[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871 --- Comment #52 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Telesto from comment #50) Oh. I tried hard to explain the problem to Telesto. Tried to explain the idea behind the feature; its intended user base; who exactly is the model user. In the end, answering Telesto's request for simple steps, I wrote roughly this: > See: here is a complex functionality, with involved mix of inheritance, > layers, dependencies, etc, which is very useful, but from Benjamin's PoV, > behaves almost randomly. > > => But here is the button created for Benjamin <= > > after pressing which, the function becomes simple for Benjamin, at the cost > of masking all the complex machinery beneath. > > Now Telesto wants to break the behaviour of the button, in such a way that > using it results in another complex behaviour, potentially useful for some > power users, but still confusing for Benjamin. I hoped that it's rather clear for anyone, that if there is a functionality is created for some user base, then breaking it exactly for that user base is a no-go. Well, the reply is: > Yes, it's correct; but I fail to see why you say that it's OK above the > "=> But here is the button created for Benjamin <=", > but having the same below the line is inappropriate... Am I the one who, respectfully assuming due intelligence in the opponent, starts suspecting being trolled? I am done here, trying to "discuss" something with a troll and spammer, who floods Bugzilla with zillions of low-quality "reports" (unlike in the beginning); making one who sees "this bug authored by Telesto" to react like "ah, this is safe to skip". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136863] Inserted Math equations are not visible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136863 --- Comment #6 from BogdanB --- Working well in Version: 7.0.1.2 (x64) Build ID: 7cbcfc562f6eb6708b5ff7d7397325de9e764452 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19041; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136527] Resizing textboxes in LibreOffice Impress is terribly slow.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136527 --- Comment #3 from BogdanB --- No problem in Version: 7.0.1.2 (x64) Build ID: 7cbcfc562f6eb6708b5ff7d7397325de9e764452 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19041; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 99385] Libreoffice installation not creating a Libreoffice Writer shortcut in the right click/New Desktop menu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99385 Martin Hooper changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103303] [META] Desktop integration bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103303 Bug 103303 depends on bug 99385, which changed state. Bug 99385 Summary: Libreoffice installation not creating a Libreoffice Writer shortcut in the right click/New Desktop menu https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99385 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136947] New: No 'Emojis & Symbols' integration into LO macOS
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136947 Bug ID: 136947 Summary: No 'Emojis & Symbols' integration into LO macOS Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.4.3.2 release Hardware: All OS: Mac OS X (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: gtomor...@libero.it Description: https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/266979/why-cant-i-access-the-native-mac-character-viewer-from-libreoffice-apps/?comment=267101#post-id-267101 This person is asking why they can't access the system-wide menu item, `Edit > Emojis & Symbols (Cmd-Ctrl-Spacebar)` in LO. And in fact, LibreOffice, being about as cross-platform as you can get, is missing this standard system-wide command -- something I'd never noticed before in all the years of using LO on OSX/macOS! Major cross-platform FLOSS examples that contain `Emojis & Symbols (Cmd-Ctrl-Spacebar)`: - Firefox - GIMP - Inkscape - Krita - XQuartz - ...and I have no idea why(!) other than `Emojis & Symbols` is standard and automatic in the GUI toolkit Major cross-platform FLOSS examples that don't: - Scribus - This is especially unforgivable, moreso than LO - Blender - Forgivable as 1) Blender is on another "planet" and 2) formatted documents and typography in a strict sense isn't done in Blender - Raw Therapee - Like Blender, RT has no text entry capabilities (discounting commenting photos) File under ~Minor not under ~"Enhancement". Thank you. Steps to Reproduce: 1. In LO (any component) macOS, press `Cmd-Ctrl-Spacebar` - Nothing happens 2. Choose `Edit > Emojis & Symbols` to invoke system-wide Emojis & Symbols palette Actual Results: Nothing: the item doesn't exist Expected Results: Using either method outlined above, the macOS Emojis & Symbols palette should appear Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Tested on: Version: 6.4.3.2 Build ID: 747b5d0ebf89f41c860ec2a39efd7cb15b54f2d8 CPU threads: 8; OS: Mac OS X 10.13.6; UI render: default; VCL: osx; Locale: it-IT (it_IT.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104005] Expert Configuration dialog does not respect finalized configuration values
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104005 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Andras Timar, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88370] Hebrew Smart Quotes Behaviour Complex and Unconfigurable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88370 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- Dear Amir Adar, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136558] Function Wizard Structure tree should correspond to interactions with formula
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136558 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136297] Spreadsheet Theme throws BASIC runtime error
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136297 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136252] Can't assign Alt+- to function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136252 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131584] dll file error
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131584 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Sam, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136536] Bullets become red (font color) after save & reload (ODT)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136536 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130869] Duplicated access key for insertar seccion(c) and insertar cabecera y pie(c)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130869 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136560] LibreOffice should support Office Forms Based Authentication Protocol
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136560 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136547] Impress 7.0 won't play embedded video's when Skia is enabled
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136547 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 99385] Libreoffice installation not creating a Libreoffice Writer shortcut in the right click/New Desktop menu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99385 --- Comment #13 from QA Administrators --- Dear Martin Hooper, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133749] Slow saving with "support for large sheets enabled" compared to normal
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133749 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136548] Poor kerning preview (maybe font-related)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136548 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90771] Radio Button: embedded pictures are lost on save
