[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 --- Comment #7 from خالد حسني --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6) > (In reply to خالد حسني from comment #5) > > The consensus seems that we don’t want to bundle any more fonts. > > I'm fine to not bundle specifically Source Sans Variable, but with work done > on bug 103596 and bug 152206 remaining do we need at least one variable font > bundled for fall back when 'fvar' table calls are used? May be for testing, but we don’t have test color fonts either. I don’t think we need to ship every kind of font to the users, but we should be able to use fonts they have installed (deprecated font formats notwithstanding). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 --- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to خالد حسني from comment #5) > The consensus seems that we don’t want to bundle any more fonts. I'm fine to not bundle specifically Source Sans Variable, but with work done on bug 103596 and bug 152206 remaining do we need at least one variable font bundled for fall back when 'fvar' table calls are used? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 خالد حسني changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from خالد حسني --- The consensus seems that we don’t want to bundle any more fonts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 خالد حسني changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- --- Comment #4 from خالد حسني --- I don't see why this was made a duplicate of bug 103596, as thus obe is about replacing a font and should be judged on its own merit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 --- Comment #3 from Yousuf Philips (jay) --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103596 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |khaledho...@eglug.org, |.freedesktop.org|michael.me...@collabora.com ||, qui...@gmail.com, ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote --- There is no internal UI for working with OpenType 1.8 OTF Variable fonts. Work flows would need to be altered as would printing and export. Why would we change over to Source Sans Variable now? Absent correct handling of the variable font--we would get an arbitrary and likely unusable rendering of the font--or more likely a fall-back to another on system font. We'd just be wasting space in the deployment package. Until such time as support for OTF 1.8.2 "fvar" (bug 103596) is implemented substituting this or any other variable font makes no sense. Duping this to bug 103596, as only when that enhancement is undertaken would it make sense to adopt any variable font. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103506 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Not a fan myself but worth to discuss. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 114855] Replacing Source Sans Pro by Source Sans Variable
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114855 Volga changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||113305 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113305 [Bug 113305] [META] Bundled fonts bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs