Re: Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux
Hi, Am 16.07.21 um 09:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Am 16.07.21 um 09:03 schrieb Luke Benes: >> Yes, a 'make check' passes with "stack_guard_gap=1" kernel parameter for the >> java bug and clang 12. > clang > > > "Of course" I use gcc here. (Except for skia where the build system > chooses clang if present and I follow.) Just for completeness: same cppunit test failures (didn't try to the end, just writing the mail after the mfio one) as before with clang builds. Regards, Rene ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux
Hi, Am 16.07.21 um 09:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > [...] The uicheck which prompted by for my linked fix > is > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/i386/libr/libreoffice/13632639/log.gz > (has also the junit dbaccess_complex segfault.) Sorry, wrong link. That one actually is the one which has the uicheck already fixed and where just the junit breakage remains. The uicheck failure was == FAIL: test_resize_object (drawinglayer.ImpressDrawinglayerTest) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.a86_7ziu/downtmp/build.BHI/src/uitest/impress_tests/drawinglayer.py", line 81, in test_resize_object self.assertEqual(9134, document.DrawPages[0].getByIndex(1).Size.Height) AssertionError: 9134 != 9133 == FAIL: test_rotate_object (drawinglayer.ImpressDrawinglayerTest) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.a86_7ziu/downtmp/build.BHI/src/uitest/impress_tests/drawinglayer.py", line 130, in test_rotate_object self.assertEqual(9134, document.DrawPages[0].getByIndex(1).Size.Height) AssertionError: 9134 != 9133 -- Ran 7 tests in 20.516s FAILED (failures=2) Regards, Rene ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux
Hi, Am 16.07.21 um 09:03 schrieb Luke Benes: > Yes, a 'make check' passes with "stack_guard_gap=1" kernel parameter for the > java bug and clang 12. clang "Of course" I use gcc here. (Except for skia where the build system chooses clang if present and I follow.) (Since with clang, even an amd64 build fails its tests miserably here, just crashes., gcc works fine.) > I also see the off-by-one gcc test failures. So it doesn't pass. At least with gcc. The attachment shows a run (run, fail, run, ..) of the failing (j|cp)unit tests here. The uicheck which prompted by for my linked fix is https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/i386/libr/libreoffice/13632639/log.gz (has also the junit dbaccess_complex segfault.) Regards, Rene ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux
Yes, a 'make check' passes with "stack_guard_gap=1" kernel parameter for the java bug and clang 12. I also see the off-by-one gcc test failures. I think these started with gcc 8 or 9. We probably have to turn off some floating point math optimization for gcc i686. -Luke From: Rene Engelhard Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 1:20 AM To: Luke Benes; Libreoffice Dev List Subject: Re: Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux Hi, Am 15.07.21 um 15:10 schrieb Luke Benes: > Build succeeds now and tests pass on Arch 32. Thanks! Tests pass? uicheck does with two patches not upstream[1], but junit crashes with segfault and then other mosly off-by one cppunit test failures here which are i386 only. Regards, Rene [1] https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/blob/debian-experimental-7.2/patches/fix-uicheck-tests-on-i386.patch ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux
Hi, Am 15.07.21 um 15:10 schrieb Luke Benes: > Build succeeds now and tests pass on Arch 32. Thanks! Tests pass? uicheck does with two patches not upstream[1], but junit crashes with segfault and then other mosly off-by one cppunit test failures here which are i386 only. Regards, Rene [1] https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/blob/debian-experimental-7.2/patches/fix-uicheck-tests-on-i386.patch ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux
Rene fixed this issue with: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=51754ca5349d Build succeeds now and tests pass on Arch 32. Thanks! ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux
those int values being passed into makeAny should be sal_uInt32, judging by the definition of that UNO command ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Build failure, Error: no matching function for call on x86 Linux
Mert,
After commit
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=67277595902d
Unit tests for .uno:MoveShapeHandle command
Fails with the error below on both Arch 32 and OpenSUSE i686. Any idea why this
would fail on 32-bit linux?
-Luke
[CXX] sd/qa/unit/tiledrendering/tiledrendering.cxx
In file included from /core/sd/qa/unit/tiledrendering/tiledrendering.cxx:10:
In file included from /core/sd/qa/unit/tiledrendering/../sdmodeltestbase.hxx:15:
In file included from /core/include/test/bootstrapfixture.hxx:15:
In file included from /core/include/vcl/salctype.hxx:25:
In file included from /core/include/vcl/graph.hxx:26:
In file included from /core/include/vcl/bitmapex.hxx:26:
In file included from /core/include/tools/color.hxx:24:
In file included from /core/include/com/sun/star/uno/Any.hxx:35:
In file included from /core/include/com/sun/star/uno/Any.h:33:
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:300:16: error: no matching function for call to
'cppu_detail_getUnoType'
return cppu_detail_getUnoType(static_cast< T1 * >(0));
^~
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:325:34: note: in instantiation of member
function 'cppu::UnoType::get' requested here
return ::cppu::UnoType< T >::get();
^
/core/include/com/sun/star/uno/Any.hxx:70:17: note: in instantiation of
function template specialization 'cppu::getTypeFavourUnsigned' requested
here
::cppu::getTypeFavourUnsigned().getTypeLibType(),
^
/core/include/com/sun/star/uno/Any.hxx:234:12: note: in instantiation of
function template specialization 'com::sun::star::uno::Any::Any' requested
here
return Any(value);
^
/core/sd/qa/unit/tiledrendering/tiledrendering.cxx:2643:32: note: in
instantiation of function template specialization
'com::sun::star::uno::makeAny' requested here
{"HandleNum", uno::makeAny(id)},
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:124:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const ::cppu::UnoVoidType *' for
1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER ::cppu::UnoVoidType const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:129:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const bool *' for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER bool const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:134:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const sal_Bool *' (aka 'const
unsigned char *') for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER sal_Bool const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:139:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const ::sal_Int8 *' (aka 'const
signed char *') for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER ::sal_Int8 const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:144:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const ::sal_Int16 *' (aka 'const
short *') for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER ::sal_Int16 const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:149:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const
::cppu::UnoUnsignedShortType *' for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:159:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const sal_uInt16 *' (aka 'const
unsigned short *') for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER sal_uInt16 const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:165:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const ::sal_Int32 *' (aka 'const
long *') for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER ::sal_Int32 const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:170:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const ::sal_uInt32 *' (aka
'const unsigned long *') for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER ::sal_uInt32 const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:176:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const ::sal_Int64 *' (aka 'const
long long *') for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER ::sal_Int64 const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:181:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const ::sal_uInt64 *' (aka
'const unsigned long long *') for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER ::sal_uInt64 const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:187:1: note: candidate function not viable: no
known conversion from 'T1 *' (aka 'int *') to 'const float *' for 1st argument
cppu_detail_getUnoType(SAL_UNUSED_PARAMETER float const *) {
^
/core/include/cppu/unotype.hxx:192:1: note: candidate function