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90771 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- Dear Alfred.Maier3, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130869] Duplicated access key for insertar seccion(c) and insertar cabecera y pie(c)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130869 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear fjmangas, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131514] hierarchical numbering of Chapters and Headings works for PDF but doesn't make it to EPUB file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131514 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131558] Crash in: mergedlo.dll
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131558 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear roland, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136538] Wrong default UI language selections for custom install on Japanese Windows
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136538 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131514] hierarchical numbering of Chapters and Headings works for PDF but doesn't make it to EPUB file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131514 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89501] Finalized configuration items set in Windows Registry can be overridden by user and can cause crashes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89501 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear hastegan, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88270] Hebrew Smart Quotes Symbols Inconsistent When Switching Between Languages
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88270 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear Amir Adar, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127237] FileOpen: PPTX Shading - Table Background color missing in Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127237 --- Comment #17 from nd101 --- Yes, it is fixed! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127237] FileOpen: PPTX Shading - Table Background color missing in Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127237 nd101 changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136863] Inserted Math equations are not visible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136863 --- Comment #5 from cowboy1...@gmail.com --- Version: 7.0.1.2 (x64) Build ID: 7cbcfc562f6eb6708b5ff7d7397325de9e764452 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136527] Resizing textboxes in LibreOffice Impress is terribly slow.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136527 --- Comment #2 from Petkra Eraus --- Is there anything happening with my report or ... is this it? Will it be reviewed or something? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136946] New: Add "Shapes" sidebar from LO Draw into Impress
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136946 Bug ID: 136946 Summary: Add "Shapes" sidebar from LO Draw into Impress Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.0.1.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com Created attachment 165749 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165749=edit Scheenshot of the "Shapes" sidebar LibreOffice Draw has a very useful sidebar named "Shapes" with which the user can easily navigate and add all basic shapes into their drawings. This sidebar would be very useful in LO Impress as well, because most presentations have shapes as arrows, boxes, flowcharts, callouts, stars, etc. Today, if the user needs to add multiple shapes into a presentation, he/she needs to click on "Insert" and then select which shape to add (I am using the tabbed interface). After adding the shape, the tabbed interface switches to the Draw tab. Hence if the user wants to add more shapes, it is necessary to click on Insert again. If the Shapes sidebar were available, it would be a lot more productive for the user to prepare a slide with multiple shapes. I would like to point out that this can't be achieved with the "Gallery" sidebar, because the shapes I'm mentioning are not available there. Also, the design of the Shapes sidebar is more adequate for this purpose, because the icons are smaller and more options can fit the screen. Thus, I would like to propose a simple enhancement, which would be to implement the "Shapes" sidebar into LO Impress, exactly as it is on LO Draw. I added an image describing exactly what I am talking about. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136891] Square root does not render correctly with LO 7.0.2+
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136891 --- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Pierre C from comment #10) > Yes, the problem is still present under W10 nor is it correct in the Daily build of master that actually contains the X11 patch ;-) https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/103097 Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: f08ddf3d3df0ef12fef36e96ffe6f5b9a7fda9e3 CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18363; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136945] New: Custom Slide Show drag-and-drop deleting items in "Selected Slides" list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136945 Bug ID: 136945 Summary: Custom Slide Show drag-and-drop deleting items in "Selected Slides" list Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.0.1.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rafael.palma.l...@gmail.com When I try to create a custom slide show (go to Slide Show -> Custom Slide Show -> New), if I drag and drop the items in the "Selected Slides" list to change their order, sometimes the items disappear from the list. Steps to reproduce: 1) Create an Impress presentation with a few slides (e.g. 4 slides) 2) Go to Slide Show -> Custom Slide Show -> New 3) Select some (or all) slides in the "Existing Slides" list and add them to the "Selected Slides" list 4) Try to drag and drop the items in the "Selected Slides" list to change their order; in some occasions, they simply disappear. On other occasions, things work as expected. I think there are some special cases that trigger this issue, but I could not figure it out. This is the build that I'm running: Version: 7.0.1.2 Build ID: 00(Build:2) CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Ubuntu package version: 1:7.0.1_rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136944] EDITING: toolbar "insert special character" works then it does nothing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136944 Terrence Enger changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bisected, regression Severity|normal |minor --- Comment #2 from Terrence Enger --- I am assigning keywords regression, bisected. Because menu option Insert > "Special Character..." remains available, I am reducint the importance to minor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136944] EDITING: toolbar "insert special character" works then it does nothing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136944 --- Comment #1 from Terrence Enger --- Created attachment 165748 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165748=edit bibisect-linux-64-7.1 tail of terminal output Working on in bibisect-linux-64-7.1 repository, I see the bug started: commits-h date --- good 64d6c750 c9c5fd9d 2020-08-27 17:02:02 bad ca93746b fce9d818 2020-08-27 18:32:42 with commit message commit fce9d818e7ddeeb309e56069f67b7fb702ea31a6 Author: Caolán McNamara Date: Thu Aug 27 16:16:03 2020 +0100 add a DisableCycleFocusOut flag for an all-welded hierarchy so we can differentiate the case of embedded welded widgets co-sharing the tab-cycle sequence with vcl widgets vs the case its all welded widgets Change-Id: I5c57b4e98d2f5c543522a72e31d554a67c259307 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/101485 Tested-by: Caolán McNamara Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136944] New: EDITING: toolbar "insert special character" works then it does nothing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136944 Bug ID: 136944 Summary: EDITING: toolbar "insert special character" works then it does nothing Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Master Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: lo_b...@iseries-guru.com These observations are made on debian-buster, initially on a local build of commit b42d5557 (2020-09-10) with SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=gtk3 using a new user profile for each execution. STR ( 1) Run LibreOffice specifying --writer on the command line. Program displays Writer window "Untitled 1". ( 2) In toolbar, click icon . The document area shows a bullet followed by the caret. ( 3) In toolbar, click icon . Program displays dropdown box Favorites. ( 4) Type . Program closes the box and returns focus to the document area. ( 5) Type . Program opens sidebar Styles. ( 6) Click icon . Program displays a different list of styles in the sidebar. ( 7) One of those styles is "Bullet ". Double click that style. In the document area, the round bullet is replaced by a checkmark in a box. ( 8) Right click that style name and from drop-down menu click Modify... . Program presents dialog "Numbering Style: Bullet ". ( 9) Click button . Program returns focus to document area. (10) In toolbar, click icon . Expected : program displays box Favorites. Observed : no visible result. With SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN, no problem is evident. At step (10), the terminal output from local build shows messages, rewrapped and retaining the colorizing strings: (*) Many times: warn:sw.ui:29704:29704:sw/source/uibase/app/docstyle.cxx:1282: GetItemSetForPrev (*) Once: ** (soffice:29704): [1;35mCRITICAL[0m **: [34m16:15:10.668[0m: AtkObject* atk_object_wrapper_new (const com::sun::star::uno::Reference&, AtkObject*, AtkObject*): assertion 'bool(xContext)' failed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101302] Deleted files visible as recent documents in menu and start center
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101302 --- Comment #37 from Thorsten Wagner --- Created attachment 165747 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165747=edit Screenshot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101302] Deleted files visible as recent documents in menu and start center
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101302 --- Comment #36 from Thorsten Wagner --- I did not take a look at the code right now, but all files seem to be checked when opening Startcenter. I attached a screenshot showing an encrypted file, which I renamed and opened the renamed one afterwards. The file no longer present is shown by a small icon only. Would not be the following behaviour enough: (1) Hide files which are no longer present or not accessible during Startcenter launch (as all files seem to be scanned anyway) (2) If a network drive became available during the meantime, missing files will be visible on the next Startcenter launch again (closing the whole application is not required, closing and reopening the Startcenter window is enough) (3) If the number of visible files exceeds the maximum number of files displayed within Startcenter, non accessible or no longer present files will be removed from Startcenter subsequently (4) Deleting recent files removes accessible as well as non existent or not accessible files from Startcenter too The implementation will be probably easy and maybe better than the current behaviour. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136012] Regression: embedded png files look extremely bad in Impress 7.0.x, OK in 6.4.6
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136012 Paul W. changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Linux (All) |All --- Comment #4 from Paul W. --- No repro on Windows Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) OS: Win 10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136943] New: Can't see last font name
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136943 Bug ID: 136943 Summary: Can't see last font name Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.0.1.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: med.medin.2...@gmail.com Created attachment 165746 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165746=edit Can't see last font name Last font name in font list cannot be read. See attached image for more info. Version: 7.0.1.2 Build ID: 00(Build:2) CPU threads: 2; OS: Linux 5.4; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US =7.0.1-1 Calc: threaded Operating System: Manjaro Linux KDE Plasma Version: 5.19.5 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.73.0 Qt Version: 5.15.0 Kernel Version: 5.4.64-1-MANJARO OS Type: 64-bit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136941] Search term not highlighted after re-opening search dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136941 Paul W. changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor --- Comment #1 from Paul W. --- Was not able to duplicate in version 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136891] Square root does not render correctly with LO 7.0.2+
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136891 --- Comment #10 from Pierre C --- Yes, the problem is still present under W10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133723] Writer's defaults are not the same as with the Default template
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133723 --- Comment #4 from andreas_k --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > Writer's defaults are hard-coded. If you load any template it will override > those. So it's working as designed and the only question is whether we > should rename the template because Default might confuse users. I'm not a fan of hard-coded as in addition the default writer template is exact what was done hard-coded. So we can remove hard-coded presets with the template or close the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136942] UI: Autocomplete for search field disturbing workflow
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136942 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136941] Search term not highlighted after re-opening search dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136941 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||6942 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136942] UI: Autocomplete for search field disturbing workflow
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136942 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||6941 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136942] New: UI: Autocomplete for search field disturbing workflow
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136942 Bug ID: 136942 Summary: UI: Autocomplete for search field disturbing workflow Product: LibreOffice Version: 4.4.7.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: UI Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: tele...@surfxs.nl Description: Autocomplete for search field disturbing workflow Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open attachment 165739 2. CTRL+F: Search for Vestibulum 3. Press ESC 4. Press CTRL+F (if text not highlighted press CTRL+F again 5. Type Vest & press Enter Actual Results: Search for Vestibulum Expected Results: I wanted to search for 'Vest'. and got Vestibulum. Maybe an auto suggestion list, instead of filling in the blanks Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: abcc4eb907661e07ad850ccce7eb06f129da4286 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: nl-NL Calc: CL also in 4.4.7.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136941] Search term not highlighted after re-opening search dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136941 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bibisectRequest, regression -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136941] New: Search term not highlighted after re-opening search dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136941 Bug ID: 136941 Summary: Search term not highlighted after re-opening search dialog Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: UI Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: tele...@surfxs.nl Description: Search term not highlighted after re-opening search dialog Steps to Reproduce: 1. open attachment 165739 2. CTRL+F & search for "Vestibulum" 3. CTRL+F search for "Vestibulum" 4. Press ESC 5. Press ESC Vestibulum in search field but not highlighted Actual Results: Vestibulum not highlighted (so not overwritteN-0 Expected Results: Should be overwritten Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: abcc4eb907661e07ad850ccce7eb06f129da4286 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: nl-NL Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136940] A thin vertical line is visible in presentation mode (Skia & GDI and OpenGL)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136940 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||bibisectRequest, ||possibleRegression -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136940] A thin vertical line is visible in presentation mode (Skia & GDI and OpenGL)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136940 --- Comment #1 from Telesto --- Created attachment 165745 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165745=edit Example file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136940] New: A thin vertical line is visible in presentation mode (Skia & GDI and OpenGL)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136940 Bug ID: 136940 Summary: A thin vertical line is visible in presentation mode (Skia & GDI and OpenGL) Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.3.0.3 rc Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: tele...@surfxs.nl Description: A thin vertical line is visible in presentation mode (Skia & GDI and OpenGL) Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the attached file 2. Press F5 Actual Results: Small thin line through Y Expected Results: Not so Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Found in 7.1 6.3 not in 6.2 (has horizontal lines in it) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 84375] CONTEXT MENU: Protect/Lock submenu to protect object size or position
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84375 --- Comment #4 from andreas_k --- As this kind of stuff is only available in the Position and Size dialog, I don't see an big with to have this checkboxes in the context menu. As you can use Strg to fix the aspect ratio which is very common (inkscape, ...) I would say close this bug as wfm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 71271] sheet's CodeName not saved
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71271 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Heinisch --- As himajin100...@gmail.com pointed out, if we drop the line at https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/source/filter/xml/xmlexprt.cxx?r=09402293#5143 (vba compatibility mode) the codename persists after closing and reopening the document. I have to clarify via IIRC, how we could solve this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136939] New: Help L10N: SQL example commands should be localizable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136939 Bug ID: 136939 Summary: Help L10N: SQL example commands should be localizable Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Master Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Documentation Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: modestas.rim...@gmail.com CC: olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org Description: The "Query Design" help page (../text/sdatabase/02010100.html) contains several examples of SQL commands. The commands include sample data that should be localizable: - ='Ms.' - LIKE 'g?ve' - NOT IN ('Smith') Actual Results: Examples include English words that should, but cannot be translated. Expected Results: Strings are localizable so that English words can be translated. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: https://helponline.libreoffice.org/7.1/qtz/text/sdatabase/02010100.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871 --- Comment #51 from Telesto --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #48) > (In reply to Telesto from comment #45) > > I'm not a heavy user. I'm only give my opinion based on what I have noticed. > > However, you should ask people who actually are correcting formatting and > > how often they need to do that. And if this a cumbersome job etc. > > And I have ten years of experience using MS Office, and then another ten > years of experience using, deploying LibreOffice in a real commercial > company; training people; creating templates; helping them solve problematic > situations related to creating new documents with really complex text > formatting (see GOST 21 at [1]), and to documents received from those using > MS Office; and sending our documents to parties using MS Office, etc. That > was prior (and the reason) to my joining development of LO. > > Don't assume that your opponents have no clue what real users use and what > problems they see. I didn't intend to offend or intimidate, or discredit your knowledge. And of course it's hard to know somebody's background/experiences. I only stating my 'gut' feeling. And I assume there are more people who run in to certain issues with DF (and styles). I'm surely not representing the whole world, not even an explicit group. Only giving my view :-). And have seen comments by Luke/Thomas related this matter (so not such big audience either :-). I do know it isn't easy for my to get to the bottom of DF formatting (and CS/PS). So DF bold being overwritten by CS Strong Emphasis. Or changing PS throwing out certain DF (reported that). If DF is always on top, Strong Emphasis shouldn't throw CS Strong Emphasis out. Or if this is desired .. I want to be able to tell the difference between DF bold and CS Strong Emphasis bold (at formatting button level). To be able to tell what I have in front of me. > > > I'm more they type of experiments.. Worse what can happen is a 'revert' (and > > some wasted time/ money developing it). However we get feedback/ and data/ > > experiences. Not that ever idea has to become an experiment.. arguments are > > fine.. but some point 'experiences' matter. > > As I already stated: this is bad. Any "battle-testing" would only attract > people who have problems with the change, and only part of those. The people > would be vocal; the reports would never show you how many have benefitted; > how many have problems with the change (only would show how loud those who > report are). This will always be never ending topic. I assume there are many more bug out there than in the bug tracker. People don't report it for various reasons (don't notice, don't know what happened, have not time, not interest etc). I always assume someone else will report an certain issue. Or the QA department of TDF will figure it out.. > And in this special case, your proposal for battle-testing is even worse. > You are making a change that presumably might (I say will) hurt those who > are the beginners, those who might as well assume their problems are due to > them being newbies. Such a change would hurt them, but would not result in > proportional increase of reports - only in proportional abandoning the tool > that was tested, and proven not suitable. Yes, ideally an separate experimental version :-). Or some 'advanced' setting etc. But than people won't use it. So this topic will go in circles. There is always an unrepresented groups. Most people don't have the time, interest etc to care. They want a working product; and the take what fits their needs. And I love to bring up markdown. I still can't believe (no data; can't proof anything] this is 'wanted' by majority. But somehow it got (a) implemented (b) turned on by default. The only thing I can argue is that add additional UX-principle. LibreOffice should restrict itself to 'core' functionality being enabled by default [not sure what the rules are about new functions etc; embedded or extension]. And of course somehow we need to end up with a decision :-). They organ in charge being UX-department. A understaffed, black box department. Still disagreeing on certain decisions (arguments), but at least a decision is made -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871 --- Comment #50 from Telesto --- Created attachment 165744 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165744=edit Example file (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #46) > Created attachment 165739 [details] > A sample with some bold text > > (In reply to Telesto from comment #45) > > The attached document contains four sample lorem ipsum paragraphs, followed > by two dummy text paragraphs. > > The first sample paragraph uses "bold" PS. The second one has one sentence > using "bold" CS. The third one uses paragraph-level direct bold formatting. > The fourth one has one sentence with character-level direct bold formatting. > > The first dummy text paragraph has Default PS. The second one has "bold" PS. > > The scenario is that a Benjamin gets this document, and needs to work with > some formatting. > > Initially the demo of natural, fundamentally unavoidable problem that > Benjamin sees when working with the document. We copy a single bold word > from sample paragraphs into *non-bold* dummy paragraph. > > 1. Select "ipsum" (double-click it) in the first paragraph, Ctrl+C, click > between "He" and "heard" in the first (non-bold) dummy text paragraph, > Ctrl+V. PS bold; pasting into PS Default. Result: unbold -> Confusing for Benjamin. He pasting bold text to different paragraph, and suddenly becomes unbolded. What the... Wouldn't change with the different model > 2. Select "nec" (double-click it) in the bold sentence of the second > paragraph, Ctrl+C, click between "heard" and "quiet" in the first (non-bold) > dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. PS default; DF bold. Pasting into PS default; without DF. Result BOLD paste. However would be unchanged > 3. Select "velit" (double-click it) in the third paragraph, Ctrl+C, click > between "quiet" and "steps" in the first (non-bold) dummy text paragraph, > Ctrl+V. PS default; DF bold. Pasting into PS default; without DF. Result BOLD paste. However would be unchanged > 4. Select "cursus" (double-click it) in the bold sentence of the fourth > paragraph, Ctrl+C, click between "steps" and "behind" in the first > (non-bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. PS default; DF bold. Pasting into PS default; without DF. Result BOLD paste. However would be unchanged > > This shows that the first bold word became non-bold when pasted to the > target. That is because paragraph styles are in play here; the copied word > does not bring its source paragraph's style to the target, and takes > formatting from the style of the target one. Benjamin has no clue why; > that's a natural confusion (he operates text created by someone else, using > tools unknown to him, with concepts unknown to him). This is not a bug, and > should not change. > > Now let's see how this changes when Benjamin starts using *his* tools. Let's > copy the same four words into the second dummy text paragraph (the bold > one), but first make each word not bold prior to copy. > > 5. Select "ipsum" (double-click it) in the first paragraph, Ctrl+B, Ctrl+C, > click between "He" and "tried" in the second (bold) dummy text paragraph, > Ctrl+V. PS bold. DF unbold after pressing CTRL+B. Pasting into PS Bold Result unbold (difference). -> > 6. Select "nec" (double-click it) in the bold sentence of the second > paragraph, Ctrl+B, Ctrl+C, click between "tried" and "to" in the second > (bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. PS Default; DF Bold. Switching to unbold. Pasting into bold PS. Result: unbold. In make case bold would be turned off > 7. Select "velit" (double-click it) in the third paragraph, Ctrl+B, Ctrl+C, > click between "to" and "nervously" in the second (bold) dummy text > paragraph, Ctrl+V. PS Default; DF Bold. Switching to unbold. Pasting into bold PS. Result: unbold = Change would mean. Bold paste, instead of unbold > 8. Select "cursus" (double-click it) in the bold sentence of the fourth > paragraph, Ctrl+B, Ctrl+C, click between "nervously" and "tap" in the second > (bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. PS Default; DF Bold. Switching to unbold. Pasting into bold PS. Result: unbold = Change would mean. Bold paste, instead of unbold > > The Ctrl+B step makes the selected text explicitly non-bold *in all cases*. > Benjamin may be sure, that no matter what magic was used to create the text > that he is facing, he may use this tool, and the text after that tool will > behave consistently with his expectations: it will be non-bold, no matter > where it arrives. True; > For comparison, let's see what would happen if, instead of applying explicit > non-bold attribute, Ctrl+B would just clear (remove) bold attribute in the > fourth sample paragraph (from where we have copied "cursus"). The first > sentences of the fourth paragraph don't have the explicit non-bold > attribute, so words in those first sentences are the perfect example what > would result from your proposal. > 9. Select "ipsum" (double-click it) in
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 119931] Fix accessibility warnings in .ui files
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119931 --- Comment #15 from Commit Notification --- Gabor Kelemen committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/a27f9de5f738b245ef2534e6a3fb0e7d3393bc04 tdf#119931 fix a11y warnings in qrcodegen.ui It will be available in 7.1.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127047] Font Sizes Greater than 255 are Printed with Size 255
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127047 --- Comment #15 from Julien Nabet --- (In reply to Noel Grandin from comment #14) > Julien, could you test > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/103113 > please? I don't have a Windows build anymore just a build on my Linux desktop. I gave a try without applying the patch, it seems already ok to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 85978] MENUS: Global shortcuts not appearing in menu entries
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85978 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval --- Comment #10 from Buovjaga --- This seems to lack a final consensus. Could be turned to easy hack. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 85373] UI: option to invert light/dark areas of the display
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85373 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #4 from Buovjaga --- johnson: this request looks to be the same as bug 98032. Do you agree? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 84375] CONTEXT MENU: Protect/Lock submenu to protect object size or position
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84375 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval --- Comment #2 from Buovjaga --- I think this needs to be re-evaluated -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88586] font effect for specifying case
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88586 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC|philip...@hotmail.com, |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |robinson.libreoffice@gmail. |.freedesktop.org |com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 85502] Maximum of iteration steps
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85502 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #3 from Buovjaga --- I tested and the limit does not even stop at 1 now. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 120543] [META] Bugs and enhancements around hyperlinks in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120543 Olivier Hallot changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||136938 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136938 [Bug 136938] HYPERLINK function cannot concatenate URL's strings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136938] New: HYPERLINK function cannot concatenate URL's strings
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136938 Bug ID: 136938 Summary: HYPERLINK function cannot concatenate URL's strings Product: LibreOffice Online Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org Blocks: 120543 Created attachment 165743 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165743=edit Image of the HYPERLINK issue (The following issue work in the desktop 7.0 version , but not in LibreOffice Online.) HYPERLINK function does not render string concatenation for its first argument (URL) Step to reproduce: 1) Place "ABS" in cell B2 2) Place =HYPERLINK("https:/wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Calc_Functions/" & B2;B2) in any other cell 3) Click in the hyperlink created in the cell Results: The link created is https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Calc_Functions/ Expected results: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Calc_Functions/ABS Further info LibreOffice Online This version of LibreOffice Online is powered by LOOLWSD 7.0.0 Served by: 390cd11e LOKit LibreOffice 7.0.1.2 (git hash: 00(Buil) "Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)" Copyright © 2020, The Document Foundation (actually this is in the TDF NextCloud instance) Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120543 [Bug 120543] [META] Bugs and enhancements around hyperlinks in Calc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107322] [META] Media (audio / video) bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107322 Bug 107322 depends on bug 63222, which changed state. Bug 63222 Summary: Embedded Movie File has Green Border https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63222 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63222] Embedded Movie File has Green Border
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63222 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #4 from Buovjaga --- Not seeing this on Linux or Windows, closing as WFM. Joel: maybe you could re-check for fun :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136781] UI: The special character favorites drop down is slightly small
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136781 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com |desktop.org | Keywords|bibisectRequest | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Caolán McNamara --- I can add a little spacing, they look a little cramped -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129937] Ctrl+S and other shortcuts fail when the cursor is in the find bar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129937 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Control+s fails to save a |Ctrl+S and other shortcuts |file when the cursor is in |fail when the cursor is in |the find bar|the find bar --- Comment #6 from Buovjaga --- Now there is an improvement in the gtk3 backend: if you mouse-click into the find field, the shortcuts work! This change was brought about by https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/3b8c42a94b5448364d47daa103b3452f54990524 FindTextFieldControl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 119159] Calc - cannot reduce width of spreadsheet to show less than 5 columns in KDE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119159 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #10 from Buovjaga --- Not seeing this anymore with gtk3 or kf5 Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: f08ddf3d3df0ef12fef36e96ffe6f5b9a7fda9e3 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 21 September 2020 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871 --- Comment #49 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #48) > formatting (see GOST 21 at [1]), and to documents received from those using [1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/60/%D0%93%D0%9E%D0%A1%D0%A2_%D0%A0_21.1101-2013._%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%A0._%D0%A0%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D0%A0.1.tif/lossy-page1-610px-%D0%93%D0%9E%D0%A1%D0%A2_%D0%A0_21.1101-2013._%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%A0._%D0%A0%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D0%A0.1.tif.jpg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871 --- Comment #48 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Telesto from comment #45) > I'm not a heavy user. I'm only give my opinion based on what I have noticed. > However, you should ask people who actually are correcting formatting and > how often they need to do that. And if this a cumbersome job etc. And I have ten years of experience using MS Office, and then another ten years of experience using, deploying LibreOffice in a real commercial company; training people; creating templates; helping them solve problematic situations related to creating new documents with really complex text formatting (see GOST 21 at [1]), and to documents received from those using MS Office; and sending our documents to parties using MS Office, etc. That was prior (and the reason) to my joining development of LO. Don't assume that your opponents have no clue what real users use and what problems they see. > I'm more they type of experiments.. Worse what can happen is a 'revert' (and > some wasted time/ money developing it). However we get feedback/ and data/ > experiences. Not that ever idea has to become an experiment.. arguments are > fine.. but some point 'experiences' matter. As I already stated: this is bad. Any "battle-testing" would only attract people who have problems with the change, and only part of those. The people would be vocal; the reports would never show you how many have benefitted; how many have problems with the change (only would show how loud those who report are). And in this special case, your proposal for battle-testing is even worse. You are making a change that presumably might (I say will) hurt those who are the beginners, those who might as well assume their problems are due to them being newbies. Such a change would hurt them, but would not result in proportional increase of reports - only in proportional abandoning the tool that was tested, and proven not suitable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131514] hierarchical numbering of Chapters and Headings works for PDF but doesn't make it to EPUB file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131514 --- Comment #5 from David W. Snow --- Created attachment 165742 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165742=edit Screenshot macOS Books -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131514] hierarchical numbering of Chapters and Headings works for PDF but doesn't make it to EPUB file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131514 --- Comment #4 from David W. Snow --- Created attachment 165741 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165741=edit Screenshot from LibreOffice Writer's odt file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131514] hierarchical numbering of Chapters and Headings works for PDF but doesn't make it to EPUB file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131514 --- Comment #3 from David W. Snow --- Created attachment 165740 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165740=edit DWS-BookTemp.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136937] New: Unicode character sometimes autocorrects
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136937 Bug ID: 136937 Summary: Unicode character sometimes autocorrects Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.0.1.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: kittykat3...@gmail.com When I enter a unicode character (U+2611) into a cell which has a Liberation Sans format, sometimes the character is displayed as a plain box with a check mark but sometimes it autocorrects to a blue cartoony box with a white check mark. Changing the fort for the autocorrected blue check box to DejaVu Sans converts the character back to a plain black check box I would expect the behaviour to always be the same rather than the character sometimes being displayed one way and sometimes the other when the cell formatting is identical as far as I can see. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871 --- Comment #47 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #46) > 9. Select "ipsum" (double-click it) in the non-bold first sentence of the > fourth paragraph, Ctrl+C, click between "nervously" and "tap" in the second must had been "between "tap" and "sodales" > (bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. > Here I omitted the observable result: the non-bold word (which, as we imagine, was explicitly made not bold by Benjamin prior to copy) became bold after arriving into the target paragraph. > I.e., if Ctrl+B in the fourth paragraph would just clear the bold attribute, > ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136936] New: In a Master doc with sub-docs whose links have write-protection removed, editing the sub-doc within the master then saving the master only saves the master and dro
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136936 Bug ID: 136936 Summary: In a Master doc with sub-docs whose links have write-protection removed, editing the sub-doc within the master then saving the master only saves the master and drops the sub-docs changes Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.0.7.3 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: LibreOffice Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: ghher...@gmail.com Steps to reproduce: 1) Make 2 docs, sub1.odt and sub2.odt, inserting a little text, anything will do 2) Make master doc master.odm 3) add sub1 and sub2 as links to master using Navigator 4) in Navigator, choose Edit Link and uncheck sub1 and sub2's Write Protection > Protected check 5) save master.odm 6) in master LOWriter window, modify the sub1.odt text (there is no warning) 7) save master.odm 8) close everything 9) reopen master.odm 10) say yes to "update links" Observed behaviour: a) the modifications made at point 6 have been lost, and b) the file timestamps indicate that only master.odm has been saved. Expected behaviour, one of the following: A) Preferred, as this is the most useful: All modified sub-files are saved and the master not since it is unchanged. If you skip the save at point 5, both master and sub1 should be saved. B) Safe but not very satisfactory IMO: Make it impossible to remove the link write-protection feature C) Silly as it is functionally equivalent to B) IMO, but still better than time-wasting human work loss: A warning pops up, saying "this will not be saved" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135552] Merged cells in LibreOffice Impress don't have lower border line when reopen.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135552 --- Comment #10 from BogdanB --- Ok, you have used the same method as me, but I can NOT confirm this bug. We need more persons to test this in order to find the cause. I will test this bug tomorrow, I will have acces to Windows 10. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136891] Square root does not render correctly with LO 7.0.2+
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136891 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added OS|All |Windows (All) Keywords|bibisected, bisected, |bibisectRequest |implementationError | --- Comment #9 from Aron Budea --- Thanks, Luboš! Let's readd bibisectRequest, and I'm assuming the remaining bug is Windows-only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132937] Export to PDF: White text appear with color outline when viewed with Acrobat Reader X; applies to LibO Writer and LibO Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132937 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135871] Highlighting no fill is not the same as no fill; there is still direct formatting present according to paragraph style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135871 --- Comment #46 from Mike Kaganski --- Created attachment 165739 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165739=edit A sample with some bold text (In reply to Telesto from comment #45) The attached document contains four sample lorem ipsum paragraphs, followed by two dummy text paragraphs. The first sample paragraph uses "bold" PS. The second one has one sentence using "bold" CS. The third one uses paragraph-level direct bold formatting. The fourth one has one sentence with character-level direct bold formatting. The first dummy text paragraph has Default PS. The second one has "bold" PS. The scenario is that a Benjamin gets this document, and needs to work with some formatting. Initially the demo of natural, fundamentally unavoidable problem that Benjamin sees when working with the document. We copy a single bold word from sample paragraphs into *non-bold* dummy paragraph. 1. Select "ipsum" (double-click it) in the first paragraph, Ctrl+C, click between "He" and "heard" in the first (non-bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. 2. Select "nec" (double-click it) in the bold sentence of the second paragraph, Ctrl+C, click between "heard" and "quiet" in the first (non-bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. 3. Select "velit" (double-click it) in the third paragraph, Ctrl+C, click between "quiet" and "steps" in the first (non-bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. 4. Select "cursus" (double-click it) in the bold sentence of the fourth paragraph, Ctrl+C, click between "steps" and "behind" in the first (non-bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. This shows that the first bold word became non-bold when pasted to the target. That is because paragraph styles are in play here; the copied word does not bring its source paragraph's style to the target, and takes formatting from the style of the target one. Benjamin has no clue why; that's a natural confusion (he operates text created by someone else, using tools unknown to him, with concepts unknown to him). This is not a bug, and should not change. Now let's see how this changes when Benjamin starts using *his* tools. Let's copy the same four words into the second dummy text paragraph (the bold one), but first make each word not bold prior to copy. 5. Select "ipsum" (double-click it) in the first paragraph, Ctrl+B, Ctrl+C, click between "He" and "tried" in the second (bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. 6. Select "nec" (double-click it) in the bold sentence of the second paragraph, Ctrl+B, Ctrl+C, click between "tried" and "to" in the second (bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. 7. Select "velit" (double-click it) in the third paragraph, Ctrl+B, Ctrl+C, click between "to" and "nervously" in the second (bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. 8. Select "cursus" (double-click it) in the bold sentence of the fourth paragraph, Ctrl+B, Ctrl+C, click between "nervously" and "tap" in the second (bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. The Ctrl+B step makes the selected text explicitly non-bold *in all cases*. Benjamin may be sure, that no matter what magic was used to create the text that he is facing, he may use this tool, and the text after that tool will behave consistently with his expectations: it will be non-bold, no matter where it arrives. For comparison, let's see what would happen if, instead of applying explicit non-bold attribute, Ctrl+B would just clear (remove) bold attribute in the fourth sample paragraph (from where we have copied "cursus"). The first sentences of the fourth paragraph don't have the explicit non-bold attribute, so words in those first sentences are the perfect example what would result from your proposal. 9. Select "ipsum" (double-click it) in the non-bold first sentence of the fourth paragraph, Ctrl+C, click between "nervously" and "tap" in the second (bold) dummy text paragraph, Ctrl+V. I.e., if Ctrl+B in the fourth paragraph would just clear the bold attribute, then Benjamin would face the situation, that after using a tool "B" he would still have the result behave unexpectedly/unexplainably to him (you can't explain this behaviour unless you understand styles). So the current status is: - Benjamin might have some difficulty working with other's documents (or after using advanced tools cluelessly); but there are tools that he may use, to get a simple behaviour expected by him. Your proposal is: - no matter what tool Benjamin would use: without understanding of styles, the behaviour of the result of *his* actions would still behave unexpected to him. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132937] Export to PDF: White text appear with color outline when viewed with Acrobat Reader X; applies to LibO Writer and LibO Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132937 --- Comment #7 from Leroy --- Now I am with Adobe Reader 11.0.0 (over Windows 7 Professional), and do not see the issue. If do you want to close it, it is OK with me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136933] Libreoffice 7 impress remains stuck in advancing to the next slide in presentation mode
