tested, translated, documented,
supported, marketed, and helped in many other ways to make ${PRODUCTNAME} what
it is today - the world's leading open-source office software.
If you appreciate their
efforts, and would like to ensure LibreOffice continues into the future, please
consider contributing to the project - see http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/";>http://www.documentfoundation.org/contribution/
for details. Everyone has a contribution to make.
Notes on
Installation
System
Requirements
MacOSX 10.4 (Tiger) or higher
Intel processor
512 MB RAM
Up to 1.5 GB available hard disk space
1024 x 768 graphic device with 256 colors (higher resolution
recommended)
Microsoft Windows 2000 (Service Pack 4 or higher), XP, Vista,
or Windows 7
Pentium compatible PC (Pentium III or Athlon recommended)
256 MB RAM (512 MB RAM recommended)
Up to 1.5 GB available hard disk space
1024x768 resolution (higher resolution recommended), at least
256 colors
Please be aware
