[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149034] FILESAVE XLSX Saved trivial file opens with "Catastrophic failure" in older Excel
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149034 --- Comment #1 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) --- Created attachment 180058 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180058=edit The example file saved by 7.3.3 - working fine in Excel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149034] FILESAVE XLSX Saved trivial file opens with "Catastrophic failure" in older Excel
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149034 --- Comment #3 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) --- Created attachment 180060 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180060=edit Opening the two xlsx files in Excel 2013 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149034] FILESAVE XLSX Saved trivial file opens with "Catastrophic failure" in older Excel
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149034 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added Regression By||Tomaž Vajngerl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149034] FILESAVE XLSX Saved trivial file opens with "Catastrophic failure" in older Excel
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149034 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #4 from Xisco Faulí --- Is this the same as bug 148835? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138880] Paragraph Style: Bottom Padding doesn't work when borders are OFF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138880 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Caolán McNamara --- yeah, looks tricky but I think this is basically working as it is supposed to. And the dialog was tweaked in the identified commit to not add extra properties not selected by the user which stopped it making the border/spacing properties not "match" the following paragraph. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107833] [META] Writer paragraph style bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107833 Bug 107833 depends on bug 138880, which changed state. Bug 138880 Summary: Paragraph Style: Bottom Padding doesn't work when borders are OFF https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138880 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148128] Mark page center on horizontal and vertical rulers
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148128 m3521...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148128] Mark page center on horizontal and vertical rulers
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148128 --- Comment #18 from m3521...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #15) > (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #14) > > Is you m3521...@gmail.com too? > > No, why? :-) > > > And seeing the discussion, setting to 'unconfirmed' looks more logic. > > So, this is an interesting semantic question. I assume that if something is > marked as WONTFIX, that also means confirming the reported behavior. My > reopening only challenged the decision not to fix it. > > I have noticed, however, that there's a tendency to use UNCONFIRMED for what > is essentially "confirmed, but we haven't decided what we think about it". > > > IMO the current problem with this issue is, that there are two questions > > being asked to the OP, m3521...@gmail.com, and we've had no reply. > > > > ONE: > > (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #6) > > > But what is "page center"? In regard to total paper size or only up to > > > gutter? > > > > TWO: > > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7) > > > The topic was on the agenda of the design meeting. > > > > > > If you are still interested in just marking the center, what workflow > > > would > > > be supported? And the center is not clear: does it include gutter, is it > > > the > > > center of the page or the text area (excluding margins, borders, spacing), > > > and if so, are there many centers for columns or sections? > > > > > > So could the OP be so kind pls :) ? > > Ok, NEEDINFO, makes sense I guess. But if OP doesn't answer in a while, > let's just choose our own answers (and OP can later file another issue > asking for behavior change etc.) I actually did previously answer both of these questions. ONE: Marking the center of the page is what I was originally asking for. That is the page proper. When designing documents, you are concerned about how the page looks to the audience. Electronically, the page can be defined in many ways. When printing for presentation, the idea is to use the page proper as an instrument for conveying information. It is a sheet of paper that is the final product. I have noticed that the margin metrics are not as accurate as they could be when viewing the document as it is being created. I often have noticed that the bottom margin looks far off from an equally spaced top margin. I asked for page center to avoid any inaccuracies at print time. Margins can be adjusted to compensate for any differences between view and print. TWO: I am not sure what 'workflow' means in this context. Designing a document IS workflow for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148894] Libreoffice cannot detect IBM Semeru ver 11.15
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148894 kitmu...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148989] writer crash in LO 7.3.3.2 when use scroll page in master documente with 170 pg
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148989 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Severity|normal |major -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148729] Setting Comments to "In Margin" causes links not to be annotated in PDF exports
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148729 --- Comment #3 from Simon Gaeremynck --- Created attachment 180061 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180061=edit A docx file with a hyperlink -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148729] Setting Comments to "In Margin" causes links not to be annotated in PDF exports
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148729 Simon Gaeremynck changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #4 from Simon Gaeremynck --- I can confirm the issue is still present in the most recent 7.4 alpha build. I also attached a test .docx document with a hyperlink that demonstrates the issue. Apologies, my earlier description states to open a PDF file. That's obviously not right. This happens when you start from a _document_ which you then export into a PDF. I use the default PDF viewer on OS x (Preview), but seeing this in other viewers such as pdf.js as well. Version information: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: e5fb120a32d04e241b35a7e63894c744196f576b CPU threads: 10; OS: Mac OS X 12.0.1; UI render: Skia/Metal; VCL: osx Locale: en-GB (en_GB.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded URL: https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/MacOSX-x86_64@tb81-TDF/2022-05-10_07.25.43/LibreOfficeDev_7.4.0.0.alpha0_MacOS_x86-64.dmg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149025] formatting problems
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149025 --- Comment #4 from David Melik --- If you saw the .ods, everything is decimals but when ‘Tools->options->libreoffice calc->calculate->general calculations->limit decimals for decimal number format->0’ is set, it only hides most decimals (summed columns' operands, and the first column sum but not sums two to nine.) If this isn't a bug, what is it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149023] Unexpected change of color property after changing once, and selecting another image
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149023 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com |desktop.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Caolán McNamara --- works as expected with gtk, but as described with gen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148801] Technomiz
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148801 Michael Warner changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|General |deletionRequest Product|Document Liberation Project |LibreOffice Resolution|--- |INVALID -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149028] assisttrading
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149028 Michael Warner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149028] assisttrading
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149028 Michael Warner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|Android Viewer |deletionRequest URL|https://www.assisttradingma | |ster.com| Resolution|--- |INVALID -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126710] fileopen: Calc can not open xlsx, consuming tens gigs of RAM (memory leak)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126710 --- Comment #7 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> --- still repro in Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 3a05acb8f0d94728ea6cbfd7a69dac6ffa7ffc68 CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU); UI: ru-RU Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #28 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #27) Or as a sidebar, providing the necessary vertical space for the results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104839] [META] Saved XLSX files that MS Excel can't open
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104839 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||148835 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148835 [Bug 148835] save to Excel breaks XLSX from 7.4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148835] save to Excel breaks XLSX from 7.4
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148835 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kelem...@ubuntu.com --- Comment #5 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) --- *** Bug 149034 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104839] [META] Saved XLSX files that MS Excel can't open
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104839 Bug 104839 depends on bug 149034, which changed state. Bug 149034 Summary: FILESAVE XLSX Saved trivial file opens with "Catastrophic failure" in older Excel https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149034 What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148835] save to Excel breaks XLSX from 7.4
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148835 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||104839 Regression By||Tomaž Vajngerl Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104839 [Bug 104839] [META] Saved XLSX files that MS Excel can't open -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149034] FILESAVE XLSX Saved trivial file opens with "Catastrophic failure" in older Excel
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149034 Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) --- (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #4) > Is this the same as bug 148835? Likely, the error message is the same with the example of that bug and the bibisect as well. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 148835 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120200] [META] Update or correct help for features
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120200 Bug 120200 depends on bug 148861, which changed state. Bug 148861 Summary: Help page for Outline toolbar in Impress needs updating https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148861 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #23 from Heiko Tietze --- Just replied to your "...1600 x 900 has been a common resolution". Adding a large dropdown either exceed the predefined maximum width - and would be cut off for many users - or require to remove a lot interactions. Let's say all insert functions. Since we want to make the Notebookbar/Tabs the default my take regarding the classic UI is therefore WF. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #23 from Heiko Tietze --- Just replied to your "...1600 x 900 has been a common resolution". Adding a large dropdown either exceed the predefined maximum width - and would be cut off for many users - or require to remove a lot interactions. Let's say all insert functions. Since we want to make the Notebookbar/Tabs the default my take regarding the classic UI is therefore WF. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148894] Libreoffice cannot detect IBM Semeru ver 11.15
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148894 --- Comment #5 from kitmu...@yahoo.com --- (In reply to kitmubet from comment #4) > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #3) > > Hello Kitmubet, > > Could you please try to reproduce it with a master build from > > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ ? > > You can install it alongside the standard version. > > I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to > > 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the master build > its fixed at libreoffice Dev Version 7.3.4+ Version: 7.3.4.0.0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 4500514571e389dec40f90d9d40dc568d5e4c490 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL ive change the status to resolved worksforme or should someone else do it?? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134552] EDITING Calc custom row height not applied with very large spreadsheets
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134552 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andis.lazd...@gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Timur --- *** Bug 148944 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148944] Screen disordered in spreadsheets when 'Enable very large spreadsheets' is enabled
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148944 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Timur --- Yes, but it was already fixed. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 134552 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148730] UI: Unexpected tristate situation in Format -> Paragraph -> Text flow tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148730 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com |desktop.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Caolán McNamara --- probably makes sense to set the widow/orphan state from the para properties even if the do not split is active -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148989] writer crash in LO 7.3.3.2 when use scroll page in master documente with 170 pg
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148989 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|luisjosegar...@gmail.com|libreoffice-b...@lists.free ||desktop.org --- Comment #3 from Timur --- Assignee means you will create a fix. I guess you filled it by error, so I remove. Please make a full screencast and attach. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148740] UI Issue: In View->Styles, the `+` gets hidden when the cursor is on a parent style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148740 --- Comment #10 from Caolán McNamara --- we "draw" the lines, but we use an icon for the expand/unexpand. Another option might be to "draw" the expand/unexpand (we have decoview thing for that) which would presumably draw the expander in the same color that the grid lines are down in and solve it that way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148801] Technomiz
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148801 Michael Warner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #24 from John Mills --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #23) > Just replied to your "...1600 x 900 has been a common resolution". Adding a > large dropdown either exceed the predefined maximum width - and would be cut > off for many users - or require to remove a lot interactions. Let's say all > insert functions. > > Since we want to make the Notebookbar/Tabs the default my take regarding the > classic UI is therefore WF. Hi again Heiko, What I wouldn't like to see is that this is rejected for the 'classic' toolbar with a promise this is implemented in the notebook bar interface and then that doesn't happen. I would like to see it in both and there is a benefit for users of LibreOffice if it is. If the display is below a certain pixel size can it simply not be displayed? Is the interface responsive enough that this could be done? It seems that the current 800-pixel limit is a detriment for serious changes to the classic UI. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #24 from John Mills --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #23) > Just replied to your "...1600 x 900 has been a common resolution". Adding a > large dropdown either exceed the predefined maximum width - and would be cut > off for many users - or require to remove a lot interactions. Let's say all > insert functions. > > Since we want to make the Notebookbar/Tabs the default my take regarding the > classic UI is therefore WF. Hi again Heiko, What I wouldn't like to see is that this is rejected for the 'classic' toolbar with a promise this is implemented in the notebook bar interface and then that doesn't happen. I would like to see it in both and there is a benefit for users of LibreOffice if it is. If the display is below a certain pixel size can it simply not be displayed? Is the interface responsive enough that this could be done? It seems that the current 800-pixel limit is a detriment for serious changes to the classic UI. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149025] formatting problems
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149025 --- Comment #5 from Timur --- It's a user error. I can easily explain, but that defeats a purpose of BZ and converts it into help tool, loosing focus on bugs and overwhelming us volunteers. So please use ask.libreoffice.org. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #30 from John Mills --- Created attachment 180063 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180063=edit Possible location for the HUD? If there is not enough horizontal space at the top of the panel in classic mode could it be moved to the bottom of the LibreOffice Window as in the attached screenshot? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #29 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #27) > What if really use Find toolbar for that? With a "special" mode "search for > commands" instead of "search for text"? > Positioning the command search at the bottom (like Firefox's 'Find in page') was suggested for bug 91874. So sure, the Find toolbar might be pressed into service for feeding the dialog. But then for simplicity we'd suppressed the 'Navigate by' listbox on the Find toolbar, searching text values by default, yet keeping the Find code common for use in the Sidebar Navigator deck. Seems a slippery slope requiring a lot of rework. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #29 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #27) > What if really use Find toolbar for that? With a "special" mode "search for > commands" instead of "search for text"? > Positioning the command search at the bottom (like Firefox's 'Find in page') was suggested for bug 91874. So sure, the Find toolbar might be pressed into service for feeding the dialog. But then for simplicity we'd suppressed the 'Navigate by' listbox on the Find toolbar, searching text values by default, yet keeping the Find code common for use in the Sidebar Navigator deck. Seems a slippery slope requiring a lot of rework. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #30 from John Mills --- Created attachment 180063 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180063=edit Possible location for the HUD? If there is not enough horizontal space at the top of the panel in classic mode could it be moved to the bottom of the LibreOffice Window as in the attached screenshot? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148848] Make "Auto Spellcheck" a module-level or document-level option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148848 --- Comment #10 from Rafael Lima --- (In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #9) > Could it be, seeing your report, that it is because you use the Ubuntu > packages? > (Ubuntu package version: 1:7.3.2~rc2-0ubuntu0.21.10.1~lo1) Hi Cor. I don't think so. I also tested the steps from Comment #8 using LO 7.4 alpha built from source and the bug is still reproducible. System info: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 4351a6ca782e1d2081ba819338ebbf6a2d2ee2b2 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148894] Libreoffice cannot detect IBM Semeru ver 11.15
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148894 --- Comment #4 from kitmu...@yahoo.com --- (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #3) > Hello Kitmubet, > Could you please try to reproduce it with a master build from > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/ ? > You can install it alongside the standard version. > I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to > 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the master build its fixed at libreoffice Dev Version 7.3.4+ Version: 7.3.4.0.0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 4500514571e389dec40f90d9d40dc568d5e4c490 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144387] Numbering schema does not work for non-heading styles from second level
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144387 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Orwel from comment #7) > I reported Bug 144387 marked as duplicate of this bug. I can confirm, that > in version Version: 7.3.2.2 (x64) / Build ID: > 49f2b1bff42cfccbd8f788c8dc32c1c309559be0 > the issue (I described in Bug 144387) is resolved. You meant to say bug 145628. Ok, let's close -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148997] Gratuitous page break in table-of-contents of ODT in Linux (OK Win)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148997 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bibisected --- Comment #5 from Timur --- Regression around 3.6. In 43all it's a rather large range: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range=bd6310886dc4351a8ac3ed3ee9a4f65d2a0e005c..9e6b086c62b4144058eb52ca40b562ff61e26a68 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149012] Options tab for Frame, Object, Image needs to be updated
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149012 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120200] [META] Update or correct help for features
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120200 Bug 120200 depends on bug 149012, which changed state. Bug 149012 Summary: Options tab for Frame, Object, Image needs to be updated https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149012 What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149027] MS Word conversion/replication problems
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149027 --- Comment #5 from David Melik --- No, the source document isn't .doc; that was deleted a long time ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148632] Point Bookmarks are not removed when the Table of Contents are removed. Can't get rid of them
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148632 --- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze --- Obviously there is a metacharacter. Maybe not a bookmark since it doesn't show in blue in older versions. Will have a closer look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 50400] PDF export: Warn that password field does not accept Unicode characters other than ASCII (see Comment 6)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50400 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyHack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148740] UI Issue: In View->Styles, the `+` gets hidden when the cursor is on a parent style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148740 --- Comment #11 from Caolán McNamara --- Created attachment 180062 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180062=edit how that would look here's what would happen if we tried that with the prototype of https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/134168 it would look like this for all icon-themes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148729] Setting Comments to "In Margin" causes links not to be annotated in PDF exports
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148729 --- Comment #5 from Dieter --- (In reply to Simon Gaeremynck from comment #3) > Created attachment 180061 [details] > A docx file with a hyperlink Thank you for the document. I will test it later. One question: Does it only happen with docx-files? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #25 from John Mills --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #23) > Just replied to your "...1600 x 900 has been a common resolution". Adding a > large dropdown either exceed the predefined maximum width - and would be cut > off for many users - or require to remove a lot interactions. Let's say all > insert functions. > > Since we want to make the Notebookbar/Tabs the default my take regarding the > classic UI is therefore WF. Regarding this statement: 'Since we want to make the Notebookbar/Tabs the default my take regarding the classic UI is therefore WF.' Is this now actually the direction that TDF intend to take? I think it makes a lot of sense but clearly there is disagreement. Is there a timeline for how long this migration will take? Cheers, John -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #25 from John Mills --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #23) > Just replied to your "...1600 x 900 has been a common resolution". Adding a > large dropdown either exceed the predefined maximum width - and would be cut > off for many users - or require to remove a lot interactions. Let's say all > insert functions. > > Since we want to make the Notebookbar/Tabs the default my take regarding the > classic UI is therefore WF. Regarding this statement: 'Since we want to make the Notebookbar/Tabs the default my take regarding the classic UI is therefore WF.' Is this now actually the direction that TDF intend to take? I think it makes a lot of sense but clearly there is disagreement. Is there a timeline for how long this migration will take? Cheers, John -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148987] Change of header height is not shown, save/reload of document fixes it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148987 Timur changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected Regression By||Michael Stahl CC||michael.st...@allotropia.de --- Comment #3 from Timur --- Repro in 43max. The first bad commit could be any of: 0aff98059cfd270d5085be57ca6ae68fc37462ed 4ab282e04cdc434fb375a4c36936a1e9906a2d37 527fc900185fa39847d8eff01c8eff7c7f311bd1 6e7ee87a96677ade84eed4d900bb3deb57e88bec b885d75221d52ce3e4f5aa39d60297a7cbb159c4 37da6ab11b7ee5bcea9891afaa6fb319f3b93698 eb0991b6652d3c1bdd56aea0ae58a6f2624220eb b9f8ceabb71e0d29d148365fedafff679a8b8cfb f9df820d914d0664ac5b60f2adf829118165ad0f 3e4abffa5e191abd17c523115c4086832a4f2316 But I think it's in: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range=94c772adc2e8d8af468f3996527c84bf7704103f..a5ce8c77a0b2dca2ab5a3564feed1cd3b8104eaa Let's try with the famous name here: author Michael Stahl2013-12-20 commit e936ecc92a7e362f57ce72a955697840920636b8 fdo#69065: sw: fix mirrored page style with first-page author Michael Stahl2013-12-20 commit 899538a155b0d58f3a864dbc26d0dc7c37386807 fdo#71429: sw: fix crashes when changing header first sharing Michael, please see. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 50400] PDF export: Warn that password field does not accept Unicode characters other than ASCII (see Comment 6)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50400 Michael Warner changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55 ||425 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91 ||874 --- Comment #26 from V Stuart Foote --- The HUD pop-up dialog was the result of quikee's implementation of much broader requests for see also bug 91874, it resulted in UNO .uno:CommandPopup assigned to the + shortcut, and menu resident as the Help -> Search Commands The HUD style dialog--offering an input line and a non-resizable panel listing the search results--is rudimentary but functional. With minor tweaks needed--make it resizable and relocatable. It matches the same feature in GIMP. The UNO can be customized onto other key bindings, or added to any menu/context menu and works now to provide an action to launch the dialog. It was not included in the assemblage of Notebook Bar commands, so currently can't be added there. No icon was assigned to the UNO, so its text "Search Commands" will appear when added to a Toolbar or Menu. Additional work, e.g. integrating the index of commands with os/DE search is called for. And, it should be possible to link the dialogs search field to an input combobox suitable for placement on toolbar or menu. But merging this command centric search with functions already resident in the Find, and Find & Replace toolbar/dialogs is less compelling and would require major refactoring in both areas. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 91874] A Search by function or keyword over main menu-- similar to SpotLight, Tell Me, or Ubuntu's HUD but native for LO GUI
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91874 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||8967 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #27 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Pedro from comment #13) > Depicitng the Find toolbar as a potential HUD toolbar. What if really use Find toolbar for that? With a "special" mode "search for commands" instead of "search for text"? (Maybe it's a nonsense, I just saw the attachment 180056 wording ant figured that could be a possibility) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #27 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Pedro from comment #13) > Depicitng the Find toolbar as a potential HUD toolbar. What if really use Find toolbar for that? With a "special" mode "search for commands" instead of "search for text"? (Maybe it's a nonsense, I just saw the attachment 180056 wording ant figured that could be a possibility) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #31 from Pedro --- Addressing the comments of Heiko about the length of my display: the beautiful thing of making available the HUD as a toolbar is that you can relocate it to wherever you want it. That's just my preference for a default location. Other points to consider: First - width of the HUD field should have minimum resolution into consideration, ofcourse. This was a quick mock-up to help visualize what is being discussed. Second - I was not aware that we wanted to make the Tabbed UI the default. I believe that the HUD should also be visible in the Tabbed UI, but in there it's harder to decide where to place it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149035] New: Falla de filtro hoja de calculo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149035 Bug ID: 149035 Summary: Falla de filtro hoja de calculo Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.3.2 release Hardware: All OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: sergio.bauti...@udes.edu.co Los filtros de la hoja de calculo cuando se selecciona se expande hacia la derecha de forma constante. Esto ocurre en Linux Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS (Bionic Beaver), LibreOffice 7.3.3.2 -- The spreadsheet filters when selected expand to the right constantly. This occurs on Linux Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS (Bionic Beaver), LibreOffice 7.3.3.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #32 from V Stuart Foote --- There are NO TDF plans to make the MUFFIN 'Tabbed' Notebook Bar the default. The LibreOffice Menu - Toolbar - Dialog w/ Sidebar will remain the primary (and supported) interface cross platform. Any divergence from that would require development effort and native code cross platform that is not feasible, nor justifiable. And this has *nothing* to do with this topic. "Discussion" here is off-topic and pointless to what is a valid enhancement request. @Heiko, please confirm the TDF position. Stuart -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #33 from John Mills --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #32) > There are NO TDF plans to make the MUFFIN 'Tabbed' Notebook Bar the default. > > The LibreOffice Menu - Toolbar - Dialog w/ Sidebar will remain the primary > (and supported) interface cross platform. Any divergence from that would > require development effort and native code cross platform that is not > feasible, nor justifiable. > > And this has *nothing* to do with this topic. "Discussion" here is off-topic > and pointless to what is a valid enhancement request. > > @Heiko, please confirm the TDF position. Stuart Not to be dismissive of your opinion but the muffin notebook bar tabbed interface is the best option for new users coming to LibreOffice. The 'classic' legacy interface is becoming an increasing detriment to the adoption of LibreOffice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #33 from John Mills --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #32) > There are NO TDF plans to make the MUFFIN 'Tabbed' Notebook Bar the default. > > The LibreOffice Menu - Toolbar - Dialog w/ Sidebar will remain the primary > (and supported) interface cross platform. Any divergence from that would > require development effort and native code cross platform that is not > feasible, nor justifiable. > > And this has *nothing* to do with this topic. "Discussion" here is off-topic > and pointless to what is a valid enhancement request. > > @Heiko, please confirm the TDF position. Stuart Not to be dismissive of your opinion but the muffin notebook bar tabbed interface is the best option for new users coming to LibreOffice. The 'classic' legacy interface is becoming an increasing detriment to the adoption of LibreOffice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 112700] [META] DOC (binary) table-related issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112700 Bug 112700 depends on bug 132925, which changed state. Bug 132925 Summary: The part of Writer table cell border is not displayed https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132925 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132925] The part of Writer table cell border is not displayed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132925 Vadim changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Vadim --- Версия: 6.3.4.2 (x64) ID сборки: 60da17e045e08f1793c57c00ba83cdfce946d0aa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107701] [META] Table border bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107701 Bug 107701 depends on bug 132925, which changed state. Bug 132925 Summary: The part of Writer table cell border is not displayed https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132925 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 142379] Incorrect shape scaling silhouette
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142379 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #3 from Buovjaga --- Not reproduced. Can you re-test with the latest version? Set to NEEDINFO. Change back to UNCONFIRMED, if the problem persists. Change to RESOLVED WORKSFORME, if the problem went away. Version: 7.3.3.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348 CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141485] Flashing UI of sidebar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141485 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from Buovjaga --- Do you still see this? Do you see this using other sessions besides Xfce? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139872] Page style printing paper is not reflected
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139872 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #2 from Buovjaga --- Do you still see this with 7.3? I think there were some fixes. No problem for me. Set to NEEDINFO. Change back to UNCONFIRMED, if the problem persists. Change to RESOLVED WORKSFORME, if the problem went away. Version: 7.3.3.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348 CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141694] Cursor flickers and returns to base state when selecting text (gtk3 + Wayland)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141694 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Summary|Cursor flicks and return to |Cursor flickers and returns |base state when selecting |to base state when |text|selecting text (gtk3 + ||Wayland) --- Comment #5 from Buovjaga --- Can you still reproduce with 7.3? There were many gtk3 fixes in the past year. Set to NEEDINFO. Change back to UNCONFIRMED, if the problem persists. Change to RESOLVED WORKSFORME, if the problem went away. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 122657] Converting .odt file to PDF contains fonts that are not in the .odf file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122657 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Version|unspecified |4.4.5.2 release Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #20 from Buovjaga --- Can you still reproduce with LibreOffice 7.3? Set to NEEDINFO. Change back to UNCONFIRMED, if the problem persists. Change to RESOLVED WORKSFORME, if the problem went away. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149029] UI: Scroll to the select object in the Animation panel on selecting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149029 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com |desktop.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 142227] [EDITING] Image displayed in the wrong place when it is inside an outline-group and sheet is set to freeze-row-and-columns
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142227 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[EDITING] Image displayed |[EDITING] Image displayed |in a wrong place when it is |in the wrong place when it |inside an outline-group and |is inside an outline-group |sheet is set to |and sheet is set to |freeze-row-and-columns |freeze-row-and-columns Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #6 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to zzz from comment #0) > Steps to Reproduce: > 1. Open attached file FoldTestFd3.ods > 2. On the left edge of the pane, click the "+" button in the outline-group > indicator column "1", to unfold that outline-group. I don't see the problem with your file. Can you re-test with 7.3? Set to NEEDINFO. Change back to UNCONFIRMED, if the problem persists. Change to RESOLVED WORKSFORME, if the problem went away. Version: 7.3.3.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348 CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141899] Fail selection on the text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141899 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Buovjaga --- rmbeer: was this in a Wayland session? Do you still see this with 7.3? Set to NEEDINFO. Change back to UNCONFIRMED, if the problem persists. Change to RESOLVED WORKSFORME, if the problem went away. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 142491] sometimes quotes are attached to an URL in a cell
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142491 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Buovjaga --- Thilo: do you have reliable steps to reproduce this or was this just a human error? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149010] "Previous Link" and "Next Link" should only appear on Frames Options tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149010 --- Comment #3 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Additional UXEval question -- Can the heading be improved for the section where Previous Link and Next Link appear? "Names" is neither informative nor accurate -- but have not been able to formulate a good alternative. If "Previous Link" and "Next Link" will only appear with Frames, then Image and Object will only have Name, Text Alternative, and Description. I tried, without success, to find a label that would refer primarily to those functions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 137639] Copying and pasting English text converts it to Chinese
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137639 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #13 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Munzir Taha from comment #8) > Unfortunately, the bug comes again. I will do my best attaching more > debugging information. > > Attached is a bug.odt file that contains a link. Just right-click -> Edit > Hyperlink, Copy the http url, close the dialog and paste the text any where > in the page and you get the Chinese characters. I let them live in the file > for now. I tried with attachment 174106, but I don't see the problem. Do you still see it with version 7.3? Set to NEEDINFO. Change back to UNCONFIRMED, if the problem persists. Change to RESOLVED WORKSFORME, if the problem went away. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.3.3.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.17; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US 7.3.3-2 Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149010] "Previous Link" and "Next Link" should only appear on Frames Options tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149010 --- Comment #3 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Additional UXEval question -- Can the heading be improved for the section where Previous Link and Next Link appear? "Names" is neither informative nor accurate -- but have not been able to formulate a good alternative. If "Previous Link" and "Next Link" will only appear with Frames, then Image and Object will only have Name, Text Alternative, and Description. I tried, without success, to find a label that would refer primarily to those functions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149037] Should "Name" and "Description" have icons in the Format menu?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149037 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Blocks||85811 Keywords||needsUXEval Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85811 [Bug 85811] [META] Main menu bar bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 85811] [META] Main menu bar bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85811 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149037 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149037 [Bug 149037] Should "Name" and "Description" have icons in the Format menu? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149037] Should "Name" and "Description" have icons in the Format menu?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149037 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Blocks||85811 Keywords||needsUXEval Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85811 [Bug 85811] [META] Main menu bar bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149013] Description of images, OLE objects and shapes is not exported to HTML
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149013 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||149012 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149012 [Bug 149012] Options tab for Frame, Object, Image needs to be updated -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149012] Options tab for Frame, Object, Image needs to be updated
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149012 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149013 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149013 [Bug 149013] Description of images, OLE objects and shapes is not exported to HTML -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138468] Cell background color selection widget UI in side-bar now extra step of palette selection droplist
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138468 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #14 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to R. Bingham from comment #7) > (In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #6) > > So strange. Can you reset your user profile using menu item Help-Restart in > > Safe Mode? > > Restart in Safe Mode (no options selected) does restore the color picker I/F > working as expected but of course without any palatte entries that may have > been created by extensions. So then likely some extension > install/update/uninstall horked the the color picker widget config in the > user profile. Assuming this is the case, then 2 courses of recovery: Then it is some unknown "corruption" of the user profile. You may zip up the profile and attach it, if you want, but I'm not sure if anyone can use it to troubleshoot. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149013] Description of images, OLE objects and shapes is not exported to HTML
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149013 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #2 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Once the "expected" LO behavior is clarified, then I will update the help page for the Description control in the Description dialog [1]. The entry for that control will also be included in the help page for the Options tab [2]. The existing text in [1] appears to have been written in 2003 and never updated. Perhaps corrections, clarifications, additions are needed. Will add NeedsUXEval. [1] https://help.libreoffice.org/7.4/en-US/text/shared/01/05190100.html [2] https://help.libreoffice.org/7.4/en-US/text/swriter/01/05060900.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149013] Description of images, OLE objects and shapes is not exported to HTML
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149013 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #2 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Once the "expected" LO behavior is clarified, then I will update the help page for the Description control in the Description dialog [1]. The entry for that control will also be included in the help page for the Options tab [2]. The existing text in [1] appears to have been written in 2003 and never updated. Perhaps corrections, clarifications, additions are needed. Will add NeedsUXEval. [1] https://help.libreoffice.org/7.4/en-US/text/shared/01/05190100.html [2] https://help.libreoffice.org/7.4/en-US/text/swriter/01/05060900.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143705] Distortion of Armenian letters
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143705 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bibisectRequest, regression Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Blocks||71732 Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #4 from Buovjaga --- Repro, but not with 3.5.0. Might be the transition to HarfBuzz. Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 172e208e6b0674f42c301c5ee5e280e9138ba1b4 CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Jumbo Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71732 [Bug 71732] [META] Bugs related to text rendering, typography and font features in LO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71732] [META] Bugs related to text rendering, typography and font features in LO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71732 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||143705 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143705 [Bug 143705] Distortion of Armenian letters -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139402] FORMATTING: Default font color for form controls is set to black but displays as gray
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139402 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Buovjaga --- No problem here. Do you still reproduce with 7.3? Please copy and paste here the contents of your Help - About. This allows us to know more about your system. Set to NEEDINFO. Change back to UNCONFIRMED, if the problem persists. Change to RESOLVED WORKSFORME, if the problem went away. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.3.3.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 30(Build:2) CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.17; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US 7.3.3-2 Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #35 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #32) > @Heiko, please confirm the TDF position. Stuart TDF has no position, the team facilitates the work around LibreOffice. The ESC usually gives favorable consideration to my recommendations, which I take from user input, done at bug 135501. So I plan to change it (affects new installation only). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143789] Sub contained in document can not call Sub from local Standard library: Freeze when tried.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143789 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #5 from Buovjaga --- Ok, let's close for now -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148967] Include a HUD inside the Standard toolbar as text field (today you can add it only as button)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148967 --- Comment #35 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #32) > @Heiko, please confirm the TDF position. Stuart TDF has no position, the team facilitates the work around LibreOffice. The ESC usually gives favorable consideration to my recommendations, which I take from user input, done at bug 135501. So I plan to change it (affects new installation only). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148740] UI Issue: In View->Styles, the `+` gets hidden when the cursor is on a parent style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148740 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kain...@gmail.com, ||riz...@libreoffice.org Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze --- Thanks Caolan, looks good to me. Rizal, Andreas: Do you accept to replace the themed expander icons by what comes from the system? At least I guess so, or is SymbolType::SPIN_DOWN some triangle vector in the end? On other places we run into trouble with self-made triangles in case of high resolution. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107139] [META] Breeze icons
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107139 Rafael Lima changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149036 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149036 [Bug 149036] Missing icon for "Label Field" using Breeze (dark) icon theme -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149036] New: Missing icon for "Label Field" using Breeze (dark) icon theme
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149036 Bug ID: 149036 Summary: Missing icon for "Label Field" using Breeze (dark) icon theme Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.2.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com Created attachment 180065 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180065=edit Screenshot showing the problem Hi! I was using the Basic Dialog Editor and noticed that the icon for the "Label Field" command hasn't been adapted to dark theme. I am using the "Breeze (dark)" icon theme. All is good with Colibre dark and Sifr dark. See attached image for more information. System info: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 4351a6ca782e1d2081ba819338ebbf6a2d2ee2b2 CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149036] Missing icon for "Label Field" using Breeze (dark) icon theme
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149036 Rafael Lima changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||107139 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107139 [Bug 107139] [META] Breeze icons -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149037] New: Should "Name" and "Description" have icons in the Format menu?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149037 Bug ID: 149037 Summary: Should "Name" and "Description" have icons in the Format menu? Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.4.0.0 alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: UI Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: sdc.bla...@youmail.dk The Format menu has icons for most of its commands, but "Name" and "Description" are some of the few exceptions. Meanwhile "Name" and "Description" do have icons in the context menus, which raises the question. Are the icons missing by intention in the menu? Or should they be included now? codepointer: remove menu:style="text" in the following 9 files https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?project=core=%22.uno%3AObjectTitleDescription%5C%22+menu%3Astyle%3D%5C%22text%5C%22%2F%22===1=full=full -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145722] Basic Editor : impossible to copy a module or a dialog to an another worksheet.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145722 raal changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected Regression By||caol...@redhat.com CC||caol...@redhat.com, ||r...@post.cz --- Comment #8 from raal --- This seems to have begun at the below commit. Adding Cc: to Caolán McNamara; Could you possibly take a look at this one? Thanks 1422df3e1338ce034c616dfbc3248b0fb3436c7f is the first bad commit commit 1422df3e1338ce034c616dfbc3248b0fb3436c7f Author: Jenkins Build User Date: Thu Jun 13 02:07:30 2019 +0200 source sha:ad1cbee2ffc7b3c10cad6fd69f5e4b523ac4027c https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/ad1cbee2ffc7b3c10cad6fd69f5e4b523ac4027c weld OrganizeDialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