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136933 --- Comment #1 from sergio.calleg...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 165738 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165738=edit Presentation showing the issue. Try /all/ the presentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136891] Square root does not render correctly with LO 7.0.2+
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136891 Luboš Luňák changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Square root does not render |Square root does not render |correctly with LO 7.0.2+|correctly with LO 7.0.2+ |and Skia| Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Blocks|129062 | --- Comment #8 from Luboš Luňák --- I've fixed the Linux+Skia problem, the rest is not Skia-specific. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129062 [Bug 129062] [META] Skia library bugs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129062] [META] Skia library bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129062 Luboš Luňák changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|136891 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136891 [Bug 136891] Square root does not render correctly with LO 7.0.2+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136372] [META] PPTX shape related issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136372 Bug 136372 depends on bug 130182, which changed state. Bug 130182 Summary: FILEOPEN: PPTX: anchorCtr="0" is imported as TextHorizontalAdjust_CENTER https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130182 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130182] FILEOPEN: PPTX: anchorCtr="0" is imported as TextHorizontalAdjust_CENTER
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130182 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Xisco Faulí --- Issue fixed by https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/10bb02efd8afd42e633e370480104e2575546d8e Closing as a duplicate of bug 129685 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 129685 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136913] FILEOPEN : A document .odt open with Draw instend of Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136913 --- Comment #4 from lucas.rou...@gmail.com --- I'm okay with this. I'll just follow your professionnals advices! Again sorry the bothering and thanks for the rapidity of your answer! Have a nice day! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136935] New: Please move option to enable/disable the presenter console in Slide Show -> Slide Show Settings dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136935 Bug ID: 136935 Summary: Please move option to enable/disable the presenter console in Slide Show -> Slide Show Settings dialog Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.4.6.2 release Hardware: All OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: sergio.calleg...@gmail.com Description: Currently the possibility to enable/disable the presenter console is rather hidden in tools->Options->Impress->General. I think that it would make great sense to move it in the Slide Show -> Slide Show Settings dialog. One of the reasons why I am asking is that the COVID pandemic made it quite frequent to have the need to deliver presentations via conferencing software like teams/zoom, etc. In this case it is quite useful to use two screen and keep one for the presentation and the other for the conferencing software interface. In this case you want to disable the presenter console. Conversely, as soon as you are in a regular setup, you may want to activate it back to use one screen for the console. Frequent activation and deactivation can be favored by having the option slightly less buried into the menu system. Steps to Reproduce: See description Actual Results: See description Expected Results: See description Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: [Information automatically included from LibreOffice] Locale: en-US Module: PresentationDocument [Information guessed from browser] OS: Linux (All) OS is 64bit: yes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136913] FILEOPEN : A document .odt open with Draw instend of Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136913 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA --- Comment #3 from Dieter --- (In reply to lucas.rouaud from comment #2) > Third, it be a infinite pleasure > to share with you the document but my hard drive said "yes but no" and > actually delete it. So let's close this report as RESOLVED INSUFFICIENTDATA (Feel free to change it back to UNCONFIRMED, if you disagree, but I think we need the document) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 104444] [META] DOCX (OOXML) table-related issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||136931 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136931 [Bug 136931] WRITER TABLES: Improve workflow for unfloating tables -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136931] WRITER TABLES: Improve workflow for unfloating tables
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136931 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||10 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 [Bug 10] [META] DOCX (OOXML) table-related issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136934] Paragraph style outside selection changed if selection based on undo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136934 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.4.0.3 release |4.0.0.3 release --- Comment #3 from Telesto --- And in Versie 4.0.0.3 (Bouw-id: 7545bee9c2a0782548772a21bc84a9dcc583b89) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136931] WRITER TABLES: Improve workflow for unfloating tables
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136931 --- Comment #2 from Dieter --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > I don't see this button as too difficult to use. Please see your remarks in bug 112704 comment 16 :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136913] FILEOPEN : A document .odt open with Draw instend of Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136913 lucas.rou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136934] Paragraph style outside selection changed if selection based on undo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136934 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Master |4.4.0.3 release Summary|Paragraph style outside |Paragraph style outside |selection changed if|selection changed if |selection caused by undo|selection based on undo --- Comment #1 from Telesto --- Versie: 4.4.7.2 Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600 Locale: nl_NL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136934] Paragraph style outside selection changed if selection based on undo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136934 --- Comment #2 from Telesto --- Created attachment 165737 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165737=edit Example file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs