[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117999] Invalid behaviour when inserting references to numbered paragraphs

2018-06-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117999

--- Comment #4 from antoniak.pi...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dieter Praas from comment #3)
> Sorry, you're right. behaviour is different from other numbered lists. So I
> would support to make it consistent, but I'm still not sure about the way to
> reach consistency.

Also I do not any idea how to ensure full consistency. But, since I do not know
how users will use the numbered lists, I would let them to decide. 

I use LibreOffice since it's very beginning (earlier I used to use OpenOffice)
and I have never had any problem with the numbered paragraphs format. Until
now. The publisher requested all "sequential" references (I mean [1], [2], [3])
to be presented in a form of a "range" format (like [1-3]). At the same time
the publisher wants the references to be formatted as a numbered list decorated
with square brackets ([1]. Smith J., The only authorized biography of John
Nash, Washington, etc.). And I am not able to meet these requirements because:
1. If I add an square bracket as a "before" part of a numbering format, best I
can get is [1]-[3], which if obviously wrong because the publisher DO NOT
tolerate the inner brackets,
2. If I do not add the bracket the list is numbered but, of course, without
brackets ;)

I am stucked. Do I really need to remove all references and replace it with a
text? In the year of 2018? Really?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117999] Invalid behaviour when inserting references to numbered paragraphs

2018-06-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117999

--- Comment #3 from Dieter Praas  ---
Sorry, you're right. behaviour is different from other numbered lists. So I
would support to make it consistent, but I'm still not sure about the way to
reach consistency.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117999] Invalid behaviour when inserting references to numbered paragraphs

2018-06-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117999

--- Comment #2 from antoniak.pi...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dieter Praas from comment #1)
> I confirm the behaviour you decribe, but I also think, that this is a
> consistent behaviour and something, that I would expect. So I think NOTABUG

I do not agree, the described behaviour is not consistent. Reproducing the case
using the "after" part only, i.e. "." - a dot (I mean a numbering format like
1., 2., etc.) one will get the expected result (1, 2 - WITHOUT "a dot"). To be
consistent the output should look like 1., 2. (WITH "a dot"). So in my opinion
this is definitely a BUG.

> 
> I also think, that [1-10] isn't correct, because the numbered list is from
> [1] to [10] and not from 1 to 10.

Also I do not agree with the thesis that in described case the list items are
numbered from [1] to [10]. In my opinion the list items are numbered from 1 to
10 and the "square brackets" are just ornamentation. Anyway, on the "Customize"
tab of "Numbering style" there is an information that the "Number" format is
"1, 2, 3, ..." and it "Start at" 1 and not "[1]".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117999] Invalid behaviour when inserting references to numbered paragraphs

2018-06-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117999

--- Comment #1 from Dieter Praas  ---
I confirm the behaviour you decribe, but I also think, that this is a
consistent behaviour and something, that I would expect. So I think NOTABUG

I also think, that [1-10] isn't correct, because the numbered list is from [1]
to [10] and not from 1 to 10.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs