Re: Experiemental interactive formula editing ...
Hi,
Le 27/03/2012 19:08, Regina Henschel a écrit :
Michael Meeks schrieb:
Hi guys,
I wondered - are there any serious known issues in this anymore ?
and/or is there any reason why it's left as an experimental feature ?
I can't say better than Regina.
From my point of view, an option to choose the editor mode is the best
thing to do.
Best regards.
JBF
I know that users coming from Word MathType will like it. But I do not
want to use it and need an option to disable it, when it leaves
experimental mode.
Main reason for me: It does not preserve the StarMath notation.
In more detail:
The feature works directly on the MathML code. But that does not know
all StarMath markup. For example sum from {i=1} to n {n_i cdot 2^i} or
1 over 22 = nospace{0,0 overline {45}}
If you use the new feature, then the formulas are changed. Try it,
change for example 2 to 3. Without that feature the StarMath markup
is preserved as annotation inside the MathML code and restored when
loading.
If the new feature is enabled, then those working with the command
window like me loose the ability to mark a part of the formula by
double-click on it in the rendering. And that is needed for easily
changing single figures or variables in a complex formula.
Therefore I want to be able to still use the old kind editing.
Kind regards
Regina
--- a/starmath/source/view.cxx
+++ b/starmath/source/view.cxx
@@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ void SmViewShell::Notify( SfxBroadcaster ,
const SfxHint rHint )
bool SmViewShell::IsInlineEditEnabled() const
{
-return pImpl-aOpts.IsExperimentalMode();
+return true;
}
/* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab: */
Having had Jonas do all the work, it seems a shame not to ship it -
right ? :-) Olivier - do you have a view ?
All the best,
Michael.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
--
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Experiemental interactive formula editing ...
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 17:45 +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote: On 27.03.2012 17:40, Ivan Timofeev wrote: 3. Impossible to write statements like 'cos x' without adding a space between 'cos' and 'x'. Sorry, I mean this statement becomes 'cos ~ x' - additional space is added. Hah - and Regina had a few issues too she shared. It looks to me as if we need some noble volunteer to collect that little lot in bugzilla under a tracker bug, and (preferably) Easy-hack-ise it. :-) Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Experiemental interactive formula editing ...
Hi guys,
I wondered - are there any serious known issues in this anymore ?
and/or is there any reason why it's left as an experimental feature ?
--- a/starmath/source/view.cxx
+++ b/starmath/source/view.cxx
@@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ void SmViewShell::Notify( SfxBroadcaster , const
SfxHint rHint )
bool SmViewShell::IsInlineEditEnabled() const
{
-return pImpl-aOpts.IsExperimentalMode();
+return true;
}
/* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab: */
Having had Jonas do all the work, it seems a shame not to ship it -
right ? :-) Olivier - do you have a view ?
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Experiemental interactive formula editing ...
Hi Michael, On 27.03.2012 17:24, Michael Meeks wrote: I wondered - are there any serious known issues in this anymore ? and/or is there any reason why it's left as an experimental feature ? There are some small (or not small) problems: 1. Ctrl+Z doesn't work. 2. Typed keywords aren't recognized as such (try to input 'newline' or '~' and then modify the starmath source). 3. Impossible to write statements like 'cos x' without adding a space between 'cos' and 'x'. (Or I just don't know how to do it?) 4. Cursor position is wrong sometimes (try to input ~50 letters 'f' in succession) And maybe something more generic... But all these seem fixable though. Regards, Ivan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Experiemental interactive formula editing ...
On 27.03.2012 17:40, Ivan Timofeev wrote: 3. Impossible to write statements like 'cos x' without adding a space between 'cos' and 'x'. Sorry, I mean this statement becomes 'cos ~ x' - additional space is added. Ivan ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: Experiemental interactive formula editing ...
Michael Meeks schrieb:
Hi guys,
I wondered - are there any serious known issues in this anymore ?
and/or is there any reason why it's left as an experimental feature ?
I know that users coming from Word MathType will like it. But I do not
want to use it and need an option to disable it, when it leaves
experimental mode.
Main reason for me: It does not preserve the StarMath notation.
In more detail:
The feature works directly on the MathML code. But that does not know
all StarMath markup. For example sum from {i=1} to n {n_i cdot 2^i} or
1 over 22 = nospace{0,0 overline {45}}
If you use the new feature, then the formulas are changed. Try it,
change for example 2 to 3. Without that feature the StarMath markup
is preserved as annotation inside the MathML code and restored when loading.
If the new feature is enabled, then those working with the command
window like me loose the ability to mark a part of the formula by
double-click on it in the rendering. And that is needed for easily
changing single figures or variables in a complex formula.
Therefore I want to be able to still use the old kind editing.
Kind regards
Regina
--- a/starmath/source/view.cxx
+++ b/starmath/source/view.cxx
@@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ void SmViewShell::Notify( SfxBroadcaster , const
SfxHint rHint )
bool SmViewShell::IsInlineEditEnabled() const
{
-return pImpl-aOpts.IsExperimentalMode();
+return true;
}
/* vim:set shiftwidth=4 softtabstop=4 expandtab: */
Having had Jonas do all the work, it seems a shame not to ship it -
right ? :-) Olivier - do you have a view ?
All the best,
Michael.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
