[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #18 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to BogdanB from comment #17) > The discussion blocked from the placement of the option. Note that that's not a blocker. This feature can be implemented in two steps: first, the functionality (a flag that is passed to the implementation that does the actual search, and the search that honors that flag itself); then the UI part can be implemented, with the control defining that flag in the dialog decided. Additionally, the first step would already enable using it in macros. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 BogdanB changed: What|Removed |Added CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or ||g --- Comment #17 from BogdanB --- Not here yet... Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: f2389a70da606768a39ee599de6a5b24058734aa CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded The discussion blocked from the placement of the option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Lendo --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #15) > Regardless - I feel implementing this feature is more important than its > exact placement. So I wouldn't mind if it were added to the "Other options" > set of boxes at first, after which point the argument about where it should > be placed could continue (or not continue...) I support that it should be placed in the other options area. The 'whole cell' setting in Calc is the pendant to Writer's 'whole word' setting and not the mentioned 'whole string only' search option of this bug report. If the 'whole string only' search option should be placed in the checkboxes area under the search field, this decision should be well justified as space is rare. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #15 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #14) > Objection. Multi-line check-/radio buttons are common on macOS but violate > HIG on Windows and (all/most/some?) Linux WMs. The only solution is to make > functions simple and easy to understand with a few words. I think you're misunderstanding Thomas: He meant (IIANM) conditionally having more than one line of checkboxes, not having individual checkboxes with more than one line of text. Regardless - I feel implementing this feature is more important than its exact placement. So I wouldn't mind if it were added to the "Other options" set of boxes at first, after which point the argument about where it should be placed could continue (or not continue...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #14 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #11) > ...an algorithm should be > introduced that breaks the checkboxes into a second line in a logical and > visually good way. Objection. Multi-line check-/radio buttons are common on macOS but violate HIG on Windows and (all/most/some?) Linux WMs. The only solution is to make functions simple and easy to understand with a few words. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Lendo --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #12) > (In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #11) > > When implementing this feature, an algorithm should be > > introduced that breaks the checkboxes into a second line in a logical and > > visually good way. > Is there a separate bug page for that? Haven't found any yet. https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=113136_resolved=0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #11) > When implementing this feature, an algorithm should be > introduced that breaks the checkboxes into a second line in a logical and > visually good way. Is there a separate bug page for that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Lendo --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10) > ... and isn't that already a problem with the existing checkboxes? Yes. Now the dialog is for example much wider in German than in English what looks not good. When implementing this feature, an algorithm should be introduced that breaks the checkboxes into a second line in a logical and visually good way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #9) > (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #8) > I support your idea but you must have localizations in mind which need > mostly more space than the English strings and we should avoid a second line. ... and isn't that already a problem with the existing checkboxes? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 153730 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=153730=edit potential UI mockup I was actually thinking about something like this as the UI, i.e. not in the collapsed section. Perhaps not in that position among the other boxes, but one of them. Sort of like we have in Writer. Still, if you disagree - collapsed is better than nothing at all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|needsUXEval | CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda |.freedesktop.org|tion.org --- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze --- We discussed this topic in the design meeting. While too many options are contraindicated to usability, these checkboxes are collapsed by default. So let's do and introduce a whole word option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3) > If you search for "H1" (with the quotes) it looks for "H1" (with the > quotes). Correct, I was wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.3.0.2 rc |Inherited From OOo --- Comment #4 from Cor Nouws --- why not? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > If you search for H1 you find H10 but "H1" retrieves only this term. If you search for "H1" (with the quotes) it looks for "H1" (with the quotes). I'm not sure what you mean by your comment. (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1) I wonder if the relevant code in Writer won't just work essentially as-is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 --- Comment #2 from Heiko Tietze --- If you search for H1 you find H10 but "H1" retrieves only this term. It's a very common and sufficient way for this restriction, isn't it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127174] Search dialog doesn't support "whole word only" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127174 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval Severity|normal |enhancement CC||er...@redhat.com, ||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu --- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote --- Hmm, we already use ICU libs for regex and word bounds are already integral. Imagine it would not be too much of a stretch to use ICU word bounds in a search option. @Eike? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
